Obesity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Obesity

Description:

Co-morbidities (CAD, HTN, DM II) affect increasing mortality risk in proportion to BMI ... GERD. NASH. Breast cancer. Increases in obesity and diabetes 1991-2000 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: valuedg785
Category:
Tags: gurd | obesity

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Obesity


1
(No Transcript)
2
Obesity
  • An excess of body fat body mass index (BMI) gt30
    kg/m2
  • Affects 30 adults in U.S. 70Billion annual
    health cost
  • Co-morbidities (CAD, HTN, DM II) affect
    increasing mortality risk in proportion to BMI

3
Body Mass Index -kg/m2 Wt(lb) x 703/Ht
(inches)2
  • Underweight lt18.5
  • Normal 18.5-24.9
  • Overweight 25-29.9
  • Obese gt30
  • Severe (morbidly) obese gt40

4
(No Transcript)
5
Obesity rates, 1991 vs 2000
Obesity defined as BMIgt30. Data were obtained by
calculating BMI from phone questionnaire on
height and weight on 185000 participants gtage 18.
CDC study ,JAMA 2001286,1195-1200
6
A typical fast food meal
  • Big Mac 570 kcal
  • Large Fries 540 kcal
  • 32 0z (large) soda 400 kcal
  • TOTAL 1510 kcal
  • A 70 kg moderately active man requires 2100
    kcal/day (3 meals).

7
Obesity co-morbidities
  • Metabolic syndrome DM II (15 of all obese), HTN
    (40 of obese), hyperlipidemia related to
    visceral adiposity and insulin resisitance
  • Sleep apnea
  • Cardiopulmonary failure
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Gallstones
  • GERD
  • NASH
  • Breast cancer

8
Increases in obesity and diabetes 1991-2000
9
Medical management of obesity
  • Energy equation wt stability when calories in
    calories out
  • Can therefore reduce by decreasing intake and/or
    increasing expenditure of calories

10
Medical management of obesity
  • Diet (according to ideal body weight for height)
    exercise (30 min/d moderate 5d/wk)
    behavioral modification 5-10 wt loss in 6
    months, most rebound.
  • Very low calorie dieting (lt900 kcal/d works for
    many, but 99 rebound
  • Pharmacological adjuncts limited success

11
(No Transcript)
12
The super-obese (BMI 50 )
  • Incidence in U.S. population 2.1 (4.4 million)
  • Increased risk of osteoarthritis, cardiopulmonary
    failure, sleep apnea, all consequences of
    metabolic syndrome (DM, NASH, HTN, hyperlipid)
  • Medical treatment essentially hopeless, though
    met syndrome improves with 5-10 weight loss

13
(No Transcript)
14
Rationale for surgery for morbid obesity
  • gt2x mortality with BMIgt40 kg/m2 due to
    cardiopulmonary failure, sleep apnea, diabetes
  • Poor results of all medical therapies to date
  • Relative safety and efficacy of gastric bypass
    compared to older jejuno-ileal bypass procedure

15
Criteria for obesity surgery
  • BMI gt 40, or gt35 with significant co-morbidities
  • Documented failure of medical management (diet
    exercise pharm)
  • Psychological ability to undergo surgery
  • Absence of other chronic disease

16
What are the surgical options?
  • Restrictive Adjustable gastric banding
    Vertical band gastroplasty
  • Malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Biliopancreatic diversion

17
  • Adjustable gastric band
  • Vertical band gastroplasty

18
  • RGB
  • BPD

19
  • BPD-DS

20
Estimated Number of Bariatric Operations
Performed in the United States, 1992-2003
Steinbrook, R. N Engl J Med 20043501075-1079
21
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric Bypass A
Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality of Life,
and Costs
  • Nguyen, Ninh T. MD Goldman, Charles MD
    Rosenquist, C. John MD Arango, Andres BS
    Cole, Carol J. BS Lee, Steven J. MS and
    Wolfe, Bruce M. MD, FACS

22
  • 155 patients w/ BMI 40-60 randomly assigned to
    lap (79) or open (76)

Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
23
OUTCOMES
Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
24
OUTCOMES
Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
25
OUTCOMES
Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
26
OUTCOMES
Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
27
OUTCOMES
Nguyen et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastric
Bypass A Randomized Study of Outcomes, Quality
of Life, and Costs. Ann Surg. 234, 2004. 279-91.
28
CONCLUSIONS
  • Laparoscopic GBP is safe alternative to open GBP
  • Lap pt s benefited from dec EBL, shorter LOS
    more rapid improvement in QOL than open GBP
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com