Waves%20and%20turbulence%20in%20the%20solar%20wind - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Waves%20and%20turbulence%20in%20the%20solar%20wind

Description:

Waves and turbulence in the solar wind Tim Horbury PG Lectures Turbulence: the basics Turbulence in plasmas: MHD scales The solar wind context Key results – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: Timothy297
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Waves%20and%20turbulence%20in%20the%20solar%20wind


1
Waves and turbulence in the solar wind
Tim Horbury PG Lectures
  • Turbulence the basics
  • Turbulence in plasmas MHD scales
  • The solar wind context
  • Key results
  • Dissipation
  • Energetic particle propagation

2
Why study waves and turbulence in the solar wind?
  • Effect on the Earth
  • Can trigger reconnection, substorms, aurorae,
  • Understanding solar processes
  • Signature of coronal heating, etc.
  • Application to other plasmas
  • Astrophysics particle propagation
  • Dense plasmas transport
  • Turbulence as a universal phenomenon
  • Comparison with hydrodynamics

3
Cosmic rays and the solar cycle
  • Cosmic ray flux at the Earth is modulated by the
    solar cycle
  • This is due to variations in the magnetic barrier
    in the solar system
  • Waves and turbulence in the solar wind form a key
    part of this barrier

4
What is turbulence?
  • Fluid phenomenon
  • Nonlinear energy transfer between scales
  • Occurs when inertial forces dominate viscous
    forces
  • Important in many engineering problems

5
The Richardson cascade
  • Bigger whirls have little whirls,
  • That feed on their velocity
  • And little whirls have lesser whirls,
  • And so on to viscosity.
  • Lewis Fry Richardson, 1920

6
The inertial range
  • If energy input is steady, and far from
    dissipation scale, have a steady state ? Inertial
    range
  • K41 k-5/3 spectrum
  • We observe this in hydrodynamic fluids
  • Note energy transfer rate is analytic in
    hydrodynamics

7
Turbulence in plasmas
  • Neutral fluids
  • Motion described by Navier-Stokes equations
  • ? Hydrodynamics
  • Energy transfer by velocity shear
  • Plasmas
  • On sufficiently large scales, can treat plasma as
    a fluid
  • ? Magnetohydrodynamics
  • Multiple, finite amplitude waves can be stable
  • Presence of a magnetic field
  • Breaks isotropy
  • Key difference to neutral fluids

8
The great power law in the sky
  • Measure interstellar density fluctuations using
    scintillations
  • Consistent with Kolmogorov scaling over many
    orders of magnitude

9
The turbulent solar wind
f -1
turbulence
f -5/3
waves
  • Fluctuations on all measured scales
  • Power spectrum
  • Broadband
  • Low frequencies f -1
  • High frequencies f -5/3

10
Solar wind as a turbulence laboratory
  • Characteristics
  • Collisionless plasma
  • Variety of parameters in different locations
  • Contains turbulence, waves, energetic particles
  • Measurements
  • In situ spacecraft data
  • Magnetic and electric fields
  • Bulk plasma density, velocity, temperature,
  • Full distribution functions
  • Energetic particles
  • The only collisionless plasma we can sample
    directly

11
Importance of the magnetic field
  • Magnetic field is often used for turbulence
    analysis
  • Precise measurement
  • High time resolution
  • Low noise
  • For MHD scales, this is often sufficient
  • (but more about velocity later...)
  • For kinetic scales, have to be more careful

12
Fundamental observations of waves and turbulence
  • Alfvén waves
  • Waves of solar origin
  • Active turbulent cascade
  • Not just remnant fluctuations from corona
  • Intermittency
  • Similar high order statistics to hydrodynamics
  • Field-aligned anisotropy
  • Fundamental difference to hydrodynamics

13
Interpreting spacecraft measurements
  • In the solar wind (usually),
  • VA 50 km/s, VSW gt300 km/s
  • Therefore,
  • VSWgtgtVA
  • Taylors hypothesis time series can be
    considered a spatial sample
  • We can convert spacecraft frequency f into a
    plasma frame wavenumber k
  • k 2?f / VSW
  • Almost always valid in the solar wind
  • Makes analysis much easier
  • Not valid in, e.g. magnetosheath, upper corona

14
Interpreting spacecraft measurements
  • Solar wind flows radially away from Sun, over
    spacecraft
  • Time series is a one dimensional spatial sample
    through the plasma
  • Measure variations along one flow line

Flow
15
Alfvén waves
  • Field-parallel Alfvén wave
  • B and V variations anti-correlated
  • Field-anti-parallel Alfvén wave
  • B and V variations correlated
  • See this very clearly in the solar wind
  • Most common in high speed wind

