Ka-fu Wong School of Economics and Finance University of Hong Kong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Ka-fu Wong School of Economics and Finance University of Hong Kong

Description:

Ka-fu Wong School of Economics and Finance University of Hong Kong ** Prepared for the Professional Development Seminar for Economics Teachers, October 21, 2009. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: Kaf83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ka-fu Wong School of Economics and Finance University of Hong Kong


1
Ka-fu WongSchool of Economics and
FinanceUniversity of Hong Kong
Calling it a Recession
Prepared for the Professional Development
Seminar for Economics Teachers, October 21, 2009.
2
Outline
  • Definition of business cycles
  • Why do we care about business cycles
  • Causes of business cycles
  • Business cycles dating
  • NBER, e.g., US
  • Shiskin Rule, e.g., HK
  • Hong Kongs dependence on US
  • Causes of the recent financial crisis and
    recession

3
Definition of Business Cycles
A cycle consists of expansions occurring at about
the same time in many economic activities,
followed by similarly general recessions,
contractions, and revivals which merge into the
expansion phase of the next cycle this sequence
of changes is recurrent but not periodic in
duration business cycles vary from more than one
year to ten or twelve years they are not
divisible into shorter cycles of similar
character with amplitudes approximating their
own. (Burns and Mitchell, 1946, p.3)
Burns, A.F., and W. C. Mitchell (1946), Measuring
Business Cycles. New York NBER.
4
Definition of Business Cycles
  • The term business cycle (or economic cycle)
    refers to economy-wide fluctuations in production
    or economic activity over several months or
    years.
  • Expansion (or boom) episode from local minimum
    output to maximum output, i.e., from trough to
    peak
  • Contraction (recession) episode from local
    maximum output to minimum output, i.e., from peak
    to trough

5
Definition of Business Cycles
6
Definition of Business Cycles
R
7
What if
8
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
  • Deviations of output from trend
  • Also known as growth cycles or deviation cycles.
  • Expansion (or boom) episode output grows at a
    higher rate than the trend.
  • Contraction (recession) episode output grows at
    a lower rate than the trend.

9
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
10
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
11
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
12
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
13
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
14
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
15
Alternative Definition of Business Cycles
  • Difficulty
  • We need to define and estimate the trend before
    we can conclude about the business cycles
  • Trends
  • Linear trend
  • Quadratic trend
  • Stochastic trend
  • Filtering out the high-frequency fluctuations and
    the low-frequency fluctuations using some
    advanced statistical technique, known as Band
    Pass Filter.

16
US Industrial production index, levels
Stock and Watson (1998, Fig. 1.1)
17
Estimate of the cyclical component of US
industrial production index
Stock and Watson (1998, Fig. 1.2)
A bandpass filter was used to isolates
fluctuations at business cycle periodicities, six
quarters to eight years.
18
Macroeconomics is about business cycles
  • The explanation of fluctuations in aggregate
    economic activity is one of the primary concerns
    of macroeconomics.
  • The most commonly used framework for explaining
    such fluctuations is Keynesian economics. In the
    Keynesian view, business cycles reflect the
    possibility that the economy may reach short-run
    equilibrium at levels below or above full
    employment.
  • Recessionary gap the economy is operating with
    less than full employment, i.e., high
    unemployment
  • Expansionary gap the economy is operating with
    more than full employment, i.e., low unemployment

19
Economic expansion or recession?
a. Expansion
Price Level (P)
b. Recession
c. Cannot be determined
SRAS
P
AD
0
Y
Quantity of Output (Y)
20
Expansionary or Recessionary (I)
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS
a. Expansionary gap
P
b. Recessionary gap
AD
0
Y
Y
Quantity of Output (Y)
21
Expansionary or Recessionary (II)
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS
P
a. Expansionary gap
b. Recessionary gap
AD
Y
0
Y
Quantity of Output (Y)
22
Recession
  • A recession is a general slowdown in economic
    activity over a long period of time, or a
    business cycle contraction. During recessions,
    many macroeconomic indicators vary in a similar
    way.
  • Production falls
  • Gross Domestic Product (GDP),
  • employment,
  • investment spending,
  • capacity utilization,
  • household incomes,
  • business profits and
  • inflation
  • Bankruptcies and the unemployment rate rises.

