Electron Acoustic Waves in Pure Ion Plasmas F. Anderegg C.F. Driscoll, D.H.E. Dubin, T.M. O - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Electron Acoustic Waves in Pure Ion Plasmas F. Anderegg C.F. Driscoll, D.H.E. Dubin, T.M. O

Description:

Electron Acoustic Waves in Pure Ion Plasmas F. Anderegg C.F. Driscoll, D.H.E. Dubin, T.M. O Neil University of California San Diego supported by NSF grant PHY-0354979 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Depto82
Learn more at: http://nnp.ucsd.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electron Acoustic Waves in Pure Ion Plasmas F. Anderegg C.F. Driscoll, D.H.E. Dubin, T.M. O


1
Electron Acoustic Wavesin Pure Ion Plasmas F.
Anderegg C.F. Driscoll, D.H.E. Dubin, T.M.
ONeil University of California San Diego
supported by NSF grant PHY-0354979
2
Overview
  • We measure the particle distribution function
    f(vz , z center) coherently with the wave
  • A non-resonant drive modifies the particle
  • distribution f(vz) so as to make the mode
    resonant
  • with the drive.

3
Electron Acoustic Wave the mis-named wave
  • EAWs are a low frequency branch of standard
    electrostatic plasma waves.
  • EAWs are non-linear plasma waves that exist at
    moderately small amplitude.
  • Observed in Laser plasmas Pure electron
    plasmas Pure ion plasmas

4
Other Work on Electron Acoustics Waves
  • Theory neutralized plasmas Holloway and Dorning
    1991
  • Theory and numerical non-neutral
    plasmasValentini, ONeil, and Dubin 2006
  • Experiments laser plasmas Montgomery et al
    2001Sircombe, Arber, and Dendy 2006
  • Experiments pure electron plasmas Kabantsev,
    Driscoll 2006
  • Experiments pure electron plasma mode driven by
    frequency chirp Fajans group 2003

5
Theory
Electron Acoustic Waves are plasma waves with a
slow phase velocity
This wave is nonlinear so as to flatten the
particle distribution to avoid strong Landau
damping.
6
Dispersion relation
  • Infinite homogenous plasma (Dorning et
    al.)

7
Dispersion Relation
8
Penning-Malmberg Trap
9
Density and Temperature Profile
rp 0.5 cm
0.05eV lt T lt 5 eV
Mg B 3T
n 1.5 x 107 cm-3
Lp 10cm
10
Measured Wave Dispersion
Trivelpiece Gould
EAW
Rp/lD lt 2
11
Received Wall Signal
Trivelpiece Gould mode
The plasma response grows smoothly during the
drive
10 cycles 21.5 kHz
12
Received Wall Signal
Electron Acoustic Wave
During the drive the plasma response is
erratic. Plateau formation
100 cycles 10.7 kHz
13
Fit Multiple Sin-waves to Wall Signal
Electron Acoustic Wave
The fit consist of two harmonics and the
fundamental sin-wave, resulting in a precise
description of the wall signal
fit
data
Wall signal volt 70db
Time ms
14
Wave-coherent distribution function
Record the Time of Arrival of the Photons
photons
Photons are accumulated in 8 separate phase-bin
Wall signal volt 70db
35.5
36.0
time ms
15
Distribution Function versus Wave Phase
Trivelpiece Gould mode
f 21.5 kHzT 0.77 eV
f(vz, z0)
The coherent distribution function shows
oscillations dv of the entire distribution
These measurements are done in only one position
(plasma center, z0)
16
Distribution Function versus Wave Phase
T0.3
T0.4
Electron Acoustic Wave
f 10.7 kHz T 0.3 eV
f(vz, z0)
The coherent distribution function shows -
oscillating Dv plateau at vphase - dv0 wiggle
at v0
Dv
These measurements are done in only one position
(plasma center, z0)
dv0
17
Distribution Function versus Phase
18
Distribution Function versus Phase
19
Distribution Function versus Phase
20
Distribution Function versus Phase
Shows wiggle of the entire distribution
4000
Velocity m/s
-4000
Small amplitude
0
90
180
270
360
Phase degree
Trivelpiece Gould mode
This measurement is done in only one position
(plasma center)
21
Distribution Function versus Phase
18055_1830523
Dv
  • Shows
  • trapped particle island of half- width ?v
  • dv0 wiggle at v0

