The Power of Information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Power of Information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture

Description:

The Power of Information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture. Ritva Reinikka ... schools do not necessarily buy their own newspaper ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: sven4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Power of Information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture


1
The Power of Information Evidence from a
newspaper campaign to reduce capture
  • Ritva Reinikka
  • Development Research Group (DRG)
  • The World Bank
  • Jakob Svensson
  • IIES Stockholm
  • University and DRG

2
The standard anti-corruption project
  • Relies on legal and financial institutions ?
    judiciary, police, financial auditors ? for
    better policies of accountability
  • But in many poor countries, these institutions
    are weak and among the most corrupt.
  • few recent examples of successful efforts to
    combat corruption and capture in public programs.

3
A complementary approach
  • Takes the expected users of public services as a
    starting point
  • Rather than increasing accountability from above,
    the idea is to enhance client power
  • That is, to empower citizens to demand certain
    standards, monitor and challenge the abuse of
    institutions, systems, and officials with whom
    they interact in their daily lives

4
An unusual policy experiment
  • An information campaign in Uganda to reduce local
    capture of education funds by empowering schools
    (parents) to monitor local officials handling of
    a large school-grant program
  • MOF/MOLG publish monthly transfers of capitation
    grants to districts in newspapers
  • Subsequently notices on actual receipts of funds
    posted at all schools
  • We exploit this policy experiment to study the
    effects of increased public access to information
    as a tool to reduce capture and corruption

5
Public expenditure tracking survey (PETS)
  • A public expenditure tracking survey of primary
    schools had revealed extensive capture of a
    capitation grant intended for schools
  • on average schools received only 20 of their
    entitlements in 1995 (Reinikka and Svensson 2004)
  • A repeat PETS in 2001

6
Key features of relationship of accountability
7
Short and long route of accountability
8
Capitation Grant Program
  • A national program that prescribes a set amount
    of funds to each student.
  • Local (district) offices used as distribution
    channels (opportunity to capture the funds)
  • PETS compares data of releases of funds (from
    central ministry) with school survey data on
    receipts

9
Effects of increased public access to information
10
Effects of increased public access to information
  • Problem not able to observe what would happen to
    a school in both the state where it is informed
    of its entitlements and that where it is not
  • Problem is compounded by the fact that the
    information campaign non-exclusive
  • Intuitively, schools with access to newspapers
    are more extensively exposed to the information
    campaign
  • Treatment group schools having access to at
    least one of the main newspapers

11
Can the policy changes in the late 1990s explain
the improvement?
  • Compare schools pre- and post-campaign
    situations, controlling for school-specific
    effects like income, quality of the school staff,
    school size

12
Can the policy changes in the late 1990s explain
the improvement?
13
Difference-in-differences estimation
14
Newspapers and knowledge
  • If newpaper access were a valid proxy of better
    access to information, schools with access to
    newspapers should be more informed about the
    program.
  • Exploit data on a simple knowledge test of head
    teachers to test this prediction.

15
Newspapers and knowledge
16
Outcome across schools with and without access to
newspapers
  • Concern newspaper access endogenous
  • control for initial outcomes (including
    unobserved school specific fixed effects)
  • schools do not necessarily buy their own
    newspaper
  • access to newspapers determined by logistical
    factors outside the school/community's control
  • School may be well informed about the program
    even if it lacks a newspaper, if parents have one
  • Treatment group is not homogeneous
  • access to newspapers varies

17
Instrument for the exposure to the newspaper
campaign
  • Distance to the nearest newspaper outlet.
  • Valid instrument?
  • must affect the schools exposure to new
    information about the grant program but have no
    direct effect on the its ability to claim funds
    from the district
  • distance to the nearest newspaper outlet captures
    the cost and ease of accessing a newspaper
    correlated both with the schools and the
    communitys likelihood of being exposed

18
Instrumental variable estimation
  • Strong relationship between distance to the
    nearest newspaper outlet and reduction in capture
    since the newspaper campaign started in contrast
    to the earlier period
  • Group effects
  • Externalities in learning about the grant program
  • Local officials may not be able to distinguish
    whether school is informed about its entitlement

19
Conclusion
  • Provision of mass information, a cheap
    intervention, allowed Uganda dramatically to
    reduce local capture of a public program aimed at
    increasing primary education
  • Because poor people were less able than others to
    claim their entitlement from district officials
    before the campaign, but just as likely in 2001,
    they benefited most from it.
  • Several countries have initiated similar
    capitation grant programs
  • Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Cambodia
  • The results suggest that policies to inform and
    empower the end-users should be an integral part
    of the school grant programs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com