C. Andrea Pelagallo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

C. Andrea Pelagallo

Description:

4 partners per project (in average) 76 foreign partners: ... Promotion of scientific and educational tourism. Promotion of sustainable managment of highlands. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Ion100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: C. Andrea Pelagallo


1
The European Initiative LEADER in Italy
  • C. Andrea Pelagallo
  • Deputy Coordinator of the Italian Network Unit
    Leader

2
The origin of LEADER
  • 1988, the E.C. publishes The future of the Rural
    World
  • Rural territories at a turning point results of
    the previous policies and new challenges to be
    fronted (pollution and intensive agriculture,
    growth of cities and reduction of rural
    population)
  • Peculiarity of each rural territory in Europe
    each areas has its potentialities and problems
  • Importance of rural areas (as opposite of
    urban) represent the 80 of the European land
    and over the 50 of the European population
  • New interest in rural development, as an
    extension of the concept of agricultural
    development

3
The European Commission sets up its strategy
  • From interventions by sector, to multi-year
    Programmes organized by territory from the
    centralized management to the decentralized
    management
  • 1989-1993 / 1994-1999 / 2000-2006 CHANGES
  • Different territorial programmes according to the
    differences among the territories (Regional
    Programmes)
  • Promotion of the socio-economic development of
    rural areas, valorisation of the rural heritage,
    advert of local initiatives

4
Main features and objectivesof LEADER
  • Creation of a European Network, to connetc the
    different actors of rural development
  • To stimulate the exchange of information within
    the same territory and between different areas
  • Dissemination of results in all territories
  • Implementation of pilot and demonstrative
    initiatives, concerning rural development in
    selected areas
  • Creation of Local Action Groups as main actors of
    the rural development
  • Promotion of initiatives in different sectors
    agriculture, handicraft, rural tourism

5
Advanced features
  • METHODOLOGY
  • Management at local level (decentralisation)
  • New concept of rural integrated development (not
    only agricultural)
  • Partnership PublicPrivate
  • Creation of a Network to exchange information and
    disseminate the results
  • PROCEDURES
  • AND FINANCING
  • Make LAGs responsible for their plans
  • Enhance national and regional coordination
  • Payment in advance up to the 40 of the total

6
Programming and implementationof Leader in the
territory
LOCAL ACTION GROUP (LAG)
SWOT analysis to define potentialities and limits
within the territory
Analysis of the Demand and of the Needs within
the area
Target setting
Definition of the strategy for rural integrated
development
Natural and cultural heritage
Professional training and HR
Local quality productions
Development of SMEs
Rural turism
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION OF THE AREA
7
3 Successful editionsof the E.I. Leader in Italy
8
 
Progress of the Programme in Italy
9
Leader in Italy
Number of LAGs 132 Area about 160.000 km2
(over 50 of Italy) 13 compared to
Leader II Population over 10 millions
(19 of the entire Italian
population) Total Cost 746,08M Total Public
share 64,6 Total EU share 38,1
10
Some figures of Leader in Italy
  • Leader is implemented by four axis
  • 1. Integrated rural development strategies
    (Local development plans) (84,8 of total
    resources)
  • 2. Support for cooperation (11,6 of total
    resources)
  • 3. Networking (1,5 of total resources)
  • 4. Managing and technical assistance (2,1 of
    total resources).
  • Leader in Italy is implemented by 22
    Programmes 21 Regional Programmes (19 Regions
    2 Independent Provinces) plus 1 Network
  • Each Region is committed to the definition of
    each Programme. They are Managing Authorities
    for Axis 1, 2 and 4. MIPAF is the Managing
    Authority for Axis 3.

