Workshop feedback - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Workshop feedback

Description:

of Vendor Countries and Countries Embarking on Nuclear Power Programmes to ... S.calpena_at_iaea.org (Stephane CALPENA) Division of Nuclear Installation Safety ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: coblentzl
Learn more at: https://www-pub.iaea.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Workshop feedback


1
Workshop feedbackRoles Responsibilitiesof
Vendor Countries and Countries Embarking on
Nuclear Power Programmes to ensure Long-term
Safety
  • S.calpena_at_iaea.org (Stephane CALPENA)
  • Division of Nuclear Installation Safety

2
OUTLINE
  • INTRODUCTION
  • WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • CONCLUSIONS

3
INTRODUCTION GLOBAL CONTEXT
  • Renewed interest for nuclear energy
  • Growth estimate from 20 to 100 by 2030
  • Different country situations
  • Countries having never stopped NPP construction,
  • Countries having stopped construction but willing
    to resume soon,
  • Nuclear power Newcomers

4
INTRODUCTION WHAT DOES THE IAEA DO?
  • GLOBAL GUIDANCE
  • MILESTONES in the Development of a National
    Infrastructure for Nuclear Power, NE series guide
    NG-G-3.1, September 2007
  • CONSIDERATION to launch a nuclear power
    programme , Brochure March 2007
  • SAFETY STANDARDS
  • SF-1 Fundamental Safety Principles
  • Requirements and guides
  • Governmental and Regulatory framework
  • Safety culture and Management
  • Engineering safety
  • Operation

5
INTRODUCTION WHAT DOES THE IAEA DO?
  • SERVICES
  • Global guidance at early stages
  • Facilitating competence building (staffing,
    identification of training needs, training)
  • Assessment of the current status of the
    Governmental and regulatory framework and
    recommendations (Laws, regulations, rules and
    Regulatory Bodys activities)
  • Expert missions to review design aspects,
    feasibility study, site survey, site evaluation,
    construction, commissioning and operation
  • Peers reviews to assess Safety Standards uses

6
OUTLINE
  • INTRODUCTION
  • WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • CONCLUSIONS

7
WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • WORKSHOP CONCEPT
  • To collect lessons learned from past experiences
    of first NPP implementations
  • To collect information from all stakeholders
  • Recipient Countries and Vendor Countries
  • Regulators, Vendors, Operators, TSOs


8
WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • CASES SELECTED TO COLLECT PAST EXPERIENCE AND
    LESSONS LEARNED
  • FRANCE exporting nuclear power technology to
    CHINA
  • CHINA exporting to PAKISTAN
  • RUSSIA exporting to FINLAND and IRAN
  • USA exporting to MEXICO and SPAIN
  • CANADA exporting to ROMANIA
  • IN EACH CASE, PRESENTATIONS OF THE MAIN
    STAKEHOLDERS REGULATORS VENDORS, OPERATORS, and
    TSOs.


9
WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • Additional presentations
  • The benefits to join Conventions
  • IAEA guidance and services for countries
    considering new build
  • INSAG insight
  • UK Nuclear Power privatization issues
  • UK Regulatory Body to liaise with potential NPP
    vendors before bidding.
  • The Indian experience
  • Synthesis of questionnaires filled in by 26
    countries and WANO


10
WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • 1-3 JULY 2008
  • VIENNA
  • MORE THAN 100 PERSONS FROM 45 COUNTRIES
  • CHAIRMAN Mr. André-Claude LACOSTE


11
OUTLINE
  • INTRODUCTION
  • WORKSHOP ORGANISATION
  • CONCLUSIONS

12
CONCLUSIONS
  • Embarking on a Nuclear Power Program is a complex
    process
  • Development of Governmental, legal and
    regulatory infrastructure
  • Training and expertise development of Regulator,
    Operator and TSOs
  • Past experience has confirmed that about 15 years
    are necessary before starting the first NPP
  • Nuclear Safety remains a national responsibility
  • No possible delegation
  • Necessary ownership and commitment

13
CONCLUSIONS
  • Nuclear newcomers should sign and apply relevant
    treaties and conventions including civil
    liability for nuclear damage
  • Vendor countries have some moral responsibilities
    and common interest. They should contribute to
    create an adequate safety infrastructure in
    recipient countries. The IAEA should support this
  • Convention of Nuclear Safety could be used to
    share steps and actions for transferring safely
    nuclear technology to newcomers

14
CONCLUSIONS
  • International leverage should be enhanced by the
    IAEA, bilateral and multilateral arrangements,
    MDEP
  • IAEA safety and guides for countries embarking on
    nuclear power should be enhanced or developed
  • IAEA tailored review services (IRRS, OSART)
    should be prerequisite at different stages of
    newcomers development.

15
CONCLUSIONS
  • Similar workshop to be repeated in 18 months
  • Gathering all parties of vendor countries and
    newcomers
  • focused on newcomers presentations about their
    situation, challenges and difficulties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com