The Processes and Timescales That Produce Zoning and Homogeneity in Magmatic Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Processes and Timescales That Produce Zoning and Homogeneity in Magmatic Systems

Description:

Title: Basalt-crust interaction Author: George Bergantz Last modified by: bergantz Created Date: 8/3/2003 8:10:22 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: GeorgeB92
Learn more at: http://www.minsocam.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Processes and Timescales That Produce Zoning and Homogeneity in Magmatic Systems


1
The Processes and Timescales That Produce Zoning
and Homogeneity in Magmatic Systems
  • George Bergantz, Olivier Bachmann and Philipp
    Ruprecht
  • University of Washington

2
How to Link Observations Across Scales?
  • How to expand our toolbox for magma forensics?
  • What are the dynamic templates that produce large
    scales?
  • How are they reflected at the crystal scale?

3
Three types of zoning patterns thatcommonly
occur in ignimbrites
4
Mechanisms to produce compositional gaps and
gradients
5
Gradients in ignimbrites (See Table 1 in text)
Type of gradient Abrupt Linear (monotonic) Not measurable
Archtypal Examples Crater Lake, Aniakchak, Toconao-Atana, Katmai (Payne et al., V21C-2122), Chaitén (Lowenstern et al., V43D-2180) Bishop Tuff, Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Bandelier Tuff Monotonous Dacites (Fish Canyon Tuff, Lund Tuff, Cerro Galan) Rhyolites (Taupo)
6
Compositional Gap (Daly Gap)
  • Fig. 2 from paper

7
CF-induced Daly Gap
Same P-T, isotopic ratios Trace element
concentration crystal fractionation Interstitia
l melt in mafic (crystal-rich) end-member
compositionally similar to silicic end-member
(Crustal melting unlikely)
8
Interstitial melt expulsion from crystal-rich
mushes
  1. Crystal-melt separation time within longevity of
    magma chambers
  2. Melt expulsion enhancers (gas-driven
    filter-pressing, earthquake fluidization)

9
Gradients in ignimbrites (See Table 1 in text)
Type of gradient Abrupt Linear (monotonic) Not measurable
Archtypal Examples Crater Lake, Aniakchak, Toconao-Atana, Katmai (Payne et al., V21C-2122), Chaitén (Lowenstern et al., V43D-2180) Bishop Tuff, Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Bandelier Tuff Monotonous Dacites (Fish Canyon Tuff, Lund Tuff, Cerro Galan) Rhyolites (Taupo)
10
(Hildreth and Wilson, 2007)
11
Gradients require mixing- what do we need?
Stretching Folding Circulation (many scales of
strain)
Mixing requires a 1) a magma chamber 2)
paddle, thermal plumes, crystal plumes, bubble
plumes, compositional effects 3) an energy
source- some change in the environment to produce
kinetic energy
12
Well, What Dictates the Dynamic Template?
  • The Reynolds number
  • Most of us know that this number delimts three
    regimes
  • Re ltlt 1, laminar flow, neglect inertia
  • Re gt 104, fully turbulent, self-similar flow
    MIXING TRANSITION
  • 104 gt Re gt1 chaotic advection, both inertia and
    viscosity important

13
Demonstrate dripping crystal plumesSee paper by
Bergantz and Ni, 1999 cited in chapter
14
Mixing Efficiency
  • For system-wide mixing caused by vertical
    transport, e.g. some flavor of plume, Jellinek
    and others proposed the concept of mixing
    efficiency.
  • BUT be very careful about this concept- it is
    really a measure of STRATIFICATION

15
Bringing together types of zoning into a common
framework
  • Formation of a cap by escape from sill-like mush
    (instead of from the walls)
  • Unzoned cap

What happens in the cap? Top cooling and
assimilation Bottom T-buffered mush
below Convection in cap but weak, low-Reynolds
number
16
Gaps and zoning- no big deal after all!
17
Processes that Produce Complexity in a Crystal
Cargo
  • Mixing
  • In-situ hyper-solidus recycling dynamic mush
  • Concurrent melting, assimilation and deformation

