International Workshop on FORESIGHT Sofia, Bulgaria June 1920, 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

International Workshop on FORESIGHT Sofia, Bulgaria June 1920, 2003

Description:

International Workshop on FORESIGHT. Sofia, Bulgaria June 19-20, 2003 ... Fashion. Lack ... illustration, a tool for elaborating ideas, for exploring ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: rafael61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Workshop on FORESIGHT Sofia, Bulgaria June 1920, 2003


1
International Workshop on FORESIGHTSofia,
Bulgaria June 19-20, 2003
Mainly structured from Prof. Ian Miles
(PREST)spresentations papers on scenarios
  • Scenarios Foresight
  • Creating visions of the future

Rafael Popper Research Associate Rafael.Popper_at_man
.ac.uk
Dobar den!
2
Outline
  • What Scenarios are
  • Varieties of Scenarios
  • Ways of Producing Scenarios
  • Using Scenarios in Foresight
  • Common attitudes
  • theres nothing to it only particularly
    gifted gurus can do it
  • Not so! Learning from experience (though not
    well collated)...

3
Prospective Studies
  • More than forecasting, but builds on forecasting
    methods and results
  • Task of synthesis, striving for holism
  • Implicit or explicit theories essential
  • Issues of consistency and validity
  • Foresight and strategic prospective

4
Scenarios
The precise definition of scenario is a tool
for ordering ones perceptions about alternative
future environments in which ones decisions
might be played out. Alternatively a set of
organised ways for us to dream effectively about
our own future.
Peter Schwartz, The Art of The Long View
(Doubleday Currency, 1992) p4
5
A Successful Scenario
  • Describes the possible future changes in a
    particular system, domain, environment,
    society, etc.
  • Involves the imagination
  • Is written in the past or present tense - as if
    the visualized trends events had already
    happened
  • Indicates the causes and consequences of key
    developments
  • Challenges our current images conjectures about
    the future
  • Helps us to create and evaluate alternative
    policies, strategies and actions
  • Is seen as relevant and an important element of
    the strategic decision/policy making process

6
What for?
  • Decisions/policies
  • background information
  • strategic planning
  • specific action courses
  • Debate
  • consensus-building
  • vision-sharing
  • opinion-forming
  • Analysis
  • research contexts
  • methodologies...

7
Scenarios of what?
  • CRITICAL FEATURE OF CONTEXT
  • evolution of market, of geopolitics, of
    technology
  • MULTIPLE FEATURES OF CONTEXT
  • selection of key parameters, and/or STEEPV
    analysis

8
PROBLEMS
  • Lack of accumulation of knowledge
  • Methodological base
  • Quality control
  • Gurus and charismatic
  • Fashion
  • Lack of respectability
  • Absorption capacity of users/ presentation of
    complexity and uncertainty

9
Approaching the Future
Exploratory
Time series extrapolation Regression
analyses Multivariate models Simulations Nonlinear
models, genetic algorithms, etc. (Scenarios) Sc
enarios and profiles Technology sequence
Scenarios Delphi (standard), surveys
Probabilistic methods (cross-impact, trend
impact) Focus groups, interviews, expert
groups Genius forecasting SF Scenarios Goals
delphi, surveys Morphological methods Scenario
workshops, focus groups, interviews, expert
groups Genius forecasting SF
Expert Based
Data-Based
Normative
Based on Ian Miles, presentation at UNU/CRIS
(2003)
10
How to get it Wrong (Coates)
  • Mechanical Extrapolation
  • Limits, ceilings, qualitative change
  • Unexamined assumptions (-isms)
  • Limited Expertise
  • failure to see limits, connections
  • Limited Vision
  • failure to see outsiders, novelty, significant
    events

11
Criteria for Scenarios
Elaborated from RB Heydinger RD Zentner 1983
Multiple Scenario Analysis New Directions for
Institutional Research no 39
  • Intelligible, choice criteria clear
  • Interesting (illustrated, concrete examples)
  • Plausible (history, consistency, worldview)
  • Useful
  • Data provided relevant to key issues
  • Relevant to decision needs
  • Hard to follow, over-complex, too numerous
  • Dull, abstract (schematic)
  • Hard to believe or identify processes
  • Difficult to apply
  • Lacks relevant data (diffuse)
  • Limited articulation with decision needs

