ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE ! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE !

Description:

always look on the bright side ! being a nonnative p ter medgyes – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Medg152
Learn more at: http://www.ucetam.org
Category:
Tags: always | bright | look | side | the

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE !


1
ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE !
  • BEING A NONNATIVE
  • Péter Medgyes

2
(No Transcript)
3
Native English-Speaking Teachers ?NESTs
Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers ?
Non-NESTs
4
Aims
  • compare NESTs and non-NESTs
  • pinpoint differences
  • focus on non-NESTs
  • touch upon our disadvantages
  • dwell longer on our advantages

5
Hypotheses Set 1
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    language proficiency.

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Hypotheses Set 1
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    language proficiency.
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    teaching behaviour.

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Hypotheses Set 1
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    language proficiency.
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    teaching behaviour.
  • The discrepancy in language proficiency accounts
    for most of the differences found in their
    teaching behaviour.

14
Hypotheses Set 1
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    language proficiency.
  • NESTs non-NESTs differ in terms of their
    teaching behaviour.
  • The discrepancy in language proficiency accounts
    for most of the differences found in their
    teaching behaviour.
  • NESTs non-NESTs can be equally good teachers
    on their own terms.

15
Who would you employ?
  • Only a NEST.
  • Preferably a NEST.
  • Makes no difference.
  • Cant tell.

16
(No Transcript)
17
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.

18
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.
  • teach learning strategies more effectively.

19
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.
  • teach learning strategies more effectively.
  • supply more information about English.

20
Enough
  • My car is big enough.
  • There are more than enough cars on the roads of
    Budapest.
  • My volkswagen isnt a big enough car for our
    family.
  • There are more than enough big cars on the roads
    of Budapest.
  • This should be explanation enough why the mayor
    of Budapest considers introducing a toll in the
    city centre.

21
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.
  • teach learning strategies more effectively.
  • supply more information about English.
  • anticipate prevent language difficulties more
    effectively.

22
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.
  • teach learning strategies more effectively.
  • supply more information about English.
  • anticipate prevent language difficulties more
    effectively.
  • show more empathy to students needs problems.

23
(No Transcript)
24
Hypotheses Set 2
  • Non-NESTs can
  • provide a better learner model.
  • teach learning strategies more effectively.
  • supply more information about English.
  • anticipate prevent language difficulties more
    effectively.
  • show more empathy to students needs problems.
  • benefit from the students mother tongue.

25
(No Transcript)
26
Critique
  • Linguists

27
(No Transcript)
28
Critique
  • Linguists
  • P. C. activists

29
(No Transcript)
30
Critique
  • Linguists
  • P. C. activists
  • Teacher educators

31
Critique
  • Linguists
  • P. C. activists
  • Teacher educators
  • Advocacy groups

32
(No Transcript)
33
On the credit side
  • Publications
  • Non-NEST researchers
  • Confidence boost

34
(No Transcript)
35
What would you tell your new non-NEST to do?
  • Pretend to be a native speaker of English.
  • Reveal your nonnative identity.
  • Do as you please.

36
When NESTs reigned supreme
  • Inferiority complex

37
(No Transcript)
38
When NESTs reigned supreme
  • Inferiority complex
  • The Centre ? The Periphery

39
When NESTs reigned supreme
  • Inferiority complex
  • The Centre ? The Periphery
  • BANA ? TESEP

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
Hurray!
  • 97 percent of the ELT profession consists of
    non-NESTs.

44
Conclusion
45
Action plan
  • Teacher supply
  • English as a lingua franca (ELF)
  • Young learners
  • Content language integrated learning (CLIL)
  • Information communication technology (ICT)
  • In-school out-of-school
  • Language improvement for non-NESTs
  • NEST job applicants
  • Collaboration between NESTs non-NESTs

46
References
  • Braine, G. (Ed.) (1999). Non-native educators in
    English language teaching. Mahwah, New
    Jersey/London Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Braine, G. (2010). Nonnative speaker English
    teachers research, pedagogy, and professional
    growth. New York/London Routledge.
  • Graddol, D. (2006). English next. London The
    British Council.
  • Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and
    social context. Cambridge Cambridge University
    Press.
  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as
    an international language. Oxford Oxford
    University Press.
  • Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes
    implications for international communication and
    English language teaching. Cambridge Cambridge
    University Press.
  • Mahboob, A., Uhrig, K., Newman, K. L. Hartford,
    B. S. (2004). Children of a lesser English
    status of nonnative English as a second language
    teachers in the United States. In L. D.
    Kamhi-Stein (Ed.) Learning and teaching from
    experience perspectives on nonnative
    English-speaking professionals (pp. 100-120). The
    University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor.
  • Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native whos
    worth more? English Language Teaching Journal,
    46, 340-349.
  • Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher.
    Houndsmills Macmillan (1999) 2nd edition.
    Ismaning Max Hueber Verlag.
  • Paikeday, T. M. (1985). The native speaker is
    dead! Toronto Paikeday Publishing Inc.
  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism.
    Oxford Oxford University Press.
  • Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations.
    New York Harper Row.
  • Povey, J. (1977). The role of English in Africa.
    English Teaching Forum, 15(3), 27-29.
  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a
    lingua franca. Oxford Oxford University Press.
  • Sowden, C. (2012). ELF on a mushroom the
    overnight growth in English as a lingua franca.
    English Language Teaching Journal, 66, 89-96.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of
    English. TESOL Quarterly 29, 377-389.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com