Consider a Spherical Mad Cow: Physical modeling of amyloid diseases - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Consider a Spherical Mad Cow: Physical modeling of amyloid diseases

Description:

Consider a Spherical Mad Cow: Physical modeling of amyloid diseases – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: danie85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Consider a Spherical Mad Cow: Physical modeling of amyloid diseases


1
Consider a Spherical Mad Cow Physical modeling
of amyloid diseases
  • D.L. Cox, Physics, UC Davis
  • R.R.P. Singh, Physics, UC Davis
  • K.Kunes, S. Dai, J. Romnes, N.R. Hayre, C.
    Trevisan, Physics, UC Davis
  • A. Slepoy, Sandia Labs
  • R. Kulkarni, Physics, Virginia Polytechnic
    University
  • D. Mobley, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, UCSF
  • F. Pazmandi, Sidney Austin LLP (Patent Law,
    Intellectual Property)
  • S. Yang, U. Chicago Med z
  • S. Clark, Oregon State
  • E. Olson, Central College Iowa
  • H. Levine, J. Onuchic, Center for Theoretial
    Biological Physics, UCSD
  • Support NIH (Seed award from regional
    Alzheimers center), NSF (NEAT IGERT, CTBP,
    ICAM), US Army CDMRC

2
Outline
  • What is amyloid matter?
  • Biophysics vs. Biological Physics
  • The Central Dogma and Protein Folding
  • Amyloids where physics can clearly make inroads
  • -Precision biology in Huntingtons and prion
    diseases
  • Prions Why they are interesting
  • Prions Intrinsically slow?
  • Prions Molecular models
  • Recent developments p53 (Cancer gene) and AIDS

3
What we are talking about is novel materials..
Plaques this is your mind on amyloid
Model cross section
Alzheimers
Parkinsons
Ab42 Fibrils (H. Lashuel) Diameter 10
nm Fibrils have been used to template
nanowires!
Huntingtons
Kuru (prion)
Fatality is correlated with plaques. Plaques are
bundles of fibrils (Pictures Feaney lab,
Harvard)
Fibrils Protein Nanotubes/nanofibers!
(Model H. Saibil see also Perutz)
4
Amyloid diseases 20 known Not
knownmechanism for cell death, toxicity BUT, in
at least two cases, precision biology
  • Most proteins involved
  • are of unknown function
  • Incidence rates for
  • Huntingtons and Prion
  • diseases are quite
  • reproducible, in a way
  • I will define more later
  • Alone among these
  • diseases, prion diseases
  • can be infectious.

5
Recent developments amyloid in cancer, AIDS?
  • CANCER
  • Two separate regions of the p53 protein, for
    which mutations play a
  • role in 50 of known cancers undergo amyloid
    aggregation
  • In aggregate form, the p53 cannot carry out
    programmed cell death or cell
  • cycle reset functions to arrest tumors.
  • AIDS
  • Naturally forming fragments of the HPAP
    protein found in semen bind
  • strongly to the HIV virus.
  • Evidence suggests that this enhances
    infectivity of the virus by 10x or
  • more in lab animal studies.
  • May explain greater susceptibility of women
    to infection by men

6
Biophysics vs. Biological Physics
  • Tradition biophysics importation of
    techniques from physical sciences to study of
    biological problems frequently a one way flow
    of both ideas and people.
  • Example first physicist in UC Davis Biophysics
    Grad Group (in existence since 1961) me!

7
Biological Physics
  • Ask not what physics can do for biology, but
    what biology can do for physics S. Ulam via
    Hans Frauenfelder
  • Study biological problems as interesting problems
    of the physical world, and ask interesting
    questions.
  • Practical two way flow of ideas

8
Caveats
  • Just because you can throw a dog off of a roof
    to measure g does NOT mean you are doing
    biological physics L. Pelliti
  • Just as physicists can study materials with
    physics ideas and methods, physicists can study
    biological systems with physics ideas and methods
  • Prerequisites humility courage. We have some
    unique techniques and styles of inquiry, but we
    are not the only smart people in the world. BUT
    dont be cowed by jargon or expertise
  • Martin Perl, Nobel Laureate and t-lepton
    discoverer When you enter a new field, dont
    know too much, and watch out for fast talkers!