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession
23
Why do we care about business cycles?
  • While we may love expansion but we would not want
    to experience recession.
  • Most of us are risk averse and prefer stable
    income
  • Implications for policy makers
  • A good understanding of the cycles helps us
    prevent it or reduce the magnitude of the cycles.
  • Implications for individual consumers and
    investors
  • A good understanding of the cycles helps us
    predict the cycles and hence prepare for the
    cycles.

24
Predictors of a recession
  • In the US a significant stock market drop has
    often preceded the beginning of a recession.
  • Inverted yield curve uses yields on 10-year and
    three-month Treasury securities as well as the
    Fed's overnight funds rate. Another model
    developed by Federal Reserve Bank of New York
    economists uses only the 10-year/three-month
    spread. It is, however, not a definite indicator
    it is sometimes followed by a recession 6 to 18
    months later.
  • The three-month change in the unemployment rate
    and initial jobless claims.
  • Index of Leading (Economic) Indicators (includes
    some of the above indicators).
  • Lowering of Home Prices. Lowering of home prices
    or value, too much personal debts.

25
Causes of business cycles
  • The cause of a business cycle typically is taken
    to be a shock or innovation to a relationship in
    the economy.
  • Only deviations from the rule then would be
    admissible as a shock.
  • Shocks are defined according to specific models.

http//www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf42/con42_
03.pdf
26
Example of shocks
  • An elementary open-economy model
  • an augmented IS-LM model or Mundell-Fleming
    model.
  • The model distinguishes domestic and foreign
    shocks as well as real and monetary shocks.
  • This level of abstraction and general orientation
    of underlying assumptions about the economy is
    typical of the historical literature on business
    cycles in the United States.

Domestic Foreign
Real DR FR
Monetary DM FM
http//www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf42/con42_
03.pdf
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mundell-Fleming_model
27
Recessionary gap
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS2
SRAS1
B
Higher price Lower output Lower employment Higher
unemployment
P2
A
P1
AD1
0
Y1
Y2
Quantity of Output (Y)
28
Recessionary gap
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS1
Lower price Lower output Lower employment Higher
unemployment
A
P1
B
P2
AD1
AD2
0
Y1
Y2
Quantity of Output (Y)
29
Expansionary gap
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS1
Higher price Higher output Higher
employment Lower unemployment
P2
B
A
P1
AD2
AD1
Y2
0
Y1
Quantity of Output (Y)
30
Expansionary gap
Price Level (P)
LRAS
SRAS1
SRAS2
Lower price Higher output Higher employment Lower
unemployment
A
P1
B
P2
AD1
Y2
0
Y1
Quantity of Output (Y)
31
Business Cycle Dating in the US
  • The National Bureau's Business Cycle Dating
    Committee maintains a chronology of the U.S.
    business cycle. The chronology identifies the
    dates of peaks and troughs that frame economic
    recession or expansion. The period from a peak to
    a trough is a recession and the period from a
    trough to a peak is an expansion.
  • The NBER does not define a recession in terms of
    two consecutive quarters of decline in real GDP.
    Rather, a recession is a significant decline in
    economic activity spread across the economy,
    lasting more than a few months, normally visible
    in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial
    production, and wholesale-retail sales.

http//www.nber.org/cycles.html http//www.nber.or
g/cycles/recessions.html
32
Identifying the trough in November 2001
  • On July 16, 2003, the committee determined that a
    trough in economic activity occurred in November
    2001. The committee's announcement of the trough
    is at http//www.nber.org/cycles/july2003.
  • On November 26, 2001, the committee determined
    that the peak of economic activity had occurred
    in March of that year. For a discussion of the
    committee's reasoning and the underlying
    evidence, see http//www.nber.org/cycles/november2
    001.
  • Thus, March 2001 (peak) to November 2001 (trough)
    was a recession.

http//www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html
33
The committees usual procedures in identifying
trough
  • Because a recession influences the economy
    broadly and is not confined to one sector, the
    committee emphasizes economy-wide measures of
    economic activity. The committee views real GDP
    as the single best measure of aggregate economic
    activity. In determining whether a recession has
    occurred and in identifying the approximate dates
    of the peak and the trough, the committee
    therefore places considerable weight on the
    estimates of real GDP issued by the Bureau of
    Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of
    Commerce.
  • The traditional role of the committee is to
    maintain a monthly chronology, however, and the
    BEAs real GDP estimates are only available
    quarterly. For this reason, the committee refers
    to a variety of monthly indicators to choose the
    exact months of peaks and troughs.

