Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade System Rview Project Overview

1
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade System RviewProject
Overview

Latifa Elouadrhiri Hall B 12 GeV Control Account
Manager
2
Outline

• Introduction
• WBS Structure
• Organization Infrastructure
• Cost Schedule
• Design and RD Tasks
• Project tracking and reviews
• Risk Mitigation
• Summary

3
CLAS12 Requirements
The 12 GeV physics program requires measurement
of exclusive reactions. At high energies cross
sections are small and high energy particles are
produced in the forward direction. The physics
program requires

• High operating luminosity of 1035 cm-2sec-1
• Small angle capabilities for charged and neutral
  particle detection
• Particle ID to higher momentum (e-/p-, p/K/p,
  g/po)
• More complete detection of hadronic final state

The PAC has approved 5 years of experiments for
the 12 GeV program most these experiments
require measurements of exclusive reactions
4
CLAS12 - Detector
Torus
Solenoid
5
Location of the Detectors Around the Magnets
Drift Chambers
HTCC PMTs
Solenoid
Torus
CTOF PMTs
6
CLAS12 Central Detector
Silicon Vertex Tracker
Time-of-Flight
Solenoid
7
Detector in the Hall
CLAS12 Infrastructure in Hall B
8
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS Structure
9
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS Structure
1.4.2 Hall B
1.4.2.2 Detectors
1.4.2.1 SC Magnet
1.4.2.1.1 Torus
1.4.2.2.1 Tracking
1.4.2.2.2 Calorimeter
1.4.2.2.3 Time of Flight
1.4.2.2.4 Cherenkov
1.4.2.1.2 Solenoid
1.4.2.2.2.3 PCAL
1.4.2.2.1.1 SVT
1.4.2.2.3.1 CTOF
1.4.2.2.4.1 HTCC
1.4.2.2.4.2 LTCC
1.4.2.2.3.2 FTOF
1.4.2.2.1.3 DC
1.4.2.6 Infrastructure
1.4.2.5 Beamline
1.4.2.3 Computing
1.4.2.4 Electronics
1.4.2.5.1 Faraday Cup
1.4.2.3.2 DAQ
1.4.2.3.1 Trigger
1.4.2.4.2 TDC
1.4.2.4.1 ADC
1.4.2.5.2 Moller Polarimeter
1.4.2.6.1 Utilities
1.4.2.6.2 Frames
1.4.2.3.3 Online
1.4.2.4.3 Scalers
1.4.2.3.4 Offline
1.4.2.4.4 High Voltage
1.4.2.6.3 Assembly
1.4.2.6.4 Installation
1.4.2.5.4 Components
1.4.2.3.5 Slow Controls
1.4.2.4.7 Crates, Racks
10
Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade WBS Structure
1.4.2 Hall B
Moderate risk Elements Dedicated one day review
for each system April 2008
1.4.2.2 Detectors
1.4.2.1 SC Magnet
1.4.2.1.1 Torus
1.4.2.2.1 Tracking
1.4.2.2.2 Calorimeter
1.4.2.2.3 Time of Flight
1.4.2.2.4 Cherenkov
1.4.2.1.2 Solenoid
1.4.2.2.2.3 PCAL
1.4.2.2.1.1 SVT
1.4.2.2.3.1 CTOF
1.4.2.2.4.1 HTCC
1.4.2.2.4.2 LTCC
1.4.2.2.3.2 FTOF
1.4.2.2.1.3 DC
1.4.2.6 Infrastructure
1.4.2.5 Beamline
1.4.2.3 Computing
1.4.2.4 Electronics
1.4.2.5.1 Faraday Cup
1.4.2.3.2 DAQ
1.4.2.3.1 Trigger
1.4.2.4.2 TDC
1.4.2.4.1 ADC
1.4.2.5.2 Moller Polarimeter
1.4.2.6.1 Utilities
1.4.2.6.2 Frames
1.4.2.3.3 Online
1.4.2.4.3 Scalers
1.4.2.3.4 Offline
1.4.2.4.4 High Voltage
1.4.2.6.3 Assembly
1.4.2.6.4 Installation
1.4.2.5.4 Components
1.4.2.3.5 Slow Controls
1.4.2.4.7 Crates, Racks
11
Hall B Upgrade Project Organization
12
Hall B Group and Collaboration

• Experienced staff in place
• Staff scientists (17)
• Engineering and technical staff (21 )
• Lead engineer, 2 mechanical engineers, electrical
  engineer, Hall coordinator, 5 detector
  technicians, 3 mechanical technicians,
• 3 electrical technicians, 5 designers
• 60 of staff scientists were involved in original
  project,
• 80 of technical staff.
• Size of collaboration (more than 200)
• 28 US institutions
• 11 Foreign institutions (Armenia, France, Italy,
  Russia, S. Korea, UK)

