The Value of Medication Therapy Management Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

The Value of Medication Therapy Management Services

Description:

The Value of Medication Therapy Management Services – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: pst91
Learn more at: http://www.pstac.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Value of Medication Therapy Management Services


1
The Value of Medication Therapy Management
Services
2
ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF MTMS
3
From Pharmaceutical Care
  • Pharmaceutical care is a practice in which the
    practitioner takes responsibility for a patients
    drug-related needs, and is held accountable for
    this commitment.

Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morely PC. Pharmaceutical
Care Practice. 1998. McGraw-Hill Companies
4
To Medication Therapy Management Services
  • The term MTMS became widely accepted after it was
    included in the Medicare Modernization Act in
    2003
  • The foundation of MTMS was built through the
    development of pharmaceutical care
  • MTMS is not limited to any specific population or
    payer group

5
Purpose of MTMS
  • To optimize therapeutic outcomes
  • To decrease the likelihood of adverse events
  • To enhance patient understanding and adherence
  • To reduce overall healthcare spending

American Pharmacists Association
6
Pharmacists Evolving Role
From Dispensing Services
to a clinical service provider
7
Pharmacys Definition of MTMS
  • Services provided by a pharmacist that improve
    treatment outcomes for individual patients
  • A professional service to promote the safe and
    effective use of medications
  • A way to provide better care for patients
  • Promotes collaboration among the patient, the
    pharmacist, and the patients other health care
    providers
  • .

Bluml BM. Definition of medication therapy
management development of professionwide
consensus. J Am Pharm Assoc. 20054556672
8
CMS MTMS Requirements
  • The CMS MTMS Requirements only apply to the
    Medicare population
  • CMS is regularly evaluating this service, and the
    program definitions will likey evolve over time.
  • Currently, CMS requires that all Medicare Part D
    Plans have an MTMS program which
  • Ensures optimum therapeutic outcomes for targeted
    beneficiaries through improved medication use
  • Reduces the risk of adverse events
  • Is developed in cooperation with licensed and
    practicing pharmacists and physicians

www.cms.hhs.gov
9
CMS MTMS Requirements
  • Currently, CMS requires that all Medicare Part D
    Plans have an MTMS program which
  • May be furnished by pharmacists or other
    qualified providers
  • May distinguish between services in ambulatory
    and institutional settings
  • Is coordinated with any care management plan
    established for a targeted individual under a
    chronic care improvement program (CCIP)
  • Describes the resources and time required to
    implement the program if using outside personnel
    and establishes the fees for pharmacists or
    others

www.cms.hhs.gov
10
Establishment of Billing Codes
  • Three (3) pharmacist only CPT professional
    service codes to bill third-party payers for MTM
    Services delivered face-to-face between a
    pharmacist and a patient
  • 99605 is to be used for a first-encounter
    service (up to
  • 15 minutes)
  • 99606 is to be used for a follow-up encounter
    with an established patient (up to 15 minutes)
  • 99607 may be used with either 99605 or 99606 to
    bill additional 15-minute increments.
  • Classified as Category 1 and became eligible for
    use January 1, 2008.

Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, et. al.
Current Procedural Terminology 2009. American
Medical Association Chicago, IL.
11
CPT Code Definition of MTMS
  • Medication Therapy Management services (MTMS)
    describe face-to-face patient assessment and
    intervention as appropriate, by a pharmacist 
  • MTMS includes the following documented elements 
  • review of the pertinent patient history
  • medication profile (prescription and
    non-prescription)
  • recommendations for improving health outcomes and
    treatment compliance. 

Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, et. al.
Current Procedural Terminology 2009. American
Medical Association Chicago, IL.
12
ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN MTMS
13
MTMS Activities
  • Assess patients health status
  • Devise medication treatment plan
  • Select, modify and administer medications
  • Review current medications and identify
    drug-related problems
  • Communicate care to other providers
  • Provide patient education
  • Refer patients for broader disease management
    services

American Pharmacists Association
14
The Spectrum of Pharmacist-Provided MTMS
  • Comprehensive or Targeted Medication Therapy
    Reviews
  • Adherence Services
  • Based on the number and/or type of medications
  • Targeted Medication Intervention Programs
  • High-alert and/or high-cost medications
  • Targeted patient population (i.e. geriatrics,
    pediatrics)
  • Disease State Management
  • Interdisciplinary approach to achieve therapeutic
    goals
  • Example disease states Diabetes, Cholesterol,
    Asthma
  • Health and Wellness Services
  • Immunizations
  • Wellness screenings
  • Smoking cessation
  • Weight management

