Closing Achievement Gaps: Research-Based Lessons for Educators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 126
About This Presentation
Title:

Closing Achievement Gaps: Research-Based Lessons for Educators

Description:

... group are permanent dropouts, meaning high school dropouts who at approximately age 22 still lack high school certification of any type. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 127
Provided by: Zak72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Closing Achievement Gaps: Research-Based Lessons for Educators


1
Closing Achievement Gaps Research-Based Lessons
for Educators
  • Joseph Murphy
  • Vanderbilt University
  • joseph.f.murphy_at_vanderbilt.edu
  • (615) 322-8038

2
  • Part A.
  • Portrayals of Gaps

3
(46) (42) (34) (25) (27)
(29) (29) (29) (32) (26) Year
(Gap)
4
(33) (40) (41)
(40) (35) (34)
(31) Year (Gap)
5
(36) (31) (27) (18)
(20) (28) (31) (32) (29)
(22) Year (Gap)
6
(29) (30) (26)
(27) (26) (28)
(26) Year (Gap)
7
(40) (38) (32) (29) (21)
(26) (26) (27) (32) (28) Year (Gap)
8
(32) (29)
(31) (33) Year (Gap)
9
(52) (50) (31) (21)
(30) (36) (30) (29) (31)
(29) Year (Gap)
10
(23) (29)
(26) (25) (25) Year
(Gap)
11
(.85) (.96) (.97) (.99) (1.06)
(1.07) (1.11) (1.10) (1.08) (1.11)
(1.14) Year (Gap)
12
(.76) (.78) (.80) (.86) (.85)
(.82) (.89) (.74) (.97) (.75)
(1.03) Year (Gap)
13
(.79) (.87) (.84) (.96) (.91) (.91) (.84)
(.89) (.93) (.89) (.96) Year (Gap)
14
(.90) (.87) (1.42) (.98) (.90) (.97)
(.92) (.94) (1.02) (1.02) (.78) Year (Gap)
15
(103) (103)
(105) (105)
(111) Year (Gap)
16
(96) (92)
(96) (99)
(98) Year (Gap)
17
(4.3) (4.4)
(4.6) (4.7)
(5.2) Year (Gap)
18
(23.0) (17.2) (14.1) (12.5) (9.8) (6.1) (7.0)
(9.8) (5.8) (5.4) (6.3) (4.5) Year (Gap)
19
(9.0) (11.5) (8.3) (7.0) (4.5) (3.7)
(4.2) (5.9) (5.7) (5.3) (4.8)
(4.4) Year (Gap)
20
(12.2) (15.3) (13.8) (13.4) (11.6) (13.4)
(13.7) (16.2) (13.4) (16.5) (15.2) (17.4) Year
(Gap)
21
Why is it important?
  • Individual
  • Society

22
Individual Educational Attainment
  • Increased chance of falling behind in school
  • Higher dropout rate
  • Reduced enrollment in college
  • Less likelihood of college degree

23
  • Over a third of the low SES group and just 3
    percent of the high group are permanent
    dropouts, meaning high school dropouts who at
    approximately age 22 still lack high school
    certification of any type. Whereas almost 60
    percent of the high SES group attended a
    four-year college by age 22, just 7 percent low
    SES youth did. (Alexander, et al., 2007)
  • Horribly, NAEP data indicate that, on average,
    Black students are leaving high school with less
    mathematical knowledge than white 8th graders
    possess. (Hughes, 2003)

24
Individual Employment Opportunity
  • Limited career path
  • Concentration in low-paying positions

25
Individual Wages
  • Lower wages

26
  • The gap has shifted from being an indicator of
    educational inequality to a direct cause of
    socioeconomic inequality.

27
Society Economic
  • Reduced economic competitiveness
  • Lower standard of living
  • Impediment to productivity and performance
  • Contribution to decline in economic health

28
  • If the minority-white gap had been closed between
    1983 and 1998
  • GDP would have been 310 - 525 billion higher (2
    - 4 of GDP) in 2008 dollars
  • If the SES gap had been closed between 1983 and
    1998
  • GDP would have been 400 - 600 billion higher (3
    - 5 of GDP) in 2008 dollars

29
Society Social Well-Being
  • Reinforces social inequality and exacerbates
    social justice problems
  • Reduces ties that bind society
  • Damages political fabric of democracy

30
  • Part B.
  • Insights and Rules for Closing Achievement Gaps
  • General Rules of Engagement

31
Four Sets of Findings
  • Big Picture Conclusions
  • Factors to Emphasize
  • Timing
  • Cautions

32
  • Big Picture Conclusions

33
  • By and large,
  • schools do not cause achievement gaps.