16
Propagation direction of Alfvén waves
  • Waves are usually propagating away from the Sun

17
Spectral analysis of Alfvén waves
  • For an Alfvén wave
  • ?b ??v,
  • Where
  • b B /(?0?)1/2
  • Calculate Elsässer variables
  • e? ?b ? ?v
  • Convention e corresponds to anti-sunward (so
    flip e and e- if B away from Sun)
  • Also power spectrum
  • Z? (f) PSD (e ?)
  • If pure, outward Alfvén waves,
  • e gtgt e-
  • Z gtgt Z-

18
Inward and outward spectrum
  • Note
  • When egtgte-, magnetic field spectrum e
    spectrum
  • Define Normalised cross helicity
  • ?C (e-e-)/(ee-)
  • ?C 1 for pure, outward waves
  • ?C 0 for mixed waves

Fast wind
Slow wind
19
Speed dependence of turbulence
  • Character of fluctuations varies with wind speed

20
Stream dependence cross helicity
  • Wavelets measure time and frequency dependence
    of waves

21
Dominance of outward-propagating waves
Speed
Solar wind speed
  • Solar wind accelerates as it leaves the corona
  • Alfvén speed decreases as field magnitude drops
  • Alfvén critical point equal speed (10-20 solar
    radii)
  • Above critical point, all waves carried outward
  • Therefore,
  • Outward-propagating low frequency waves generated
    in corona!

Critical point
Alfvén speed
Distance from Sun
22
Active turbulent cascade in fast wind
  • Bavassano et al (1982)
  • Fast wind knee in spectrum
  • Spectrum steepens further from the Sun
  • Evidence of energy transfer between scales
    turbulent cascade

after Bavassano et al 1982
23
Interpretation
  • Initial broadband 1/f spectrum close to Sun
  • High frequencies decay, transfer energy
  • Spectrum steepens
  • Progressively lower frequencies decay with time
    (distance)
  • Breakpoint in spectrum moves to lower frequencies
  • Breakpoint is the highest frequency unevolved
    Alfvén wave

24
Summary spectral index in fast wind
  • Ulysses polar measurements
  • Magnetic field component
  • Inertial range
  • Development of cascade
  • 1/f Alfvén waves at low frequencies
  • Not shown or considered here
  • Dissipation at higher frequencies
  • Structures at lower frequencies

25
High and low latitudes power levels
  • Low latitudes fast and slow streams
  • Stream-stream interactions
  • Big variations in power levels
  • Cross helicity often low, highly variable

26
High and low latitudes power levels
  • High latitudes at solar minimum
  • Dominated by high speed wind form coronal hole
  • Power levels very steady
  • Cross helicity steady and high
  • Therefore,
  • Ulysses polar data are ideal for detailed
    analysis of turbulence and waves

27
Turbulence and CIRs
28
Large scale variations in power levels
  • Power in high speed wind, low and high latitudes
  • Ulysses agrees well with Helios
  • Data taken 25 years apart
  • Increasing scatter in Helios reflects
    stream-stream interactions

29
Power dependence on distance
  • WKB (Wentzel-Kramer-Brillouin)
  • Assume propagation of waves through a slowly
    changing medium
  • Solar wind density scales as r -2
  • ? power scales with distance as r -3
  • We expect this for low frequency Alfvén waves
  • Non-interacting
  • No driver or dissipation, especially in high
    latitude polar flows

30
Large scale power dependence
  • Ulysses measure large scale trends in power
    levels

31
Latitude dependence?
  • Horbury latitude dependence, due to coronal
    overexpansion
  • Bavassano non-power law scaling, due to
    nonlinear effects
  • Answer is unclear

32
Problems
  • Q1 Alistair
  • Q2 Chris Alice
  • Q3 Ute
  • Q4 Daniel Lottie

33
Intermittency
  • Distributions of increments are not Gaussian
  • Well known in hydrodynamics, also present in
    solar wind MHD
  • More big jumps than expected
  • Is this a signature of the turbulence, or solar
    wind structure?

Sorriso-Valvo et al., 2001
34
Identifying intermittent events
  • What causes these large jumps?
  • Identify individual events, study in detail
  • Discontinuities?
  • Are large jumps part of the turbulent cascade, or
    are they structures?

35
Discontinuities vs turbulence
  • Turbulence
  • Field-perpendicular cascade generates short
    scales across the field
  • Tube-like structures
  • Not topological boundaries
  • Flux tubes
  • Sourced from Sun (Borovsky)
  • Topological boundary?
  • How to decide?
  • Composition changes?

