The Significance of Dipole Tilt for Substorm Onsets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Significance of Dipole Tilt for Substorm Onsets

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: psciences Last modified by: James Wanliss Created Date: 12/10/2002 5:14:21 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: psc103
Learn more at: http://pages.erau.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Significance of Dipole Tilt for Substorm Onsets


1
The Significance of Dipole Tilt
for Substorm Onsets
  • James Wanliss

2
Introduction
  • What is a magnetic dipole?
  • What is the magnetosphere?
  • What is a magnetospheric substorm?

3
Magnetic dipole
4
(No Transcript)
5
Space Physics Substorms
6
Polar substorms
7
Scientific questions
  • Where does substorm onset occur?
  • One idea is that onset of reconnection initiates
    auroral substorms (20-30 Re)
  • Another idea is that substorms are ignited by an
    instability between 6-10 Re
  • In-situ magnetotail observations not definitive
  • What role do parameters such as dipole tilt play?

8
Data
  • Results for 30 substorms via CANOPUS
    magnetometers, photometers
  • Considered only substorms 90 minutes around
    local midnight
  • Selection criteria
  • Brightening of most equatorward auroral arc,
    immediately followed by rapid poleward motion
  • Magnetic bay, and near-simultaneous Pi2 magnetic
    pulsations

9
(No Transcript)
10
Procedure
  • Select appropriate subset from original dataset
    of over 200 substorms Wanliss et al., 2001,
    2002
  • Locate ionospheric footprint of ignition
  • Use magnetic field models to map footprint from
    ionosphere to magnetic field lines furthest
    radial distance this determines a source
    location

11
Model Issues
  • Statistical models of Tsyganenko and
    collaborators (T87, T89, T96, T01) suited to this
    kind of problem Tsyganenko, 1987, 1989, 1996,
    2002ab
  • T87, T89 depend only on tilt and Kp
  • T96, T01 dependent on tilt, Dst, and solar wind
    Pdyn, B, V
  • T01 is only model explicitly designed for inner
    tail

12
Substorm example
  • November 15, 1992
  • Onset at 0533 UT
  • Onset arc at 67.2o
  • Model
  • Ignition
  • location

T87 T89 T96 T01
X -6.20 -7.60 -9.90 -9.79
Y 1.78 2.26 3.51 3.09
Z -2.16 -3.15 -3.82 -3.68
R 6.80 8.53 11.18 10.91
13
1992/11/15
14
1992/11/15
15
1992/11/15
16
1992/11/15
17
486.1 nm
1992/11/15
Latitude
557.7 nm
onset
630.0 nm
Time (UT)
18
1992/11/15 Model Fits
19
(No Transcript)
20
Statistical onset results
  • 77 of sample onsets on duskside (Figure S1)
  • As Kp/Pdyn/Bz increases onsets occur closer to
    Earth (Figures S3, S4, S5)
  • No dependence of onset distance on MLT (Figure
    S6)
  • Strong dependence of onset Y-location on MLT
    substorms prefer duskside (Figure S7)
  • Onsets occur closer for large ve dipole tilts
    (Figure S8)

21
Figure S1
22
Figure S2
23
Figure S3
24
Figure S4
25
Figure S5
26
Figure S6
27
Figure S7
28
Figure S8
29
Summary
  • T87/T89 have all substorms in the inner tail
  • T96 has a wide range of ignition sites (negative
    Bz causes onset further downtail)
  • No dependence on dipole tilt for T87/T89
  • Strong dependence for T96/T01 linear inside 15 RE

30
Table 1. Statistical means
Mean all substorms X Y Z R Min R Max R
T87 -6.66 1.43 -2.24 7.31 5.30 16.04
T89 -8.09 1.97 -3.02 9.06 6.04 18.41
T96 -18.59 3.42 -3.03 19.85 5.87 65.78
T01 -13.02 2.76 -3.16 14.10 5.48 29.26
31
Conclusions
  • Clear onset dependencies on tilt/Pdyn/Bz/Kp for
    T96, T01. Less clear for T89 not clear for T87
  • For T96/T01 there is a strong linear dependence
    between tilt and downtail distance as tilt
    becomes less negative onsets occur further
    downtail
  • Ignition occurs preferentially before midnight
  • Best estimate (T01) for onset location is on
    duskside at a downtail distance of R14.10 RE

32
References
  • Tsyganenko, N. A., Global Quantitative Models of
    the Geomagnetic Field in a Cislunar Magnetosphere
    for Different Disturbance Levels, Planet. Space.
    Sci., 35, 1347-1358, 1987.
  • Tsyganenko, N. A., A magnetospheric magnetic
    field model with a warped tail current sheet,
    Planet. Space. Sci., 37, 5-20, 1989.
  • Tsyganenko, N. A., Effects of the solar wind
    conditions on the global magnetospheric
    configuration as deduced from data-based models,
    in Proceedings Third International Conference on
    Substorms (ICS-3), ed. E. J. Rolfe and B.
    Kaldeich, European Space Agency Spec. Publ., ESA
    SP-399, 181-185, 1996.
  • Tsyganenko, N.A., A model of the near
    magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 1.
    Mathematical structure, J. Geophys. Res., 107,
    10.1029/2001JA000219, 2002a.
  • Tsyganenko, N.A., A model of the near
    magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry 2.
    Parameterization and fitting to observations, J.
    Geophys. Res., 107,10.1029/2001JA000220 , 2002b.

33
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com