34
50 75
100 25
25
35
4 3 2 1
3 2 1
Summer 4 5
Summer 3 4
Summer 2 3
Summer 1 2
Summer K 1
2 1
K 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12

(Preschool) Period A (Age 0-5)
(K 5) Period B ( Age 6 11)
(6 12) Period C (Age 12 18)
36

K
3 4 50 of gap
25 of gap

37
Summer effect
school

K
3 4 50 of gap
25 of gap

38
Schools cannot close achievement gaps alone.
39
Much of the solution is to be found in factors
external to the school, but
social policy
schooling
schools have a part to play.
40
  • Schools have not been
  • especially effective in
  • helping close
  • achievement gaps.

41
Deep-Seated, Long-Standing, Hard-to-Solve Problem
  • Historically not a front-burner issue
  • An unwillingness to see the issue in ethical
    terms
  • A reluctance to re-set priorities and re-allocate
    resources

42
  • Since low-income and minority
  • students are more school-
  • dependent than their more
  • advantaged peers, there is
  • potential for schools to help
  • solve the problem.

43
What School Dependency Means
  • These youngsters are more advantaged in general
    when schools do things well
  • These youngsters are more disadvantaged in
    general when schools do not do things well

44
  • Factors

45
  • A focus on both
  • out-of-school and
  • in-school factors
  • is required.

46
  • Schools did not
  • cause the gaps.
  • They cannot solve gap
  • problems alone.

47
  • A combination of factors
  • is required to close
  • achievement gaps.

48
Silver Bullet
49
Better instruction
Stronger culture (academic press)
Lower class size
More personalization
Greater curricular rigor
50
  • Students do not need
  • different types of interventions.
  • They require
  • more intensive support.

51
Academic and Environmental Factors Need to be
Addressed in Tandem
  • Instructional program
  • Culture

Ultimately, programs that rely entirely on
increasing academic standards without parallel
attention to social-emotional factors associated
with achievement motivation and performance will
be less likely to improve student achievement
outcomes. (Becker and Luther, 2002)
52
  • We need to concentrate on those
  • factors that disproportionately
  • advantage low-income and
  • minority students.

53
(No Transcript)
54
  • Preschool programs
  • Cooperative instructional strategies
  • Smaller class sizes
  • Quality instruction
  • Co-curricular/extra curricular activities
  • More rigorous courses
  • Placement in high SES schools (school
    composition)
  • Minority teachers/working class teachers
  • Parent help with homework
  • Protective, supportive, risk-free environment
  • Service learning
  • High teacher expectations

55
Smaller Class Size
  • Ferguson, 1998
  • Finn, 1998
  • Finn Achilles, 1990
  • Grissmar, 1998
  • Kruger Whitmore
  • Rothstein, 2004
  • Slavin Madden, 2006
  • More beneficial for minority than non-minority
    students
  • Largest for disadvantaged students
  • Greater for students attending inner-city schools

56
Quality Instruction
  • The impact of the teacher is far greater for
    minority studentsGood teachers can have a
    differentially positive effect on minority
    students. (Singham, 2003)

57
Curricular Rigor
  • Minority and low-income students seem to benefit
    more than others from stronger course
    requirements. (Thompson, 2002)
  • Content standards have a positive effect on
    average achievement the gains are especially
    large more minority students. (Harris Hertert,
    2006)
  • The gains from taking a more demanding
    mathematics curriculum are even greater for
    African American and Latino students than for
    white students. (Thompson OQuinn, 2001)

58
Service Learning
  • Service learning may be especially attractive to
    principals of low SES schools, in part because it
    may be related to higher achievement generally
    and to smaller achievement gaps between higher
    and lower income students. (Scales, et al.,
    2006)
  • Community service appears to be related to a
    smaller achievement gap between students from
    lower and higher income backgrounds. Moreover,
    experiencing service-learning for at least a few
    weeks appears to be related to a smaller gap in
    most academic outcomes between low and high-SES
    students. (Scales, et al., 2006)

59
  • Some factors carry more
  • weight than others.

