PIA 2501 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PIA 2501

Description:

Title: Programs and Projects Author: yoder Last modified by: jml339 Created Date: 1/31/2001 4:17:11 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:178
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: yoder
Learn more at: https://sites.pitt.edu
Category:
Tags: pia | gypsies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PIA 2501


1
PIA 2501
  • Development Policy and Management
  • WEEK FIVE

2
1983-2000 Special Focus
  • Structural Adjustment with or without a Human
    Face

3
(No Transcript)
4
End of development model assumption
  • Orthodoxy Overseas capital investment
  • Accepts Foreign or "Pariah" group ownership and
    control of trade and commerce
  • A New Reality Local soft political institutions,
    weak private sectors

5
Change the Neo-Orthodoxy
  • The Realities To End of 1980s- Focus on
    anti-Marxist, growth regimes
  • Korea, Taiwan, Brazil, Chile, South Africa
    (newly emerging States)
  • Politics not important

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Neo-Orthodoxy
  • No development management- development programs
    are bad
  • Cant make planning better
  • Neo-Orthodoxy and privatization

9
To what extent is the state planning approach
possible?
  • Bureaucratic, administrative and political
    constraints constitute a major limitation
  • Development strategies often parallel but ignore
    political realities
  • Looking for
  • a Rule to Follow

10
Neo-Orthodoxy View of Development Management
  • Five year plans of over 1500 pages for a country
    of less than a million people
  • Part of unfulfilled rhetoric of development
  • National Planning to be replaced by local and
    regional planning (and Projects

11
(No Transcript)
12
Failures of Development Planning
  • A Problem The limits on political compromise and
    local level autonomy
  • Failure of Development and the limits of the
    econometric model
  • Failure of planning blamed on weak planning and
    administrative capacity
  • Planning was a shopping list

13
Counter-Orthodoxy Argument
  • Bureaucracies are socio-economic actors
  • Good example Land reform and bureaucracies
  • A study of 25 major land reforms--in 15 cases the
    bureaucracy was major beneficiary in the process

14
PICARD
  • Unpaid Editorial

15
The Problem (1) Bad Planning and Foreign Aid
  • 1. Bureaucrats/practitioners ignored development
    theories ideas
  • 2. LDC Development Institutes were largely
    irrelevant as training centers--donors used
    overseas training
  • 3. International Organizations (UNDP, IMF and
    World Bank) promoted Programs that were
    unworkable.

16
The Foreign Aid Meeting
17
The Problem (2)
  • Development administration did little to deal
    with issues of population control, food
    production and rural development
  • Foreign aid was seen as little more than a front
    for foreign policy

18
Anti-Planning Neo-Orthodoxy The Problem (3)
  • Planning illustrates problem of soft-state and
    inability of state to impose its will on society-
  • Planning Part of the Problem
  • But the Problems are real

19
  • Land Reform
  • and Womens
  • Rights

20
But.
  • Donors Need Planning Skills (Still)
  • National Program Support Office, Afghanistan
    (October, 2005)
  • Project Management Unit (PMU)

21
Autonomous Work Packaging Model
22
  • End of Editorial

23
The Middle View
  • The Moderate Interpretation of Development
    Administration Failures
  • Goal Realistic Decision-Making based on
    sufficient knowledge (strategic planning) Mixed
    Scanning
  • Balance Public-Private Partnerships

24
The Twenty-First Century Model
25
The Problems of Development Management
Discussion
  • Quote of the Week
  • "The Human Condition being what it was, let them
    fight, let them love, let them murder, I would
    not be involved."
  •  Graham Greene
  • Return to Issue in Discussion
  • Is Strategic Planning (involvement) possible?

26
Structural Adjustment Policies1985-2001- Redeux
  • Failure of the Developmental State Goran Hyden
  • Linked to pre-scientific modes of
  • production of peasantsEconomy of Affection
  • Failure of State and Exit Option (See work of
  • Albert O. Hirschman)
  • Problem of Endemic Patronage and
  • Corruption

27
Structural Adjustment Policies1985-2001
  • The Structural Adjustment Argument- Need to
  • stabilize currency and markets (getting the
    prices right)
  • Promote Free Trade
  • Need to refocus role of state from development to
    law and order and deregulation
  • Address the problem of Debt and Structural
    Adjustment reforms (IMF and World Bank)

28
Structural Adjustment, Cont.
  • Reduce the size of the public sector (infamous
    19 cut)
  • Promote Privatization or NGOismNegative on the
    State
  • Privatization (Rambo vs. Effete)
  • Faith in Capitalist Entrepreneurialism
  • Neo-Orthodoxy had a purist element

