Title: Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic Canada Indice de progr
1Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic CanadaIndice
de progrès véritable - Atlantique The Business
Case for Waste ReductionWaste Reduction Week
Clean Nova Scotia Breakfast with Minister
Halifax, 20 October, 2004
2Waste and Sustainability
- How we manage waste is a significant indicator of
community sustainability - Capitalizing on use and reuse of waste as a
resource is a key component of the efficient use
of natural resources - Resource conservation, materials efficiency,
waste prevention, reuse, and recycling are all
integral components of a sustainable economy
3GDP Waste
- Economic growth indicators do not place a value
on reduced resource extraction and energy use,
decreased landfill emissions and leachate
contamination, or improving the quality of our
air, water, and natural environment - As long as economic growth measures remain the
primary benchmark of wellbeing and prosperity,
waste diversion will be seen as a cost and not as
the investment that it is
4GPI Waste
- The GPI recognizes resource extraction, resource
use, and spending to compensate for environmental
damage as costs rather than gains to the economy - The GPI counts the value of what remains in our
forests, oceans and other resources, not just
what we extract from them, and so recognizes
waste reduction initiatives as gains rather than
costs to the economy
5Can we do it?Percentage Waste Diversion in Nova
Scotia
6Competitiveness and Genuine Progress
7(No Transcript)
8The Nova Scotia GPISolid Waste-Resource Accounts
- Are the costs and benefits of the Nova Scotia
solid waste resource system worth the investment?
- The GPI Atlantic Solid Waste-Resource report
calculates for the first time the marginal
economic, social and environmental costs and
benefits of solid waste-resource management in
Nova Scotia
9- The report compares the operating and amortized
capital costs of the provinces solid
waste-resource system in the 1996-97 fiscal year
(April 1, 1996 to March 31, 1997) and the full
costs of the solid waste-resource system in the
2000-2001 fiscal year - This is the first detailed independent evaluation
of the Nova Scotia solid waste-resource system
and the first Canadian evaluation of a solid
waste system using the full-cost accounting
principles of the GPI
10Full Cost-Benefit Analysis Components Costs
- Operating and amortized capital costs (including
curbside pickup) - Additional time of some citizens
- Nuisance (handling organic waste)
- Stewardship program costs
- HHW, beverage container recycling, used tire
program costs - RRFB admin and operating costs
11Full CBA Analysis Benefits
- Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emission
reductions - Extended landfill life
- Energy savings from recycling
- Direct and indirect employment (part)
- RRFB diversion credits, programs
- Avoided siting and liability costs
- Export revenue from waste-resource goods and
services - Additional Tourism
12Intangible Benefits
- Indicators excluded from analysis and therefore
not explicitly monetized - Aesthetic
- Public health costs from pollutants emitted from
extraction of virgin materials for manufacturing - Odours and noise
- Social values such as health
- Community pride (perception/self-image) and
collective and community values
13Intangible Benefits ctd.
- Wildlife/nature (greater access to unspoiled,
safe parklands and preserves) - Biodiversity
- Reduced litter
- All above excluded from CBA due to challenges of
assigning monetary value - Yet value of these benefits should be acknowledged
14Calculating Value System Costs
- Cost-benefit assessment compares the base case
costs (business as usual costs prior to the
inception of the new strategy) with a full cost
accounting assessment of the 2000-01 solid
waste-resource system - FCA analysis determines the marginal costs and
benefits between the 1996-97 fiscal year solid
waste-resource system and the 2000-01 fiscal year
solid waste resource system
15Results
- Implementation of the Solid Waste-Resource
Strategy led to an increase in operating and
amortized costs from 48.6 million (53/capita)
in the 1996-97 fiscal year to 72.5 million
(77/capita) in the 2000-01 fiscal year. - An increased cost of 24 million (25/capita) for
implementing the changes
16Results
- The new NS solid waste-resource system in 2000-01
produced net savings of at least 31.2 million,
when compared to the old 1996-97 solid
waste-resource system - This translates into savings of 33 for each Nova
Scotian, versus a cost of 25 as suggested when
comparing strictly the operating and amortized
capital costs of the two systems
17Benefits
- Total benefits of 2000-01 system range from 79
million to 221 million 84-236 pp, incl - 3.3 - 84.3 million in GHG emission reductions
- 9 - 67 million in air pollutant reductions
- 18.8 million in extended landfill life
- 28.6 million in energy savings from recycling
- 6.5 - 8.9 million in employment benefits
- 1.2 - 1.9 million in avoided liability costs
- 1.1 - 1.7 million in export revenue of goods
and services - 187,000 in additional tourism
18Energy savings per tonne of waste recycled
19Costs
- Total costs of 2000-01 solid waste-resource
system were 96.6-102.7 million - 72.4 m. in operating and amortized capital costs
- 14.3 m. for beverage container recycling prog.
- 2.7 million for used tire management program
- 1.6 million in RRFB operating and admin costs
- 5 - 9.5 million to increase participation
- 220,000 - 1.8 million in nuisance costs
20Conclusions
- 1995 NS Solid Waste-Resource Strategy has led to
a considerable net benefit, both in monetary and
non-monetary terms - 1) The solid waste-resource system in 2000-01,
despite increased operating and amortized capital
costs, provided a net savings of between 31
million and 167.7 million compared to the
operating and amortized capital costs of the old
system
21Conclusions
- 2) Nova Scotia is a leader both internationally
and nationally in solid waste diversion. - 3) The accessibility, comprehensiveness, and
levels of waste being composted and recycled have
all improved since the introduction of the Solid
Waste-Resource Strategy.
22Genuine Progress
- Access to curbside recycling in Nova Scotia
jumped from less than 5 in 1989 to 99 today - 76 of residents now have access to curbside
organics pickup - Both are by far the highest rates in the country
23Access to curbside recycling, NS 1987-2001
24Comparisons
- On a per capita basis, Nova Scotia disposes of
39 less waste than Canadian average - HRM has the highest waste diversion rate of any
municipality in Canada twice the average. - Nova Scotias overall waste diversion rate of 46
is also higher than any industrialised country. - Nova Scotia's high diversion rate is due in large
part to its composting system.
25Organics Diversion
26Challenges
- Back-sliding NS 1989 3 diversion 2000
50 2003 46 - HRM decreased from around 50 to 47.
- Inadequacy of systems for household hazardous
waste and construction and demolition waste
(25-30 of the waste stream) - Inadequate waste diversion in apartment buildings
and businesses - Need expansion of waste stewardship agreements
with businesses
27(No Transcript)
28What can businesses do?
- Sydney Olympics demonstrated that compostable
coffee cups can be successfully used on very
large scale. In NS, Irving Oil, Just Us use
biodegradable coffee cups. But biggest purveyors
of coffee in Nova Scotia still dont use
recyclable or compostable coffee cups. - Litter study found Tim Hortons and MacDonalds
alone account for one-third of all litter in NS
22 and 10.1 resp. Efforts by the NS DEL to
encourage Tim Hortons to use compostable or
recyclable coffee cups are ongoing
29In the long term
- If we really want to reduce waste further, we
need to reduce the amount of waste we generate in
the first place by re-examining consumption
habits and reducing unnecessary packaging. - A Zero Waste Council a good first step with
business, NGOs, government
30How we manage our waste affects the kind of Nova
Scotia we leave our children?
31Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic CanadaIndice
de progrès véritable - Atlantique