36
Intermittency and structure functions
  • Structure functions
  • S(?,m)ltb(t?)-b(t)m gt
  • Moments of the distribution of differences at
    different lags
  • We are interested in how these scale with time
    lag
  • S(?,m) ? ?(m)
  • How do the wings of the distribution change with
    scale?

37
Intermittency and K41/IK65
  • For IK65, expect m/4
  • Neither is right whats going on?

38
Structure function scaling
  • Intermittency burstiness
  • p model (Meneveau and Sreevinasan. 1987)
  • Uneven distribution of energy between daughter
    eddies
  • p0.5 equality
  • Often get p0.7-0.8 in hydrodynamics
  • See that here too
  • But.. No physics....
  • Dots data
  • Square p model fit

39
Kolmogorov vs Kraichnan
Inertial range
  • Carbone (1992) g(4)1 for Kraichnan
  • Use g(3) and g(4) to distinguish Kraichnan from
    Kolmogorov
  • Answer Kolmogorov
  • Why is it not a Kraichnan cascade?
  • Answer lies with anisotropy.

40
Field-aligned anisotropy
  • Power levels tend to be perpendicular to local
    magnetic field direction
  • ? anisotropy
  • Dots local minimum variance direction
  • Track large scale changes in field direction
  • Small scale turbulence rides on the back of
    large scale waves

41
Anisotropy of energy transfer
  • Neutral fluid
  • No preferred direction
  • ? isotropy
  • Plasmas
  • Magnetic field breaks symmetry
  • ? anisotropy
  • Shebalin (1983) power tends to move
    perpendicular to magnetic field in wavevector
    space
  • Goldreich and Sridhar (1995) critical balance
    region close to k0

42
Critical balance
  • Goldreich and Sridhar, 1995
  • Balance of Alfven and nonlinear timescales
  • Distinguish hydro-like and MHD-like regimes
  • What is nature of cascade around this regime?

43
Anisotropic energy transfer
Hydrodynamics
  • Wavevectors
  • Energy tends to move perpendicular to magnetic
    field

MHD
  • Eddies
  • On average, tend to become smaller perpendicular
    to field
  • Results in long, fine structures along the
    magnetic field

44
Anisotropy and 3D magnetic field structure
  • Slab
  • Plane waves
  • Infinite correlation length perpendicular to
    magnetic field
  • Flux tubes stay together
  • 2D (slab)
  • Finite perpendicular correlation length
  • Flux tubes shred
  • ? Field-perpendicular transport

45
Anisotropy and 3D field structure
100 slab 0 2D
  • Wavevectors parallel to the field long
    correlation lengths perpendicular to field
    (slab)
  • Wavevectors perpendicular to the field short
    correlation lengths perpendicular to field (2D)
  • Mixture of slab and 2D results in shredded flux
    tubes
  • Consequences for field structure and energetic
    particle propagation

20 slab 80 2D
Matthaeus et al 1995
46
The reduced spectrum
  • For a given spacecraft frequency f, this
    corresponds to a flow-parallel scale
  • ?VSW / f
  • and a flow-parallel wavenumber
  • k2?f / VSW
  • But sensitive to all waves with
  • kVSW2?f
  • ? reduced spectrum

47
The reduced spectrum wavevector space
  • Spacecraft measure reduced spectrum, integrated
    over wavenumbers perpendicular to flow
  • Contribution by slab and 2D varies with
    field/flow angle, ?BV

Definition ?BV angle between magnetic field
and flow
48
Anisotropy and the power spectrum
Slab fluctuations
kB
2D fluctuations
k?B
B
49
Evidence for wavevector anisotropy
  • Bieber et al., 1996
  • Power levels vary with field/flow angle
  • Not consistent with just slab
  • Best fit 20 slab, 80 2D
  • Limitations of analysis
  • Long intervals of data
  • Magnetic field direction not constant
  • Adds noise and error to analysis

50
Anisotropy
  • Large scale magnetic field induces anisotropy
  • Isotropic
  • k equal in all directions
  • Hydrodynamic case
  • Slab
  • k aligned with B-field
  • Alfvén wave propagation
  • 2D
  • k perpendicular to B-field
  • Three-wave interactions

51
Correlation function anisotropy
  • Dasso et al., 2005
  • Left slow wind (2D)
  • Right fast wind (slab)

52
Limitations of a single spacecraft
  • Solar wind flows radially away from Sun, over
    spacecraft
  • Time series is a one dimensional spatial sample
    through the plasma
  • Cant measure variations perpendicular to the
    flow
  • How can we measure the 3D structure of the
    turbulence?

