Title: Are you confident about.. Future trends and how they might affect you Where the new opportunities wi
1Exchange Of Foresight Relevant Experiences for
Small European and Enlargement Countries
2Outline
- Transition Country Foresight
- Insights from eFORESEE
- Redefining Foresight
- Creative Methods and Approaches
- Hidden Challenges
- Constraining factors
- Current application of results
- Foresight challenges
3Transition Country Context
- In a transition economy context where systematic
approaches to policy are often not appreciated,
basic yet smart approaches methods are called
for. - EU-driven and EU policy-related exercises are
likely to be viewed more favourably - EU transnational foresight can prove more visible
and relevant in terms of benchmarking and policy
learning especially for a small country however
there are constraints in implementation.
4Transition Country Context
- Adapting foresight to the transition country
context requires - redefining foresight to the local context
- creative use and adaptation of methods and
approaches - a focus on hidden challenges, e.g. societal
concerns - a ongoing communications and learning strategy
- a balance between tangible and intangible
benefits
5Insights from a transnational exercise eFORESEE
- The three partner countries shared a common
challenge of introducing foresight into a
transition economy context and into a policy
system which was undergoing fast pressures of
change in the critical pre-accession phase. - The main challenges in this context which have
come to the fore during implementation of the
project, are the need to activate and support
fast policy learning and unlearning processes,
and the need to bridge the divide between
policy-makers and society by engaging able new
actors and moving towards more consensus-oriented
dialogue.
6Traditional definitions
- A tool or set of tools used to survey as
systematically as possible what chances for
development and what options for action are open
at present, and then follow up analytically to
determine to what alternative future outcomes the
developments would lead Martin Irvine - 2. Foresight is more than just a set of tools,
and involves a process whereby the tools are just
one element, interacting with human inputs of
intellect, expertise and sector-specific
knowledge. a process - a systematic,
participatory, future intelligence-gathering and
medium-to-long-term vision-building process
FOREN Guide
7The learning dimension
- But foresight is essentially embodied in the
actors involved in its design and implementation
and may be defined in relation to two key human
attributes - 3. foresight as a philosophy or particular
mindset/approach to life evident at the
individual or group level. It separates the
proactive from the reactive, the path-dependent
from the path-breakers. (Pace Harper) - 4. foresight as a capacity for contemplating,
anticipating and coping with the future also
evident at the individual or group level. It
entails a set of skills which can be taught but
presumes a mindset open to creative thinking and
proactive exploration of the future. (Pace
Harper)
8Redefining Foresight
- The foresight process involves intense iterative
phases of open reflection, networking,
consultation, and discussion leading to the joint
refining of future visions and the common
ownership of strategies, with the aim of
exploiting long-term opportunities opened up
through the impact of STI on society . - It is the discovery of a common space for open
thinking on the future and the incubation of
strategic approaches in this sense the
foresight process has no beginning or end, since
it builds on previous and ongoing conversations
and consultations and sets in motion learning
curves and other intangible spin-offs which are
not easily captured in short timeframes
9Creative methods and approaches
10 11The Hidden Challenges
12Ongoing Communications Learning
- Communications and learning were considered a
vital element of the foresight exercise and the
communications/ marketing strategy was given a
central place in the exercise both in terms of
engaging policy-makers, stakeholders and the
public. - Project launch through EOIs and a number of open,
dissemination events attracting the media - On-line consultations and dedicated mailing lists
via eFORESEE website - A number of training activities in foresight
basics to ensure that the dialogue did not revert
to the usual unstructured discussion in such
consultations.
13Foresight as timeless live dialogue
- Foresight as a tool for achieving turn-around
from vicious to virtuous circles in policy
development through dialogue and
consensus-building - Building on previous vision-setting processes
- Fusing STI and socio-cultural foresight in
design, scoping, process, methods and
dissemination - Actors as real drivers - targeting their inputs
- Bringing implementation into design
- Foresight as timeless live dialogue linkage
with ongoing strategic conversations and current
societal concerns.
14Shared space for learning
- Use of the eFORESEE site and mailing lists to
engage strategic players, new actors and external
experts in the discussions, has helped to make
local players more aware of science, technology
and innovation policy concerns - Open facility to share documents, proposals,
ideas, and news has brought important knowledge
and opportunities to the attention of local
players and continues to be appreciated by the
subscribers as a free source for receiving key
STI Policy updates
15Intangible, unforeseen benefits
- A less-emphasized benefit of a foresight exercise
is its facility to make transparent policy
processes and structures and to bring to the fore
key challenges and key individuals or champions
to the cause. - It also helps to identify hidden obstacles to the
introduction of more informed, transparent, open
participatory processes to governance as well as
other barriers hindering the wiring up the
national system of innovation
16Constraining Factors
- Differing Contexts (socio-economic, cultural
differences..) - Different sponsors/clients
- Similar goals but different priorities
- Implementation styles vary
- Diverse foresight capacities/competencies
- Time constraints for learning activity
- Few examples of successful transnational
foresight activity involving mutual learning
17National RDIST Strategy 2006-8 DRAFT Terms of
Reference
- To assess the local academic capability and
potential in various sectors - To assess the local industry capability and
potential in various sectors - To identify the constraints and opportunities
resulting from Maltas geophysical and other
characteristics (physical size, population size,
geographical location) - To assess the suitability of the various sectors
(and niche areas) for focused effort to Malta, in
terms of their potential to generate revenue,
employment and growth. - To deliver a 3-year strategic plan identifying
the sectoral areas where Malta should focus its
effort
18Dovetailing with Related Initiatives
- National Reform Programme
- MARIS
- ETAP
- Euro-Med ITI
- Tax Review Commission process
- Higher Education Reform process
- National ICT Strategy and other strategic
sectoral plans
19Methodology
- Stakeholder-mapping (university, industry, other)
- Questionnaire-based survey for priority-setting
- Commissioning of expert reports
- Horizon-scanning exercise
- Meetings with industry representatives
- Sectoral consultations and targeted 1-1 meetings
- Prepare consultation document
- Review feedback and revise if necessary
20Foresight Challenges
- Foresight methods and results are still not
sufficiently in tune with policy-makers
expectations and needs - Fast changing backdrop to policy-making
constant interplay between national and global
contexts/events - Fast policy learning/unlearning and iterations
- Reconciling long-term strategies with short-term
disruptions/crises in policy processes - Need for ongoing implementation and fast results
- Addressing publicly visible issues and concerns
- Results which are appreciated by society/voters!
21Foresight Challenges
- Foresight still has seemingly limited impact on
RTDI policy it remains outside the inner
circle! - Policy-makers are not obliged to follow the
recommendations of their foresight exercises ?
But then should they be? - Do foresight exercises deliver what
policy-makers, expect, want or need? Investments
in second rounds of foresight in new M/S proving
difficult to justify - Why?? Reasons vary from one country to another
but resources are limited and senior
policy-makers sceptical over cost/benefits of
such investments - Way forward?