Title: Surveillance
1Surveillance Findings/Analysis/CAPs ATAC 2010
2Transport Canada Civil AviationPrairie Northern
Region
- David White
- SMS Coordinator PNR
- Oversight Coordination Division
- Based in Edmonton, Alberta
- (780) 495-5216
- david.white_at_tc.gc.ca
3Contents
- Define surveillance activities
- Discuss surveillance procedures (SI-SUR-001)
- Refer to areas of review, SMS, QAP,Ops Control
- Analysing Issues identified during surveillance
- Causal analysis (root cause)
- Generating acceptable Corrective Action Plans
(CAP) - Effective communication during the process
4What is an Assessment?
- Assessment means the surveillance activity
conducted to evaluate effectiveness and level of
compliance with the CARs. - Staff Instruction (SI) SUR-001
- Sometimes referred to as 17 PVIs.
5What is a PVI?
- A systematic review of one or more SMS components
of an organization OR other regulated areas of
a certificate holder. - Used to determine if regulatory requirements are
documented, implemented, in use and effective
within certified organizations. - It is a means to focus on the effectiveness of
management systems make judgments on
performance. - Quality Assurance (QA) and the Ops control
system are examples of management systems
6Additional distinction between terms
- Assessment Evaluation of entire SMS
- Limited to companies that meet SMS requirements
- PVI Evaluation of regulated area of companys
control system or specific SMS component - Applicable to all companies
- Process Inspection In-depth review of steps
to obtain specific output - Our focus will be on Assessments/ PVIs here today.
7Surveillance Activity Overview
- The activity consists of
- Documentation review (preparation)
- On-site review (including interviews sampling)
- Analysis
- Reporting
8Surveillance Procedures in SUR-001
- Notification
- Team selection
- PVI plan
- Preliminary doc review
- Documentation review
- Team meeting
- Sampling procedures
- On-site procedures
- PVI team on-site briefing
- On-site review
- Interviewing
- Analysis
- PVI worksheets
- Findings
- Exit meeting
- PVI report
- PVI CAP procedures
- PVI follow-up closure
9Program Validation Inspection (PVI)
- PVI will review the following areas for
certificate holder without Quality Assurance (QA)
Program - Part III - Airport operators obligations
- Part IV - Company operational control
supervision - Part VII - Subpart 3 or 4 - Company operational
control - Part VII - Subpart 5 - Safety Oversight component
- Part VIII - Operating certificate requirements
10Quality Assurance Program
- Regulations for certificate holders to have QA
- Will be implemented in phased manner
- PVIs for Parts III, IV, VII VIII without fully
implemented QA Program use customized PVI
worksheets - SUR-001 Appendix A contains expanded list of all
PVI worksheets organized by operating rule
11Quality Assurance Program
- Certificate holders that have QAP
- Inspectors use worksheet SUR-001 Appendix A Table
5.1 Quality Assurance - This includes certificate pursuant to
- CAR 561
- STD 566
- CAR 573
- Maintenance requirements for all Part IV VII
operators
12Some Examples of Worksheets referenced in
SI-SUR-001 (k) TABLE 3.1 Reactive
Processes (l) TABLE 3.2 Proactive
Processes (m) TABLE 3.3 Investigation
Analysis (n) TABLE 3.4 Risk Management
(p) TABLE 5.1 Quality Assurance (r)
Program Validation Inspection Worksheet CAR 302
(s) Program Validation Inspection Worksheet
CAR 406 (t) Program Validation Inspection
Worksheet CAR 703/704 (u) Program Validation
Inspection Worksheet CAR 801 (ee) Program
Validation Inspection Worksheet EASA NOTE
These Worksheets are internal documents only
13Surveillance Activity Responsibilities
- Convening Authority
- Identifies - Who
- Defines - Scope depth
-
- PVI/Assessment Manager
- Plans
- Manages
- Team Member(s)
- Conduct
14Documentation Review
- Doc review 4-6 weeks before on-site review
Assessment - Doc review 1-2 weeks before on-site review PVI
- Includes review of all files docs relevant to
certificate holder and scope of the surveillance
activity - Ensure all reference manuals/docs are available
include latest amendments - Confirm revision status of any manual subject to
review - Review approved manuals for conformance to
standard - Identify areas that require further review during
on-site. - Develop specific questions for certificate holder
and appropriate management based on intelligence
gathered during review.
15- A general policy statement is not usually
enough to satisfy requirements. Document review
team members must verify that there is a policy
in place and that it is support by an
appropriately documented procedure or process as
required - This varies dependent on the area being reviewed
and the type of certificate issued but is
basically the Write what you do and do what you
write principle. - TC may request additional documentation if the
initial submission does not meet the teams
requirement. -
16Onsite Activities
- Entrance Meeting
- Interviews ( Management and selected employees)
- Sampling
- Based on size, scope and complexity of the
organization. - Determined through process in SI-SUR-001
- Used in conjunction with interviews to determine
regulatory compliance - Non-compliance issues Identified
- Purpose of the activity is to determine
regulatory compliance. - Company briefing(s)
- Exit meeting
17Surveillance Findings
- We will concentrate on PVI examples today.
- Ineffective Quality Assurance
- Loss of Operational Control
- Examples of Non-compliance with regulatory
requirements. - Examples of Non-compliance with Company
Policy/Procedures and processes.
18Surveillance Reporting
- Report generated with findings.
- Required actions determined through review with
CA. - Issues are typically handled through the
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) process. - Required additional actions are based on the
severity of non-compliance issues identified. - Additional actions may involve Certificate Action
and/or Enhanced Monitoring.
19Review of Findings
- Recognizing the System Failure
- Addressing the immediate concerns
- Causal Analysis
- Planning the short-term corrections
- Planning the long term corrections
- Informing TC
20Causal Analysis
- SI-SUR-001, Section 10.4 CAP Evaluation
- A Root Cause Analysis of the Non-conformance
- The certificate holders analysis shall include a
summary of the root cause as well as any causal
factors that may have contributed to the
non-conformance. Even though the certificate
holder may use a causal analysis method that is
not familiar to the CAP reviewer (e.g. MEDA
process, 5 Whys, etc.), the certificate holder
must be able to demonstrate how they arrived at
the root cause and it should be clear what caused
the non-conformance to occur.
21Causal Analysis
- Causal Analysis seeks to identify and understand
the reasons why things are as they are and hence
enabling focus of change activity. - Some Examples
- The 5 Whys
- Meda
- Fishbone
- The key is just to keep asking until you get to a
real 'aha' that you can treat.
22CAP Submission
- TC Inspector Expectations
- Causal Analysis
- Appropriate Timelines
- Documentation
- Communication
- SI SUR-001 Section 10.4 (2) states
- The role of the principal inspector
responsible for the acceptance of the CAP shall
be limited to the assessment of the process used
by the certificate holder in reaching conclusions
regarding the findings. It is not the inspectors
role to second-guess the CAP solutions, but
rather to evaluate the process used in developing
those solutions.
23CAP Acceptance and Follow-up
- Remember it is your Plan
- Monitor the implementation to ensure it is
implemented - Communicate Issues if implementation not as per
plan. - Document the issues and resolution with the
regulator. - Be prepared for the Activity follow-upConfirming
your systems are working not just that the
examples identified during the inspection have
been addressed
24Surveillance Activity Closure
- Effective systems are a continuing process.
- Your responsibility for day to day compliance
- Systems will mature and improve as we continue to
use them.
25Thank-you