VS.
12
Priority Scenarios
Likelihood/Feasibility
Substantial Attention/ Strong Emphasis
high
Scan, use as baseline/ Increased Selectivity
Some Attention/ Increased Selectivity
Scan, Examine wild cards / Increased Selectivity
Limited Attention/ Little Emphasis, Support
Importance/ Attractiveness
high
low
13
Exploratory Method
Trends, processes
Course of events (future history)
Outcome of events (image of future)
Events, strategies
14
Normative Method
Critical end-state (profile of future)
Critical event path
Trends, processes
Events, strategies
Outcome of events (image of future)
Course of events (future history)
15
Scenario Construction Normative and
Worldview-based

P
Profiles of
Goals/values
Theories/frameworks
Profiles of future


Events


Histories of future
SCENARIOS
I
I
I
I
Images of future
16
Scenario Construction Exploratory
Research/debate on data and theory
Interests and values
Data sources
Theory articulation
Assessment of likelihood of actions, trends and
impacts
Assessment of desirability of outcomes
Construction of histories and images of future
Presentation of scenarios, confrontation with
other studies, audiences
17
What are scenarios? The term has a dual meaning
18
What are scenarios? The term has a dual meaning
  • IMAGE OF THE FUTURE - description of a future set
    of circumstances, a portrait of the state of
    affairs (at a more or less tightly specified date
    or period, or after a particular set of
    developments)
  • FUTURE HISTORY - description of a future course
    of events, sequence of developments, often
    highlighting key events, decisions, or turning
    points

19
Why multiple scenarios?
  • To illustrate alternatives, indicate a range of
    plausible developments (not one inevitable future
    path) to assess robustness of strategies to
    stimulate reflection on underlying assumptions.
  • To give insight into contexts and outcomes
    (intended or otherwise) of actions, conditions
    when objectives may be realised to help identify
    turning points, key decisions, indicators, early
    warnings of change..

20
How many?
  • One scenario may be used, usually as a
    presentational device, to illustrate a particular
    future.
  • Several scenarios may be presented to indicate
    different facets of essentially the same future -
    illustration, a tool for elaborating ideas, for
    exploring the consistency of different lines of
    thought.
  • Multiple scenario analysis is employed to
    consider alternative paths of development and
    their implications.

21
The Ins and Outs of Scenario Analysis
Starting from the present (exploratory) What
next? What if?
OUTWARD
INWARD
Starting from the future (normative) Where
to? How to?
22
Outward The Principle
OUTWARD
23
Inward The Principle
Critical end-state (profile of future)
INWARD
24
Outward Scenarios - Example
Trends and events of particular interest to users
- not necessarily preferable ones
25
Inward Scenarios - Example
Futures of particular interest to users - not
necessarily desirable ones thus a PROFILE
approach
26
Inward Scenarios - Workshop Example
A desirable futures of particular interest to
users - the SUCCESS SCENARIO (also a PROFILE
approach)
Indicators of realisation and progress
Background inputs
Specification of feasible, desirable future
Actions and responsible parties
27
Scenario Building, like Foresightmay emphasise
  • Product (codified outputs) - reports, books,
    videos. Discursive accounts, summaries, action
    lists and priorities. Inputs to decision making.
    Scenarios integrate diverse studies,
    concretise and communicate visions suggest
    action points and key indicators
  • Process (embodied knowledge) - forging and
    enriching networks, developing knowledge about
    knowledge. Establishing and empowering
    constituencies for action. Scenario analysis
    recruit support, integrate diverse viewpoints
    share fuse visions, provide focus for joint
    work.
  • The big question What sort of mix?

