Information Collection and Dissemination Practices for Learners with Specific Learning Differences a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Information Collection and Dissemination Practices for Learners with Specific Learning Differences a

Description:

Information Collection and Dissemination Practices for ... Kate Byford & Velvet Kearley-Heywood. Higher Education Academy. AchieveAbility National Network ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: tah3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information Collection and Dissemination Practices for Learners with Specific Learning Differences a


1
Information Collection and Dissemination
Practices for Learners with Specific Learning
Differences across the Education Sector The
Impact and Consequential Intellectual Loss to
Education and Employment
  • Kate Byford Velvet Kearley-Heywood
  • Higher Education Academy
  • AchieveAbility National Network
  • University of Westminster

2
AchieveAbility HE Academy
  • In 2005 the HE Academy was commissioned to
    conduct a unique piece of research
  • Aims of the research
  • To identify the issues surrounding the collection
    and dissemination practices used to collect data
    about learners with Specific Learning Differences
    (SpLD)
  • To promote a greater understanding of how to
    evaluate learner progression into Higher
    Education.

3
Research Methodology
  • Two phased approach
  • In-depth semi-structured interviews with 23
    participants
  • Consultation through online survey and discussion
    forum with 100 participants
  • Across the education sectors
  • Addressing depth and breadth
  • Aiming to be as broadly representative as
    possible

4
Findings Data collection
  • Data collection practices
  • Focuses on mandatory assessment requirements.
  • Purpose of data collection
  • Four key purposes fulfil mandatory duties,
    assessment, strategic and operational.
  • Funding is a key driver of information
    collection.
  • Variations of practice
  • Between sectors different mandatory procedures,
    categorisations and assessment practices hence
    different types of information.
  • Within sectors screening of learners,
    identification of support needs, type of data
    collected, recording and treatment of data
    hence differing learner experiences.
  • Issues
  • Lack of standardisation of data collection
    practices across the system
  • Reliance on self disclosure to instigate data
    collection
  • Focus on admissions and assessment (not success
    and progression)

5
Findings Data Use
  • Users of data
  • Funding providers to calculate funding and
    support provision but also to monitor the
    progress of SpLD set performance indicators set
    equality diversity targets inform
    interventions staff development.
  • Institutions to obtain funding, inform
    objective setting, monitor support, enhance
    quality, improve effectiveness and aid planning.
  • End users to inform choice of institution.
  • Other bodies to inform institutions about
    profile of applicants/accepts.
  • Issues
  • Tracking learners variations make it difficult
    to track/monitor learners and make cross sector
    comparisons.
  • Lack of external focus nature and scope of data
    creates gaps - hence evaluating the progression
    of learners is problematic

6
Findings Data Dissemination
  • Practices for sharing and disseminating data
  • Practices depend upon internal and external
    communication.
  • Variety of mechanisms are used to disseminate
    information.
  • Depends on individuals commitment, size of
    institution, data protection.
  • Variations in data dissemination practices
  • Key differences between institutions in how
    learners are referred, the provision of staff
    development opportunities treatment of data.
  • Dissemination at transition
  • Few standardised procedures to support transfer
    of information.
  • Issues
  • Staff awareness and development has the potential
    to support learners.
  • Data protection protocols affect how data is
    obtained, held and disseminated.

7
Conclusions
  • Purpose for which information is recorded about
    learners is not focused on their progression
    through the system, making research problematic.
  • Efforts to standardise practices are a local or
    regional level rather than at a national scale.
  • Partnerships between sectors, institutions and
    with learners offer the potential to generate a
    better understanding of the achievements and
    progression of learners with SpLD.
  • The consequential loss of intellectual talent

8
Recommendations
  • National organisations and policy makers
  • Consider developing national or regional
    protocols and processes to support data
    collection and dissemination
  • Raise the prominence of success and progression
    data collection.
  • Institutions
  • Be proactive in obtaining learner consent and
    access to information (preferably pre-entry).
  • Make the most of opportunities to share data
    collection practices between and within education
    sectors.
  • Become familiar with data collection practices in
    feeder sectors/ institutions
  • Raise staff awareness of SpLD
  • Work in partnership with other sectors,
    institutions and learners.
  • Learners
  • Be proactive
  • Seek explanations (if unsure) about why
    information is required, as it may be beneficial
    to pass information on.

9
AchieveAbility Network Projects
  • AchieveAbility Interventions A Framework for
    whole class learning drawn from SpLD work
  • SpLD identification checklist
  • Quintin Kynaston School Whole school approach to
    multi-sensory teaching
  • Enhanced and personalised learning training for
    FE and HE staff

10
  • Full copies of the report can be downloaded from
    the AchieveAbility website
  • www.achieveability.org.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com