Seria%20I:%20%20Studenci%20IV-go%20roku%20%20G - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Seria%20I:%20%20Studenci%20IV-go%20roku%20%20G

Description:

... Dane geotechniczne niezb dne do projektowania Podsumowanie najwa niejszych klasyfikacji masywu skalnego Terzaghi, RQD, RMR and Q Mniej polecane: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: RichardBi6
Category:
Tags: 20g | 20i | 20iv | 20studenci | 20roku | seria

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Seria%20I:%20%20Studenci%20IV-go%20roku%20%20G


1
Seria I Studenci IV-go roku GÓRNICTWO I
GEOLOGIA Akademia Górniczo -
Hutnicza
Kraków 23. X. 2010
Projektowanie filarów i stropów w
górnictwie wegla

Prof. Zdzislaw Bieniawski Bieniawski
Design Enterprises, USA
2
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Dane geotechniczne niezbedne do projektowania
  • Podsumowanie najwazniejszych klasyfikacji masywu
    skalnego
  • Terzaghi, RQD, RMR and Q
  • Mniej polecane GSI
  • Dziesiec Przykazan dla uzywania RMR i Q
  • Nowa Austriacka Metoda budowania Tuneli
  • Oszacowanie wlasnosci masywów skalnych

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Nowa Austriacka Metoda Tunelowa NATM
  • RMR NATM (2004 ÖNORM B2203) Q
  • 80 100 Class I (80-100) A1
    Strong/stable gt100
  • 60 80 Good II (65-80) A2
    Loosening/Block failure 10 100
  • 50 60 Fair IIIa (58-65)
    B1 Friable/Low stress failure 4 10
  • 40 50 IIIb (45-58)
    B2 Deep stress failure 1 4
  • 20 40 Poor IV (29-45) B3
    Rock pressure 0.1 1
  • 10 20 Va (20-29)
    C1 Shear failure 0.01
    0.1
  • 0 10 Vb (5-20)
    C2 Ravelling, flowing lt 0.01
  • over
    L1 Soil, high cohesion
  • V
    L2 Soil, slight cohesion

New ref Austrian Society for Geomechanics, 2008
Draft
7
Palmström and Singh, 2001
8
(No Transcript)
9
Odksztalcenie masywu skalnego
Modul EM (GPa)
Galera 2008 EM Elab
e(RMR - 100)/36      
10
Rock Mass Strength (MPa)
sMASS sc (intact) e(RMR - 100)/24
Kalamaras 1995
Galera 2008 EMASS E
intacte(RMR - 100)/36 dlatego EM
sM Ei sc    
2/3
11
Kalamaras, 1995
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Praktyczne zastosowaniaKlasyfikacji w Górnictwie
  • M-RMR (Laubscher and Taylor, 1975)
  • Mod.RMR (Newman and Bieniawski, 1981)
  • MBRMR (Cummings and Kendorski, 1982)
  • Coal Mining RMR (Unal, 1983)
  • Indian Coal RMR (CMRS, 1986)
  • Coal Mine Roof Rating (Molinda and Mark, 1994)
  • Weak Rock RMR (Unal, 1996)
  • Deutsche Steinkohle klasifikacion (Witthaus,
    2006)

15
MBR (Mining Basic RMR) system Kendorski et
al A rock mass classification for caving mine
design, RETC, 1983, p.193
16
Conclusions
  • Place rock mass classifications within the
    overall engineering design methodology and
    process
  • Observe the Ten Commandments for use of rock mass
    classifications
  • For best engineering practice, exchange
    experience between tunnelling and mining
    projects.

17
Literatura
  • Alber, M (1996)
  • Classifying TBM contracts. Tunnels
    Tunneling Int., December, p.41.
  • Aksoy, C O (2008)
  • Review of Rock Mass Rating classification.
    Journal of Mining Science, v. 44, no. 1, p.51.
  • Barton, N and Bieniawski, Z T (2008)
  • RMR and Q Setting records straight.
    Tunnels Tunnelling Int., February, p 26.
  • Bieniawski, Z T (1997)
  • Quo Vasis Rock Mass Classifications.
    Felsbau, v. 15, no. 3, June, p.177.
  • Bieniawski, Z T (1992)
  • Design Methodology in Rock Engineering
    Theory, Education and practice. A A Balkema
    Publishers, Rotterdam, 198p.
  • Jakubec, J and Esterhuizen, G S (2007)
  • Use of mining rock mass rating
    classification. NIOSH Info. Cir. IC 9498, ed C
    Mark, p.73.
  • Kalamaras, G and Bieniawski, Z T (1995)

18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com