34
The committees usual procedures in identifying
trough
  • It places particular emphasis on two monthly
    measures of activity across the entire economy
  • (1) personal income less transfer payments, in
    real terms and
  • (2) employment.
  • In addition, the committee refers to two
    indicators with coverage primarily of
    manufacturing and goods
  • (3) industrial production and
  • (4) the volume of sales of the manufacturing and
    wholesale-retail sectors adjusted for price
    changes.
  • The committee also looks at monthly estimates of
    real GDP such as those prepared by Macroeconomic
    Advisers (see http//www.macroadvisers.com).
  • Although these indicators are the most important
    measures considered by the NBER in developing its
    business cycle chronology, there is no fixed rule
    about which other measures contribute information
    to the process.

35
Figure 1 Quarterly Real GDP
The fact that this broad and reliable indicator
of macroeconomic activity surpassed its previous
peak in the fourth quarter of 2001 was a key
reason that the committee felt that the recession
that began in March 2001 had ended. The fact
that quarterly real GDP grew very strongly in the
fourth quarter of 2001 also helped to limit the
possible months that could be identified as the
trough. The committee felt that the recovery must
have begun before December 2001 for GDP to have
grown so rapidly in the fourth quarter.
36
Figure 2 Real Personal Income less Transfers
The behavior of this series is consistent with
both the identification of a trough and the
placement of the trough in November 2001. Real
personal income fell in early 2001. It reached
its low point in October 2001. However, because
it grew only a small amount between October and
November 2001, the NBER methodology indicates
that it reached its trough in November. Since
then, personal income less transfers generally
rose through January 2003, fell in February and
March, but rose in April and May, the most recent
reported months.
37
Figure 3 Payroll Employment
The fluctuations in this series are quite
different from those in the broader, output-based
measures. Employment reached a peak in February
2001 and declined through July 2002. It rose
slightly through November, took a sharp downturn
in December, rose again in January 2003, but
since then has declined through June 2003, the
most recent reported month. It is now 394,000
below the start of the year, and 2.6 million
below the February 2001 peak. The fact that
employment has continued to decline while
output-based measures have risen reflects the
fact that productivity has risen substantially
since late 2001. The divergent behavior of output
and employment was a key reason why the committee
waited a long time before identifying the trough.
38
Why identified November 2001 as trough with
conflicting data?
  • The behavior of other monthly series is also
    consistent with the identification of the trough
    in late 2001. Industrial production fell until
    December 2001 and then rose rapidly until July
    2002. It has fallen slightly since then.
  • Real manufacturing wholesale-retail sales reached
    its low in September 2001. It then recovered
    substantially in October 2001, only to fall again
    in November. As discussed in the trough
    announcement, the NBER methodology holds that
    extreme events, such as strikes and natural
    disasters, that affect particular monthly
    observations should be downweighted in
    identifying business cycle turning points. For
    this reason, the committee emphasized the
    November 2001 trough in this series, rather than
    the dramatic decline in sales following the
    tragic events of September 11th. This series has
    generally risen since September 2001. It fell
    sharply in February 2003, but rose substantially
    in March, the most recent reported month.
  • The committee also looks at monthly estimates of
    real GDP provided by Macroeconomic Advisors. This
    series reached its low in September 2001 and has
    generally been growing since then. The fact that
    monthly GDP rose dramatically in December 2001
    reinforced the committees decision that the
    trough occurred in November. Monthly real GDP
    fell slightly in March and April 2003, the most
    recent reported months.

