Geen diatitel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Geen diatitel

Description:

Title: Geen diatitel Author: B. van Wee Last modified by: Bert van Wee - TBM Created Date: 12/1/1999 11:04:17 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: B479
Category:
Tags: diatitel | fuel | geen

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Geen diatitel


1
Public hearing on white paper on Transport
where do we stand now? Bert van Wee Delft
University of Technology, The Netherlands Brussel
s, 6-3-2015

2
a) domains where progress has been more
successful or positive
  • Commitment on CO2 standards
  • Less emphasis on Biofuels
  • Recognition of importance of electrification. But
    future is uncertain. Vehicle prices, range,
    charging infrastructure
  • Soon new proper test procedures for fuel use
    and CO2 emissions of cars (and other road
    vehicles).
  • Recognition of need for transition
  • (New commitioners ambions Violeta Bulc?)

3
b) areas that failed to achieve the desired
results
  •  
  • Governance of type approval. Conformity of
    production, In use compliance. Survival of most
    customer friendly test institute
  • Bio fuels too much optimism
  • CO2 standards for car not stringent enough, real
    world progress limited.
  • CO2 lorries stand still

4
  • Aircraft, sea going ships
  • Consistent integration with overall energy and
    climate policies. First energy in general, then
    transport. Position of transport in transition
  • Energy security transport highly depends on
    fossil fuels (mainly oil)
  • Road charging
  • Fairness (knowledge gap)


5
c) Which WP actions should be prioritized from
now on?
  • Trading system OK. The devil is in the detail.
    Distinguish priciple and practice so far.
    Resistance some industries exclude some
    industries?
  • Trading system OK, but cars should do more
    than according to trading 1) cars are potitional
    goods (Verhoef and Van Wee, 2000 Hoen and Geurs,
    2011). 2) No carbon leakage.

6
  • Modal shift policies be careful. Freight
    transport limited potential, expensive (unless
    via push road), Passenger transport OK if
    bicycle, capacity public transport in urban
    areas. Not cheaper, faster PT
  • Be careful with TENs less growth in car use, BCR
    often poor. HSR very expensive. Only if air
    transport limited. Opportunity costs.
  • Rail poor collaboration. Condition for infra
    investments. Buying tickets, unreliable

7
  • Less impact of lobby. Personal impression
  • Less sound policies. Vested interests
    prevailAnti innovations
  • Less transparency
  • Violates democracy
  • Decreases support for EU

8
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com