Neil Harrison, David James and Kathryn Last - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Neil Harrison, David James and Kathryn Last

Description:

The impact of a skills-led qualification on GCSE attainment: the case of ASDAN's Certificate of Personal Effectiveness Education and Employers Taskforce – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: NeilH174
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neil Harrison, David James and Kathryn Last


1
The impact of a skills-led qualification on GCSE
attainment the case of ASDAN's Certificate of
Personal Effectiveness Education and Employers
Taskforce 16th October 2012
  • Neil Harrison, David James and Kathryn Last

2
Background to CoPE (1)
  • Skills-led qualification offered by ASDAN
  • Based around modules that promote learning
    through undertaking challenges, Plan-Do-Review
    process and portfolio-building (c.f. Watkins
    2010)
  • Modules include Work-Based Learning and
    Enterprise and Vocational Preparation - wider key
    skills run through all modules
  • Learner-centred, drawing on personal interests,
    innovative curriculum and mainstream school work

3
Background to CoPE (2)
  • Available at Levels 1, 2 and 3
  • This study focused on Level 2 usually taken at
    KS4 and currently equivalent to B at GCSE
  • Offered across around 1,000 schools, with around
    10,000 young people completing each year
  • A wide range of young people take CoPE, though
    pupils with lower measured ability, FSM and
    special educational needs are over-represented

4
Use of CoPE in schools
  • We identified two main uses of CoPE
  • Thin where used mainly as supplement for
    small minority of young people with disrupted
    education between KS3 and KS4 (e.g. illness,
    absenteeism, disengagement, behavioural issues)
  • Wide where used as a more mainstream tool
    either to enhance the curriculum, increase
    motivation or broaden opportunities for
    achievement
  • This distinction is based on data, with the
    boundary set at 25 of cohort

5
Research method
  • Three strand approach
  • Analysis of National Pupil Database (NPD)
    statistical analysis of around 500,000 entries
    for cohort completing KS4 in 2010
  • Matched pairs quasi-experimental study using
    pairs of learners either taking or not taking
    CoPE, but otherwise similar across eight
    variables
  • Case studies research visits to four schools
    (three thin and one wide), with interviews
    with learners, teachers and school managers

6
National Pupil Database analysis
  • Multilevel binary logistic regression
  • Dependent variable is outcome in four variations
  • GCSE English pass at grades A to G
  • GCSE English pass at grades A to C
  • GCSE English pass at grades A or A
  • Achieving five GCSEs passes at A to C (inc.
    Eng/Maths)
  • Identifies the unique impact of each variable
    while holding others constant
  • Accounts for clustering of learners within
    schools and both individual and school level
    variables

7
Variables investigated
8
NPD findings (1)
  • GCSE English pass at A to G
  • In both thin and wide schools, taking CoPE is
    associated with a significantly higher likelihood
  • Other significant predictors
  • Positive KS3 English outcome (L6/7), gender
    (female), ethnicity (BME), ESL (yes), high
    school English and Maths pass rate
  • Negative KS3 English outcome (L2/3/4), FSM
    (yes), SEN (yes), KS3 absentee (yes), high
    school deprivation

9
NPD findings (2)
  • GCSE English pass at A to C
  • In wide schools, taking CoPE is associated with
    a significantly higher likelihood
  • In thin schools, taking CoPE is associated with
    a significantly lower likelihood
  • Other significant predictors
  • Positive KS3 English outcome (L6/7), gender
    (female), ethnicity (BME), ESL (yes), high
    school English and Maths pass rate, high school
    deprivation
  • Negative KS3 English outcome (L2/3/4), FSM
    (yes), SEN (yes), KS3 absentee (yes)

10
GCSE English A to C
11
NPD findings (3)
  • GCSE English pass at A or A
  • In wide schools, taking CoPE has a
    non-significant relationship with the likelihood
    of achieving pass
  • In thin schools, taking CoPE is associated with
    a significantly lower likelihood of achieving
    pass
  • Other significant predictors
  • Positive KS3 English outcome (L6/7), gender
    (female), ethnicity (BME), ESL (yes), high
    school English and Maths pass rate
  • Negative KS3 English outcome (L2/3/4), FSM
    (yes), SEN (yes), KS3 absentee (yes)

12
NPD findings (4)
  • Five GCSE passes at A to C inc Eng/Maths
  • In wide schools, taking CoPE is associated with
    a significantly higher likelihood
  • In thin schools, taking CoPE is associated with
    a significantly lower likelihood
  • Other significant predictors
  • Positive KS3 English outcome (L6/7), ethnicity
    (BME), ESL (yes), high school English and Maths
    pass rate, high school deprivation
  • Negative KS3 English outcome (L2/3/4), gender
    (female), FSM (yes), SEN (yes), KS3 absentee
    (yes)

13
Five GCSEs at A to C (inc. EM)
14
Paired sample analysis (1)
  • 200 young people completing CoPE in a wide
    school chosen at random from NPD data
  • Matched with 200 young people in schools not
    offering CoPE across eight variables
  • KS3 outcomes and regular absenteeism during KS3
  • Gender, ethnicity, special educational needs and
    English as additional language
  • Free school meals and neighbourhood deprivation
  • Creates two identical schools for comparison

15
Paired sample analysis (2)
GCSE English pass at A to C
132
150
No CoPE
CoPE in wide school
16
Paired sample analysis (3)
  • Robust quasi-experimental study
  • The CoPE school outperformed the non CoPE
    school across all measures
  • Mix of significant and non-significant effects
  • Average uplift of one-fifth of a grade, but much
    higher for some

17
Interpretation of findings
  • In thin schools
  • CoPE is directed towards learners expected to
    severely underperform relative to KS3 outcomes
  • Learners do still underperform in relation to
    achieving A to C grades, but more likely to take
    exams and achieve D or E grades (not F, G or U)
  • CoPE perceived to mitigate underperformance
  • In wide schools
  • CoPE is associated with better A to C pass
    rates, but not achievement of top grades (A to
    A) where subject knowledge vital alongside skills

18
Does CoPE work better for some?
  • Positive relationship of CoPE stronger for
  • Those with special educational needs
  • Those receiving free school meals
  • Those from minority ethnic communities, including
    those with English as a second/subsidiary
    language
  • Suggests specific role for challenging
    educational disadvantage
  • No coherent relationship between CoPE and gender

19
Why does CoPE work?
  • Not possible to examine statistically
  • Rich qualitative data from case study schools
  • Three possible mechanisms identified
  • Transferability of skills from CoPE to GCSEs
    especially written communication
  • Increased motivation learners actively enjoy
    CoPE and this engages them with other learning
  • Use of wider knowledge and activity base
    increases confidence and self-esteem connects
    school to lived lives

20
Why does it matter?
  • CoPE is caught up in the current bonfire of the
    vocationals. The loss of official equivalence
    with GCSE will mean schools are much less likely
    to offer CoPE. Thus
  • Loss of a learning process that appears to help a
    large number of pupils to gain better GCSEs
    (regarded by some as a prime indicator of labour
    supply skills)
  • Loss of explicit work-related opportunities for
    many pupils at the same time as the removal of
    the statutory requirement for WRL
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com