Background characterization: MD plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Background characterization: MD plan

Description:

Background characterization: MD plan W. Kozanecki MD goals Background sources Operational procedures Open questions – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Diana250
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Background characterization: MD plan


1
Background characterization MD plan
W. Kozanecki
  • MD goals
  • Background sources
  • Operational procedures
  • Open questions

2
MD goals
  • Main goal characterize beam-current dependence
    of
  • machine-induced backgrounds
  • all BaBar detectors SVT, DCH, EMC, DIRC, IFR
    TRG, ODF
  • dedicated background monitors (pins, CsI
    counters, collim. BLMs)
  • beam-beam performance
  • specific luminosity
  • vertical horizontal spot sizes in LER HER
  • loss rates _at_ collimators in PR12 (HER), PR04
    PR02 (LER)
  • Parasitically measure thermally-induced motion
    of IR components
  • using a witness bunch in HER (1mA, feedbacks
    off) when varying LER current, vv
  • take advantage of slow current staircase to
    measure thermal time constants
  • note this only measures the effect on the OTHER
    beam (e.g. LER ? HER)

3
Background sources
  • Luminosity (radiative-Bhabha debris) major
    concern (DCH future)
  • BP dP L (strictly linear with L)
  • Beam-beam tails
  • from LER tails BL, bb bL,bbIL fL(xL,H
    /-)
  • from HER tails BH, bb bH,bbIH fH(xL,H
    /-)
  • Beam-gas (bremsstrahlung Coulomb)
  • HEB only BHbg aHIH bHIH2 (aH , bH gt
    0)
  • LEB only BLbg aLIL bLIL2 (aL , bL gt
    0)
  • beam-gas cross term BLHbg cLH IL IH
    (LEBHEB, out of collision)
  • BI LER injection (trickle) background
  • BLT (exp. signature somewhat similar to
    bremsstrahlung)

4
Proposed operational procedure colliding beam
measurements (1)
  • 2000 2002 procedure

5
Proposed operational procedure general guidelines
  • BaBar taking data!
  • Perturb as adiabatically as possible
  • start with stable machine in delivery mode
  • avoid acrobatics (collisions ? pedestals ?
    single-beam ?
    non-colliding ? pedestals)
  • LER Touscheck background a separate, dedicated MD
  • At each current setting
  • optimize tunes
  • on luminosity (in collision, coasting so lifetime
    reasonable)
  • on lifetime (single beam, for beam-gas
    measurement)
  • reset vertical IP angles in both rings
  • check SLM interferometer settings
  • start a new run (also at trickle-coasting
    transition)
  • Pedestal runs
  • 1.5 mA in each ring, non-collidng
  • Reproducibilty if beam(s) lost, redo last setting

6
Proposed operational procedure colliding beam
measurements (2)
  • Setup save configs orbits check fbcks change
    BBR L1 config.
  • Keep IL constant, vary IH (gt 0.30 A, 0.20 A
    steps)
  • 2 regimes (to help separate Lumi beam-beam
    contributions)
  • IL 1.20 A (2/3 of peak LER current, moderate
    beam-beam)
  • no trickle (LER coasting only)
  • 7 steps
  • IL 1.85 A (or max. sustainable LER current)
  • to measure trickle contribution differentially,
    for each HER current setting
  • trickle LER ( 5)
  • coast LER ( 5) (peak L H currents 5
    additional for IFR high-stat data)
  • Keep IH constant, vary IL (gt 0.30 A, 0.25 A
    steps)
  • 2 regimes (to help separate Lumi beam-beam
    contributions)
  • IH 0.85 A (2/3 of peak HER current, moderate
    beam-beam)
  • IH 1.35 A (or max. sustainable HER current,
    assuming 8 stations)
  • no trickle, 7 /setting
  • Pedestal run
  • 1.5 mA in LER bucket 0, 1.5 mA in HER bucket 3400

7
Proposed operational procedure single-beam
measurements
  • Vary IH 0.30-1.35 A, 0.20 A steps, no LEB
  • no HER bunches in buckets 0-100 (LFB
    permitting), 1.5 mA in LER bunch 0
  • 7 per setting 5 at the highest current (IFR)
  • Vary IL 0.3-2 A, 0.25 A steps, no HEB
  • no LER bunches in buckets 0-100 (LFB permitting),
    1.5 mA in HER bunch 0
  • at topmost (or 2 topmost) LER current(s), trickle
    then coast
  • 7 per setting 5 at the highest current (IFR)
  • Reproducibility check on single beam scans (esp.
    pins)
  • repeat middle top points of previous two scans
    (HER, then LER)
  • Non-colliding scan (sparse)
  • Keep IH constant (1.30 A), vary IL (gt 0.30 A,
    0.5 A steps)
  • Keep IL constant (1.85 A), vary IH (gt 0.30 A,
    0.4 A steps)
  • Operational aspects
  • Separate beams vertically by 2 400 microns
    (feasibility ?)
  • Patterns 100 bucket truncation at opposite ends
    of the two trains (YP!)
  • 7 per setting
  • Pedestal run

8
Total time estimates (ONLY data taking BBR
on-off) 620
  1. Setup 10
  2. Collision scan _at_ fixed LER current 170
  3. IL 1200 mA, vary IH 7 x 10
  4. IL 1850 mA , vary IL 7 x 13 5
  5. Collision scan _at_ fixed HER current 140
  6. IH 850 mA , vary IL 7 x 10
  7. IH 1350 mA , vary IL 7 x 10
  8. Pedestals 5
  9. HER single-beam scan 7 x 10 5 80
  10. LER single-beam scan 7 x 10 2 x 5 5
    90
  11. Repeat middle top points of single-beam scans
    (H, L) 40
  12. Non-colliding scans 80
  13. IH 1350 mA , vary IL 4 x 10
  14. IL 1850 mA , vary IH 4 x 10
  15. Pedestals 5

9
To be clarified
  • Likely prerequisites
  • routine 8-station running in HER
  • decent stored-beam trickle backgrounds during
    preceding owl shift
  • Actual trigger rmix to enhance background
    fraction minimize duration tbd by BaBAr trig
    expert
  • Run duration/ evts per beam setting 7 (coast
    only) or 75 (trickle/coast), dominated by pin
    diode stability
  • Trickle ? coast switch
  • Need volunteer(s) to analyze CsI BLM data!

10
Spare slides
11
Proposed baseline parametrization
  • B BP Bbb BHbg BLbg BLHbg BLT BI
  • a0 (from no-beam data ?)
  • dP L (from colliding-beam data)
  • Bbb (IbL, IbH) (from colliding-beam data)
  • aHIH bHIH2 (from single-beam HER
    data)
  • aLIL bLIL2 (from single-beam LER
    data)
  • cLH IL IH (from 2-beam, non-colliding
    ?)
  • BLT (LER only, vary VRF?)
  • BI (differential, trickle coasting ?)

12
DCH 2002
13
TRG 2002
14
EMC 2002
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com