9
What can biological physics ask and say about
amyloid diseases,
OR, Consider a spherical mad cow
  • Are these diseases of aging, or just slow?
    (Spontaneous prion disease thermodynamically
    unlucky). Namely, can we physically model the
    onset distributions of disease
  • What are the organizing principles of the
    relevant protein structures (fibrils,
    oligomers..) and how can we constrain these from
    data and make falsifiable predictions?
  • Do the structures suggest/correlate with toxicity
    mechanisms? (time permitting)
  • Can the structures be modified by interacting
    with other atoms/molecules? (time permitting.)
  • For experiment frontier nanosciencehow to
    reliably probe biological matter at the nanoscale
    in complex environments????

10
First, a brief tour of the central dogma and
proteins
  • Or, Biological Physics, the early years

11
A reminder In some ways, biological phyiscs is
not new!
  • 1940s Erwin Schroedinger wrote What is Life? In
    which he looked at the major problems of biology
    from the perspective of a physicist. Among other
    things-he predicted that DNA would turn out to be
    an aperiodic crystal as it did-
  • The non-physicist cannot be expected to grasp -
    let alone to appreciate the relevance of - the
    difference in statistical structure' stated in
    terms so abstract I have just used. To give the
    statement life and colour, let me anticipate
    that.. the most essential part of a living
    cell - the chromosome fibre - may suitably be
    called an aperiodic crystal. In physics we have
    dealt hitherto only with periodic crystals.
  • Lots of physicists were inspired at this time to
    dive into biological problems (Perutz, Crick,
    Delbruck, Monod)

12
Central Dogma of Molecular Biology I
(Schroedinger to Watson to Crick to)
Who ordered That? Each Biological amino Acid
comes from Triplets of the four Base
nucleotides G,A,T,C for DNA G,A,U,C for RNA
13
Central Dogma II Elements of Protein Structure
Proteins are polymers formed from The 20 amino
acidsRESIDUES, coded for from DNA/RNA. They
can, depending upon the side chain, be polar
(but uncharged), charged, or hydrophobic
14
Most common secondary structures
a-Helices Amide? carbonyl Hydrogen bonds every
3-4 residues
  • ? b-structurecan be parallel or
  • or antiparallel
  • ?Lends to aggregation on edges
  • No constraint on where bonding
  • arises along the sequence

15
Paradox Typical ensembles of random
heteropolymers ? act like a glassy system--
  • Typical random heteropolymers DONT fold into
    compact shapesFrustration unsatisfiable
    competing interactions arise from i) putting
    hydrophobic residues out
  • How on earth do we get well folded useful
    biological proteins in reasonable time scales
    (milliseconds to seconds)?
  • Levinthal Paradox (c.f. Wikipedia) In 1969
    Cyrus Levinthal noted that, because of the very
    large number of degrees of freedom in an unfolded
    polypeptide chain, the molecule has an
    astronomical number of possible conformations.
    (The estimate 10300 appears in the original
    article). If the protein is to attain its
    corrected folded configuration by sequentially
    sampling all the possible conformations, it would
    require a time longer than the age of universe to
    arrive at its correct native conformation. This
    is true even if conformations are sampled at
    rapid (nanosecond or picosecond) rates.
  • The protein folding problem!!!