39
NBER recession dateshttp//www.nber.org/cycles.ht
ml
Peak Trough Contraction Expansion Cycle Cycle
P-P T-T
August 1929(III) March 1933 (I) 43 21 64 34
May 1937(II) June 1938 (II) 13 50 63 93
February 1945(I) October 1945 (IV) 8 80 88 93
November 1948(IV) October 1949 (IV) 11 37 48 45
July 1953(II) May 1954 (II) 10 45 55 56
August 1957(III) April 1958 (II) 8 39 47 49
April 1960(II) February 1961 (I) 10 24 34 32
December 1969(IV) November 1970 (IV) 11 106 117 116
November 1973(IV) March 1975 (I) 16 36 52 47
January 1980(I) July 1980 (III) 6 58 64 74
July 1981(III) November 1982 (IV) 16 12 28 18
July 1990(III) March 1991(I) 8 92 100 108
March 2001(I) November 2001 (IV) 8 120 128 128
December 2007 (IV) December 2007 (IV) 73 81
40
Suggested exercises
  • Go through the NBERs Business-Cycle Dating
    Procedure in class.
  • Exercise 1 Give students some US data up to
    different point in time (available at the St.
    Louis Fed, http//research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/).
    Let them work in groups and determine the most
    recent trough or peak.
  • Exercise 2 Give students some Hong Kong data
    up to certain time (available at
    http//www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/in
    dex.jsp). Let them determine the most recent
    trough or peak.

Re-label the dates if we are concerned that
students may remember the recession dates
previously identified by the official
announcements.
41
Shiskins Rules of Thumb for Spotting a Recession
(two-quarter rule?)
  • Real GDP declines for two successive quarters
  • Industrial production declines for a 6-month
    period.
  • Real GDP declines by at least 1.5
  • Payroll employment declines by at least 1.5
  • At least two-point rise in unemployment rate
  • For six months or longer, less than 25 of the
    industries are expanding when measured by the
    employment diffusion index using 6-month spans.
  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics employment
    diffusion index covers 274 industries and asks
    this question What share of the industries are
    enjoying an employment expansion or experiencing
    a contraction? A reading of 50 indicates exact
    balance. Values below 50 indicate contraction.

42
Hong Kong RecessionsYear-on-year Growth rate of
Real GDP (chained)
43
HK recessionsUnemployment rate 198110 - 200909
200908 200909
SA 5.4 5.3
NSA 5.8 5.6
44
Hong Kongs dependence on the US
  • Monthly seasonally adjusted unemployment rate
    from 1981 October to 2009 August is obtained from
    the online statistical tables of Hong Kong Census
    and Statistics Department, a total of 335
    observations.
  • The data are plotted with NBER recession dates.

45
Hong Kongs dependence on the US
46
Hong Kongs dependence on the US
  • Hong Kongs unemployment rate tend to increase
    during episodes of US recessions. The negative
    impact of the US recession or downturn on Hong
    Kong takes a couple of months to realize.

47
Understanding recession
  • We have to understand expansion

48
How do bubbles cause cycles?
Higher asset prices
Consumption increases due to wealth effect
Aggregate demand increases
Output increases
49
How does excess liquidity cause a boom?
Excess liquidity and easy credit
Higher asset prices
Consumption and investment increase
Consumption increases due to wealth effect
Aggregate demand increases
Output increases
50
Causes of the financial crisis?
Influx of Foreign Money
  • High consumption
  • Unprecedented debt load
  • Property appreciation

Housing bubbles
  • easy initial terms ARM
  • Free cash from refinancing
  • Kept derivatives market unregulated.
  • Underestimated the impacts of shadow banking
    systems, i.e. investment banks and hedge funds,
    which lacked financial cushions.
  • Accounting practices allowed commercial banks to
    move new financial products off balance sheets as
    complex legal entities.
  • SEC relaxed capital rule prompted banks take on
    higher leverages.
  • Encouraged subprime mortgages, incl. Fannie Mae
    Freddie Mac.

