Weather and Climate Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Weather and Climate Engineering

Description:

Weather and Climate Engineering William R. Cotton Professor of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: BillC179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Weather and Climate Engineering


1
Weather and Climate Engineering
  • William R. Cotton
  • Professor of Atmospheric Science
  • Colorado State University

2
  • This talk is based on a chapter of the book
    Clouds in the Perturbed Climate System Their
    Relationship to Energy Balance, Atmospheric
    Dynamics, and Precipitation, 2009. ed. J.
    Heintzenberg and R. J. Charlson.Strugmann Forum
    Report, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA The MIT Press.

3
Weather and ClimateEngineering
  • The above is the title of the chapter that I was
    tasked to write.
  • This chapter has been said to be Wicked by the
    lateTony Slingo and Wacko by Graeme Stephens
  • No one has called it Wonderful

4
Weather Engineering
  • Deliberate cloud seeding, with the goal of
    increasing precipitation by the injection of
    specific types of particles into clouds, has been
    pursued for over 60 years.
  • It all began following following experiments by
    Irving Langmuir and Vincent Schaefer
  • For many years weather modification was highly
    visible in the news media and most funding for
    cloud research was linked in some way to weather
    modification

5
(No Transcript)
6
  • .
  • I remember comic books where even Donald Duck got
    into cloud seeding

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Cloud seeding methods
  • Deliberate cloud seeding can be divided into two
    broad categories glaciogenic seeding and
    hygroscopic seeding.

12
Glaciogenic cloud seeding
  • Glaciogenic seeding involves seeding with ice
    nuclei or dry ice and has been applied to
    supercooled cumulus clouds and orographic clouds.
  • The documentation of increases in precipitation
    on the ground due to glaciogenic seeding of
    cumuli has been very elusive
  • The evidence that seeding orographic clouds can
    cause significant increases in snowpack is quite
    compelling

13
Hygroscopic Cloud Seeding
  • This is the inverse of pollution aerosols
  • Essentially the approach is to seed with giant
    soluble aerosol particles, while pollution
    aerosols are primarily small aerosols
  • The results of hygroscopic seeding experiments
    are quite promising but they still do not
    constitute a proof that hygroscopic seeding can
    enhance rainfall on the ground over an extended
    area.

14
Lessons learned
  • The scientific community has established a set of
    criteria for determining that there is proof
    that seeding has enhanced precipitation.
  • For firm proof see NRC, 2003 Garstang et al.,
    2005 that seeding affects precipitation, both
    strong physical evidence of appropriate
    modifications to cloud structures and highly
    significant statistical evidence is required.
  • Likewise, for firm proof that climate
    engineering is affecting climate, or even that
    that CO2 is modifying climate, both strong
    physical evidence of appropriate modifications to
    climate and significant statistical evidence is
    required.

15
  • Another lesson from evaluating cloud seeding
    experiments is that natural variability of
    clouds and precipitation can be quite large and
    thus can inhibit conclusive evaluation of even
    the best designed statistical experiments.
  • The same can be said for evaluating the effects
    of climate engineering or that human-produced CO2
    is altering climate. If the signal is not strong,
    then to evaluate if human activity has produced
    some observed effect (cause and effect), one
    requires much longer time records than is
    available for most if not all data sets.
  • We do not have an adequate measure of the
    natural variability of climate.

16
  • Venturing into climate engineering recognizing
    that potentially large natural variability may
    exist is hazardous indeed.

17
Climate Forcing Factors
  • Greenhouse gas variabilitywater vapor, CO2,
    Methane.
  • Changes in solar luminosity and orbital
    parameters,
  • Changes in surface properties
  • Natural and human-induced changes in aerosols and
    dust--volcanoes, desert dust, pollutants
  • Differential temporal responses to external
    forcing by the atmosphereand oceans.

18
Natural Variations do not Explain Observed
Climatic Change
  • Climate models with natural forcing (including
    volcanic and solar) do not reproduce warming
  • When increase in greenhouse gases is included,
    models do reproduce warming
  • Addition of increase in aerosols (cooling)
    improves agreement

19
Some Climate Engineering Hypotheses
  • Crutzen among others propose to burn S2 or H2S
    carried into the strosphere by balloons,
    artillery guns, or rockets to produce SO. Like
    volcanoes sulfuric acid drops would then enhance
    reflectance of solar radiation
  • Crutzen among others proposed black carbon
    seeding in the stratosphere which would absorb
    solar radiation thus depleting radiation reaching
    the surface but warm the stratosphere

20
More hypotheses
  • Seed marine stratocu with small sea-spray drops
    to increase their albedoa cooling effect(Latham
    1990 2002)

21
Artists concept
22
Black Carbon Seeding of Cirrus
  • Another idea is to seed cirrus with black carbon
    aerosol. The absorbed solar radiation would have
    a semi-direct effect of dissipating cirrus.
  • This would have to be done selectively for
    optically thin cirrus which absorb upwelling LW
    radiation(heating) but reflect small amounts of
    solar radiation(cooling). In addition, the
    absorbed solar radiation would cool the lower
    atmosphere.
  • It would not work for optically thick cirrus and
    anvils as they have high albedo, thus dissipating
    them would have a warming affect as well as
    requiring huge amounts of aerosol to have any
    effect

23
Other proposals
  • Deploy something like 55,000 mirrors with a
    surface area of 100km2 into Earth orbit.
  • Introduce a solar shield at the Sun-Earth
    Lagrange point (1.5X 106 km from Earth).
  • Costs of either are very high and if undesirable
    responses occur it would be hard to remove and
    reverse the cooling

24
Robock, (2008) Unexpected undesirable
consequences of climate engineering
  • The list is too long(20) to enumerate here but it
    includes things like
  • Impacts on the hydrological budget
  • Unexpected consequences such as stratospheric
    ozone depletion
  • Increased demands for fossil fuel use in response
    to cooling
  • If it goes awry can it be turned off?

25
NASA is already doing Climate Engineering!!
26
So why Research Climate Engineering?
  • If for no other reason, we know from cloud
    seeding that if there is a drought or major
    weather disaster, politicians call for cloud
    seeding to do something without due regard for
    the consequencesa political placebo
  • I expect if we find ourselves in a real climate
    disaster, human caused or not, politicians will
    likewise call for implementation of climate
    engineering strategies
  • It is important that it be done with the most
    advanced scientific knowledge and with full
    understanding of the consequences of our actions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com