Interpretation of the Raman spectra of graphene and carbon nanotubes: the effects of Kohn anomalies and non-adiabatic effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interpretation of the Raman spectra of graphene and carbon nanotubes: the effects of Kohn anomalies and non-adiabatic effects

Description:

... and carbon nanotubes: the effects of Kohn anomalies and non-adiabatic effects ... Cambridge University Engineering Department: Centre for Advanced Photonics and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: SP77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interpretation of the Raman spectra of graphene and carbon nanotubes: the effects of Kohn anomalies and non-adiabatic effects


1
Interpretation of the Raman spectra of graphene
and carbon nanotubes the effects of Kohn
anomalies and non-adiabatic effects
S. Piscanec Cambridge University Engineering
Department Centre for Advanced Photonics and
Electronics, Cambridge, UK
2
G-band in graphite and nanotubes
Graphite one single sharp G peak corresponding
to q?0, mode E2g
  • Nanotubes
  • Two main bands, G and G-.
  • Modes derived from graphite E2g
  • Metallic ? semiconducting

3
Common interpretation curvature
Jorio et al. PRB 65, 155412 (2002)
G no diameter dependence ? LO axial
G- diameter dependence ? TO circumferential
4
Common interpretation Fano resonance
  • In metallic tubes the G- peak is
  • Downshifted
  • Broader
  • Depends on diameter
  • Interpretation
  • Fano resonance
  • Phonon-Plasmon interaction

Electron-phonon coupling and Kohn anomalies have
to be considered
5
Kohn anomalies
  • Atomic vibrations are screened by electrons
  • In a metal this screening abruptly changes for
    vibrations associated to certain q points of the
    Brillouin zone.
  • Kink in the phonon dispersions Kohn anomaly.
  • Graphite is a semi-metal
  • Nanotubes are folded graphite
  • Nanotubes can as well be metallic

6
Kohn anomalies when?
Everything depends on the geometry of the Fermi
surface
q phonon wavevector k electron wavevector
  1. k1 k2 k1q on the Fermi surface
  2. Tangents to the Fermi surface at k1 and k2 k1
    q are parallel
  • W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 393 (1959) bold

7
Kohn anomalies in graphite
  • Graphite is a semi metal
  • Fermi surface 2 points K and K 2 K

K
K
p
E
G
G
G
EF
G
p
Kohn Anomalies for
8
Kohn anomalies in graphite
IXS data J. Maultzsch et al. Phys. Rev. Lett.
92, 075501 (2004)
E2g
A1
E2g
  • 2 sharp kinks for modes E2g at G and A1 at K

Kohn Anomaly
EPC ? 0
9
Kohn anomalies in nanotubes
Metallic tubes same geometrical conditions as
graphite
  • Metallic tubes two Giant Kohn anomalies predicted
  • Semi-conducting tubes NO Kohn anomalies predicted

10
Metallic tubes LO-TO splitting
  • TO
  • Circumferential
  • No KA
  • ? G
  • LO
  • Axial
  • strong EPC
  • ? G-

Opposite Interpretation
10
11
Dynamic Effects
  • Frozen phonons
  • Finite differences
  • Density functional perturbation theory

Rely on Born-Oppenheimer approximation electrons
see fixed ions
Static approaches
For 3D crystals this is 100 OK
This is no longer true for 1D systems
  • The dynamic nature of phonons can be taken into
    account
  • Beyond Born-Oppenheimer

12
Dynamic effects in nanotubes
  • KA_at_LO smeared
  • New KA_at_TO
  • LO increased
  • TO decreased

13
Dynamic effects
Phonons are not static deformations
  • T increases
  • KA_at_LO weaker
  • KA_at_TO no changes
  • d increases
  • KA_at_LO weaker
  • KA_at_TO weaker
  • KA_at_LO smeared
  • New KA_at_TO

14
LO and TO frequencies
15
Th Vs Exp Room Temperature
  • Metallic tubes
  • G-?LO G?TO
  • Semiconducting tubes
  • G- ?TO G ?LO
  • Fermi golden rule
  • EPC? FWHM(G-)

16
Interpretation of Raman spectra
TO circumferential
LO axial
  • Semiconducting
  • LO-TO splitting ? curvature
  • G ? axial
  • G- ? circumferential

TO circumferential
LO axial
  • Metallic
  • LO-TO splitting ? Kohn an.
  • G ? circumferential
  • G- ? axial (KA)
  • FWHM(G-) ? EPC
  • G- interpretation EPC and not
  • Phonon-plasmon resonance

Piscanec et al. PRB (2007)
17
G- band Vs T experiments
  • Metallic SWNTs
  • Dielectrophoresis
  • HiPCo SWNTs (Houston), d1.1nm
  • Vpp 20 V and f3MHz
  • Raman Spectroscopy
  • ? 514 nm (resonant with semicon.)
  • ? 633 nm (resonant with metallic)
  • Linkam stage 80K lt T lt 630K

Krupke et al. Science 301, 344 (2003)
18
G- band Vs T experiments
  • Semiconducting tubes G - G- constant ?
    Anharmonicity
  • Metallic tubes G - G- increases with T ? ???
    (EPC)

19
Th Vs Exp Temperature Dependence
Metallic tubes from R. Krupke
20
Conclusions
  • Measurement of the Raman G-band Vs T
  • Metallic tubes from dielecrophoresis
  • Semiconducting tubes ? G - G- constant
  • Metallic tubes ? G - G- changes with T
  • Kohn anomalies and electron phonon coupling and
    dynamic effects
  • Interpretation of G-band in SWNTs Raman spectra
  • Explanation of the T-dependence of the G- in
    metallic SWNTs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com