NPO conference Amsterdam 19 20 June - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

NPO conference Amsterdam 19 20 June

Description:

... include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the ... Expert knowledge; published research; existing statistics; stakeholder ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: medi135
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NPO conference Amsterdam 19 20 June


1
NPO conferenceAmsterdam 19 20 June
  • The Importance of Evidence-Based Policy Making
  • Professor Denise Lievesley
  • UN African Centre for Statistics
  • Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • and President, International Statistical Institute

2
Content of presentation
  • What is evidence-based policy?
  • Need for an evidence base at all stages in the
    policy cycle
  • Why is evidence-based policy important?
  • Judging what works
  • Evidence but one input into policy process
  • What is evidence?
  • Evidence initiatives
  • Challenges for statisticians
  • Examples from the developing world

3
What is evidence-based policy ?
  • Helping people to make well-informed decisions
    about policies, programmes and projects, by
    putting the best available evidence from research
    at the heart of policy development and
    implementation
  • Enlightening through making explicit what is
    known through scientific evidence and importantly
    what is not known
  • Better statistics, better decisions, better
    outcomes Vision of the African Centre for
    Statistics

4
In contrast to opinion based policy
  • which relies heavily on
  • either the selective use of information or
  • on the untested views of individuals or groups
    often inspired by ideological standpoints,
    prejudices or speculative conjecture.

5
What counts is what works (Labour Gov
manifesto)
  • Too narrow
  • Need clarity as to the problem
  • who is affected
  • what causes it
  • what might be done about it
  • at what cost
  • by whom
  • with what effects?

6
  • A modern perception of evidence-based policy
    making is sometimes characterised as a process
    whereby the evidence is assembled almost
    independent of the policy options and then the
    preferred policy choice emerges. Holt DT

7
Need an evidence base at all stages in the policy
cycle
  • in shaping agendas,
  • in defining issues,
  • in identifying options,
  • in making choices of action,
  • in delivering them and
  • in monitoring their impact and outcomes.

8
Context in the UK
  • Modernising Government white paper commits to
    policy making that is
  • strategic,
  • outcome-focussed,
  • joined up (works across organisational
    boundaries),
  • inclusive (is fair and takes account of the
    interests of all gender sensitive, promotes
    equity),
  • flexible,
  • innovative (means taking risks and so risks
    must be identified, monitored and managed)
  • robust (works and continues to work).
  • Tackles causes not symptoms.
  • Is acceptable to the public.

9
Why is evidence-based policy important?
  • Sherlock Holmes it is a capital mistake to
    theorise before you have all the evidence. It
    biases the judgement
  • Policy makers may be well-intentioned but
    misguided

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Results of a meta-analysis
  • Collation of the results of many studies
    contradict this advice
  • Extract from publicity prepared for the UK
    Reduce the Risk Campaign (early 1990s)
  • The risk of cot death is reduced if babies are
    not put on the tummy to sleep. Place your baby on
    the back to sleep. .Healthy babies placed on
    their backs are not more likely to choke.

14
(No Transcript)
15
Iain Chalmers
  • No doubt like millions of his other readers, I
    passed on and acted on this apparently rational
    and authoritative advice.
  • We now know that the advice promulgated so
    successfully in Spock's book led to thousands, if
    not tens of thousands, of avoidable cot deaths.
  • (Letter to BMJ)

16
Judging what works
  • Outcomes often defined too narrowly eg
    performance management whereby targets are often
    set top down and may have unintended
    consequences.
  • Hitting the target but missing the point
  • The good, the bad and the ugly report of the
    Royal Statistical Society
  • Difficulty is that sometimes different things
    work in different circumstances and this is
    interpreted as nothing works.
  • (Ref Robert Martinsons 1974 review of
    American offender rehabilitation programmes- He
    concluded that there was no single approach which
    worked consistently different things worked in
    different circumstances but this was misread as
    nothing works.)

17
Concern about an over-concentration on quantity
not quality
  • Who decides what works?
  • Examples
  • Focus on growth rather than equity in Africa
  • Focus on waiting times rather than health quality
    in the NHS
  • Ref targets are crowding out compassion in
    the NHS The Independent Sunday June 1 2008
    Shadow health minister quoted as saying This is
    not a criticism of the NHS staff but of the ethos
    that has been created in the health service.
    They are working in systems designed around
    throughput and not quality

18
  • The gross national product does not allow for
    the health of our children, the quality of their
    education, or the joy of their play it does not
    include the beauty of our poetry or the strength
    of our marriages, the intelligence of our public
    debate or the integrity of our public officials.
    It measures neither our wit nor our courage,
    neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our
    compassion nor our devotion to our country, it
    measures everything in short except that which
    makes life worth while.
  • Robert Kennedy

19
The policy making processPolicy making is the
process by which governments translate their
political vision into programmes and actions to
deliver desired changes in the real world.
  • Evidence but one input into policy process

Self interest
Values/ beliefs
Campaign promises
Ideology
Judgement
Tradition
Lobbies
Expert views
Acceptability to public
Experience
Resource constraints
20
  • There is nothing a government hates more
    than to be well-informed for it makes the
    process of arriving at decisions much more
    complicated and difficult.
  • John Maynard Keynes

