Language Testing and Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Language Testing and Assessment

Description:

Title: Developing an international English proficiency test for university use: the case of WELT Author: elsdh Last modified by: Gerard Sharpling – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:216
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: elsd5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Language Testing and Assessment


1
Language Testing and Assessment
  • Dr. Gerard Sharpling
  • Centre for Applied Linguistics
  • University of Warwick
  • Coventry CV47AL

2
Introduction
  • Individualisation-Standardisation

3
Why test language?
  • Measure
  • Compare
  • Monitor
  • Gatekeep
  • Maintain standards
  • Motivate
  • Give feedback
  • Make people employable

4
Individualising
  • Focus on the individual
  • Knowledge is socially constructed
  • Difference
  • Learning style
  • Not only writing
  • Flexible formats
  • Stress
  • Awareness of SEM (Standard Error of Measurement)
  • Validity is driving force

5
Standardising
  • Focus on the group
  • Knowledge is given and objective
  • Everyone treated equally
  • Candidates expected to adapt
  • Format reflects standards
  • Stress is common to all individuals and can be
    overcome or cured (medical model)
  • Driving force reliability/objectivity

6
Statistical overviews
Statistics Statistics Statistics
Score
N Valid 200.000
N Missing .000
Mean Mean 21.020
Std. Error of Mean Std. Error of Mean .227
Median Median 21.000
Mode Mode 23.000
Std. Deviation Std. Deviation 3.214
Variance Variance 10.331
Skewness Skewness -.556
Std. Error of Skewness Std. Error of Skewness .172
Kurtosis Kurtosis .707
Std. Error of Kurtosis Std. Error of Kurtosis .342
Range Range 19.000
Minimum Minimum 9.000
Maximum Maximum 28.000
Sum Sum 4204.000
Percentiles 25 19.000
Percentiles 50 21.000
Percentiles 75 23.000
7
Traditional view of Testing
  • Reliability and objectivity
  • Psychometric
  • Standardisation
  • Comparison of individual with the group
  • Normal distribution curves
  • No relationship between assessor and assessed

8
Who might the traditional system fail?
  • It might fail children (or students)
  • Who have special needs
  • who are gifted and talented
  • who have individual learning differences
  • Who have a non-traditional learning style
  • who experience social deprivation
  • who are looked after and/or within the care
    system
  • from particular ethnicities

9
Part 2
  • Test purposes and test outcomes

10
What are the different types of test
  • Diagnostic
  • Proficiency
  • Placement
  • Achievement
  • Selection
  • Summative
  • Formative
  • High stakes
  • Low stakes

11
How performance is represented
  • Raw mark
  • Mark compared to broad standard
  • Mark or grade linked to verbal descriptor
  • Criteria checklist
  • Norm-referencing
  • Criterion-referencing

12
Representing language ability
  • A grade or percentage for English
  • A grade or percentage plus a breakdown into
    different skills areas
  • A grade or percentage, a breakdown into skills
    and a written report
  • All of the above plus a portfolio of evidence
    that the student has compiled

13
Part 3
  • The qualities of good language tests

14
Reliability
  • Restrict choice
  • Write unambiguous items
  • Provide uniform test conditions
  • Have fewer marking bands
  • Ensure familiarity with format
  • Give clear criteria
  • Provide good training for raters
  • Ensure anonymous marking
  • (Hughes, 1989 36-43)

15
Item facility
16
More facility values
17
Split half analysis
  • First test (part)
  • Mean 34.96 St.Dev. 4.61
  • Second test (part)
  • Mean 33.08 St.Dev. 4.88
  • The t-test for difference gives a value of 6.297
    with 195 df
  • The correlation between the two sets of scores is
    0.612
  • Assuming form means are exactly the same over
    whole population
  • reliability 0.552 st. error of measurement
    3.24
  • Within forms analysis
  • reliability 0.611 st. error of measurement
    2.96
  • Split parts analysis
  • Cronbach Alpha 0.767 and Spearman Brown
    Coefficient 0.759

18
Sample unreliability issues (Essays)
  • Describe a blizzard that you have experienced.
    How did you make your way home?
  • Describe the legal system in your country.
  • Discuss your favorite sport and why you enjoy it.
  • Discuss the importance of Christmas in our
    contemporary society.

19
Sample unreliability issues (MCQ 1)
  • 1. Why hasnt your mother come?
  • Well, she said that she leave the baby.
  • cant
  • wont
  • couldnt
  • maynt

20
Sample unreliability issues (MCQ 2)
  • 2. Which word or phrase, a, b, c, or d, means the
    same as the word underlined.
  • Ill see you soon.
  • next year
  • in a few days
  • tomorrow
  • In a couple of hors

21
Validity
  • Ensure good visual presentation of test
  • Test only the skill(s) you plan to test
  • Avoid introducing any unnecessary complexities
    that dont matter
  • Avoid testing something else instead, by default.
  • Ignore any mistakes outside the skills area being
    tested (?)
  • Keep focussed.

22
Sample validity issues
  • Listen to the radio recording and write a short
    summary of 150-200 words on the content.
  • Outline the extent to which economic factors have
    impinged on individuals abilities to manage
    their lives effectively.
  • Read the following text and answer the questions
    which follow. Copy your answers correctly from
    the text as marks will be deducted for incorrect
    spelling.

23
Part 4
  • Language testing philosophy

24
An example of a bell curve
25
Example of test histogram
26
Further histogram
27
Inter-test correlations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com