Title: Models of infection: Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV)
1Models of infection Porcine Reproductive and
Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV)
- Dr. Amelia Woolums
- LAMS 5160
2PRRSV
- Family Arteriviridae
- ss () RNA, enveloped
- genome encodes 7 proteins
- Clinical syndrome recognized in North Carolina in
mid 1980s - Virus isolated in Europe in 1991
- Isolated in N. America shortly thereafter
3PRRSV
- Already significant genetic variability when
European and NA types identified - Mathematical modeling suggests virus first
appeared 1980 - Jumped from another species?
- Other family members
- equine arteritis virus (EAV)
- LDH-elevating virus (LDV)
- possible source of PRRSV??
4PRRSV, clinical signs
- Reproductive problems
- late gestation most common
- litters with normal, weak, stillborn, and mummies
- anorexia, agalactia in sows
- early gestation losses possible abortions,
return to service - Respiratory disease
- Dyspnea and tachypnea, ill-thrift, poor growth
- Interstitial pneumonia
- Most common in grower/feeder
- Rarely, severe fatal disease in in adults
5PRRSV, clinical signs
- Cutaneous signs possible
- Hyperemia or cyanosis of extremities
- Neuro signs in sows rarely
- Repro, respiratory, and cutaneous signs very
similar to EAV in horses
6http//www.elsenburg.com/vets/prrs
7http//www.elsenburg.com/vets/prrs
8Courtesy Dr. D. Reeves
9- NOTE that inapparent infection is not unusual
- Infection can be prolonged (persistent)
- As long as 5 months post infection
- Shedding is intermittent
- Important contribution to epizootiology
10Pathogenic mechanisms
- Virus targets macrophages
- Alveolar macrophages, tissue macrophages
- Primary sites in acute disease
- Lung
- Lymphoid tissue lymphadenopathy common
- Many other sites possible kidney, spleen, heart,
thymus, skin, reproductive tract, nervous system - In chronic phase, virus found in peripheral lymph
nodes, TONSILS
11- Consider how could preferential targeting of
macrophages contribute to disease? - Decreased (or increased?) production of
proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-1) - Decreased APC activity decreased activation of
CD4 TH cells - Decreased clearance of virus and cell debris
12PRRSV, effects on macrophages
- Direct killing of macrophages
- Decreased production of TNF-a
- as compared to influenza, other viruses
- Decreased phagocytosis
- Induction of apoptosis of bystanders
- Possibly related to dysfunctional cytokine or
costimulatory molecule expression by MP?
13Effects on immune response
- Humoral
- Rapid onset of non-neutralizing antibody
- Neutralizing response surprisingly slow (3-4 wks)
- Some in vitro evidence for antibody-enhanced
disease - How could antibody enhance disease?
14Effects on immune response
- Cell-mediated
- T cell responses following vaccination or
infection are slow and weak - IFN-a production actively suppressed
- Cells exposed to PRRSV then TGE virus (strong
IFN-a inducer) no IFN-a - Why does IFN-a matter?
