SHEAR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT ON METAL/POLYMER INTERFACE USING FRAGMENTATION TEST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

SHEAR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT ON METAL/POLYMER INTERFACE USING FRAGMENTATION TEST

Description:

SHEAR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT ON METAL/POLYMER INTERFACE USING FRAGMENTATION TEST S. Charca, O. T. Thomsen Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: OleT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SHEAR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT ON METAL/POLYMER INTERFACE USING FRAGMENTATION TEST


1
SHEAR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT ON METAL/POLYMER
INTERFACE USING FRAGMENTATION TEST
  • S. Charca, O. T. Thomsen
  • Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing
    Engineering
  • Aalborg University, Aalborg Denmark
  • CompTest 2011, Lausanne

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Objectives
  • Sample manufacturing and experimental procedure
  • Results and analysis
  • Filament failure mode
  • Photoelasticity and isochromatic fringe patterns
  • Fragment lengths
  • Finite element analysis validation
  • Conclusions

3
Introduction
  • The mechanical properties and performance of
    polymer composites materials are to a large
    extent determined by the interface properties.
  • There are several methods that are currently used
    to characterize the interface properties such as
    single fibre pull-out, micro-tension,
    micro-indentation and fragmentation tests.
  • The single fibre fragmentation test method
    appears to offer some advantages compared with
    other methods (e.g. single fiber pull out and
    micro indentation tests) for assessing the
    fiber-resin interface shear strength. Moreover
    it offers the advantage over the other methods
    that the number of fragments that can be obtained
    from one single test specimen is typically large,
    thus enabling a complete statistical analysis.
  • The fragmentation test was proposed initially by
    Kelly and Tyson (1965) based on their work on
    tungsten fibres embedded in a Cu matrix.

4
Introduction (cont.)
  • The low cost and high mechanical properties of
    the steel filament/cord compared to the
    traditional carbon/glass fibers are the main
    motivation to the start exploring the potential
    and reliable application of polymers reinforced
    by steel filament/cord for civil engineering,
    automotive, wind turbine and others applications
  • A significant challenge in polymers reinforced
    by steel filament/cord is the resin-steel
    interface properties

5
Objectives
  • The objectives of this research include
  • Study the interface properties of single steel
    filament embedded in a resin.
  • Achieve multiple fragmentations of steel
    filaments embedded in an unsaturated polyester
    matrix.
  • Determination of the failure mechanisms.
  • Perform a statistical analysis including a data
    discrimination process.
  • And finally to determine the interface shear
    strength using the Kelly and Tyson criterion.

6
Sample manufacturing
  • Steel filaments
  • Zinc coated ultra high strength steel filament D
    0.1mm
  • Sizing Silane with amino functionality
  • Resin Unsaturated polyester
  • Samples were manufactured by casting using
    treated (sizing) and non treated filaments
  • 10 dogbone samples were manufactured for each
    type of filament - 5 samples were made at the
    Risø DTU National Laboratory for Sustainable
    Energy (Denmark) facilities and the rest at the
    AAU facilities

7
  • Specimens design

Obtained at 0.05mm/min
Fragmentation occurs if E lt ECrit
Where
From the ECrit. and rules of mixture.
Fiber fragmentation occurs if
Minimum sample cross section for fragmentation
test
8
Final sample dimensions
  • In order to fix the filament into the mould in
    the manufacturing process and avoid non uniform
    stress distribution along the filament filaments
    were pre-loaded in tension during the casting and
    curing process using a 200g weight

9
Experimental setup

Fragmentation processes were monitored using the
photoelasticity technique, with a 50X
magnification stereomicroscope After samples
fails, the specimens were polished until to
obtain a mirror surface to observe and measure
the filament fragments
Loading rate 0.05mm/min
10
Filament failure mode
  • Filament failure in the resin displayed a defined
    pattern as shown using 50X magnification

11
Photoelasticity and isochromatic fringes
  • Typical stress/strain curve on dogbone
    fragmentation specimens and the corresponding
    polarization image observed during the test _at_
    e5.33

Light areas appears around the filament, which is
an indication of apparent interface debonding
12
Microscopic image at 37N/mm2 and e 5.70. (Non
treated steel filament)
  • Photoelastic birefringence around the filament
    fragments at 37N/mm2 and e 5.70

High stress concentration zones
Matrix is purely subjected to tension
In the fragmentation experiments high intensity
fringe patterns were observed (light or dark,
depending of the polarization angle).
13
Fragment length data discrimination
Filament fragment representation along the sample
  • Dependent on the specimen cross sectional area,
    distinct differences in the number of
  • fragments per specimen unit length were
    observed
  • In the zones e2, e4, and e1 the saturation
    limit was reached and the samples failed
  • Longer fragment lengths were observed in zone
    e3 than in the other zones.
  • Accordingly, the fragment lengths in zone 3
    have been dismissed from the data processing
  • The observed fragmentation data shows three
    different length ranges
  • 0.5 5mm
  • 5 8mm
  • 8 15mm

14
Detailed statistical fitting tests
(Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Chi-square) showed that
the fragment length distributions for each
specimen fitted with the extreme distributions
(Gamma, Gumbel and Weibull). Histograms show
the relative frequencies of occurrence of
different fragment lengths.
Non-treated filament surface no. of fragments
284
Treated filament surface no. of fragments 329
15
  • Summary of results of the fragmentation test
    after data discrimination
  • The apparent interface shear strengths were
    calculated using the Kelly and Tyson relation
    considering the critical fragment length

Non-treated filament surface
Treated filament surface
16
FEA modeling
  • ANSYS 12.1
  • Assumption Material is linear elastic
  • Element type 2D plane183 (Axi-symmetric 32000
    elements)
  • Perfect interface bonding assumed
  • Thermal analogy for resin shrinkage

Filament under study
  • sult 3016 N/mm2 (Steel)
  • Calculated critical fragment length for filament
    failure using FEA
  • LcFEA 1.65mm
  • Experimental average fragment length
  • LcExp 1.70mm

17
  • Conclusions
  • Fragmentation tests were successfully implemented
    with single steel filaments embedded in polyester
    resin.
  • The fragmentation process start with debonding,
    followed by necking (yielding) and finally
    fracture of the steel filaments.
  • Filament fragmentation starts to develop at
    specimen longitudinal strains exceeding 4.90.
  • Fragmentation length distributions fit the
    extreme distributions (Gamma, Gumbel and
    Weibull).
  • The apparent interface shear strengths derived
    using the Kelly and Tyson equation are very
    large.
  • The experimentally observed critical fragment
    length was confirmed using Finite Element
    Analysis
  • Apparent improvement of the interface shear
    strength was observed for samples manufactured
    using surface treated steel filaments

18
Acknowledgement
  • The research reported was sponsored by the
    Danish National Advanced
  • Technology Foundation. The financial support
    is gratefully acknowledged.
  • The authors wish to thank Dr. Jakob I. Bech,
    Dr. Hans Lilholt, Mr. Tom L.
  • Andersen, Dr. R.T. Durai Prabhakaran and
    other colleagues at Risø
  • National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy,
    Technical University of
  • Denmark, for inspiring discussions

19
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com