11
Trans-national Cooperation ProjectsMain themes
and areas
12
Trans-national Cooperation ProjectsPartnership
  • 44 Italian LAGs are involved in Transnational
    Cooperation projects

13
Successful aspects of LEADER in Italy
  • Programming and management of the interventions
    at a local level, directly involving local actors
    (Learning By Doing)
  • Valorisation and commercial exploitation of the
    rural heritage environment, traditional
    handicraft, historical and cultural resources
  • Promotion of the local rural identity and
    creation
  • of Local Development Agencies
  • Connections among LAGs placed in different
    territories and dissemination of good practices
  • Collaboration between different economic sectors
    and between public and private actors

14
Problematic issues of LEADER in Italy
  • SELECTION OF LAGs
  • Difficult arrangement and timetable for the
    selection of LAGs, especially under Leader II and
    Leader (because the selection was prerogative
    of each Region)
  • EUROPEAN PROCEDURES
  • Complex European procedures. Concerning Leader I
    and Leader II, financing were organized under 3
    different Structural Funds

COOPERATION Different procedures according to the
different Member States. In Italy, each Region
has its own procedures and timetable
MONITORING Difficult organization of the
monitoring system
15
Problems at the local level
  • SELECTION AND FUNCTIONING OF LAGs
  • Doubts concerning administrative and procedural
    changes
  • Problems regarding LAGs gathering Local
    Administrative Bodies and private actors

UNPROOFED PROCEDURES Doubts concerning private
associations managing public funding Lack of
previous experiences from both sides (public and
private)
FINANCIAL RESOURCES Bank payments in advance,
Bank Guarantee, Private financing
16
Problems at the local level
COORDINATION Doubts concerning the efficient
coordination among many different Administration
Bodies
SKEPTIKISM Spare entrepreneurial initiatives New
and complex procedures
OVERLAP Overlap with other administrative
structures and finanging programmes Public
Development Agencies, other European and National
programmes
17
Problems at the local level
COMPLEX MANAGEMENT Multi-sector objectives and
interventions and difficult coordination among
areas of action and actors
INNOVATIVE ASPECTS Different methodologies and
activities to be implemented
DISORGANIZED TIMETABLE AND SCHEDULING Not enough
working time to efficiently involve local
population, find money, call for tenders,
implement successful activities
18
The Italian experience
  • SUCCESSFUL PRACTICES TO BE DISSEMINATED
  • LAGs must be well-set up and representative of
    the local system
  • Efficient assignation of tasks within each LAG,
    in order to clearly verify the results
  • Local Development Plans aiming at the
    valorisation of the local heritage in terms of
    income, employment and professional training,
    improvement in the quality of life
  • Set-up of a clear and sustainable strategy within
    LDPs

19
The Italian experience
  • SUCCESSFUL PRACTICES TO BE DISSEMINATED
  • Increase the awareness of local population and
    their interest in local resources
  • Good actors involved with the local development,
    who are interested in collaborating for long-term
    sustainable projects
  • Good and experienced Local Administrative Bodies,
    banks, Universitiesto support LAGs

20
The Italian experience
  • SUCCESSFUL PRACTICES TO BE DISSEMINATED
  • Role of the National Network Unit in terms of
    connnections among LAGs, exchange of information,
    dissemination of good practices
  • Suitable timetable setting, in order to schedule
    the activities, implement all programmed actions,
    definitely involve local population
  • Self-evaluation, to compare expected results to
    achieved results

21
SWOT analysis
  • WEAKNESS
  • Difficult application of the bottom-up approach.
  • Unspecific priority themes and interventions
    within LDPs.
  • Low complementarities with other programmes.
  • STRONGNESS
  • Interest in rural areas, whose problems are
    unsolved by other programmes.
  • Creation of Local Development Agencies, active
    also out of Leader.
  • THREAT
  • Overlap with other programmes.
  • Inefficient allocation of resources within LDPs.
  • OPPORTUNITY
  • Valorisation of local quality productions.
  • Valorisation of rural heritage environment,
    culture, traditions
  • Human Resources

22
Who is the Italian Leader Network?
  • INEA
  • VIA BARBERINI,36
  • 00187 ROMA
  • Tel 39 06 47856455
  • AGRICONSULTING SpA
  • VIA VITORCHIANO, 123
  • 00189 Roma
  • Tel. 39 06 330881

Financed by EU Commission and Ministry for
Agriculture and Forestry Policies
23
The Italian Network Leaderin Europe
Italian Regions
The European Observatory
Italian LAGs
Member States
Leader Network In other MSs
European LAGs
24
The Italian Network Leader
25
The Italian Network Unit Leader
26
Thank You!The Italian National Network Unit
  • Contact us at
  • Redazione_at_reteleader.it
  • Or see our web-site
  • www.reteleader.it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com