ADF capability management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

ADF capability management

Description:

Title: ADF capability management Author: malcolm.tutty Last modified by: Malcolm Tutty Created Date: 5/13/2010 1:35:18 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:153
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: malc185
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ADF capability management


1
Experimentation of Complex, Adaptive Aerospace
Mission Capabilities - An International Code of
Best Practice for TE Experimentation Spousal
Family of Systems Parable
Wing Commander Malcolm G. Tutty MEng, CPEng,
FRAeS, FIE(Aust) UniSA DASI PhD Candidate / HQSRG
SO1TC Air malcolm.tutty_at_defence.gov.au /
www.maltutty.com Use visitor / Maven1
Si ego Certiorem Faciam, Mihi Tu Delendus Eris
the Greek Goddess of Chaos! Homer
2
The FICS FOC Effectors
  • FICS Fundamental Inputs to Capability
  • Driven by OCDs Conops
  • Personnel
  • Organisation
  • Collective Training
  • Major Systems
  • Supplies
  • Facilities Training Areas
  • Command Management
  • User perspectives at all levels
    (Sqn/Wing/Group/HQs) need to be identified and
    argued for ...

FOC Effectors - Fundamental Outputs of
Capability Results expected of the Conops
... SIPOC Critical Operational/Technical
Issues Measures Of Effectiveness Measures Of
Performance IVV Rate of Effort Preparedness
both readiness sustainment Interoperability
with other SoS? Question/Observation How many
Conops do you have/need, really?
3
Technology / Systems Readiness Levels
1 Basic principle observed and reported. Studies or initial investigations undertaken.
2 Technology concept and/or application formulated. Potential applications have been identified.
3 Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept. RD has been initiated, work towards validating the concept done.
4 Component and/or breadboard validation in lab environment. The basic elements of the system/ product have been integrated to show they will work.
5 Components and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment. A higher fidelity validation of the system/ product in a realistic environment.
6 System/sub-system model or prototype demonstration in a relevant and or realistic environment.
7 System prototype demonstration in operational environment. Prototype demonstrated. Productionisation can commence.
8 Actual system completed and mission qualified through test and demonstration. Actual system/ product has been successfully tested/ qualified.
9 Actual system proven through successful mission operations. Actual system/ product has been successfully fielded.
4
Complex Capability Management Model- Lust to
Dust Methodology
CAPABILITY IDENTIFIED
CAPABILITY DEFINITION-ACQUISITION
INTRODUCTION INTO SERVICE
CAPABILITY MAINTAINED
CAPMGR ORD MET? Y / N
P W D 10
CONOPS / OCD REQT DEFN 0
INTRO INTO SERVICE
VEHICLE SYSTEMS SPO(s) ACQN SYST
ENG (Acft-Msn Cap EDP / Sim Survey) 2
CONOPS REQT ACHIEVED MAINTAINED 9
EXPERIMENTN 1
Follow-on OTE(s) 7
Developmental TE 3
ONGOING IN-SERVICE Tactics, Techniques
Procedures EXPERIMENTATION 8
Qualification TE 4
Acceptance TE 5
Initial OTE 6
5
Proposed Case Studies
  • F-111 AGM-142 Demo and DMO win/fail/win
  • P-3 MU90 Light Weight Torpedo fail
  • P-3 EO/IR SSHD TCDL win/win
  • Classic Hornet - JDAMER fail/win
  • Classic JDAM/JDAMER/JSOW wins
  • Tiger ARH AGM-114 Hellfire wins
  • Joint Fires (JTAC) and Danger Close impact wins
    and future criticality
  • Develop Spousal FoS Capability

6
Spousal Capability a FoS parable!
  • The power to achieve a desired operational effect
    in a nominated environment, within a specified
    time, and to sustain that effect for a designated
    period.
  • Conops To see, experience change the world for
    the better (world peace / hunger / control
    (Pinky) solved) with a friend and lover until
    Death (Planned Withdrawal Date) with at least 2.6
    children with an online availability of daily
    missions
  • FICS Fundamental Inputs to Capability
  • - Driven by Conops, of course!
  • a. Personnel sensuous sultry wife fun kids,
    wider families.
  • Organisation wife family, decentralised
    parents.
  • Collective training marriage, schools, Uni,
    entertainment, Swingers Club ??.
  • Major Systems Home Ent, Cars, Computer Avatar
    LVC Sim, Guns, power, ...
  • e. Supplies Alcohol, Food Markets, Financial,
    contraception ...
  • Facilities and Training Areas House, Bar,
    holiday home/caravan, shooting range.
  • Support social / financial / ETSA, Gas, water.
  • Command and Management Comms essential (so Im
    told), others?

