WHY STUDY ORGANIZATION THEORY? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

WHY STUDY ORGANIZATION THEORY?

Description:

WHY STUDY ORGANIZATION THEORY? Chapter 1 Mary Jo Hatch with Ann L. Cunliffe Table 1.1 Some Applications of Organization Theory Structuring activities and designing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2378
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: KateH158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WHY STUDY ORGANIZATION THEORY?


1
WHY STUDY ORGANIZATION THEORY?
  • Chapter 1

Mary Jo Hatch with Ann L. Cunliffe
2
Table 1.1 Some Applications of Organization
Theory
  • Structuring activities and designing
    organizational processes to
  • Strategy/Finance Support goal achievement
    performance monitoring.
  • Marketing Align the organization its brand
    strategy.
  • Information Align information flows with work
    processes
  • Technology outcomes.
  • Operations Support value chain management.
  • Human Resources Provide a basis for HRM
    activities,organizational
  • development change.
  • Communication Design effective communication
    processes.

3
A theory . . .
  • consists of a set of concepts and the
    relationships that tie them together into a
    coherent explanation or understanding of the
    phenomenon of interest

4
Cultural Studies
Literary Theory
Poststructural Philosophy
Postmodern Architecture
Linguistics
Semiotics and Hermeneutics
Folklore Studies
Cultural Anthropology
Social Psychology
Biology-Ecology
Political Science
Sociology
Engineering
Economics
PREHISTORY 1900-1950s
MODERN 1960s 70s
SYMBOLIC- INTERPRETIVE 1980s
POSTMODERN 1990s
Smith (1776) Marx (1867) Durkheim(1893) Taylor
(1911) Follett (1918) Fayol (1919) Weber
(1924) Gulick (1937) Barnard (1938)
Von Bertalanffy (1950) Trist Bamforth
(1951) Boulding (1956) March Simon (1958) Emery
(1960) Burns Stalker (1961) Woodward
(1965) Lawrence Lorsch (1967) Thompson (1967)
Schutz (1932) Whyte (1943) Selznick
(1949) Goffman (1959) Gadamer (1960) Berger
Luckmann (1966) Weick (1969) Geertz
(1973) Clifford Marcus (1986)
Saussure (1959) Foucault (1972) Bell
(1973) Jencks (1977) Derrida (1978) Lyotard
(1979) Rorty (1980) Lash Urry
(1987) Baudrillard (1988)
Fig 1.1 Sources of inspiration for organization
theory
5
Theoretical Perspectives
  • Theories linked by similar underlying
    assumptions, logics, and vocabularies.
  • Research adopting similar approaches, methods,
    and ways of theorizing.

6
Theory (built from a selected set of concepts to
explain, understand, criticize or create the
phenomenon of interest)
analysis and association
Concepts (categories for sorting, organizing,
storing information, formed from common features
of specific instances)
abstraction
Phenomena of Interest (what is to be explained,
understood, criticized or created by the theory)
7
Abstraction
  • The process of removing the unique details of
    particular examples so that only their common
    aspects remain.
  • Enables us to process and communicate more
    information.

8
Abstract
All Living Things
Plant
Animal
Reptile
Mammal
Bird
Dog
Cat
Fido
Spot
Phydough
Spought
Concrete
9
Paradigms
  • A set of assumptions and practices that define a
    scientific discipline (Kuhn).
  • A way of seeing and thinking about the world.

10
Why Multiple Perspectives?
  • Help better understand and manage the complexity
    of organizations.
  • Become more aware of the assumptions underlying
    theory and practice and the reasons for doing or
    not doing things.
  • Form a basis for determining pressures to act and
    their relationship to ethical, efficient, and
    socially responsible action.

11
Ontology
  • Ontology concerns our assumptions about reality
    and agency
  • is there an objective reality out there or
    is it subjective,
  • existing only in our minds?
  • are our actions predetermined or do we have
  • freewill?

12
Epistemology
  • Epistemology is concerned with knowledge
  • how we generate knowledge
  • what constitutes good knowledge
  • how we represent or describe reality

13
Comparing Ontologies
  • Objectivism the belief in an objective,
    external
  • reality that exists independently of
  • our knowledge of it.
  • Subjectivism the belief that knowledge of the
  • world is subjective and that social
  • reality only exists when we
  • experience it and give it meaning.

14
Comparing Epistemologies
  • Positivism we can discover Truth through the
  • scientific measurement and
  • validation of behavior systems.
  • Interpretivism all knowledge is relative to
    the
  • knower can only be understood
  • from the point of view of individuals
    who are directly involved truth is socially
    constructed.

15
Modernist Perspective
  • Objectivist ontology
  • Positivist epistemology
  • Organizations are real,
  • rational entities and
  • systems
  • Organization theorists focus on finding
    universal laws governing system
    behavior, rational structures,
    standardized procedures

16
Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective
  • Subjectivist ontology
  • Interpretivist epistemology
  • Organizations are communities, socially
    constructed in everyday interactions
  • Organization theorists study how people
    create and give meaning to their
    experience of organizational life

17
Postmodern Perspective
  • Ontology - the social world is created
    through language discourse
  • Epistemology - there is no Truth
  • knowledge power are interwoven
  • Organizations are texts - sites of power
    relations, marginalization, and play
  • Organization theorists deconstruct destabilize
    ideologies rational forms of organizing
    encourage a reflexive questioning of taken
    for granted assumptions practices

18
Poststructuralist Ideas
Power
Privileged
Knowledge
Other knowledge
Binary
19
Environment
Culture
Social
Physical
Structure
Structure
Technology
Fig. 1.2 A Conceptual Model Of Organization.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com