W A T K I N S - J O H N S O N C O M P A N Y Semiconductor Equipment Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

W A T K I N S - J O H N S O N C O M P A N Y Semiconductor Equipment Group

Description:

Chp.6 Energy EROEI - Nuclear Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer BMayer_at_ChabotCollege.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: WATKI93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: W A T K I N S - J O H N S O N C O M P A N Y Semiconductor Equipment Group


1
Engineering 10
Chp.6 EnergyEROEI - Nuclear
Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical Mechanical
EngineerBMayer_at_ChabotCollege.edu
2
EROEI
  • Energy Returned On Energy Invested
  • Energy Invested in order to
  • ACQUIRE energy, it TAKES ENERGY
  • To PROCESS (Refine) energy, it TAKES ENERGY
  • TRANSPORT a form of energy, it TAKES ENERGY.
  • STORE energy, it TAKES ENERGY.
  • USE energy, it also TAKES ENERGY

3
EROEI
  • Energy Returned On Energy Invested
  • Energy Returned
  • After you have taken into account all the energy
    used in the last slide...how MUCH ENERGY do you
    have left?
  • OR How much energy does it actually COST in order
    to USE a particular form of energy?

4
EROEI - Analogy
  • Say that you have 100 that you want to INVEST
    at a bank.
  • The bank is offers an account for a year that
    pays 10 interest.
  • Check the TOTAL Gain or LOSS From this Investment
  • What if you didn't have a car so you take the Bus
    to the Bank. It costs you 4 to catch the bus
    round-trip to go to the bank and deposit the
    money.
  • After a year, you pay another 4 to catch another
    bus to the bank to withdraw your money and
    interest.
  • The math on This investment
  • 100 10 interest 110 at the end of the
    year.
  • MINUS 4 for the first bus and another 4 for the
    2nd bus 8 total.
  • Subtracting the 8 from the 110 that leaves a
    total of 102
  • the REAL return on your investment 2/100 2
  • Not such a good deal after all

5
EROEI Graphically
BackWork
Note EROI ? EROEI
  • If there is NO Surplus, then Eout/Ein lt1, and We
    have WASTED energy

6
EROEI Fuel (Thermal) Energy
Energy Form EROEI/EROI
Oil Gas 1940's Discoveries gt 100.0
Oil Gas 1970's Production 23.0, discoveries 8.0
Coal (mine mouth) 1950's 80.0
Coal (mine mouth)1970's 30.0
Oil shale 0.7 to 13.3
Coal liquefaction 0.5 to 8.2
Geopressured gas 1.0 to 5.0
Ethanol (sugercane) 0.8 to 1.7
Ethanol (corn) 1.3
Ethanol (corn residues) 0.7 to 1.8
Methanol (wood) 2.6
Solar space heat (fossil backup) 1.9
7
EROEI Electrical Energy
Energy Form EROEI/EROI
Coal 9.0
Hydropower 11.2
Nuclear (light-water reactor) 4.0
Solar Photovoltaics 1.7-10
Geothermal 1.9-13
  • From these Lists We Spot a Couple of Dicey
    Propositions
  • Solar Electricity
  • Corn Ethanol as a fuel

8
EROEI Life Cycle Analysis Example
  • Consider the Production of a Wind Turbine with a
    20-25yr Operating Life

9
Wind Turbine Nacelle
http//www.vestas.com/en/about-vestas/sustainabili
ty/wind-turbines-and-the-environment/life-cycle-as
sessment-(lca).aspx
10
Wind Turbine LCA
  • Turbine Production Environmental NEGATIVE Impacts
  • Manufacturing of raw materials
  • Production of components
  • The wind turbines energy production
  • De-commissioning of the wind turbine

Energy Source Energy ConsumptionMJ/kWh produced
FOSSIL FUELS  
Crude oil 2.46E-02
Hard coal 1.95E-02
Lignite 3.38E-03
Natural gas 2.24E-02
Nuclear power 2.05E-02
RENEWABLE ENERGY  
Biomass, dry matter, fuel 7.29E-04
Biomass, dry matter, raw material 2.54E-05
Hard wood, dry matter, raw material 1.26E-04
Primary energy from hydro power 6.07E-03
Primary energy from wind power 4.51E-07
Renewable fuels 2.08E-08
Total (MJ/kWh produced) 9.82E-02
Total (kWh/kWh produced) 2.73E-02
Total Energy Invested (kWh/turbine) 4,304,222
11
3.0 MWe Wind Turbine EROEI
  • Energy Invested 4,304 MWh/turbine
  • Energy Returned 173,580 MWh/turbine
  • 7,890,000 kWh/Turbine?Year
  • 22 Year Operating Life
  • The EROEI Calculation
  • An EXCELLENT Return!

12
WindPower DownSide
  • WindPower is NONDispactchable
  • Can NOT call it up at any time
  • Needs Supplemental STORAGE

13
Energy Sources Fact Fancy
  • Question Which Energy Source Has These
    Attractive Aspects
  • NO HydroCarbon or NOx Emissions
  • NO GreenHouse Gas Emissions
  • Very High Energy Density
  • Easy to Transport Fuel
  • Plug-Compatible With Existing Electrical Grid
  • Can Easily Produce Hydrogen During Off Peak
    Hours
  • Low Energy Inputs to Produce?

