Civil Liberties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Civil Liberties

Description:

Civil Liberties Sticking it to the Man – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Jason565
Category:
Tags: civil | liberties | wade

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Civil Liberties


1
Civil Liberties
  • Sticking it to the Man

2
Civil Liberties
  • PERSONAL rights and freedoms that can not be
    abridged either by law, constitution, or judicial
    interpretation.
  • Unalienable Rights

3
Birth of the Bill of Rights
  • It was apparent that without an article directly
    speaking to the Bill of Rights the Constitution
    would not be ratified.
  • Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists
  • Federalist 84- Bill of Rights Unnecessary and
    Dangerous
  • Anti-Federalists win and Bill of Rights 1791

4
Dual Citizenship
  • Bill of Rights was designed to limit the powers
    of the National Government.
  • Barron vs. Baltimore 1833(Supreme Court Supported
    the Idea)
  • Courts ruled that the Bill of Rights only applied
    to the national government and not the state.
  • Each state established a constitution for itself

5
Incorporation
  • 14th Amendment not only defined citizenship but
    placed Restrictions on the State Government
  • NO STATE SHALL

6
INCORPORATION
  • USING THE 14th AMENDMENT TO APPLY THE BILL OF
    RIGHTS TO THE STATES ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS
  • Tool used in incorporation is the 14th AMENDMENT

7
Incorporation
  • The Supreme Court waited until 1925 to interpret
    the 14th Amendment to protect individuals from
    State Action
  • Gitlow vs. New York
  • Gitlow was Advocating a Forcible overthrow of the
    New York Government
  • Gitlow was arrested for his inflammatory remarks
  • The Court Case went to the Supreme Court and the
    Court ruled States no longer had the power to
    Abridge free speech due to the 14th Amendment

8
Near v. Minnesota
  • Near wrote and published an Anti-Semitic and
    Anti- Catholic newspaper
  • The State of Minnesota refused to let it be sold
  • INCOROPORATED FREEDOM OF PRESS

9
First Amendment Guarantees
  • Freedom of Religion
  • The Establishment Clause
  • Prohibits the government from establishing a
    national religion
  • Thomas Jefferson Called it Wall of Separation

10
Establishment Clause
  • School Prayer
  • Engel vs. Vitale
  • Struck down Non-Denominational Prayer
  • Abbington School District vs. Schempp
  • Struck down Public School Prayer

11
Establishment Clause
  • How can the Courts tell what is religious in
    schools or what is secular?
  • Lemon vs. Kurtzman
  • Lemon Test
  • Have a Secular Purpose
  • Have a primary effect that neither advances or
    prohibits religion
  • Not foster excessive government entanglement with
    Religion

12
Free Exercise Clause
  • Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free
    exercise
  • However this clause is also open to
    interpretation. Several Religious Practices have
    been ruled as unconstitutional including
  • Reynolds vs. United States
  • Polygamy is illegal and thus not covered under
    the Free Exercise Clause
  • Oregon vs. Smith
  • Banned illegal Drug use in Religious ceremonies.
    Free exercise clause does not cover illegal acts

13
Freedom of Speech
  • World War 1
  • Schenck vs. U.S.
  • Clear and Present Danger
  • Chaplinsky vs. New Hampshire
  • Fighting Words Doctrine
  • personally abusive epithets which, when addressed
    to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of
    common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke
    violent reactions."

14
Freedom of Press
  • Prior Restraint- Censorship
  • NYT vs. Pentagon Papers
  • Prior Restraint is unconstitutional unless it
    presents a clear and present danger to our nation
  • Miller vs. California
  • Obscenity
  • Community Standards Test
  • Patently offensive sexual conduct lacking serious
    literary artistic, political, or Scientific value
  • Miller said they were local and Not national
  • I KNOW IT WHEN I SEE IT

15
Freedom of Assembly
  • Dejonge vs. Oregon- Incorporated freedom of
    Assembly
  • National Socialist Party of America vs. Skokie
  • Skokie Case- It is constitutional for the Nazis
    to march in a Jewish Neighborhood

16
1st Amendment at School
  • Students do not shed their constitutional rights
    when they enter the schoolhouse door." 
  • Tinker vs. Des Moines
  • Alright to wear a black armband to protest the
    Vietnam war
  • MORSE et al. v. FREDERICK
  • Upheld the suspension of the Bong Hits 4 Jesus
    culprit
  • Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier
  • Administration has
  • Prior Restraint

17
2nd and 3rd Amendments
  • Have not been incorporated
  • Selective incorporation allows for fundamental
    rights to be granted to all citizens. The right
    to bear arms or quarter soldiers are not
    fundamental rights

18
Rights of the Accused
19
4th Amendment
  • Unreasonable Search and Seizure
  • Mapp v. Ohio
  • Overturned Wolf v. Colorado
  • Incorporated the Exclusionary Rule
  • Anything obtained in an illegal search and
    seizure may not be used at a trial
  • Katz v. United States
  • Wiretapping without a warrant violates the 4th
    amendment

20
5th Amendment
  • Indictment by a grand jury, self incrimination,
    double jeopardy, and eminent domain
  • Miranda vs. Arizona
  • Miranda Rights
  • Kelo vs. City of New London
  • The government can take public property to give
    to private companies

21
6th Amendment
  • Right to a Speedy and public trial, Right to a
    lawyer
  • Gideon vs. Wainwright
  • Right to an attorney during the trial
  • Escobedo vs. Illinois
  • Right to have a lawyer present during police
    interrogation

22
8th Amendment
  • Cruel and Unusual Punishment
  • Gregg v. Georgia
  • Death Penalty is NOT cruel and unusual punishment

23
Other Freedoms and Limitations
  • First Amendment
  • Freedom of Expression
  • Texas v. JohnsonIts constitutional to burn a
    U.S. Flag
  • First Amendment
  • Prohibitions on Speech/Press
  • Libel- Knowingly defaming a persons character
    with malicious intent. (PRESS)
  • NY Times v. Sullivan
  • Slander- Knowingly defaming a persons character
    with malicious intent. (Speech)

24
Right to Privacy?
  • No where in the Constitution does it state you or
    I have the right to privacy.
  • However, the courts have used several amendments
    to interpret a right to privacy
  • Griswold vs. Connecticut
  • Law was passed in Connecticut banning the
    dissemination of information about the sale of
    Contraceptives
  • Courts ruled the law was Unconstitutional based
    on Amendments 1,3,4,9,and 14
  • Establishes the RIGHT TO PRIVACY

25
Roe v. Wade
  • Argued that the decision to carry a pregnancy to
    term was a Womens fundamental right
  • In Roe v. Wade, the court found it was a
    fundamental right of a woman to have an abortion.
  • Used right to privacy and primarily the 9th
    amendment to reach their conclusion
  • Ever since Conservative justices have been trying
    to overturn Roe vs. Wade

26
The Right to Die
  • Cruzan v. Missouri Dept of Health (1990)
  • Living will is legitimate
  • Only if the patients family is able to provide
    Clear and convincing evidence like a living
    will
  • 9th Amendment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com