16
Organizing Principle Minimal Frustration
(Wolynes, Onuchic Shakhnovich, Dill)
  • Evolution selects for minimal frustration of
    sequence, which in model simulations leads to a
    funneled landscape
  • Formation of partially folded molten globule
    largely erases Levinthal paradox (to within a few
    orders of magnitude)
  • Correlations of nearbye states on landscape
    erases the rest
  • Sufficient stabilization of minimum with respect
    to mean of glassy continuum ? fast folding and
    well folded proteins

Frustration
Onuchic and Wolynes
Designed Stability
Bryngelson and Wolynes, PNAS 1987
17
So what about amyloid proteins?
  • Most have large stretches of random structure or
    are completely random!
  • Stabilization of structure apparently comes with
    aggregation.
  • Whether in fibril or oligomer form, there is
    cross-beta structure

Fibril axis ? ? b-sheets
18
Cross ?-Structure - Evidence from Experiment
  • 8 different amyloid diseases, x-ray diffraction
    off of fibers of fibrils
  • fiber axis vertical - peak at /- 2?/C, C
    4.8-5 angstroms
  • Cross ??structure (Pauling, 1951)
  • Also see ??in circular dichroism, FTIR
  • (From M. Sunde et al., Journal of Molecular
    Biology
  • Volume 273, Issue 3, 31 October 1997, Pages
    729-739)

19
Why is ?-sheet prone to aggregation?
unstructured
Unsatisfied H-bonds - Allows Aggregation
Critical nucleus
elongation
20
Amyloids can be GOOD!
  • Curli amyloids present in bacteria (E. Coli image
    from Chapman lab, U. Mich.) - can participate in
    stationary phase survival mechanism (Bad-may play
    a role in infection)
  • Spider silk manufacture has been argued to be pH
    switched alpha -gt beta amyloid self assembly
  • Amyloids appear to be part of some insect eggs
    (silk fibroin)
  • Controlled reversible amyloid scaffolds useful in
    tissue engineering (e.g., J. Schneider, U.
    Delaware)
  • Prions in yeast/fungus convey useful,
    heritable traits (outside the genome!!!)

21
The Beautiful? Organizing principles for amyloid
matter
22
Organizing Principle 1 Extend minimal
frustration in well ordered proteins by domain
swapping
  • Link native contacts on one monomer to
    corresponding native contacts on another
    (champion-D. Eisenberg)
  • Example - human cystatin at left (Janowski et
    al., Nat Struct Bio 2001)
  • Theory extends minimal frustration concept to
    aggregates - Yang, Cho, Levy, Cheung, Levine,
    Onuchic, Wolynes, PNAS 2004

23
Organizing Principle 2 Steric Zippers (D.
Eisenberg group, Nature 2007)
  • Synthesized lots of fragments from amyloid-
    ogenic proteins
  • Fibrils from combination of beta sheet stacking
    plus steric zipper (interlocking of well packed
    side chains)

24
Organizing principle 3 Amyloid stucture from
monomeric motifs
PrPSc model
Overlay
1T3D
1T3D stacked in silico
  • Appears in multiple bacterial enzymes and insect
    antifreeze proteins (11 on PDB)
  • Who ordered that? Unlike a-helix which
    Pauling predicted prior to discovery
  • and has local hydrogen bonding (residue j bonds
    to residue j3 or j4) b-helix is
  • very nonlocal (residue j bonds to j18)
  • b-helix structures easily bond into aggregate
    (edge-to-edge bonding of monomers)

25
Example Huntingtons one of 10
neurodegenerative diseases associated with
genetically acquired added repeats of glutamine
(polyQ diseases)
  • Model with elongation of equilib.
  • nucleus
  • Growth PQM2 t2 for simple
  • elongation from critical nucleus of
  • size M. Here M1!!!!

Intrinsically Slow!!! Extrapolate slow PolyQ lag
kinetics to physiological con- centrations
(Chen, Ferrone, Wetzel, PNAS 2002)
Zoghbi Orr, Ann Rev Neurosci 2000
26
Theory as a probe of possible sub-observable
structure I
  • All atom molecular dynamics (MD Newtons laws
    for approxmate force fields) used to probe
    stability of left handed b-helix for PolyQ
    (folding to helix not possible!) (CHARMM)
  • drms mean square deviation of atoms from
    starting positions.
  • Two layered b-helix not stable within several ns
    of simulation time
  • Three layered b-helix is stable out to 10 ns
  • PolyQ diseases have critical insert number of 36
  • Aggregation studies of PolyQ suggest critical
    nucleus of 1 (!) monomer (Chen, Ferrone, Wetzel,
    PNAS 2002)
  • This is the minimal stable left handed beta
    helical turn (18 residues per turn)
  • Is the minimal stable PolyQ a left handed
    b-helix? (But Hear Rappu)