Velocity m/s
dv0
-2000
0
90
180
270
360
Electron Acoustic Wave
Phase degree
This measurement is done in only one position
(plasma center)
22
Model
18055_1830523
  • Two independent waves
  • Collisions remove discontinuities

2000
Velocity m/s
-2000
0
90
180
270
360
Phase degree
Electron Acoustic Wave
23
Island Width Dv vs Particle Sloshing dv0
Trapping in each traveling wave gives Dv The sum
of the two waves gives sloshing dv0
Linear theory gives
0
24
Frequency Variability
Large amplitude drives are resonant over a wide
range of frequencies
25
Frequency jump
100 cycles
TG
EAW
f response
f drive
The plasma responds to a non-resonant drive by
re-arranging f(v) such as to make the mode
resonant
26
f(v) evolves to become resonant with drive!
Non-resonant drive modifies the particle
distribution f(vz) to make the plasma mode
resonant with the drive.
27
Particle Response Coherent with Wave
Fixed frequency drive 100 cycles at f 18kHz
The coherent response give a precise measure of
the phase velocity
28
When the Frequency Changes kz does not change
T 1.65 eV
kz p / Lp
29
Range of Mode Frequencies
Trivelpiece Gould
EAW
When the particle distribution is modified,
plasma modes can be excited over a continuum
range, and also past the theoretical thumb.
30
Chirped Drive
The frequency is chirped down from 21kHz to10 kHz
The chirped drive produce extreme modification of
f(v)
Damping rate g/w 1 x 10-5
31
Summary
  • Standing Electron Acoustic Waves (EAWs) and
    Trivelpiece Gould waves are excited in pure ion
    plasma.
  • Measured dispersion relation agrees with
    Dornings theory
  • We observe - Particle sloshing in the trough
    of the wave - Non-linear wave trapping. -
    Close agreement with 2 independent waves
    collisions model
  • Surprisingly Non-resonant wave drive modifies
    the particles distribution f(v) to make the
    drive resonant.Effectively excites plasma mode
    at any frequency over a continuous range

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
Distribution Function versus Phase
Shows wiggle of the entire distribution
Velocity
Large amplitude
0
90
180
270
360
Phase degree
Trivelpiece Gould mode
This measurement is done in only one position
(plasma center)
35
Typical Parameters
rp 0.5 cm
0.05eV lt T lt 5 eV
Mg B 3T
n 1.5 x 107 cm-3
Lp 10cm
Standing wave phase velocity
36
Stability
f (v)
Penrose criteria predicts instability if
satisfied
k lt 96 m-1
and k satisfies
Our
230 m-1 is larger than the maximum
gt This plasma is stable
allowed by Penrose criteria
37
Chirped Drive
Received signal Volt 70db
Time ms
The frequency is chirped down from 21kHz to10 kHz
38
Particles Coherent Response
Trivelpiece Gould mode
vph
vph
The coherent response changes sign at v 0
(almost no particle are present at the phase
velocity)
39
Particles Coherent Response
Electron Acoustic Wave
vph
vph
The coherent response changes sign at v 0
at the wave phase velocity
40
Distribution Function versus Phase
Dv
  • Shows
  • trapped particle island of half- width ?v
  • dv0 wiggle at v0

Velocity m/s
dv0
-2000
0
90
180
270
360
Electron Acoustic Wave
Phase degree
This measurement is done in only one position
(plasma center)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com