A low-cost weather/situation monitor for wildland firefighter safety - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

A low-cost weather/situation monitor for wildland firefighter safety

Description:

Title: Montana Burning or How I Spent My Summer Vacation Subject: Computer Graphics aspects of DIRSIG Author: Bob Kremens Last modified by: end user – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: BobK169
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A low-cost weather/situation monitor for wildland firefighter safety


1
A low-cost weather/situation monitor for wildland
firefighter safety
  • Jason Faulring
  • Robert Kremens
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Colin Hardy
  • USDA Rocky Mountain Research Station Firelab

2
The weather/situation monitor came out of the
NASA funded FIRES program that has broad
scientific goals
3
Several generations of fire monitoring devices
have been built or are being designed
  • Generation I Autonomous Fire Detector fire
    detection and position location in a compact
    inexpensive package as a fire alarm. Radio voice
    reporting of alarm condition.
  • Generation II Data logger for ground temperature
    measurements, fire radiant flux and weather
    parameters (wind speed, wind direction, humidity,
    temperature)
  • Generation III Radio linked data as in Gen II
    plus RF video channel (NIR or visible), incident
    light (9 total data channels plus video) (Under
    development, to be deployed Spring 2004)

4
Generation 1 devices were tested fully but not
deployed on wildland / prescribed fires
  • Unit is GPS aware so that it may be deployed
    anywhere
  • Integral radio transmitter with voice synthesizer
    transmits alert on detection of fire
  • Thermistor used to detect rapid temperature rise
  • Proof of concept device, never deployed in an
    actual situation
  • Minimal space, power and price optimizations

5
Generation II devices have been deployed
successfully on fires
  • This unit combines and extends unique features
    and capabilities of several very expensive units
    now used by the FS
  • Remote weather station(RAWS) 12,000
  • IR radiometers 1500 each
  • Alarm/sentry not available
  • Radio reporting of data not available
  • Low cost 300 vs gtgt10,000 for commercial
    units
  • Can be considered expendable

6
In-fire weather is critical to modeling efforts
and firefighter safety
Under 250 so burn-over is OK Measures Wind
Speed, direction Relative humidity Air
temperature Ground/fuel temperature Can record,
transmit data via voice or data link, or transmit
alarms on lookout conditions. Low cost allows
a large number (10) of weather locations to be
measured A- 70 (unit qty.) wind speed/direction
sending head B Data acquisition box (RH, 4
ground temperatures) Transmitter unit mounts
on weather pole
7
Generation III devices will have full radio TX/RX
capability and will be even less expensive and
more compact
  • Major revision and change in architecture
  • Goal optimize size, power, price and usability
  • Move to a larger, more flexible processor with
    more features
  • New development environment speeds prototyping
    enhances functionality
  • Upgraded analog signal processing daughter board
    in production
  • New motherboard design under way, should be in
    production in the Spring of 2004

8
Generation III description / block diagram / costs
  • Utilizing an Atmel ATMEGA128 cheaper (16),
    more I/O more memory
  • Chipcon CC1000 fully programmable radio modem
    5.00 per part and with a 20 amplifier high
    power links can be established
  • Moving to compact flash based storage more
    storage, cheaper universally accepted and used
  • Basic to assembler compiler is feature rich for
    rapidly integrating processor with just about any
    sensor imaginable

9
We obtained data at two fires this summer using
our weather/situation monitors (Gen II)
  • Cooney Ridge Complex fire, Montana wildfire
    27,000 acres
  • Joint experiments with USMC RMSC, UM, UI, others.
  • Measured weather and thermal flux data
  • Continuous over flights with FireMapper camera
  • Ground base MWIR using CE camera system
  • Ecological, biological and plot survey performed
    by RMSC and UI
  • Post burn evaluation by UI and USFS
  • Tenderfoot Research Forest, Lewis and Clark NF
    prescribed burn 100 acres
  • AS ABOVE

10
We measured the surface thermal flux and kinetic
temperature in addition to fire weather parameters
  • Used thermopile to measure surface flux for our
    remote sensing efforts
  • Basically a disposable device (60)
  • Data recorded by logger
  • Thermocouples previously deployed at Albany Pine
    Bush TNC prescribed burn
  • Wind speed, direction using inexpensive weather
    vane on lightweight tripod
  • RH/Temperature sensor MUCH better than Kestral
    (compared to sling hygrometer)

11
We finally deployed on the Cooney ridge fire on
August 30.
  • Almost all the desired experiments were
    performed
  • Continuous aerial over flights (5 minute period
    for 3 hours)
  • In-fire Weather (humidity, wind speed, wind
    direction, air temp, ground surface temperature,
    thermal flux (0.5 10 mm integrated) at 20
    second sampling rate
  • Fire videography using witness markers (RMSC)
  • Total radiant and total thermal flux (RMSC)
  • Plot characteristics, before and after fire
  • Fuel loading
  • Plant types and populations
  • Fuel consumption
  • Fuel moisture and size distribution
  • Georeferencing
  • Ground-mounted MWIR camera with still exposures
    (15 second sample rate) and video

12
We are continuing development of relevant
technology for fire detection, fire ecology and
fire management
  • Enhanced capability and radio transmission
    upgrades
  • Develop networking capabilities amongst multiple
    units
  • Enhanced sensor capability
  • Incident light, multi-band flux
  • Stride towards low power consumption for enhanced
    battery life
  • Low cost for statistical relevance
  • Up to 50 units deployed at a single fire (NSF
    funding, Coen, Vodacek, et al)

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com