Stork et al, Biophysical Journal 2005
27
From organizing principle to disease - one
possibility - oligomers
  • Fibrils are not perfectly correlated with disease
    (many have plaques with no AD, some prion
    diseases have no plaques).
  • Fibrils may be protective (collecting aggregate
    away from cells)
  • Some oligomers can form pores which permeate
    membrane and let in excess calcium.

28
a
Ab
SOD1
Ab
c
A4V
Arctic (E22G)
?-Synuclein
?-Synuclein
A30P
A53T
29
What about prions?
30
What is special about prions?
  • Prion Proteinaceous infectious particle
    (Prusiner 1980s).
  • Along among amyloid diseases infectious as well
    as sporadic, inherited possibilities (PrPSc)
  • Numerous experiments (radiation damage,
    UV/temperature/protease/denaturant
    insensitivity.) -gt NO nucleic acids (not a virus
    or bacteria)
  • Bolstered by test-tube synthesis of infectious
    protein only prions last year (Baskakov, Prusiner
    et al, Science 2004)
  • Prusiner isolated the PrPc protein as key to the
    diseasemice with the gene for PrPc knocked out
    dont get sick on innoculation with infectious
    prion material (PrPSc and PrPC are identical
    after full denaturation-same primary sequence!)
  • Examples Scrapies (sheep), Kuru (humans),
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) (humans), Mad
    Cow, Chronic Wasting Disease (deer and elk)

31
Structure of normal PrPC (Wuethrich et al, PNAS
97, 8334 (2000) 97, 8340 2000)
Proposed structure of PrPSc in one case (Wille
et al, PNAS 99, 3993 (2002) Govaerts et al,
PNAS 101, 83422004)
  • 90-95 homology in mammals
  • Observed in all vertebrates
  • Binds copper in divalent form
  • sites in humans, mice, six in
  • cattle

Trimer of left-handed beta helices gives best
model
32
What is special about the prion diseases?
  • Alone amongst ANY disease, prions can be
    spontaneous, heriditary AND infectious
  • Prion diseases represent precision biology
    rates of incidence and dose incubation
    distributions are highly reproducible. (1 in
    106 in developed countries get sporadic CJD
    worldwide). Suggests a purely physico-chemical
    model might capture important features of the
    disease
  • Simple models can test important questions about
    the disease from this perspective that protein
    conformation (and potentially aggregate
    structure) dictate disease dynamics and properties

33
Two dimensional aggregation kinetics?
  • Prions are membrane bound
  • Can there be interesting differences in models
    with 2D aggregation?

34
Model prions in action
Seed introduced slow initial conversion and
aggregation
Wait a while conversion and aggregation
accelerates
35
More precision biology? prion incubation (Slepoy
et al., Phys Rev Lett, 2001 Mobley et al.,
Biophys. J. 2003)
Seed Aggregate Fission
Fission adds (short) doubling and translates-gt
(BSE best fit)
Distribution of aggregation times
Time to aggregate to critical size N over peak
time
36
Role of membrane in toxicity and exponential
growth (fission)
  • Cheseboro et al, Science, 2005 Engineer
    transgenic (Tg) mice with GPI anchor deleted.
  • Evidence is that expressed PrPC transport to
    membrane but are sent off between cells.
  • Innoculate mice with a particular lethal dose of
    PrPSc for which wild type (WT) mice get symptoms
    at 150 days.
  • Tg mice dont die or get symptoms out to 600
    days, but accumulate infectious prion material in
    between cells!