FOCS - Fundamental Outputs of Capability The
Conops in User perspective ... Scenarios ok be
realistic now SIPOC ... RoE key average
loving/sex / daily / weekly / monthly / yearly
for some SEs? Preparedness readiness
sustainability? COI/CTIs could be interesting
to get agreement on these MOE Ops suitability
Effectiveness!, World Peace or World Hunger
solved, kids in Uni/TAFE, Govt stable
Pop/social/economic betterment MOP Min 2 kids
Max 4... Other Perf measures IVV should be
interesting! Interoperability with other SoS hmm
7
CAPABILITY IDENTIFIED
CAPABILITY DEFINITION - ACQUISITION
INTRODUCTION INTO SERVICE
CAPABILITY MAINTAINED
OUTCOME Female Male configurations that meet
operational suitability, effectiveness and
preparedness criteria!
Girls
Roadmap
To see, experience change the world for the
better (world
peace/hunger/control (Pinky) solved) with a
friend and lover until Death (the
Planned Withdrawal Date) with
at least 2.6 children with an online
availability of daily missions
Boys
Traditionally seen as a System/SoS -gt FoS,
obviously

8
Spousal Capability a FoS parable!
2030 GOALS
2015 GOALS

2045 GOALS
2060 GOALS
2075 GOALS
? FoS - to achieve capability others are involved
in the mission messy, complex, real ? Value
of / How to experiment early with what you have
simulation LVC, -gt 2nd Life / avatars ? Note
that the Conops has more dimensions
Wife 1
Wife 2
Wife 3
Girlfriend 1
Girlfriend 2
Affairs!
You
Boyfriend 1
Husband 2
2000 2015
2030 2045
2060
2075 2100

SCOPE/RD/ORD .1 / .2
Increment / Spiral / P3I
LINKS
ACQUISITION - .3 / .4
YOD
A / IOTE - .5 / .6
FOTE / IOS - .7
PWD
IOC
DELIVERY
IN SERVICE - .8 / .9
9
Spousal Capabilities - coming
sometime soon
  • Dear Tech Support,
  • I have upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband
    1.9 and I noticed a distinct slowdown in the
    overall system performance, particularly in the
    flower and jewellery applications, which operated
    flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.
  • Husband 1.9 uninstalled many other valuable
    programs, such as Romance 9.5 and Personal
    Attention 6.5, and then installed undesirable
    programs such as NEWS 5.0, NOMONEY 3.0
    and FOOTBAL 4.1, Conversation 8.0 no longer runs,
    and Housecleaning 2. 6 simply crashes the system.
  • Please note that I have tried running Nagging
    5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail.
  • What can I do?

9
Unclassified
SETE 2011 Tutty
10
IT Supports Response
  • DEAR Madam,
  • First, keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an
    Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.X is an
    operating system. Please enter command
    ithoughtyoulovedme.Html and try to download Tears
    6.2 and do not forget to install the Guilt
    3.0 update. If that application works as
    designed, Husband1.X should then automatically
    run the applications Jewellery 2.0 and Flowers
    3.5.
  • However, overuse of the above application can
    cause Husband 1.0 to default to Silence
    2.5 or Beer 6.1. Note that Beer 6.1 is a very bad
    program that will download the Snoring Loudly
    Beta.
  • Whatever you do, DO NOT under any circumstances
    install Mother-In-Law 1.0 (it runs
    a virus in the background that will eventually
    seize control of all your system resources) and
    DO NOT attempt to reinstall the Boyfriend
    5.0 program. These are unsupported applications
    and will crash Husband 1.9.
  • In summary, Husband 1.9 is a great, mature
    program, but it does have limited memory and
    cannot learn new applications quickly. You might
    also consider buying additional software to
    improve memory and performance. We
    recommend Cooking 3.0 and Good Looks 7.7.

10
Unclassified
SETE 2011 Tutty
11
Warning
  • A Flight Test Armament Engineer is a person who
    passes as an
    expert on the basis of being able to turn out,
    with prolific fortitude, indefinite strings of
    incomprehensible mathematical figures, calculated
    with micromatic precision from vague assumptions
    which are based on debatable figures taken from
    inconclusive data, carried out
    through forms of problematic
    accuracy by
    persons of doubtful reliability and questionable
    mentality about things designed to kill or negate
    targets and/or non-allies, for the avowed purpose
    of annoying and confounding a hopelessly
    befuddled group of key personnel and who
    may never read the damned reports
    anyway!

