Visual Cocktail Party Phenomenon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Visual Cocktail Party Phenomenon

Description:

Visual Cocktail Party Phenomenon Amanda Caddell Angie French Kevin Utt Julie Witherup Introduction Moray (1959) Cocktail Party Phenomenon Neisser and Becklen (1975 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Psychol87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Visual Cocktail Party Phenomenon


1
Visual Cocktail Party Phenomenon
  • Amanda Caddell
  • Angie French
  • Kevin Utt
  • Julie Witherup

2
Introduction
  • Moray (1959)
  • Cocktail Party Phenomenon
  • Neisser and Becklen (1975)
  • Selective looking

3
Hypothesis
  • Participants will selectively attend to a
    visually relevant person more than a less
    visually relevant person

4
Method
  • Participants
  • 26 students
  • 25 Caucasian
  • 1 Japanese
  • 31 freshman
  • 23 sophomores
  • 23 juniors
  • 23 seniors

5
  • Equipment
  • Video production
  • Sony digital handycam, model number DCR-TRV17
  • Quicktime Pro by Apple Computers, Inc.
  • Apparatus
  • Gateway computer model E-3400
  • Windows 98
  • Quicktime version 6.5
  • Screen size 13

6
  • Stimuli
  • Production--3 video clips superimposed
  • Clip 1 white t-shirts
  • Clip 2 black t-shirts
  • Clip 3 Betsy or Erica
  • 2 Videos
  • Personally relevant person (Betsy)
  • Less personally relevant person (Erica)

7
  • Procedure
  • Randomly assigned
  • Condition 1 Betsy
  • Condition 2 Erica
  • Video
  • Questionnaire
  • Questions relevant to condition
  • BetsyHow often do you eat in the UG?
  • EricaHow often do you go to the Career Center?

8
Results
  • Chi Square Analyses
  • Comparing the frequency of whether participants
    detected a person walking across the screen in
    each condition

Yes No Total
Betsy 8 61.5 5 38.5 13
Erica 5 38.5 8 61.5 13
Total 13 13 26
?² (1) 1.39, ns
9
  • Chi Square Analyses
  • Comparing the frequency of whether participants
    identified the person walking across the screen
    in each condition

Betsy Other No One Total
Betsy 4 30.8 1 7.7 8 61.5 13
Erica 0 0 13 100 13
Total 4 1 21 26
?² (2) 6.19, p lt .05
10
Discussion
  • Participants selectively attend to the personally
    relevant individual
  • Related to Morays findings

11
Limitations
  • Small, homogeneous sample
  • Counterbalancing of the attention task
  • Personally relevant individual may not have been
    equally relevant to all participants

12
Questions
13
References
  • Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic
    listening Affective cues and the influence of
    instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
    Psychology, 11, 56-60
  • Neisser, U. Becklen, R. (1975). Selective
    looking Attending to visually specified events.
    Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480-494
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com