Title: Rigidity of 2d and 3d Pinned Frameworks and pebble game".
1Rigidity of 2d and 3d Pinned Frameworks and
pebble game".
- Dr. Offer Shai
- Department of Mechanics Materials and Systems,
Tel Aviv University, Israel - shai_at_eng.tau.ac.il
-
2Pebble game
Rigidity Theory
Mechanical Engineering
Theorems and methods in Engineering
In this talk Theorems in engineering underlying
rigidity circuits. Methods for check rigidity of
Pinned Frameworks from engineering.
3Pebble Game and Pinned Frameworks
- Pebble game results in
- 1. Pinned Framework (the pinned edges
correspond to the free - pebbles at the end).
- 2. Separation of the Pinned Framework into
special type of Pinned - Framework, referred as Assur Graphs.
4Assur Graphs (AGs)
- Definitions (many)
- 1. Structure with zero mobility that does not
contain a simpler - substructure of the same mobility.
- 2. Minimal rigid related to vertices.
- 3. Cycles of dyads.
- and more (Servatius et al., 2010).
Not Assur Graph
Assur Graph
5Pebble game results in Partition into Assur
Graphs.
Each directed Cutset defines a partition.The
cyclic (well concected) subgraph are Assur
Graphs.
First Triad
Application of the pebble game
Decomposition into two triads.
Second Triad
2
1
6The same applies in 3d
Application of the pebble game
Decomposition into two triads.
3
2
1
7Necessary Condition for Pinned Isostatic
Frameworks in d dimension
- Decomposed into AGs.
- There should be at least d1 ground edges.
- Each AG should be connected to the others by at
least d ground vertices.
8Example Not rigid because1. Can not be
decomposed into AGs.2. There are d ground
(pinned) edges instead of d1.
9Example. Pebble Game reveals the Connection
Problem between AGs in 2D.
AG I
AG I
AG II
AG II
Not Rigid AG I is connected through d-1
vertices.
Rigid
10Example. In 3D Pebble Game does not reveal the
Connection Problem between the AGs.
Implied Hinge
Application of the pebble game
Decomposition into two 3D triads.
3
2
1
11D,E,F
G
Application of the pebble game
A
Decomposition.
12Implied Hinges Implied Hinges
Implied Hinges in
the connections in AGs
easy
??????????
The problem of Implied Hinges
If there is a circuit of size three, we locate
the 6 free pebbles on its vertices.
A
13Relation between Assur Graphs and rigidity
circuits.Contract the ground vertices into d-1
support vertices and add a d-2 simplex.
- contract all the ground vertices into one
vertex. (Servatius et al., 2010)
2D
Rigid in 2D
2D Triad
- In 3D Contract the ground vertices into two
support vertices and add an edge between the two
support vertices. -
3D
Rigid in 3D
3D Triad
Adding an edge between the two support vertices
rigidity circuit
14Engineering theorems underlying Rigidity Circuits
- Suppose you have a Pinned Framework and an
external force applied on one of the vertices.
When will there be forces on all the edges?
- Theorem there will be forces on all the edges
IFF the vertex ,where the external force acts,
belongs to the first AG in the decomposition
order and there is a directed path from this AG
to any AGs in the decomposition graph
15The topology structure of rigidity circuits (in
2d, 3d and possibley in higher dimensions)
The scheme of rigidity circuits as a composition
of Assur Graphs and an additional edge.
16The Map of all AGs in 2D
17- The Map of 3d AGs
- - The map is NOT complete.
- - We try to rephrase the extension operation.
- - Extension in dimension d is adding a d
- dyad.
18(No Transcript)
19- The Origin of Assur Graphs (Groups)
- Assur Graphs (Groups) were developed in
- Russia, in 1914, for decomposing linkages
(mechanisms) into primitive building - blocks for analysis, optimization and
- more.
20A mechanism
A schematic graph of the mechanism
21The decomposition of the schematic graph into
s-genes
10
F
9
Tetrad
Diad
Triad
22Decomposition of the mechanism
Tetrad
Triad
Diad
Velocities of inner joints are known
A
C
3
B
4
1
2
5
E
J
10
D
F
6
G
9
7
8
H
I
11
23-
- Nowadays, we use Assur Graphs for synthesis of
linkages, structures and - more.
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26Thank you!!