60
All factors are not equal in closing the
gap.Some have more power to reduce discrepancies.
  • Opportunity to learn
  • Quality instruction

61
An integrated, coherent, cohesive, overlapping
design works best.
62
service learning
after school tutoring program
ninth grade academy
summer support, grades 8 and 9
co-curricular involvement
master teachers
acceleration remediation design
extra servicesdouble sessions
faculty advisors
extended schooling
63
  • Issues

64
  • There is no short-term solution.

65
Early interventions trump later interventions.
66
  • The place to solve the
  • 9th grade problem
  • is in preschool.

67
ball
ball
hill
hill
8th grade
vs.
12th grade
68
Later
  • Problems are harder
  • Problems are more entrenched
  • Problems are less malleable
  • Problems have infected multiple domains
  • (e.g., reading problem ? motivation ?
    engagement) an early problem of 1 or 2
    things becomes a later problem of 5 or 6
    things

69
Some factors carry more weight in certain
periods of the school career.
  • High teacher expectations are more powerful in
    PreK-4
  • High personalization is more powerful in grades
    8-12

70
Length of time intreatment is important.
71
Quality Instruction (concept portrait)
72
Prevention trumps remediation.
73
Acceleration remediation trumps remediation.
74
  • lesson 1 lesson 2
  • instruction ? learning instruction
  • problem
  • arises
  • lesson 1 lesson 2
  • instruction ? learning instruction
  • problem
  • arises

75
  • One rarely arrives --
  • do not withdraw supports.

76
  • Cautions

77
Use of Categories
  • Lumping minorities together
  • Aggregating diverse groups within categories
  • Ignoring individual differences

78
  • Lumping groups into minority status is
    problematic.

79
  • Sub-Group Scores
  • Mask Differences
  • Many groups in Hispanic and Asian designations

80
We need to remember that we are talking about
averages.
81
(No Transcript)
82
Factors are not uniformly effective for all
forms of the gap.
83
  • There is a need to surface potential unintended
    consequences.

84
  • move enhance accountability via testing
  • strategy move most effective teachers to
    tested grades
  • consequences ???
  • move enhance academic rigor
  • strategy detrack
  • consequence ???
  • move create culturally responsive culture
  • strategy establish AA center/club
  • consequence ???

85
Costs as well as benefits of gap reduction
strategies need to be weighed.
  • Ninth grade academy? Salary supplement for
    teachers working in schools with high
    concentrations of low-income students? Additional
    AP courses?

86
Do not lose sight of the real goal (forest)
when focusing on the gaps (trees).
87
  • The core issue is
  • addressing underachievement.

88
Three Dimensions of Achievement
  • Level
  • Equity
  • Value added

89
gap .6
1.2
1.4 VALUE ADDED
90
gap .2
.4
.3 LEVEL
91
  • Absolute vs. Relative Gain

92
Absolute 3.0 3.5 .5 Relative Rate
of change black 60 white
44 Black achievement as of white
achievement 63 70
93
Do not count on luck, prayer, magic, or martyrs
to solve the problem.
94
ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS ACTIONS
Focus Enhancement Actions Enhancement Actions Barrier-Removal Actions Barrier-Removal Actions
Focus Help All Equally Help Low-SES More Help All Equally Help Low-SES More
All Students 1 Align curriculum Deepen PD for Teachers 2 Provide academic summer school Use cooperative learning strategies Raise teacher expectations Add time to school day 3 4 Detrack Re-culture discriminatory discipline culture Remove transportation barriers for more co-curricular opportunities Reduce class size
Targeted Students 5 6 Provide supplemental tutoring Target additional instructional time Form cultural similar clubs (AA) 7 8 Remove barriers that prevent parents from participating with school
95
  • Part C.
  • Lessons for Closing
  • Achievement Gaps

96
  • The Instructional Program (1-5)
  • Culture (6-7)
  • Structure Support (8-10)

97
  • THE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM
  • 1. Ensure youngsters on the wrong side of the
    achievement gap have excellent teachers
  • Storyline
  • Teacher-student interactions are consequential
    for student learning
  • most consequential variable
  • 40 of student achievement
  • Quality of teachers is connected to achievement
    gaps, especially closing gaps

98
  • Action
  • Bring effective teachers to low-performing
    schools
  • Put best teachers with low-income and minority
    students
  • Effectiveness
  • High
  • Teacher test scores (verbal)
  • Medium
  • Race of teacher
  • Diversity of teachers across the staff
  • Class background
  • Subject matter knowledge in area(s) taught

99
  • Low
  • Teacher performance evaluation scores
  • Masters degree in general
  • Credentials
  • Experience in general