U.S. Govt.
51
A note on the financial innovations
  • Subprime lending means lending towards those
    borrowers with weak credit histories thus it has
    greater risks of loan defaults.
  • Mortgaged-backed securities (MBS) are securities
    derive their values from mortgages payments and
    housing prices.
  • A Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) bundles
    cash payments from multiple mortgages or other
    debt obligations into a single pool, from which
    the cash is allocated to specific securities in a
    priority sequence.
  • A Credit Default Swap (CDS) involves an insurance
    party, such as AIG, receiving a premium in
    exchange for a promise to pay money to party A
    (say an investment bank) in the event of party B
    (mortgage holder) defaulted.

The risks inherent with the above financial
derivatives were not accurately measured nor
reflected by the issuers and rating agencies nor
fully understood by the investors.
52
How bubbled were the Housing Bubbles?
  • Price of a typical American house increased by
    124 from 1997 to 2006.
  • U.S. home mortgage debt to GDP ratio increased
    from 46 in 1990s to 73 in 2008.
  • The value of U.S. subprime mortgages was
    estimated at 1.3 trillion as of March 2007. It
    spiked to 20 of all mortgages in 2005 from 10
    prior to 2004. Delinquency rates increased from
    10-15 before 2006 to 25 in early 2008.
  • As of Aug., 2009, 9.2 of all mortgages
    outstanding were either delinquent or in
    foreclosure.

53
How bubbled were the financial Bubbles?
  • Between 1996 and 2004, the USA current account
    deficit increased by US650 million, from 1.5
    to 5.8 of GDP.
  • The top five U.S. investment banks, plus Fannie
    Mae and Freddie Mac, were estimated to have US9
    trillion in debt or guarantee obligations in
    2008. These shadow financial institutions were
    not subject to the same depository banking
    regulations.
  • The top four U.S. commercial banks were estimated
    to have to return between US500 billion to US1
    trillion to their balance sheets in 2009.
  • Volume of CDS outstanding increased 100-fold from
    1998 to 2008, estimated at US33 to 47 trillion
    as of Nov., 08.

54
Financial markets impacts (1)
  • Troubled banks were nationalized (Northern Rock)
    or acquired (Merrill Lynch), if not gone bankrupt
    (Lehmann Brothers).
  • The credit markets were paralyzed, so the U.S.
    government had to extend insurance for the money
    market accounts. A 700 billion emergency
    bailout program, Troubled Asset Relief Program
    (TARP), was signed into law in October, 2008 to
    stabilize the economy.
  • It was estimated that Americans on average lost
    more than one quarter of their collective net
    worth from mid 2007 to late 2008, resulting from
    declines in consumption and business investment.

55
Financial markets impacts (2)
  • The U.S. financial crisis rapidly spilled over
    and many European banks failed. The
    de-leveraging of financial institutions further
    worsened the liquidity crisis. Although Asia was
    not at the center of the financial crisis,
    weakened economies in the west caused a drastic
    decrease in international trade.
  • For the 1st quarter of 2009, the GDP declined by
    14.4 in Germany, 15.2 in Japan, 7.4 in the UK,
    9.8 in the Euro, 21.5 in Mexico and 6 in the
    U.S.A. The unemployment rate in the U.S. was
    9.5 by June 2009.

56
Short-term government remedies
  • To avoid a global recession, collective actions
    were taken by many governments, including
  • Interest rates were at historical low
  • Injected liquidity into the credit markets
  • Purchased trillions of government debts and
    troubled private assets from banks
  • Raised the capital of the national banks by
    purchasing newly issued preferred stock in major
    banks.

57
The current US recession
  • When did the current recession start?
  • http//www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.html
  • Has the recession ended?

