The Lost Tomb of Jesus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Lost Tomb of Jesus

Description:

The Lost Tomb of Jesus A believer s response – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:271
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Keith397
Category:
Tags: jesus | lost | tomb | worldview

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Lost Tomb of Jesus


1
The Lost Tomb of Jesus
  • A believers response

2
The dangers of Christian reactionism
  • It is unwise to react to everything in culture
    that appears to be a threat to Christianity
  • Unthoughtful, reactionary responses are usually
    not honoring to God
  • However, certain cultural events both warrant
    careful, wise biblical responses from Christians
    and provide believers with opportunities for
    conversations with unbelievers

3
What is The Lost Tomb of Jesus?
  • It is a Discovery Channel TV documentary, in
    which the producers claim to have found Jesus
    family tomb, including his ossuary containing his
    bones.

4
4 Questions
  • What did archeologists actually find?
  • What conclusions does the show make?
  • Are those conclusions correct?
  • How should a Christian respond?

5
What did archeologists actually find?
  • Background
  • In March, 1980, on Dov Gruner Street in the
    Jersualem neighborhood of East Talpiyot, the
    entrance to a burial cave was discovered by a
    construction crew.
  • Yosef Gat of the Department of Antiquities and
    Museums lead a salvage excavation, along with
    Shimon Gibson, who published the first drawings
    of the tomb.
  • The excavation lead to the discovery of ten
    ossuaries (bone boxes), six of which had
    inscriptions on them. There were also bone
    fragments and bone dust found on the floor of the
    tomb. The bones catalogued, and were then
    reburied.                                         
                  

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
What did archeologists actually find?
  • Background
  • L.Y. Rahmani published information on the
    ossuaries and their inscriptions, along with
    hundreds more in 1994.
  • In 1996, Amos Kloner published an article on this
    particular tomb in the Israel Antiquities
    Association publication, Atiquot.                
                                              

10
What did archeologists actually find?
  • The six ossuaries

11
1.1 ft
0.8 ft
1.78 ft
12
Ossuary 1
Mariamenou e mara of Mariamene,who is (also
called) Mara
13
(No Transcript)
14
Ossuary 2
Yehuda bar Yeshua Judah son of Jesus
15
(No Transcript)
16
Ossuary 3
Matia Matthew
17
(No Transcript)
18
Ossuary 4
Yeshua? bar Yehosef Jesus? son of Joseph
19
(No Transcript)
20
Ossuary 5
Yose Jose short for Joseph
21
(No Transcript)
22
Ossuary 6
Mariah Mary
23
(No Transcript)
24
What conclusions does the show make?
  • This is a family tomb, and specifically the
    family tomb of Jesus Christ
  • The names are interpreted as follows
  • Jesus, son of Joseph is Jesus Christ
  • Mary is Mary, Jesus mother
  • Matthew is an unknown relative of Jesus
  • Joseph is Jesus brother, Joseph
  • Judah, son of Jesus is Jesus son, Judah
  • Mariamenou e Mara is Mary Magdalene, Jesus
    wife

25
What conclusions does the show make?
  • The producers claim these conclusions on the
    basis of archeological, forensic (DNA), and
    statistical evidence
  • They specifically claim a 6001 probability that
    this is Jesus tomb

26
Are the conclusions correct?
  • The inscription Jesus is uncertain and the
    identification of Mariamenou e Mara as Mary
    Magdalene is extremely unlikely according to
    experts.
  • Acts of Phillip is unreliable gnostic literature,
    and it doesnt appear to link Mariamene to Mary
    Magdalene, but instead to Mary of Bethany
  • Mara is written in Greek, not Aramaic, therefore
    it is to be taken as the name Martha, not an
    Aramaic word for Lord
  • The question of why this one ossuary is written
    in Greek and not Aramaic/Hebrew as the others has
    not been considered
  • The relationship of the occupants with one
    another is total speculation. There is no way to
    tell if they were related at all, let alone how
    they were related.