100
  • 2. Provide additional instructional support to
    those in need
  • Storyline
  • Deficits build up for low-income and African
    American students 0-5 and 6-9
  • Schools need to backfill for problems as well as
    educate well in real time
  • Action
  • Add instructional time, instructional resources,
    and intensive supports
  • Preschool
  • Summer programs
  • Before school/after school
  • One-on-one tutoring

101
  • Effectiveness
  • High quality
  • Flow primarily to students on the wrong side of
    the achievement gap
  • Supplement, not supplant
  • Be part of a comprehensive system of supports

102
  • 3. Feature Balanced Instruction Emphasizing Basic
    Skills, Teaching for Understanding, and
    Culturally Responsive Pedagogy
  • Storyline
  • The quality of instruction is the main issue
    instruction matters more than standards
  • Quality instruction can narrow achievement gaps
  • Effective Actions
  • More equitable grouping strategies
  • Strong teacher-student relations
  • Emphasis on cooperative learning strategies
  • Pedagogy that underscores social connectedness
  • Community-oriented learning contexts

103
  • High expectations
  • Setting and maintaining high standards
  • Refusal to accept excuses for limited effort and
    poor quality work
  • Nonjudgmental responsiveness
  • Fierce persistence
  • Individual and collective responsibility for
    student performance

104
  • Culturally responsive teaching
  • Uses cultural knowledge, prior experience, and
    the frames of reference of ethnically diverse
    students to make learning more relevant
  • Uses childs background as a foundation for
    teaching
  • Builds on strengths and knowledge students bring
    to school
  • Highlights culturally-anchored materials

105
  • Focus on both direct instruction and teaching for
    higher-order skills
  • Explicit teaching
  • Cognitively demanding instructional strategies
  • Targeted teaching behaviors
  • Questions with high answer success rate
  • Additional wait time
  • Diversified assessment designs
  • A minimum of classroom administrative routines

106
  • 4. Ensure That All Low-Income and African
    American Students Complete a Rigorous Curriculum
  • Storyline
  • Rigor
  • Curriculum rigor is closely linked to learning
  • Low track/ability group placement
    maintains/exacerbates achievement gaps developed
    0-9
  • Challenging curriculum has the power to reduce
    achievement gaps
  • Minority and low-income students benefit more
    than others from stronger course requirements
  • Alignment
  • Part of larger picture of alignment standards,
    instruction, and assessment

107
  • Supporting Pillars
  • Two pillars buttress curricular rigor
  • Social/emotional support personal
    encouragement, warm, demanding, caring, and
    supportive classroom environment
  • Extended time
  • During the school day
  • Extended school day/year
  • Action
  • Eliminate non-academically challenging courses
  • Get students into more challenging courses

108
  • 5. Develop a Cohesive System for Collecting,
    Analyzing, and Using Data to Understand, Address,
    and Close Achievement Gaps
  • Storyline
  • How schools use data has a good deal to do with
    closing gaps
  • Gap-closing schools are adept at analyzing and
    using data
  • Actions
  • Develop systems for a data-driven instructional
    program
  • Systematic methods for gathering and employing
    data
  • Multiple data-gathering strategies
  • Frequent and ongoing work

109
  • Create an infrastructure to support the
    consistent use of data
  • Time for data work
  • Policies/structure for work
  • Leadership
  • Collaborative work

110
  • CULTURE
  • 6. Develop a Culture of High Academic Press and
    High Personalization
  • Storyline
  • Culture marked by high academic press and high
    personalization is key to ensuring greater equity
    in learning
  • Harmony between the two is critical caring in
    combination with high expectations
  • Elements of Highly Personalized Culture
  • Caring each student is known and cared for
  • Trust students trust the school and the staff

111
  • Affiliation opportunities to be part of
    communities, for cooperative work, and for
    developing continuing relationships
  • Support nurturing and supportive relationships
    between educators and students
  • Cultural compatibility an environment that is
    reflective of the culture of youngsters homes
    and communities
  • Action
  • Rich array of co-curricular activities, with
    concerted effort to nurture involvement
  • Opportunities for meaningful involvement in
    leadership activities
  • Culturally anchored clubs
  • Racially balanced staff

112
  • Professional development on high personalization
  • Open examination of race and class
  • Safe and orderly learning environment
  • Smaller classes
  • Comprehensive services
  • Guidance for students advisors, mentors, tutors
  • Celebrations of accomplishments of students