WT
37
Exponential growth also requires the membrane!
(Cox, Singh, Yang)
  • Short time elongation kinetics without fission or
    autocatalysis gives t2agrees remarkably well
    with Cheseboro et al!
  • We estimate PrPCTg 28 X PrPCWT

38
Proposed b-helical trimer model for minimal
infectious prion particle (UCSF, Govaerts et al.
PNAS 2004)
Loop
1THJ
Raw EM image of infectious prion aggregatenote
faceting!
Signal averaged density (difference) mapnote
3 Fold symmetry
Proposed prion trimer has same size as known
bacterial trimer (1THJ)
  • What holds the UCSF model together? Known
    bacterial trimers are held together by
    intermonomer Zn bonding (1THJ) or massive
    hydrogen bond networks (1T3D)

39
Stabilize Prion Trimer by Domain Swapping (S.
Yang, H. Levine, J. Onuchic, D.L.C. FASEB J, Nov.
2005)
Domain swapped Prion Trimer (DSTP) model
UCSF or BPT model (beta helical Prion trimer)
  • All atom MD Amber 8 on trial
  • structure energy minimized in loop region
  • Domain swap Grab part of one monomer and bind it
    to anotheralternative approach to generating
    amyloid (Eisenberg et al 1995)
  • Domain swapping relaxes stress in loop Elastic
    energy relaxed by 2 kBT
  • Domain swapping adds hydrogen bonds now
    structure plausibly held together sufficient to
    run MD to 1-2 ns for H-bonds
  • Alternative domain swap being explored by S.
    Cho, Y. Levy, P. Wolynes

40
The plot thickens test tube grown fibrils
(Saibil et al, JMB 06)
Kunes, Clark, Cox, Singh, to appear in Prion
For this model, M129 Contacts D178!!!
41
C terminal stability good
  • Molecular dynamics simulation out to 10 ns of
    root mean square deviation of atoms from starting
    positions (subtracting center of mass motion) -
    black, red known stable beta helices, blue green
    our models.

42
Templating - possible connection to kinetics
  • Roughly, extra H bond to link M129 to H177, N178
    in FFI
  • Hard to link R177 for dogs to this
  • For mice the suspicion is that the S143N change
    relative to humans leads to a different preferred
    thread

For this model, M129 Contacts D178!!!
43
Conclusions
  • Amyloid diseases emergent and generic COLLECTIVE
    stabilization of structure
  • Can be INTRINSICALLY SLOW (Huntingtons,
    prions..)
  • Simple areal aggregation model with little
    biology accounts for much within the protein only
    model for proins!
  • Membrane mediates toxicity (Chesboro et al,
    Science 2005) AND exponential growth via fission
    or oligomeric autocatalysis (Cox, Singh, Yang)
  • Domain swapping of the b-helices in the proposed
    prion trimer may stabilize the structure Also
    suggests a model for strains of prions, possible
    understanding of GSS mutations
  • More complex domain swapping and C-terminal beta
    helix formation can possibly explain fibrils and
    more!!!
  • Amyloid formation is possibly playing a role in
    other surprising places (p53 cancer gene,
    protein in semen which increases infectivity of
    AIDS virus)

44
Some essential issues to explore in modeling
  • Autocatalysis vs. Autocatalytic Aggregation
    (cooperative conversion) Strong arguments (Eigen)
    and data legislate against autocatalysis at the
    monomer level conversion upon aggregation is
    more sensible (and supported by our work).
  • What aggregate structures and sizes best
    correspond to experiment?
  • Fission is critical to explain exponential
    runaway (Masel, 2000). Do aggregate shapes and
    sizes influence this?
  • Can infectious and sporadic time scales be
    reconciled in the models?

45
More precision biology? prion incubation (Slepoy
et al., Phys Rev Lett, 2001 Mobley et al.,
Biophys. J. 2003)
Seed Aggregate Fission
Soft Oligomer/Micelle
Hard/Oligomer
46
Dependence upon coordination environment
?----------------gt
12 years --------------?1000 years(!) (Kuru?)
(CJD?)

----gt
----gt
qc 3 Seeded
Sporadic
qc1 Seeded Sporadic
qc2 Seeded Sporadic
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com