28
Building Scenarios
  • Clarifying Purposes, Audiences
  • Identify Key Drivers
  • Develop themes, stories
  • Compare relevant elements
  • Check wildcards

29
A Spectrum of Scenario Methods
  • Surveys, clustering articulated viewpoints
  • Expert Groups with systematic tools
  • Stakeholders Interest Map (SIM)
  • Workshops
  • .. Beginning to see computer support

30
Ups and Downs of Scenario Analysis
Developed in workshop, etc., by at least some
users.
31
Outward Scenarios, top-down, based on different
worldviews
Where are we now? Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
How much change to expect how similar to
present...
Paperless Society
32
Inwards Scenario based on expert workshops
(plus..)
IPTS/ISTAG Ambience
? REQUIREMENTS ?Sociopolitical ? Business
Industrial Models ? Technology
33
Inwards Scenario using expert workshops
Success in 2005
34
Importance-Uncertainty Matrix
Importance
Traditional Strategic Planning
Scenario Planning
Daily Decision Making
Management
Uncertainty
35
There are many ways to present and communicate
scenarios, e.g.
  • HISTORIES
  • Flow charts
  • Trend analysis
  • narratives (press reports historians
    reflections)
  • strategy games
  • IMAGES
  • Tables
  • Charts
  • narratives (press stories diaries)
  • portrait of organisation/ market/ actors...

36
Possibly use Signposts
  • Indicators of events in the scenario
  • Expressed as headlines in the media
  • Provide a focus for subsequent environmental
    scanning, monitoring

37
Possibly use Wildcards
  • What surprises have we not considered?
  • Which of these, along with the signposts, should
    be monitored going forward?

38
Exercise 3.a - Driving Forces
  • Working in groups, you will be allocated a
    heading (e.g. e-governance, biotechnology)
  • Define two driving forces within that heading
    which you think will have a major impact on
    shaping Bulgaria over the next 20 years (e.g.
    extent of integration to the EU, quality of life)
  • For each driving force define at least four
    different possible outcomes
  • Write the name of each driving force and the
    outcome on a separate sheet

39
Exercise 3.b - Defining Scenarios
  • Working in 4 groups, select one of the outcomes
    from each of the driving forces defined earlier -
    the outcomes chosen do not have to fit together
    logically
  • Using the set of outcomes as a start point,
    develop a plausible scenario of what Bulgaria
    would look like on 2025
  • You can present your scenario back in whatever
    way you think most appropriate - picture, one act
    play, news report, day in the life, etc.

40
Tips for writing the scenarios
  • Explore the local environment
  • Extrapolate Change Drivers
  • Decide on Level of Uncertainty and Importance
  • Generate Impacts
  • Outline Skeletal Scenarios
  • Find Leverage Points for change
  • Create Preferred Vision

41
Conclusion Scenarios are
  • Potentially very useful, but have to be
    appropriate to purposes, audience, etc
  • Whether product or process, scenario analysis can
    articulate communicate Foresight.
  • Not magic - a combination of expertise and
    craft.
  • Capable of being produced in many different ways
    there may be a best way for a given situation,
    but there is no one all-purpose best way.
  • Sometimes fun to produce sometimes fun to read,
    usually hard work to create (OK) often hard work
    to use (this is not OK)!

42
Blagodarya!Thank you!
  • Rafael Popper
  • PREST, University of Manchester, UK

Rafael.Popper_at_man.ac.uk http//les1.man.ac.uk/PRES
T
Dobar den!
43
Exercise 3- Scenarios for Bulgaria 2025(30
minutes)
  • Please get together in 4 groups
  • You will be assigned one of the SWOT elements
  • Discuss about Bulgarian CC (Competences
    Capabilities) or lack of them as well as / -
    circumstances affecting the country by 2025
  • Nominate one group Facilitator one Secretary
  • Use results from STEEPV exercise together with
    the regional comparison of this presentation as
    starting points for your discussion
  • Identify a maximum of 10 issues (up to 15 words
    each)
  • Rank the level of importance of each issue (1-10)
    and assign a level of uncertainty from 1-10
    (10very uncertain)
  • The facilitator will try to keep conversation
    alive/dynamic
  • The secretary will try to take notes of most
    relevant issues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com