14
Answer ? Nuclear (Fission) Power
15
Energy Sources Fact Fancy
  • Nuclear Fission Limitations
  • Waste Handling is a Political Issue
  • Have Technological Solutions
  • Waste Concentration, and Then Storage in
    Water-Free, Geologically Stable Salt-Mine
    Structures
  • Fear of Accidental Radiation Releases Due to Loss
    of Coolant Accidents Such as TMI
  • New Designs are Fail-Safe LoCAs can Be
    Engineered OUT
  • ByProduction of Nuclear-Weapons Compatible
    Materials e.g., Plutonium

16
Energy Sources Future
  • Any of the Previous Techniques Could Benefit from
    Technology BreakThrus
  • Possible Examples
  • A BioEngineered Fermentation Enzyme Greatly
    Reduces Energy Required to Make Ethanol
  • Nuclear FUSION
  • Fission Break a Heavy Atom (Uranium) to Liberate
    Heat (and Neutrons)
  • FUSION Combine Light Hydrogen Atoms to Liberate
    Heat (and Make Heavier Helium Atoms)

17
Energy Sources Future cont
  • Fusion Produces MUCH LESS Radioactive Material
    Than Fission Reactors
  • But its NOT Zero
  • Fuel is Heavy Water Isotopes That are in More
    than Sufficient Supply in Sea Water
  • Fusion Limitations
  • An EXTREMELY Difficult Technical Problem Must
    Generate Local Temperatures That Approximate
    those found in STARS
  • 50 Years of Intense Study Have barely Even
    Reached the Energy Break-Even Point

18
Fission Fusion Nuclear Reactions
  • Fission ? Splitting
  • Fusion ? Joining
  • Dueterium ? H with 1 Neutron (2 nucleons)
  • Tritium ? H with 2 Neutrons (3 nucleons)

19
(No Transcript)
20
Electric Cars?
  • The USA consumes about 140 BILLION Gallons of
    Gasoline per year
  • As discussed by Dr. Mike Carnall in his Ethanol
    presentation
  • Lets make an estimate of how much electricity
    would be needed to replace the amount of gasoline
    used by on-road vehicles

21
Electricity Estimate Assumptions
  • 95 of Gasoline is used in Cars/Trucks
  • Gasoline heat of combustion 45 MJ/kg
  • Gasoline Density 737 kg/cu-m
  • Piston Engine Thermal efficiency 25
  • Electricity Transmission Efficiency 96
  • Battery charging efficiency 80
  • Battery discharging efficiency 80
  • Electric Motor efficiency 90
  • 1 cubic meter 264.2 gallon US, liquid

22
Electricity Estimate
  • 95 of Gasoline used by Vehicles
  • 133B gallons to Cu-m

23
Electricity Estimate
  • Mass of 503M cu-m
  • Thermal Energy in 371B kg of Gasoline

24
Electricity Estimate
  • Energy delivered to DriveShaft using 25 Engine
    Efficiency
  • This is the amount of Mechanical Energy that must
    be delivered to the DriveShaft by the electric
    motor that REPLACES the gasoline engine
  • Now Work BACKwards

25
Electricity Estimate
  • Electrical Energy applied to the motor using
    motor efficiency
  • Energy stored in Batteries to Power the motor
    using Battery efficiency
  • Electrical Energy applied to Battery Charger
    using charger efficiency

26
Electricity Estimate
  • Electrical Energy produced at the PowerPlant
    using Transmission Efficiency
  • Thus the ADDITIONAL electric energy that power
    plants must produce to run vehicles is about 7
    550 000 TeraJoules in a year

27
Electricity Estimate
  • Convert TeraJoules per year into
    MegaWatts-Electric (MWe)
  • And a J/s is a watt, so the MWe equivalent

28
Electricity Estimate
  • Now a BIG nuclear PowerPlant such as Diablo
    Canyon is rated at about 2000 MWe Use this to
    Calc the NEW Power Plants needed run vehicles

29
Electricity Estimate
  • Thus to Run our vehicles on Electricity we would
    need to open a NEW Nuclear PowerPlant EVERY MONTH
    for TEN YEARS

30
New Electricity for Cars Compared
  • The TOTAL generating Capacity in the USA is about
    1 070 000 MWe
  • The Electricity for Cars would add about 25 to
    the USA total
  • The Total generating Capacity in the CALIFORNIA
    is about 56 000 MWe
  • The Electricity for Cars would require about 4
    NEW Californias

31
Energy Summary
  • In My Humble Opinion ENERGY PRODUCTION is the
    SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT Technology Issue Facing
    Human Kind
  • A Low-Cost, Low-Environmental-Impact Energy
    Source GREATLY Facilitates The Solution of All
    Technical Problems
  • Food Production
  • Medical Advances
  • Water Production
  • Housing Shelter

32
All Done for Today
Cool Videos https//lasers.llnl.gov/multimedia/vid
eo_gallery/
NationalIgnitionFacility
Fusion in LIVERMORE
33
Electricity Estimate
  • Engery delivered to DriveShaft using 25 Engine
    Efficiency
  • Electrical Energy applied to the motor using
    motor efficiency

34
DT Reaction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com