American Pharmacists Association
15
Components of the MTMS Core Elements Service
Model
  • Medication Therapy Review (MTR)
  • a review of all medications including
    prescription, nonprescription, herbal products,
    and other dietary supplements
  • Personal Medication Record (PMR)
  • Medication-Related Action Plan (MAP) for the
    patient
  • Intervention and/or Referral
  • Documentation and Follow-Up

American Pharmacists Association
16
Medication Therapy Reviews
  • A Medication Therapy Review
  • (MTR) is provided at routine
  • intervals by a pharmacist
  • Annual comprehensive MTR
  • Additional comprehensive MTRs
  • as needed
  • Targeted MTR at any time to address new or
    ongoing medication-related problems

American Pharmacists Association
17
What Do Patients Get From Care Aligned With the
MTMS Core Elements Model?
  • A complete list of all
  • of their medications
  • Personal Medication Record (PMR)
  • A guide for managing their medications and
    related conditions
  • Medication-Related Action Plan (MAP)

American Pharmacists Association
18
Value of a Personal Medication Record
  • The medication record helps give the doctors a
    better picture of whats going on with me.

19
Value of MTMS
Having the help of a person who specializes in
medications, which impacts me on a daily
basisputting drugs in my body.
20
PHARMACISTS ROLE IN THE HEALTH CARE TEAM
21
they are integral members of the health care team!
MTM Pharmacists do not work in silos.
22
Physicians Value MTM Pharmacists
  • Working with the MTM Pharmacist has helped me
    to focus on the things that only I can do as a
    physician.

23
Medication Therapy Management Process
ASSESSMENT
? Evaluate appropriateness, effectiveness,
safety, and compliance with medications ?
Identify drug therapy problems

Practitioner
Patient

CARE PLAN
Experienced Decision Making
Medication Experience
? Resolve drug therapy problems ? Establish goals
of therapy ? Interventions
? Philosophy of Practice ? Social Obligation ?
Responsibility to identify, resolve, and
prevent drug therapy problems ?
Patient-centered approach ? Caring
? Todays wants and needs ? Responsibility to
participate in information sharing and
decision making
FOLLOW-UP
? Evaluate progress in meeting goals of therapy ?
Record actual patient outcomes ? Reassess new
problems
Therapeutic Relationship
24
MTM Pharmacist/Prescriber Relationship
25
Pharmacists Communication with other Health
Providers
  • MTM Pharmacists will communicate regularly with
    patients primary care provider, and other health
    care team members as appropriate
  • Describe assessment
  • Describe and rationalize recommendations for
    medication changes
  • Recommendations for follow-up

26
Medications Recommendations
  • MTM pharmacists may make recommendations in
    several ways
  • Directly to the patient
  • Over-the-counter changes, general adherence tips,
    managing side effects
  • Through the prescriber
  • Changes in prescription medications
  • Directly to the patient under a collaborative
    practice agreements
  • Allows pharmacists to make adjustments to
    prescription medications via protocol

27
VALUE OF MTMS
28
American Pharmacists Association
29
How do we define value?
  • Value on investment
  • Economic
  • Overall cost savings or cost
  • Clinical
  • Improvements in health outcomes
  • Humanistic
  • Patient satisfaction, improved quality of life,
    worker productivity
  •  

30
EVIDENCE OF THE VALUE OF MTMS
31
Studies Illustrating Value of MTMS
  • Asheville Project Diabetes
  • Asheville Project Asthma
  • Diabetes Ten City Challenge
  • Minnesota Experience Project

32
Asheville Project Diabetes
  • Evaluation of outcomes following community based
    provision of MTMS to patients with diabetes
    covered by a self-insured employer group
  • Longitudinal study with pre- and post- data
  • Participants were provided incentives including
    waiver of all copays for diabetes medications and
    supplies
  • 5 years of follow-up data
  • 187 participants entered the program, with 26
    continuing at 5 years

Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. J Am Pharm
Assoc. 20034317384.
33
Asheville Project Diabetes
  • Pharmacists performed the following as part of
    this study
  • Set and monitored treatment goals
  • Glucometer training
  • Adherence monitoring
  • Basic physical assessment, including foot exam,
  • blood pressure and weight
  • Diabetes education
  • Referral to other providers as needed

Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. J Am Pharm
Assoc. 20034317384.
34
Clinical Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Diabetes
Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The
Asheville Project long-term clinical and
economic outcomes of a community pharmacy
diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc.
20034317384.
American Pharmacists Association
35
Asheville Total Health Care Costs1
1Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The
Asheville Project Long-term clinical and
economic outcomes of a community pharmacy
diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc.
200343173-84.
American Pharmacists Association
36
Average Annual Diabetic Sick-Leave Usage (City of
Asheville)
American Pharmacists Association
37
Key Findings Asheville Diabetes
  • Economic benefit
  • Total health care costs for patients decreased
  • Prescription costs increased, but medical costs
    decreased
  • Clinical benefit
  • Significant improvement seen in A1C and LDL
  • Humanistic benefit
  • Decreased sick leave increased worker
    productivity

38
Asheville Project Asthma
  • Evaluation of outcomes following community based
    provision of MTMS to patients with asthma covered
    by a self-insured employer group
  • Longitudinal study with pre- and post- data
  • Participants were provided incentives including
    waiver of all copays for asthma medications and
    supplies
  • 5 years of follow-up data
  • 207 participants entered the program

Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
39
Asheville Project Asthma
  • Pharmacists served as care managers and met with
    subjects an average of every 3 months
  • Reviewed asthma action plans
  • Medication assessments of inhaler use
  • Assessment of inhaler technique
  • Review of symptoms and peak flow meter readings
  • Recommendations for treatment changes were sent
    to physician

Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
40
Economic Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Asthma
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
41
Clinical Outcomes of MTMSThe Asheville Project -
Asthma
Improved Asthma control sustained over 5 years
Bunting BA, Cranor CW. JAPhA. 2006 46133-147.
American Pharmacists Association
42
Key Findings Asheville Asthma
  • Economic benefit
  • Decreased percentage of asthma patients requiring
    emergency and hospital care
  • Clinical benefit
  • Improved asthma control sustained over 5 years
  • (as evidenced by FEV1 measurements)

43
Diabetes Ten City Challenge
  • Employer-funded, collaborative health management
    program for diabetes using community-based
    pharmacists in 10 cities across the USA
  • Pharmacists were located in
  • Independent pharmacies
  • Chain pharmacies
  • Ambulatory care clinics
  • On-site workplace locations
  • Participants received waived co-pays for
    medications.
  • 573 patients participated

Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
44
Diabetes Ten City Challenge
  • Pharmacists performed the following as part of
    this study
  • Applied a prescribed process of care based on
    clinical assessments and progress to goals
  • Worked with patients to set individualized
    self-management goals
  • Recommended changes in therapy when appropriate

Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
45
10 City Challenge Economic Outcomes after Year 1
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
46
10 City Challenge Clinical Outcomes after Year 1
HEDIS process measures for patients with diabetes
Fera T., Bluml BM, Ellis WM. JAPhA. 2009
49e52-e60.
47
Key Findings 10 City Challenge
  • Economic benefit
  • Total health care costs were less than predicted
  • Prescription costs increased, but overall health
    care
  • costs decreased
  • Clinical benefit
  • Increased percentage of patients meeting HEDIC
  • process measurement goals for patients with
    diabetes

48
Minnesota Experience Project
  • Evaluation of MTMS provided at 6 ambulatory care
    clinics over 1 year
  • 285 patients received MTMS
  • HEDIS goals for hypertension and dyslipidemia
    were evaluated
  • Study patients were required to have 1 of 12
    study conditions
  • Return on investment was calculated at 121

Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
49
Minnesota Experience Project
  • Pharmacists in this study
  • Used a consistent and systematic patient care
    process
  • Established goals of therapy in collaboration
    with patients and primary care providers
  • Made recommendations for changes in therapy as
    appropriate

Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
50
Economic Outcomes from the Minnesota Experience
Project
51
Clinical Outcomes from the Minnesota Experience
Project
HTN n 254 p0.03
Dyslipidemia n 254 P0.001
Isetts, et al., J Am Pharm Assoc.
200848(2)203-211
52
Key Findings Minnesota Experience Project
  • Economic benefit
  • A 121 return on investment was seen
  • Savings was seen in facilities costs
  • Per person per year costs decreased from 11,965
    to 8197
  • Clinical benefit
  • The MTM intervention group had a higher
    percentage of patients meeting HEDIS goals for
    hypertension and dyslipidemia

53
Limitations of Current Evidence
  • Most of the data comes from self-insured employer
    groups
  • Individual studies are small
  • Ten City Challenge was the largest with 573
    participants
  • Much of the evidence is focused on specific
    disease states

54
Summary of evidence of Value of MTMS
  • Economical
  • Multiple studies have shown positive results on
    total health care costs, creating a positive
    return on investment
  • Clinical
  • Multiple studies have indicated improved in
    clinical outcomes, specifically in diabetes,
    asthma, hypertension and dyslipidemia
  • Humanistic
  • The Asheville project has demonstrated reduced
    employee sick days and increased productivity.

