Title: Plasma etch control by means of physical plasma parameter measurement with HERCULES
1Plasma etch control by means of physical plasma
parameter measurement with HERCULES
A. Steinbach S. Wurm F. Bell Ch. Koelbl D.
Knobloch D. Köhler
2Contents
- Introduction - Motivation
- Plasma monitoring tool HERCULES
- Al etch on LAM TCP 9600 SE
- Contact etch on Applied Materials Centura MxP
- Summary
3Our way of plasma processing today an
effective way ?
Process parameters powerpressureB fieldgas
flow......
Process results etch rateuniformityselectivityp
articles.......
Black Box called plasma processing
- Experience and statistical methods in process
development - Process Monitoring and Tool control by test
wafers
4Measuring Techniques for real time Plasma
Monitoring
5Basic HERCULES Model
- High Frequency Electron Resonance Current Low
Pressure Spectroscopy
6HERCULES - Principle of measurement
- Passive electrical method,no influence on the
plasma - RF current measurement on ground potential at
the chamber wall - RF voltage measurement at the matchbox output
- Integral measurement
- Results of FFT and modelelectron collision
rateelectron densitybulk powerbias voltage
7Principle and experimental setup
Algorithm
- Passive electrical method,no influence on the
plasma - Integral measurement
8SEERS provides reciprocally averaged parameters
Self Excited Electron Resonance Spectroscopy
9Automatic data handling
10TCP Al etch - trend analysis main etch
- Cl2 - MFC failure - Cleans
11TCP Al etch - trend analysis barrier etch
- Cl2 - MFC failure - Cleans
12TCP Al etch in Cl2 - first wafer effect
- First wafer effect in main etch
13TCP Al etch - with / without barrier (TiN,Ti)
14LAM TCP 9600SE Al etch - electron density and
bulk power vs TCP power
TCP power effects the density and collision rate
of electrons and therefore the plasma impedance
and the power dissipation of the bottom power
(capacitive). Mainly dependent on collision
rate, the bulk power (bottom) decreases by
increasing TCP power (gt250W). This is the reason
for the plateau in the electron density.
15AMAT MxP chamber - Hook up problems
- In the actual configuration no peak - to - peak
rf voltage measurement possible? dark space
thickness declared to be constant rough
approximation for varying B field? systematic
failure of electron density, bulk power and
bias voltage - Plasma oscillation caused the B field
circulation? measurement is triggered by B
field sensor? 1 measurement every 2 s only
(minimum measurement period 0,2 s)
16MxP CT etch Plasma parameters dependíng on
process parameters
Change of process chemistry ? strong nonlinear
correlation
17MxP CT etch - Etch rate BPSG (blanket)
depending on plasma parameters
Obvious correlations between etch rate
and electron collision rateelectron densitybulk
power
18MxP CT etch - Contact angle depending on
plasma parameters
Change of process chemistry ?no obvious
correlation between electron density and contact
angle
19MxP Chamber monitoring of contact etch
processes on product wafers
Process mix in Applied Materials Centura MxP
chamber Oxide and Nitride etch with CF4 / CHF3
/ Ar / O2 chemistry Process 1 Process 2 Process
3 Descum --- N2 / O2 --- Step 1 BPSG BPSG Oxide S
tep 2 --- Nitride ---
20MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring of product
wafers electron collision rate
- Electron collision rate
- decreases with rf hours
- very sensitive to etch chemistry Pr1
Pr2 !
One point - one wafer
21MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring on product
wafers electron density
- Electron density
- decreases with rf hours slightly
- sensitive to etch chemistry
One point - one wafer
22MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring on product
wafers bulk power
- Bulk power
- decreases with rf hours
- very sensitive to power input
- nearly not sensitive to etch chemistry
One point - one wafer
23MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring on blanket
BPSG wafers
- Electron collision rate correlates with
uniformity. - Electron density and bulk power too
24MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring on test
wafers Etch Rate and Uniformity
- Electron collision rate, electron density and
bulk power correlate with change of etch rate at
wafer edge, caused by growing polymer at chamber
wall.
25MxP CT etch - Chamber monitoring on test
wafers Particle density
- Electron collision rate, electron density and
bulk power correlate slightly with change of
particle density, caused by growing polymer at
chamber wall.
26MxP Conditioning after wet clean
Wetclean Stable chamber conditions after about
10 wafers.
27MxP CT etch - short term chamber drift
depending on idle time
Electrical failure counts at Contact etch
Bad chamber
Wafer
- Collision rate shows dependence on chamber idle
time. - Constant chamber conditions after about 40 min.
- Change in electron collision rate corresponds to
change in electrical failure counts.
28MxP CT etch - short term chamber drift
Electrical failure counts at Contact etch
Wafer
- Electron density and failure counts increase by
wafer number.
- One of four chambers causes high failure counts.
29eMxP Arcing detection
Arcing between e - chuck and wafer
30MxP CT etch - endpoint detection
- endpoint on patternd wafer
- endpoint on blanket wafer
- First test of endpoint detection on patterned CT
test wafers showed lower sensitivity than AMAT
HOT Pack.
31Summary
- Al etch in LAM TCP 9600 SE, oxide and nitride
etch in Applied Materials Centura MxP have been
monitored with HERCULES. - The measured parameters depend significantly on
chamber conditions and etch results. - The masured parameters are absolute values.
- No difficult modeling by the user is necessary,
results are immediate.
32Applications of the tool
- Development and optimizing processes yes
- Long and short term tool stability yes
- Tool matching yes
- Control of chamber cleaning yes
- Control of power coupling into plasma yes
- Endpoint detection possible
- Layer resolution possible
- Spatial resolution no
- Reduction of test- and monitor wafers yes
- Detection of tool failure yes
- Arcing detection yes