13
CLAS12 - Institutions

• Institution Focus Area
• Arizona State University (US) Beamline,
  Tagging System
• Argonne National Laboratory (US) Cerenkov
  Counter
• California State University (US) Cerenkov
  Counters
• Catholic University of America (US) Reconstruc
  tion Software
• College of William Mary (US) Magnet Mapping
• Edinburgh University (UK) Software
• Fairfield University (US) Polarized Target
• Florida International University, Miaimi
  (US) Beamline/Moller polarimeter
• Glasgow University (UK) Online, Data
  Acquisition
• Hampton University (US) Central Tracking
• Idaho State University (US) Drift chambers
• INFN Frascati (Italy) Central Detector
• INFN Genova (Italy) Cental Detector
• Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics
  (Russia) SC. Magnets, Simulations
• James Madison University (US) Calorimetry
• Kyungpook National University (Republic of
  Korea) CD TOF
• Los Alamos National Laboratory (US) Silicon
  Tracke
• Moscow State University, Skobeltsin Institute for
  Nuclear Physics (Russia) Software, SVT

MOUs are being Developed
14
Hall B Status

• Facilities still in place
• Fabrication and assembly space in EEL building
  and Test Lab
• Large class 10,000 clean room for wire chamber
  stringing
• Collaborating institutions will provide
  substantial fabrication assembly facilities
• Procedures and Policies in place
• EHS, Safety documents for operations
• Special safety reviews for new equipment
• Conduct of Operations document
• Readiness Reviews for new experiments
• Operating experience with the present CLAS
• World leader in operating Large Acceptance
  Detectors in high luminosity electron scattering
  environment
• Experience with 3 different superconducting
  magnets (Torus, Solenoid, Helmholtz magnets)
• Implemented numerous incremental upgrades of
  detectors and ancillary equipment

15
12 GeV Upgrade Schedule
16
Hall B Upgrade Schedule
17

• More detail Schedule for Each detector

18
Hall B Cost Summary TEC
19
Hall B Cost Basis of Estimate
External Independent Project Review September
2007
20
Hall B RD (WBS 1.1.3)
21
Hall B RD (WBS 1.1.3)
22
Hall B RD (WBS 1.1.3)
23
Hall B Design Reviews

• DOE-convened reviews
• Earned Value Management System Review December
  2007
• External Independent Project Review September
  2007
• Independent Project Review June 2007
• Independent Project Review June 2006
• Independent Project Review July 2005
• JLab-convened reviews
• Complete CLAS12 Detector Review May 15, 2008
• Superconducting Magnet Review April 2008
• SVT Review April 2008
• Particle ID Detector Review - April 2007
• High Threshold Cerenkov
• Preshower Calorimeter
• Drift Chamber Review - March 2007
• Superconducting Magnet Review - September 2006
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 32) - August 2007
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 30) - August 2006
• Hall-B-convened reviews
• Third CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- February
  2008

24
Hall B Design Reviews

• DOE-convened reviews
• Earned Value Management System Review December
  2007
• External Independent Project Review September
  2007
• Independent Project Review June 2007
• Independent Project Review June 2006
• Independent Project Review July 2005
• JLab-convened reviews
• Complete CLAS12 Detector Review May 15, 2008
• Superconducting Magnet Review April 2008
• SVT Review April 2008
• Particle ID Detector Review - April 2007
• High Threshold Cerenkov
• Preshower Calorimeter
• Drift Chamber Review - March 2007
• Superconducting Magnet Review - September 2006
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 32) - August 2007
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 30) - August 2006
• Hall-B-convened reviews
• Third CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- February
  2008

25
CLAS12 PID Design Review, (Apr 2007)
26
CLAS12 PID Design Review, (Apr 2007)
27
Hall B Upcoming Design Reviews

• DOE-convened reviews
• Independent Project Review July 22- 24, 2008
• JLab-convened reviews
• Program Advisory Committee (PAC 34) December
  2008
• Hall-B-convened reviews
• Fourth CLAS12 Workshop Detector Review- May 2008

28
Construction Hall B Risk Matrix
The Overall risk of the Hall B subsystems 1.4.2.3
1.4.2.6 is LOW JLab Staff experienced with
similar detector design and construction during
the original construction of Hall-B Moderate
risk for one detector element (SVT) and two
magnets Lack of in-house experience with SVT
detector technology Low likelihood but high
impact on technical and cost performance of
CLAS12 magnets
29
Summary of Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade

• The technical scope of the Hall B upgrade with
  CLAS12 is well matched to the performance
  requirements
• Major portions of the project scope are based on
  existing technology
• Overall technical risks are low
• Utilize many components of CLAS and Hall B
  Infrastructure
• Planning is sound and based on the broad previous
  experience of the JLab technical staff and the
  collaboration
• Experienced staff in place with an excellent
  track record on the construction, operation, and
  incremental upgrades of the Hall B equipments