113
  • 7. Mix Students by Race and Class
  • Storyline General
  • A students school peers are a key factor in
    explaining academic achievement for any given
    student, school culture is shaped by the peers
    with whom s/he interacts
  • Schools can permit peer efforts to damage the
    achievement of students or they can influence
    peer interactions in ways that help ensure a more
    equitable distribution of learning
  • Storyline Specific
  • Students are often clustered together in
    classrooms in terms of race and class

114
  • Race and social class segregation matters
  • who sits next to whom makes a difference in
    student learning (grades, achievement scores,
    educational aspirations, occupational aspirations)

115
  • Reversing segregation matters
  • the benefits of integration are clear, especially
    for the most disadvantaged students
  • desegregation is an important tool for closing
    achievement gaps
  • schools need to manage peer influence effects
    actively
  • Explaining the Storyline
  • Allocation of school resources

116
  • Allocation of expectations and demands for
    excellence
  • Peer effects and peer culture
  • concentration can help produce a culture in which
    negative attitudes, poor behavior, low
    motivation, limited effort, and poor self concept
    blanket students
  • restricted access to high aspirations for school
    success and post-school opportunities the
    reverse of the middle-class peer effect

117
  • Action
  • Mix students by race and class be proactive in
    getting students on the wrong side of the
    achievement gap into meaningful contact with
    peers with pro-achievement norms, strong academic
    performance, and high aspirations for school and
    post-school success

118
  • STRUCTURE AND SUPPORT
  • 8. Build Linkages Between Home and School that
    Focus on Student Learning
  • Storyline
  • Parent involvement has a direct and strong impact
    on student achievement
  • Close cooperation between schools, parents, and
    the community is one of the keys to closing
    achievement gaps

119
  • Action
  • Parental Involvement at the School
  • Deliberate recruiting strategies
  • Make school a comforting, welcoming place
  • Remove barriers that hinder involvement
  • Educate staff on how to help parents in their
    home education role
  • Employ multiple strategies for involvement
  • Provide parent education programs

120
  • Parent Support of the Education of Children at
    Home
  • Discussing childrens schoolwork and experiences
    at school (taking a real interest)
  • Structuring home activities
  • Providing help with homework
  • Encouraging attendance
  • Promoting high expectations for school success at
    home
  • Creating a home environment that encourages
    learning (e.g., quiet, specific place to work)
  • Linking children with enhanced learning
    opportunities outside the home and school

121
  • 9. Provide High-Quality Professional Development
    to Help Teachers Close Achievement Gaps
  • Storyline
  • There is a link between professional development
    and student achievement
  • Professional development for teachers of poor and
    minority children often leaves much to be desired
  • Cajoling and bullying teachers in the absence of
    capacity building in the area of skills and
    knowledge needed to close gaps will fail
  • Appropriate capacity building can help narrow gaps

122
  • Quality Elements
  • Valued by teachers and formal school leaders
  • Part of a thoughtful plan that is long-term in
    nature and employs frequent learning sessions
  • Schoolwide
  • Carefully linked to other aspects of the school
  • Sufficient time for learning
  • High levels of administrative support and
    involvement
  • Intensive support over time
  • Grows from student-driven data and school results

123
  • Practice anchored/job embedded
  • Context sensitive
  • Center of gravity is real challenges in the
    classroom/school
  • Direct and obvious application
  • Often part of collaborative arrangements, e.g.,
    networks
  • Focus on growth rather than deficits
  • Trusting context
  • Reflective work
  • Focus
  • all the content emphasized to this point
    instruction, curriculum, assessment, and so forth

124
  • 10. Reduce Class Size in the Early Primary Grades
    and Reduce School Size
  • Storyline
  • The effect of assignment to a small class on the
    racial test score gap is sizeable
  • The negative effects of poverty on student
    achievement are considerably stronger in larger
    schools and districts than in smaller ones that
    is, smaller schools and districts are
    considerably more successful in disrupting or
    mitigating the relationship between poverty and
    student achievement

125
  • Small classes and schools help minority and
    low-income students the most
  • Timing of reductions is important
  • Size of reduction is important
  • Length of treatment is important

126
  • What Powers Size Effects
  • Changes in instruction made possible by class
    size reductions
  • More effective classroom management
  • More individualized attention
  • Greater and more appropriate differentiation of
    instruction
  • Less space for children not to engage
  • Better linkages to parents
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com