Title: Modeling Wildfire Emissions Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Technology and Satellite Data
1Modeling Wildfire Emissions Using Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) Technology and
Satellite Data
- Presented by Neil J. M. Wheeler
- Sonoma Technology, Inc.
- Petaluma, California
- at the
- Fifth Annual Community Modeling and Analysis
System (CMAS) Conference - October 16-18, 2006
- Chapel Hill, North Carolina
STI-3009
2Acknowledgements
- Authors
- Dana C. Sullivan
- Stephen B. Reid
- Bryan M. Penfold
- Sean M. Raffuse
- Lyle R. Chinkin
- Sponsors
- CENRAP
- NASA
- USFS
- City of Albuquerque
Corresponding author Dana C. Sullivan, Sonoma
Technology, Inc., 1360 Redwood Way, Suite C,
Petaluma, CA 94954 e-mail dana_at_sonomatech.com
3Introduction
- Purpose Support emissions assessments used for
evaluating episodic visibility and air quality
impacts from biomass burning. - Approach Develop and apply a GIS-based emissions
modeling system. - - The approach was first applied to prescribed
and agricultural burns in the Midwestern U.S. - - Currently, the approach is being refined and
applied to wildfires in Arizona, New Mexico,
and surrounding states
4Overview of Approach
- Emission estimates prepared using
- Fire activity data (location, acres burned)
- Satellite derived
- Human reported
- Vegetation data (classification, fuel loading)
- EPAs Biogenic Emissions Landcover Database
(BELD) - Fuel Characteristic Classification System (FCCS)
- Fuel moisture data
- Weather Information Management System (WIMS) data
- Emission factors (specific to vegetation type and
fuel moisture content) - First Order Fire Effect Model (FOFEM)
5Overview of Approach
6Fire Histories Satellite-Derived Data vs. Human
Reports
7Land Use and Vegetation Cover
8Emissions Model
- Basic Equation
- Emissions (lb)
- Burn area (acres) Fuel loading (ton/acre)
Emission factor (lb/ton) - First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM)
- Cross-walk developed with EPAs Biogenic
Emissions Landcover Database (BELD) - Default or customized fuel loadings may be used
- Fuel moisture values set using day-specific
Weather Information Management System (WIMS) data - Produces vegetation-specific emission factors in
lbs/acre burned
9Wildfire Plume Rise Estimation
- Wildfire Modeling
- Large fire events modeled as numerous individual
point sources - A plume bottom, plume top, and layer 1 fraction
were calculated for each fire point source - Non-layer 1 emissions were vertically allocated
at 25m, 75m, 100m, and every 100m up to the plume
top
Modeling of the Cave Creek Wildfire in Arizona
10Example Results Central U.S.
11Example Results New Mexico
Emissions by Source Type for the New Mexico
Modeling Domain July 1, 2005
Source Type NMHC (tons) NOx (tons)
Area Sources 1,507 374
Non-road Mobile Sources 725 1,024
On-road Mobile Sources 871 1,558
Point Sources 517 2,397
Wildfires 4,934 189
Total 8,554 5,542
NOx Emissions Densities for the New Mexico
Modeling Domain July 1, 2005
12Final Thoughts
- Advantages of a GIS-based approach
- Facilitates effective use of detailed spatial
data for input to the emissions model - vegetation cover
- satellite-derived fire data
- human-reported fire data
- Facilitates visualization of inputs and outputs
13Final Thoughts
- Results depend on the quality and completeness of
the fire histories and emission factors. - Emission factors are the subject of continuing
research. - Fire histories require significant effort.
- Satellite-derived data are timely and consistent,
but only cover fires larger than several hundred
acres. - Human reports suffer from human errors, but are
the only available means to capture small fires.
- Reconciliation of these data sets is necessary to
avoid double counting, but can be challenging.
14Status and Future Direction
- Currently a set of procedures not a single tool
- Increasing interest in the effects of fire
emissions on ozone formation - Will be incorporated into a national operational
modeling system with NASA and USFS funding - Operational systems may eventually provide input
to national inventories
15(No Transcript)
16Topography is too complex for 12-km modeling grid