55
ELEMENTS OF MTMS BENEFIT DESIGN
56
Elements of MTMS Plan Design
  • Eligibility
  • Reimbursement structure
  • Member engagement strategy
  • Incentives

57
Eligibility
  • Eligibility for a MTMS benefit can be based on
  • Number of medications
  • Specific chronic conditions
  • Total amount of prescription expenditures

58
Reimbursement Structure
  • Recommend utilizing the MTMS CPT billing codes
  • May used them as defined as time based codes,
  • or use a cross-walk relative value scale

59
Example Minnesota Medicaid
  • MHCP will reimburse only for face-to-face
    encounters and based on the lowest of five
    patient need levels, according to the following
    qualifying criteria
  • The number of medications the patient is
    currently taking
  • The number of drug therapy problems the patient
    has at present and
  • The number of medical conditions for which the
    patient is currently being treated.
  • CPT Codes (Time Based Codes)
  • Based on adopted Minnesota Medicaid law
  • 99605
  • 99606
  • 99607

60
Example MN Medicaid Payment Structure
Level Assessment of Drug-related needs Identification of Drug Therapy Problems Complexity-of-Care Planning FU Evaluation Approx. Face-to-Face Time Bill CPT Code Units
1 Problem-focused-at least 1 medication Problem-focused 0 drug therapy problems Straightforward 1 medical condition 15 min. 99605 or99606 1 unit
2 Expanded Problem-at least 2 medications Expanded Problem at least 1 drug therapy problem Straightforward 1 medical condition 16-30 min. 99605 or99606 and 1 unit
2 Expanded Problem-at least 2 medications Expanded Problem at least 1 drug therapy problem Straightforward 1 medical condition 16-30 min. 99607 1 unit
3 Detailed-at least 3-5 medications Detailed at least 2 drug therapy problems Low complexity at least 2 medical conditions 31-45 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
3 Detailed-at least 3-5 medications Detailed at least 2 drug therapy problems Low complexity at least 2 medical conditions 31-45 min. 99607 2 units
4 Expanded Detailed-at least 6-8 medications Expanded Detailed at least 3 drug therapy problems Moderate Complexity at least 3 medical conditions 46-60 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
4 Expanded Detailed-at least 6-8 medications Expanded Detailed at least 3 drug therapy problems Moderate Complexity at least 3 medical conditions 46-60 min. 99607 3 units
5 Comprehensive- gt 9 medications Comprehensive at least gt4 drug therapy problems High Complexity at least gt 4 medical conditions 60 min. 99605 or 99606 and 1 unit
5 Comprehensive- gt 9 medications Comprehensive at least gt4 drug therapy problems High Complexity at least gt 4 medical conditions 60 min. 99607 4 units
61
Example Outcomes Pharmaceutical Health Care
Pharmacist Service CPT Codes
Comprehensive Medication Review 99605 99607
Physician Consultation 99606 99607
Patient Compliance Consultation 99606 99607
Patient Education/Monitoring 99606
62
Member Engagement Strategy
  • May offer copay reductions or waivers
  • For all medications
  • For medication associated with a targeted medical
    condition (i.e., diabetes)
  • Offer reduced copay (or none) for MTMS

63
Whats in it for the payer?
  • MTMS results in decreased overall healthcare
    costs
  • Prescription costs will likely increase, but this
    is compensated by an overall decrease in costs
  • Pharmacists can provide MTMS as a member of the
    health care team and medical home model
  • Increased member satisfaction
  • Mechanisms for MTMS claims processing are well
    established through CPT codes

64
Whats in it for the patient?
  • MTMS provides patients with improved health
    outcomes from optimizing medication use
  • This includes decrease emergency department
    visits and hospitalizations
  • Increased understanding of medications and
    disease management
  • Improved quality of life

65
Summary
  • Medications are a standard in the care of chronic
    diseases
  • Pharmacist delivered Medication Therapy
    Management Services are well documented to
    decrease health care costs while increasing the
    quality of health care
  • High satisfaction rates among participants
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com