Flow
53
Combining data from two spacecraft
  • Compare between spacecraft
  • Provides information about variations across flow
  • Varying time lag corresponds to varying scale and
    direction of separation vector
  • Limitations on scales and directions

Flow
54
Using multiple spacecraft
  • Each pair of spacecraft gives a plane on which we
    can measure the correlation
  • Four spacecraft give six planes
  • We have a large range of angles and scales over
    which we can measure the turbulence structure

55
Results
  • Axisymmetry around field direction
  • project onto a 2D plane
  • Bin and average the data
  • superimpose grid
  • grid square (2?2) ?103 km
  • Fit to an elliptical model
  • Measure of anisotropy ?/?
  • related to the ratio of the parallel to
    perpendicular correlation lengths

? 0.84, ? 0.49, ?/? 1.71
56
Anisotropy and Kolmogorov turbulence
  • Why is the MHD cascade Kolmogorov-like, not
    Kraichnan-like?
  • Kraichnan
  • Equal populations of oppositely-propagating
    Alfvén waves
  • Decorrelation slows cascade
  • Solar wind
  • Dominated by one propagation direction
  • Anisotropy wavevectors usually perpendicular to
    field
  • Wave speed V VAcos(?)
  • Perpendicular wavevectors, not propagating no
    decorrelation
  • ? Kolmogorov cascade

57
k-filtering
  • Narita et al., 2006
  • Use k-filtering to identify different components
    of turbulence

58
Anisotropy and k-filtering
  • Sahraoui et al., 2006
  • Here, in magnetosheath Taylors hypothesis not
    satisfied
  • Single spacecraft cant do this analysis
  • Anisotropic energy distribution in k space

59
Turbulence and energetic particles
  • Energetic particles follow and scatter from
    magnetic field
  • Ulysses particles at high latitudes
  • Unexplained latitudinal transport
  • Must be related to 3D structure of magnetic field
  • This is poorly understood at present

60
Turbulence and energetic particles
  • Field-line wandering
  • Resonant scattering slab waves
  • Apparent power levels slab vs 2D
  • Anomalous diffusion (next slide)

61
Superdiffusion
  • Anomalous diffusion Zimbardo et al.
  • Result of anisotropy in k space

62
Kinetic processes
  • What happens when we reach non-MHD scales?
  • Kinetic processes important
  • Hydrodynamics viscosity causes dissipation
  • Collisionless plasmas no real viscosity
  • What causes dissipation?
  • Waves become dispersive

63
Steeper spectrum at kinetic scales
  • Alexandrova et al., 2007
  • Note Taylors hypothesis not necessarily
    satisfied

64
E and B spectrum in the kinetic regime
  • MHD E-VxB
  • Not so on kinetic scales
  • Evidence for kinetic Alfven waves?
  • Bale, 2005
  • See also Galtier, Hall MHD

65
Kinetic instabilities
  • Evidence for evolution of kinetic distribution
    limited by instabilities
  • Instability thresholds for ion cyclotron (solid),
    the mirror (dotted), the parallel (dashed), and
    the oblique (dash-dotted) fire hose
  • Figure from Matteini et al., 2007
  • Evidence for generation of waves due to this

66
Magnetosheath fluctuations
  • Magnetosheath is very disturbed shocked
  • Very different environment
  • Turbulence very different too
  • Alfven filaments
  • Spatially localised Alfven ion cyclotron waves
  • Alexandrova et al., 2006

67
Turbulent reconnection
  • Turbulence can bring differently directed
    magnetic fields together
  • Trigger reconnection
  • Retino et al., Nature, 2007

68
Turbulence and coronal heating
  • How is the corona heated?
  • Turbulent cascade dissipating photospheric
    motions as heating?
  • Nano-scale reconnection events?
  • Old UVCS evidence for enhanced heating of heavy
    ions due to wave-particle interactions?
  • Recent HINODE evidence for waves, but also
    reconnection events...

69
Waves and motion in the chromosphere
70
X-ray bright points ubiquitous reconnection
71
Other stuff
  • Magnetic holes
  • Common features short decreases in field
    magnitude
  • Mirror modes?
  • Reconnecting current sheets
  • Solitons (Rees et al., 2006)
  • Tens of seconds
  • Increases in field magnitude, decreases in
    density
  • Very rare

72
Summary results to date
  • Anisotropy
  • Perpendicular cascade
  • K41-type cascade
  • Intermittency
  • Similar to hydro
  • Large scale dependence
  • Distance/latitude/wind speed variability

73
Summary unanswered questions
  • 3D structure
  • What is the 3D form of the turbulence,
    particularly the magnetic field?
  • How does this control energetic particle
    transport?
  • Intermittency
  • Is solar wind intermittency the same as in
    hydrodynamics?
  • Dissipation
  • Mechanism?
  • Coronal heating
  • What can we learn about coronal conditions from
    the solar wind?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com