21
What is evidence?
  • Expert knowledge published research existing
    statistics stakeholder consultations previous
    policy evaluations the Internet outcomes from
    consultations costings of policy output from
    economic and statistical modelling. UK Cabinet
    Office 1999
  • Scientific, rigorous, critically appraised, well
    documented
  • Fit for purpose
  • Beware policy-based evidence?
  • Unbiased (note problems of publication bias)
  • But data are never value free

22
All scientific evidence is imperfect.
  • The absence of excellent evidence does not
    make evidence-based decision making impossible
    what is required is the best evidence available
    not the best evidence possible
  • Muir Gray 1997
  • Evidence rarely provides neat and tidy
    prescriptions to decision makers as to what they
    should do. Often it generates more questions to
    be resolved
  • Petrosino et al 2001

23
Evidence should be based on experiments
  • Adrian Smith Mad cows and ecstasy choice or
    chance in evidence-based society
  • Experiments used too little in social and
    economic research
  • Rich data from different sources
  • There is a need to shift goalposts as to the
    definition of robustness so that it becomes more
    inclusive of quantifiable quantitative research.
    Only this can ensure that social issues do not
    remain confined to anecdotal boxes, but provide
    information of equal comparability in poverty
    assessments
  • Claus Moser

24
Challenges for statisticians
  • increase understanding of the policy process,
    where and how evidence can feed into it (eg
    SPATS)
  • improve interpretation and communication of data
    particularly in relation to uncertainty
  • speak the language of policy makers
  • forge strong relationships with policy analysts,
    increase number of policy analysts
  • combine humility and confidence
  • improve training for statisticians
  • (International Research Forum on statistical
    reasoning, thinking and literacy
    http//www.srtl.stat.auckland.ac.nz)

25
Particular challenges with respect to timing
  • collection of quality data takes time
  • demand for quick fixes means that policy makers
    often do not have time for in-depth research
  • Demands by Ministers are short term, quick fix
    solutions rather than major carefully considered
    strategic initiatives (Bullock et al)
  • yet to be effective the research strategy needs
    to look beyond the timescales of one government
  • many issues are chronic beware unwarranted
    impatience (Boruch)

26
Evidence compilations example initiatives
  • Data archives
  • Cochrane collaboration
  • Campbell collaboration
  • National Library of Health
  • African Programme on Rethinking Development
    Economics
  • Communities of practice

27
Joint Marrakech Memorandum
  • Affirm a commitment to fostering a global
    partnership on managing for development results.
    Awareness is growing that getting better
    development results requires management systems
    and capacities that put results at the center of
    planning, implementation and evaluation. We
    need to align cooperation programs with desired
    country results, define the expected contribution
    of our support to country outcomes and rely on
    and strengthen countries monitoring and
    evaluation systems to track progress and assess
    outcomes better distil the lessons of
    countries experiences and disseminate knowledge
    about what gets results in different country
    contexts.

28
Evidence base urgently needed in developing
countries
  • Problems are severe and urgent
  • Need ownership by countries
  • and to empower them
  • Develop policies which are relevant to their
    needs
  • and ensure effective implementation
  • Need to counteract corruption
  • Paucity of data is a major obstacle
  • Lack of recognition /acceptance of much data

29
C.Scott for Paris 21Use of good statistics
having a positive effect on policy
  • Uganda
  • Poor public service delivery caused by
    governments failure to ensure that budgeted
    funds reached front line agencies
  • Brazil and Mexico
  • Tackled child poverty and education by a
    programme to give child benefits to mothers
    according to the attendance of their children in
    school (experimental research)

30
C.Scott for Paris 21Absence of data or failure
to use available information has negative effect
on policy making
  • Malawi
  • Data from Save the Children on child malnutrition
    disregarded by government because of conflict
    with crop data
  • Botswana
  • Deficiencies in data on HIV/AIDS (from sentinel
    surveillance systems) legitimised the rejection
    of the message on the scale of the problem

31
Current challenge in policy development in poor
countries
  • Development literature of the 1990s dominated by
    the view that growth is central to any strategy
    aimed at poverty reduction.
  • Since modified not growth per se but structure
    of growth that matters.
  • Further recognised that income inequality matters
    when making progress on poverty reduction.
  • Example Nigeria
  • Aigbokhan asks why the rate of poverty is so high
    in Nigeria despite the strong growth performance
    and concludes it is because of a lack of explicit
    concern with inequality in public policy. He
    analyses data on Nigeria and on other countries
    for comparative purposes to argue that if growth
    occurs in the sectors that require skills that
    the poor of Nigeria do not possess although the
    economy grows it has little impact on poverty
    reduction.

32
conclusions
  • Overview of evidence-based policy
  • Question for us as to whether this is rhetoric or
    reality ?
  • Policy people still often pay lip service to
    evidence and evaluation Bullock et al
  • How can we work together to ensure that policies
    are as well as being well-intentioned are
    well-informed and transparent?
  • Our aims to develop a strategic vision, an
    honest assessment of progress and an
    institutional flexibility to adapt to new
    information.

33
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com