11
SETE 2011 Tutty
Unclassified
12
CAS Experimentation 3 Levels of
Abstraction
13
JAIME CODEx Tests
TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view... TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view... TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view... TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view... TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view... TABLE 1. JAIME CODEx FRAMEWORK / TAXONOMY Draft v 0.7 Sphere of Influence of Actor / Problems with compatibility are usually all about the interface(s) / / CoBP has to be evidence based and have a whole of life, learning view...
Scientific / Engineering / Technical Discipline Sub-Discipline 4D Veh, Sensor, C2, Shooter, EW, Ranges ... Time -gt 4D Veh, Sensor, C2, Shooter, EW, Ranges ... Time -gt 4D Veh, Sensor, C2, Shooter, EW, Ranges ... Time -gt 4D Veh, Sensor, C2, Shooter, EW, Ranges ... Time -gt
Scientific / Engineering / Technical Discipline Sub-Discipline Lab / Virtual Constructive MS Analysis 0.-.- Live System Gnd Test - 1.-.- Live System Flt Test - 2.-.- Live In-service Exercise, Trng, RM 3.-.-
Physical Form and Fit -.1.- Fit of Form -.-.1 011 110 (PreProd) 111 (101) 211 flexible struct on acft and store? 311
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- Loads -.-.1 021 120(141) 121(131) 220(252) 221 (200) 321
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- Vibrations -.-.2 022 122 (152) 222 (221) 322
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- Aero-acoustic -.-.3 023 123 (152) 223 (222) 323
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- EMC / EMI -.-.4 024 124 (154) 224 324
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- HERO -.-.5 025 125 (153) 225 224 EW 325
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- Temperature -.-.6 026 126 (155) 226 (223) 326
Physical Victim Safety Structural Environment -.2.- Noise (Aeroacoustics) -.-.7 027 127 227 327
Physical - Victim Safety Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Captive Carriage, Flying /Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance -.3.- Aeroelasticity -.-.1 031 130 (143) 131(142) 232 (210) 331
Physical - Victim Safety Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Captive Carriage, Flying /Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance -.3.- Take-Off, Handling Qualities,( WB) Landing (Carrier) -.-.2 032 132 (120) 230 (251) 231 (230 260) 332
Physical - Victim Safety Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Captive Carriage, Flying /Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance -.3.- Take-Off, Handling Qualities,( WB) Landing (Carrier) -.-.2 032 WB (132) WB 230 (251) 231 (230 260) 332
Physical - Victim Safety Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Captive Carriage, Flying /Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance -.3.- Perf and Drag -.-.3 033 133 (142 Update) 233 (240) 333
Physical - Victim Safety Aerodynamics, Aeroelasticity, Captive Carriage, Flying /Handling Qualities Aircraft Performance -.3.- Endurance -.-.4 ? ? 234 vs 200 (253)
Physical - Victim Safety Employment Jettison -.4.- Separation -.-.1 041 140 (144) 141 (110) Fstream Sep Coeff? 241 (271) (291 or 293?) 341
Physical - Victim Safety Employment Jettison -.4.- Dispense -.-.2 042 142 (162) 242 (272) 342
Physical - Victim Safety Employment Jettison -.4.- Gun Firing -.-.3 043 143 (161) 243 (273) 343
Physical - Victim Safety Employment Jettison -.4.- Launch -.-.4 044 144 (144) 244 (274) 344
Physical - Victim Safety Employment Jettison -.4.- Jettison -.-.5 045 145 (144) 245 (280) 345
14
JAIME CODEx Tests
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function Comms C2 IntraNetworks -.-.1 051 (Lab ?) 151 (Acft) 251 351
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function Sensor System -.-.2 052 152 (102) DT EW / EMC ? 352
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function- Shooter Role In-range envelope VV -.-.3 Ball 053 153 DT 255 (292) 353
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function- Shooter Role In-range envelope VV -.-.3 Ball 053 153 OT 255 (294) OT
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function- Shooter Role In-range envelope VV -.-.3 0PGMs 1PGM 2PGM 3PGM
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Function DE ??? 054 154
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Other Mission ???
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play Range ?? Y Y OT Y
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play FTS ??
Information- Function, States, Modes of Op/Delivery, Vehicle Level / Role/Ballistics OFP Validation Verification Note needs to cover sensor, C2 and shooter... Source Mission Critical Rx Tx ranges 2D / 3D at various security levels -.5.- This is where most MOE/MOPs should come into play RCS / Noise Signatures
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- -1 061 161 261 361
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- -32 0632 1632 2632 3632
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- -33 0633 1633 N/A -
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- -34 / Tacman 0634 1634 2634 3634
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- Msn Planning Tools 06MPS ? 16MPS ? DT OT 256 ? 36
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- EBO Tools 06 EBO? 16EBO?
Cognitive System Level Procedures VV and Human Factors -.6.- Operator 1472 NEO HF ? ? ? ?
Social ie pure SoS / focused on FoS especially C2 -.7.-  Mission SOS -605th SOS 605th SOS 605th ?
Social ie pure SoS / focused on FoS especially C2 -.7.-  TBMCS ... FOS? FOS? FOS ? ?
Social ie pure SoS / focused on FoS especially C2 -.7.-  ...
Social ie pure SoS / focused on FoS especially C2 -.7.-  ....
Social ie pure SoS / focused on FoS especially C2 -.7.-  ....
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com