15(No Transcript)
16A. Woolums, LAMS 5160
17Effects on immune response
- PRRSV suppresses TH1 response
- Decreased IFN-a
- Decreased TNF-a
- Increased IL-10
- Suppresses TH1 response
- Net effect poor response to intracellular
pathogen
18PRRSV, outcome of infection
- Outcome of PRRSV infection in a herd of pigs is
unpredictable - Why some infected herds apparently suffer no ill
effects while others are constantly battling
clinical PRRS is not known - Zimmerman, 2003
19- Three factors have important impact on outcome of
PRRSV infection - Strain of infecting virus
- Host factors
- Management factors
20Disease severity influence of virus
- Genetic variability major influence on
pathogenesis - Two major types European and North American
- Only 60 concordance at genetic level
- Innumerable subtypes with varying degrees of
relatedness - Immunity to heterologous strains is incomplete to
nonexistent
21Influence of viral genetic variability
- PRRSV exists as quasispecies
- Genetic variation occurs between farms, among
pigs, and WITHIN individual pigs - Farm level diversity (nucleotide) 93
- Among pigs 4
- Within a given pig 3
- No two pigs on the same farm had identical PRRSV
- Multiple variants coexist in individual animals
-
(Goldberg et al, 2003)
22Influence of viral genetic variability
- PRRSV mutates at an unusually rapid rate, even
for an RNA virus - 10-2/amino acid site/year, as compared to 10-3
to 10-5 for HIV, hepatitis C virus - Data suggests this is due to more rapid
replication, rather than higher error rate, than
other RNA viruses -
(Hanada et al, 2005)
23- How does the rapid generation of genetic variants
contribute to the disease caused by PRRSV? - Frequent opportunity for virus to evade host
immune response - New variants could lead to disease in susceptible
subgroups within a supposedly resistant herd - Theoretically, persistent virus could outstrip
host immunity and lead to recurrent disease in
previously infected individual - Very difficult to come up vaccines effective in
every situation
24- Viral strain impacts virulence
- Genetic variability could allow opportunity for
improved virulence how? - Change in receptor better attachment/invasion?
- Change in proteins that impair host immunity?
- Change in proteins that promote inter-pig
transmission? - At this time, almost nothing is known about how
viral proteins relate to virulence
25Disease severity influence of host
- Many anecdotal reports of variation in disease
severity among different breeds, families - Research supports differential susceptibility
among purebreds and commercial lines - Factors that contribute to breed-related
susceptibility not known
26Disease severity influence of host
- Coinfection with other agents makes disease due
to PRRSV worse - Influenza, porcine circovirus-2, TGE, Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae, Strep. suis among otherslead to
enhanced PRRSV - Does PRRSV-induced immunosuppression enhance
secondary disease? Data mixed - Likely important in at least some cases
- PRRSV M. hyopneumoniae currently considered
leading cause of respiratory disease in
growing/finishing pigs
27Disease severity influence of management
- Clear farm effect on PRRSV severity
- More research needed to determine relevant
factors - SIZE of farm consistently associated with PRRSV
problems - Larger farms more likely to have disease,
persistent/recurrent infection - Smaller farms less problems, even if no efforts
made to prevent disease
28Disease severity influence of management
- Although some farms can have inapparent
infection, overall, PRRSV is associated with
decreased productivity - Choice for management try to eradicate, or live
with it?
29Disease severity influence of management
- Problem strategies that have worked to maintain
herds free of other pathogens have not worked
well for PRRSV - Herds cleared of PRRSV infection can become
reinfected despite all efforts to prevent
reintroduction
30Disease severity influence of management
- Important sources of infection
- New introductions
- Infected semen
- Possible sources of infection
- Fomites trucks, boots, coolers (for transporting
semen), lunchboxes (!) - Fomite transport a bigger problem when cool (34
F) - Flies, mosquitoes, mallard ducks
- Airborne from neighboring farms
31Disease severity influence of management
- Other factors that impact maintenance of
PRRSV-free status - Long-term, low-level infection with inapparent
shedding - Imperfect diagnostic tests
- No test yet discovered with 100 sensitivity and
100 specificity - At level of discrimination needed to keep 1000s
of pigs permanently virus-free, this matters
32- Some general recommendations
- If youre going to live with the virus
- Maintain immunity to endogenous strains by
vaccination or planned exposure - Ensure herd-wide immunity dont let susceptible
subgroups develop - Prevent introduction of new strains that could
circumvent herd immunity - Screen new introductions, semen, watch out for
fomites
33- Some general recommendations
- If youre going to try to be PRRSV-free
- Consider depopulation/repopulation
- Undertake regular serologic and virologic testing
to identify and segregate/remove infected animals - Once infected animals cleared, regularly monitor
- Consider using multiple diagnostic tests to
maximize sensitivity/specificity - Screening test high sensitivity
- Confirmatory test suitable sensitivity, higher
specificity - Exercise extreme vigilance to prevent
introduction via new arrivals, semen, fomites