58
Identifying the quarter of peak
  • The product-side estimates fell slightly in
    2007Q4, rose slightly in 2008Q1, rose again in
    2008Q2, and fell slightly in 2008Q3. The
    income-side estimates reached their peak in
    2007Q3, fell slightly in 2007Q4 and 2008Q1, rose
    slightly in 2008Q2 to a level below its peak in
    2007Q3, and fell again in 2008Q3. Thus, the
    currently available estimates of quarterly
    aggregate real domestic production do not speak
    clearly about the date of a peak in activity.
  • Other indicators reached peaks between November
    2007 and June 2008
  • real personal income less transfer payments,
  • real manufacturing and wholesale-retail trade
    sales,
  • industrial production, and
  • employment estimates based on the household
    survey.
  • The decline in economic activity in 2008 met the
    standard for a recession

http//www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.html
59
Identifying the Month of the peak
  • Payroll employment, the number of filled jobs in
    the economy based on the Bureau of Labor
    Statistics survey of employers, reached a peak in
    December 2007 and has declined in every month
    since then.
  • An alternative measure of employment, measured by
    the BLS household survey, reached a peak in
    November 2007, declined early in 2008, expanded
    temporarily in April to a level below its
    November 2007 peak, and has declined in every
    month since April 2008.
  • Real personal income less transfers peaked in
    December 2007, displayed a zig-zag pattern from
    then until June 2008 at levels slightly below the
    December 2007 peak, and has generally declined
    since June.?
  • Real manufacturing and wholesale-retail trade
    sales reached a well-defined peak in June 2008.
  • Industrial production peaked in January 2008,
    fell through May 2008, rose slightly in June and
    July, and then fell substantially from July to
    September.

http//www.nber.org/cycles/dec2008.html
60
NBER recession dateshttp//www.nber.org/cycles.ht
ml
Peak Trough Contraction Expansion Cycle Cycle
P-P T-T
August 1929(III) March 1933 (I) 43 21 64 34
May 1937(II) June 1938 (II) 13 50 63 93
February 1945(I) October 1945 (IV) 8 80 88 93
November 1948(IV) October 1949 (IV) 11 37 48 45
July 1953(II) May 1954 (II) 10 45 55 56
August 1957(III) April 1958 (II) 8 39 47 49
April 1960(II) February 1961 (I) 10 24 34 32
December 1969(IV) November 1970 (IV) 11 106 117 116
November 1973(IV) March 1975 (I) 16 36 52 47
January 1980(I) July 1980 (III) 6 58 64 74
July 1981(III) November 1982 (IV) 16 12 28 18
July 1990(III) March 1991(I) 8 92 100 108
March 2001(I) November 2001 (IV) 8 120 128 128
December 2007 (IV) December 2007 (IV) 73 81
61
Additional readings about the crisis
  • The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis maintains
    an excellent website about
  • The recent Financial Crisis (http//timeline.stlou
    isfed.org/)
  • The Financial Crisis A Timeline of Events and
    Policy Actions
  • The Financial Crisis Glossary
  • the current global recession (http//research.stlo
    uisfed.org/recession/)
  • the US data (http//research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/
    )
  • Slightly more technical papers
  • Caballero, Ricardo, J. and Pablo Kurlat (2009)
    The Surprising Origin and Nature of Financial
    Crises A Macroeconomic Policy Proposal, Paper
    presented at the Jackson Hole Symposium on
    Financial Stability and Macroeconomic Policy,
    August 20-22, 2009.
  • Taylor, John B. and John C. Williams (2008) A
    Black Swan in the Money Market, Federal Reserve
    Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper 2008-04.

62
Additional reading on Business Cycles
  • The National Bureau of Economic Research keeps
    the past announcement of the business cycle
    dating
  • Peak and trough dates and announcements
    http//www.nber.org/cycles.html
  • An illustration of the NBER Recession Dating
    Procedure http//www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.h
    tml
  • Niemira, Michael P. and Philip A. Klein (1994)
    Forecasting Financial and Economic Cycles, John
    Wiley Sons, Inc.
  • Cotis, Jean-Philippe, and Jonathan Coppel (2005)
    Business Cycle Dynamics in OECD Countries
    Evidence, Causes and Policy Implications, Paper
    presented at the Changing Nature of the Business
    Cycle, the Reserve Bank of Australia Economic
    Conference, July 11-12, 2005.
  • Temin, Peter (1998) The Causes of American
    Business Cycles An Essay in Economic
    Historiography, NBER Working Paper 6692.
  • Stock, James H. and Mark W. Watson (1998)
    Business cycle fluctuations in U.S.
    macroeconomic time series, NBER Working Paper
    6528.

63
End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com