27
Are the conclusions correct?
  • The producers were only able to get mitochondrial
    DNA samples from two of the ossuaries (Mariamenou
    e Mara and Jesus, son of Joseph)
  • All that the DNA evidence showed was that the
    occupants of these two ossuaries were not related
    maternally.
  • Furthermore, the original archeologist stated
    that each ossuary averaged 1.7 occupants per
    ossuary, further complicating the entire DNA
    hypothesis

28
Are the conclusions correct?
  • The view that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene
    has already been refuted by scholars. The entire
    tomb hypothesis falls apart if Jesus and Mary
    were not married.
  • This tomb was discovered in 1980 and scholars
    have known about it since then. This tomb is no
    big deal because the names that were found were
    some of the most common names in the first
    century Palestine.
  • Joseph second most common male name
  • Mary the most common female name
  • Judah the third most common male name
  • Jesus the sixth most common male name

29
Are the conclusions correct?
  • Specifically, the name Jesus has been found on
    22 different ossuaries, with several (at least
    two, perhaps as many as six) of the inscription
    Jesus, son of Joseph.
  • The statistical analysis is filled with multiple
    problems, mostly involving unverifiable
    assumptions and even some flat out mistakes (such
    as the number of total occupants in the tomb)

30
Are the conclusions correct?
  • Jesus was from Nazareth, not Jerusalem thus if
    he had a family burial spot it would not have
    been in Jerusalem
  • Neither Jesus nor his followers ever referred to
    Jesus as the son of Joseph.
  • The vast majority of archeologists (Jewish,
    Christian, and secular) have completely dismissed
    this documentary as impossible, a publicity
    stunt, and nonsense.

31
How should a Christian respond?
  • Any attack on the person and work of Jesus
    Christ, particularly on His resurrection, is to
    be taken very seriously and warrants a wise
    response from believers (1 Cor. 15, Gal. 1, 2
    Cor. 11)
  • A Christians response in this case should
    particularly focus on the worldview of the
    producers, particularly their view of theology,
    faith, and truth.
  • This story is not ultimately about who is right
    based on evidence and empirical research, it is
    really about who has ultimate authority and who
    determines truth.

32
How should a Christian respond?
  • Video clip 1
  • What is faith?
  • Biblical definition Faith is a confident trust
    in God and His Word.
  • Biblical view of truth/knowledge versus Worldly
    view of truth/knowledge
  • Where does the Bible fit into a worldly view of
    knowledge/truth?

33
How should a Christian respond?
  • Video clip 2 -
  • Doesnt deal with theological matters?
  • Two story view of Truth
  • The assumption of neutrality

34
How should a Christian respond?
  • Biblical view of truth
  • All truth comes from God (John 146)
  • The fear of the LORD is the beginning of
    knowledge (Prov. 17)
  • Instead of starting with a biblical worldview and
    Scripture as ones starting point, todays
    worldview sees man a neutral bystander, who
    through empirical research and the scientific
    method, determines for himself what is true

35
How should a Christian respond?
  • This worldview
  • Dethrones God as the authority and determiner of
    truth and replaces it with man
  • Dethrones the Scriptures as Gods authoritative
    revelation of God-breathed truth and replaces it
    with man
  • Begins the journey of discovering truth with
    mans own thinking and reasoning ability, which
    assumes certain biblical presuppositions about
    man
  • Assumes mans neutrality and impartiality,
    ignoring the noetic effect of sin on ones
    thinking and motives
  • At best, makes Scripture fit in to whatever
    conclusions are made, or otherwise ignores or
    discredits Scripture altogether
  • Does not pursue the praise and glory of God as
    the goal of the pursuit of knowledge and truth

36
How should a Christian respond?
  • Any attack on the person and work of Christ
    ultimately becomes an attack on Scripture, since
    Scripture is the final and inerrant authority
    which reveals and testifies of Christ
  • Theological anchors
  • The Bible really is Gods inerrant, God-breathed,
    authoritative revelation (2 Tim. 316-17)
  • Jesus Christ really did come back to life
    physically and later ascended to heaven
    physically (John 2027, Luke 2451, Acts 19, 1
    Cor. 156)

37
How should a Christian respond?
  • All right thinking about anything starts with
  • A submission to God and His Word
  • A commit to worship and glorify God through a
    relationship to Jesus Christ
  • Starting with a biblical worldview and biblical
    principles
  • Carefully pursuing knowledge based on these
    presuppositions and principles

38
How should a Christian respond?
  • When talking with people
  • Dont discuss this from the cultures worldview,
    bring a biblical worldview into the conversation
  • Ask questions which will bring a persons
    worldview to the surface
  • Graciously show how the Bible reveals a different
    worldview
  • Use the Bible to show that Jesus both rose from
    the dead and ascended into heaven physically,
    therefore the question, Is this Jesus tomb and
    bones? is irrelevant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com