29
(No Transcript)
30
Structural Adjustment Policies1985-2001
  • The Argument for NGOism
  • Left wing Privatization (Private Voluntary
    Organizations, Cooperatives, Community Based
    Organizations, Non-Profits)
  • Energy of NGOs
  • Structural Adjustment
  • Public Sector ReformReduce size and restructure
    state
  • Populist

31
(No Transcript)
32
Summary Development Management in 2000
  • Concern about incapacity Questions raised about
    efficacy of state approach
  • Critics spoke of negative state
  • Government had become a negative
  • Debates focused on privatization, public sector
    reform and NGOism
  • Need to address issues of external vs. internal
    solutions to development problems
  • (domestic capacity vs. international
    redistribution)

33
Summary Development Management in 2000
  • Focus should be on issues of sustainability and
    institutional development- not projects
  • Need to search for a creative, flexible, and
    innovative management system
  • Difficult to separate development from politics
  • Implementation had become the neglected component
    of development policy (Pressman and Wildavsky)
  • Question The appropriateness of the U.S. case
    study as lessons for development action?

34
Choices
  • Contracting Out and Privatization
  • NGOism and Grants
  • Capacity Building (HRD)
  • A Mixed Scanning Approach

35
  • TEN MINUTE BREAK

36
Internal Capacity Issues(Bryant White)
  • Debates the Attitudes Problem in LDC?
  • How to get people to think developmentally?
  • Changes in programmatic values have an impact on
    LDC elites
  • Problem of the Organizational Bourgeoisie
    Bureaucratic values unchanged from colonial
    period as domestic elites manipulate public
    policy (Picard)

37
Internal Capacity Issues(Bryant White)
  • Debates the Attitudes Problem and the Public
    Sector
  • Myth of civil service neutrality Bureaucratic
    elites have interests Statism
  • At best what results is benign neglect, at worst
    resource extraction
  • Problem failure to develop and indigenous
    capitalism

38
Problem The Expanding Civil Service
  • Civil Servant Component of the total Current
    Budget
  • 10 to 15 in MDCs
  • 30 to 60 in LDCs
  • South Africa in 2001, 46
  • Benin in the 1980s, 64
  • Central African Republic in the 1960s, 81

39
Private Sector
  • Limited to settler, pariah groupsJews and Roma
    in Eastern Europe, Chinese in much of Asia,
    Lebanese and East Indians in parts of Africa and
    Latin America (See Books of V.S. Naipaul)

40
Gypsies (Roma) in Europe
41
Internal Capacity Issues(Bryant White)
  • Debates the Attitudes Problem
  • Indigenous Elites- Sometimes referred to as
    Comprador classes or dependent elites, since
    they have been co-opted and are linked to
    Northern Tier states- Cronyism
  • Expatriate Attitudes?

42
Internal Capacity Issues(Bryant White)
  • Debates the Bureaucratic Attitudes Problem
    continued
  • How developmental are bureaucrats?
  • Can the state be used for SOCIAL ENGINEERING?
  • Is the private or non-profit sector better at
    development?

43
Social Mobilization Training
44
Internal Capacity Issues(Bryant White)
  • Basic Needs Assumptions Problem
  • Need for increased capacity of public, parastatal
    and private sectors
  • State should remain central to development
    planning and management
  • Need for administrative reform to develop more
    creative development structures

45
AMTRAK- Public or Private?
46
DISCUSSION
47
From Mister Johnson
48
Denis A. Goulet, 75, died December 26, 2006
Appropriate Theory and Practice
49
The Discussion Debate
  • Joyce Cary, The Two Faces of Progress
  • Denis Goulet, The Cruel Choice
  • The Development Message?
  • Is Progress the Answer?

50
Late Colonial Philippines
51
Discussion Stanley Karnow In Our Image?
  • In Our Image (France, U.S., Portugal)
  • Is assimilation the answer?
  • In the Philippines, South East Asia, Middle East
    / Africa?
  • Latin America Just Spain?

52
Books of the Week
  • Graham Greene, The Quiet American
  • Jan Myrdal, Report from a Chinese Village

53
The Problems of Development Management
  • Quote of the Week
  • The Quiet American- An Alternative to expatriate
    non-involvement?
  • "The Human Condition being what it was, let them
    fight, let them love, let them murder, I would
    not be involved.
  •  Graham Greene

54
Books for Next Week
  • Khushwant Singh, Last Train to Pakistan
  • Kurban Said, Ali and Nino

55
The Authors
  • Gunnar Myrdal and Graham Greene

56
The Development Debates
  • What message does each author bring to the table?
  • What do we learn about development?
  • What do you like and dislike about the two books

57
The Authors
  • Kushwant Singh
  • Kurban Said

58
Case Studies for Next Week
  • Carlos Fuentes- The Cost of Living
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala, The Interview

59
Ruth Prawer Jhabvala and Carlos Fuentes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com