Are Biofuels the Answer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Are Biofuels the Answer

Description:

Are they more environmentally friendly than the fossil fuels they will replace? What are the unintended consequences of promoting biofuels on a national level? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: catheri79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Are Biofuels the Answer


1
Are Biofuels the Answer?
  • By Catherine Clark
  • Econ 539 Presentation 2

2
Main Research Questions
  • Will biofuels allow the U.S. to be energy
    independent?
  • Are they more environmentally friendly than the
    fossil fuels they will replace?
  • What are the unintended consequences of promoting
    biofuels on a national level?

3
What is a biofuel?
  • A biofuel is any biomass (feedstock) that can be
    turned into liquid fuel.
  • Ex. Corn has cellulosic material that is
    separated and processed to make ethanol.
  • Ex. Soybeans are broken down into alcohol which
    is then converted to biodiesel.

4
What is the Current U.S. Policy?
  • 14 Provisions in the EPAct 2005 involve subsidies
    for biofuels.
  • The act encourages the USDA, DOE, EPA to
    partner to create a biofuel that will be
    commercially available and priced competitively
    with petroleum fossil fuel.
  • Other policy goals include moving to a fuel
    source that is less polluting than fossil fuel.

5
Review of the Literature
  • Hill et al. (2006) determined using life cycle
    analysis that corn ethanol is more polluting than
    just fossil fuels when mixed at high quantities
    for CO, VOC, PM10, SOx, NOx.
  • They also determined that soybean biodiesel is
    less polluting than diesel for VOC, CO, PM10, and
    SOx.
  • If we use all of the corn and soybeans grown to
    make fuel we could cover 2.4 and 2.9 U.S.
    ethanol and biofuel demand.

6
Efficiency of Some Feedstocks
7
What about using marginal lands?
  • Walsh et al. (2003) determined at a farmgate
    price of 1.83 per Giga Joule of energy, farmers
    with Conservation Reserve Program lands would
    benefit from growing biofuel crops instead of
    traditional crops.
  • Schneider and McCarl (2003) furthered this study
    to determine biofuels were the best way to
    mitigate excess carbon emissions if carbon sold
    for 70/ton.

8
Other Options
  • Jaeger et al. concludes that a gas tax or raising
    CAFE standards is a cheaper way to mitigate green
    house gas emissions than producing biofuels.

9
Concerns With the Literature
  • It does not take into account excess pesticide or
    fertilizer use in growing crops.
  • It does not take into account how food supply
    will be affected when farmers are encouraged to
    sell traditional food commodities at higher
    prices to produce biofuels instead.

10
Conclusion
  • Can biofuels make the U.S. energy independent?
    No. The best we can hope for is less dependence
    of foreign oil.
  • Are biofuels better for the environment than
    fossil fuels? We are not sure, but this is
    certainly not the cheapest way to reduce green
    house gas emissions.
  • Who is benefiting from the (politically
    attractive) billions of dollars currently
    subsidizing biofuels?
  • You be the judge of that.

11
If you would like to learn more
  • Aden, Andy, Rovert Wooley, and Mark Yancey.
    (2000). Oregon Biomass-to-Ethanol Project
    Pre-feasibility Study and Modeling Results. NREL
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory Publication.
  • Hill, Jason, Erik Nelson, David Tilman, Stephen
    Polasky, and Douglas Tiffany. (2006).
    Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and
    Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
    103(30), 11206-11210.
  • Jaeger, William K., Robin Cross, and Thorsten M.
    Egelkraut. Biofuel Potential in Oregon
    Background and Evaluation of Options. Forthcoming
    to Oregon State University Press.
  • Kemppainen, Amber J. and David R. Shonnard.
    (2005). Comparative Life-Cycle Assessments for
    Biomass-to-Ethanol Production from Different
    Regional Feedstocks. Biotechnology Progress,
    21(4), 1075-1084.
  • Kim, Seungdo and Bruce E. Dale. (2005). Life
    Cycle Assessment of Various Cropping Systems
    Utilized for Producing Biofuels Bioethanol and
    Biodiesel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, 426-439.
  • Schneider, Uwe A., and Bruce A. McCarl. (2003).
    Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for
    Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation. Environmental
    and Resource Economics, 24, 291-312.
  • Walsh, Marie E., Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte,
    Hosein Shapouri, and Stephen P. Slinsky. (2003).
    Bioenergy Crop Production in the United States.
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, 313-333.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com