What are links to the dynamic templates?
18
Simulations of gas driven overturn with smart
crystals
  • Movies from
  • Modeling of gas-driven magmatic overturn
    Tracking of phenocryst dispersal and gathering
    during magma mixing Ruprecht, Bergantz and
    Dufek, G3, v. 9, no. 7, 2008

19
Conclusions from simulations
  • For 2x105 crystals report back
  • A single overturn is sufficient to gather
    crystals onto a thin-scale from as much as a 100
    m initial separation. Continued choatic stirring
    can increase these distances, in accord with
    natural examples.

20
But what do crystals really remember?
  • Depends on rate of travel through regions of
    distinct chemical potential vs. rate at which
    crystals can record to changes
  • Damköler number
  • If Da ltlt 1, kinetics dominate
  • If Da gtgt 1, equilibrium assumption okay

21
Crystals as recorders of events in real-time
  • For rapid, e.g., gas driven overturn, crystal
    growth will lag and only record an echo of the
    process (Da ltlt 1), but dissolution may reach Da
    1
  • For slower processes rate-limited by heat
    transfer, both growth and dissolution will have
    Da 1 or more

22
Gradients in ignimbrites (See Table 1 in text)
Type of gradient Abrupt Linear (monotonic) Not measurable
Archtypal Examples Crater Lake, Aniakchak, Toconao-Atana, Katmai (Payne et al., V21C-2122), Chaitén (Lowenstern et al., V43D-2180) Bishop Tuff, Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Bandelier Tuff Monotonous Dacites (Fish Canyon Tuff, Lund Tuff, Cerro Galan) Rhyolites (Taupo)
23
Homogeneity
  • Mostly in large, crystal-rich magmas with
    intermediate (dacitic) composition (Monotonous
    Intermediates)
  • Also true for large granodioritic batholiths
    (main upper crustal building block)
  • How to reach homogeneity on large volumes of
    viscous crystal-rich magmas?
  • Low Re convection inevitably leads to
    gradients????
  • How to retain homogeneity on large volumes?
  • New magma recharge will inevitably occur???

24
New mass injections limited to similar
compositions?
  • Once a critical crystallinity is reached, silicic
    mushes act as density filter, buffer for T, C
  • But crystals often very strongly zoned

25
  • Spectacular small-scale disequilibrium in FCT, a
    homogeneous intermediate
  • Reflects a long history of overturn

(Charlier et al., 2007)
26
Time scales have dual nature homogeneity at the
large scale, heterogeneity at the small scale
  • Toba chem oscillations in allanites gt .4 M.y.
    before eruption cycling of crystals through
    hyper-solidus domains (Reid et al.)
  • Bandelier Tuff reheating prior to eruption
    (Wolff et al.)
  • Fish Canyon reverse mineral zoning, complex
    crystal compositions (Bachmann, Charlier et al.)
  • Tuolumne Intrusive Suite complexly zoned
    zircons,
  • Spirit Mtn., Mojave system complex rejuvenation
    of intrusive sheets, zoned zircon (Miller et al.)

27
Lengthscale-dependent mixing
  • Some bulk mixing must occur
  • Crystals record a changing environment- not just
    change in intensive variables
  • Zoning patterns different in juxtaposed crystals
  • Homogeneous at hand sample scale

28
Large silicic system are NOT just strips of
rhyolite- geophysical evidence Long Valley
Caldera. Very different from Mt. St. Helens.
New injections of basalt or intermediate magma
common
29
Unzipping
  • Sluggish convection regime
  • Gradients induced by crystal plumes,
    assimilation, mixing
  • As system grows, assimilation and mixing become
    more transparent
  • Lock-up from floor as crystal accumulation
    reaches 50 vol
  • Cooling slows down (at least by a factor of 2)
  • New magmas can not mix in gt Heat plate
  • Unzipping

30
Thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com