Title: Dr Ross J Todd Rutgers, the State University of NJ rtodd@scils.rutgers.edu
1Dr Ross J ToddRutgers, the State University of
NJrtodd_at_scils.rutgers.edu
School Libraries, Productive Pedagogy and the
Leading of Learning
2Student Learning
- School libraries as powerful and engaging places
in the lives of students do not happen by chance
or force.
3Student Learning
- Learning outcomes are achieved through deliberate
actions and instructional interventions of
Teacher-Librarians and Teachers working as
Partner-Leaders - INFORMATIONAL TRANSFORMATONAL FORMATIONAL
4(No Transcript)
5A TIME OF BOLD ACTION Lauren Becall
- "Standing still is the fastest way of moving
backwards in a rapidly changing world.
Imagination is the highest kite one can fly"
6The Victorian Landscape
- Increasing acknowledgement of
- the complexity and diversity of student learning
- intellectual quality as key learning outcome
- engagement with, and ownership of learning
- integratedness of disciplinary knowledges and
skills - inclusiveness educational leaders, learners,
knowledge, community, cultural diversity - teacher as the most important influence on
student learning.
7REVOLTING LIBRARIANS
A Time for Bold Action
8Revolting Librarians
- Sex, drugs, and will you please be quiet - Our
revolting jobs - An archivists classification of problem
patrons - In the stacks and in the sack An undercover
look at librarians and erotica - Check out those buns or, What do you say to a
male librarian? - Library service to the insane
- Being a cataloguer is better than gutting fish
for a living because - Astrology and library job correlation
9- Risky Business The Leading Of Learning
From authority- or role- or person-centered
leadership to cultural- and learning-centered
leadership explicitly focuses on leading of
learning.
10Taking Risks
- "I'm just glad it'll be Clark Gable who's falling
on his face and not Gary Cooper." --Gary Cooper
on his decision not to take the leading role in
"Gone With the Wind. - "We don't like their sound, and guitar music is
on the way out." --Decca Recording Co. rejecting
the Beatles, 1962. - "Heavier-than-air flying machines are
impossible." --Lord Kelvin, president, Royal
Society, 1895. - "Louis Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous
fiction". --Pierre Pachet, Prof. of Physiology
at Toulouse, 1872
11Revolting Librarians Taking Risks
- Stop talking about collaboration
- Stop talking about information literacy
- Stop talking about research projects
- Stop talking about roles of teacher-librarians
- Start talking about guided inquiry through
information resources - Start talking knowledge outcomes, not information
literacy outcomes - Start talking about intellectual quality of
learning - Start talking about libraries as quality learning
environments, not resource environments - Start talking the leading of learning through the
library - You are the information-learning specialist,
working with partner-leaders to lead learning
through complex and diverse resources, enabling
your students to develop deep understanding of
their curriculum topics
12The Key Question
- What constitutes effective shared teacher
librarian-teacher pedagogy and leading of
learning through partnerships?
13The Principles of Learning and Teaching
- The learning environment is supportive and
productive - The learning environment promotes independence,
interdependence and self motivation - Students needs, backgrounds, perspectives and
interests are reflected in the learning program - Students are challenged and supported to develop
deep levels of thinking and application - Assessment practices are an integral part of
teaching and learning - 6. Learning connects strongly with communities
and practice beyond the classroom
14Outcomes of the PoLT
- Intellectual Agency
- Personal Agency
- Social and Cultural Agency
- These learning outcomes are how we talk about the
school library
15PERSONAL AGENCY
- Self Confidence
- Willingness to take risks
- Trying new ideas and practices
- Independence
- Autonomy
16INTELLECTUAL AGENCY
- Have depth and breadth of knowledge and
understanding - Able to engage in intellectual exploration
- Can think deeply about ideas and practice
- Can deal with conflicting data and information
problematic knowledge - Engage in higher oigher order, flexible thinking
analysis, synthesis, evaluation, problem
solving able to think creatively and laterally - Able to reason with with evidence, particular to
the discipline area Relevant, connected
knowledge - Able to use the complex language of a discipline
- Meta-language
- Substantive discussion of ideas
17SOCIAL AND CULTURAL AGENCY
- Respect for different values, cultural knowledges
and viewpoints - Team building, collaboration, negotiation and
decision making - Knowledge integration from bits and bytes to
conceptual coherence and integration - Inclusivity
- Connect with current and future lives
- Social and ethical values
18The Principles of Learning and Teaching
- As a key learning environment, how is the school
library supportive and productive? - How does the school library promote independence,
interdependence and self motivation? - How does the school librarys learning program
reflect students needs, backgrounds,
perspectives and interests? - How does the school library challenge and support
the development of deep levels of thinking and
application? - How does the school library provide meaningful
feedback on learning that nurtures and nourishes
learning? - How does the school library connect learners with
communities and practice beyond the classroom? - EVIDENCE EVIDENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
19PoLT ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT LEARNING
- Process of personal and social construction
- Cumulative and developmental process
- Involves the whole person thinking, acting,
reflecting, discovering and linking ideas, making
connections - Transformative developing and transforming
prior knowledge, skills, attitudes, values
conceptual change - Encompasses feelings and motivations
- Closely resemble the ways that students will be
expected to use their knowledge and skills in the
real world - Dewey-Kelly-Brunner-Piaget-Vygotsky
20PoLT What do we want students to do?
- actively search for meaning and understanding
- construct deep knowledge and deep understanding
rather than passively receiving it - directly involved and engaged in the discovery of
new knowledge rather than collecting facts and
data - encounter alternative perspectives and
conflicting ideas so that they are able to
transform prior knowledge and experience into
deep understandings - transfer new knowledge and skills to new
circumstances - use a range of complex knowledge construction
competencies to transform raw data, prior
knowledge and information into deep understanding - take ownership and responsibility for their
ongoing learning and mastery of curriculum
content and skills - contribute to societal well being, the growth of
democracy, and the development of a knowledgeable
society.
21Teacher-Librarians And TheLeading Of Learning
- Learning to Read
- Reading to Learn
22School Librarians And TheLeading Of Learning
- Learning to Read
- Principles of Learning and Teaching (PoLT)
- Reading to Learn
23The Unfortunate Reality
- Many types of research /project assignments using
library or web-based sources contribute little or
nothing to learning - Very little evidence of construction of deep
knowledge and deep understanding - Rarely guided and sustained throughout the
project - Rarely equip students with the range of critical
thinking and problem solving competencies
necessary to demonstrate deep knowledge and deep
understanding
24Dinosaur units are generally a disaster
- Cutting and clipping of information
TRANSPORTATION rather than TRANSFORMATION of
information - Make decisions based on limited prior knowledge
lack of building background before focus and
formulation - Focus on product construction rather than
knowledge construction - (Limberg, Sweden 2005)
25Transportation of Text
- Cutting and pasting plagiarism
- Amassing of facts without imposing any
organizational or reflective structure - No local or global coherence to the facts
- No interpretation of data / facts or development
of positional stance - Little evidence of internalization of
understanding
26Transportation of Text
Presentation
Final version
Rewriting
Print-out
Interaction
(Limberg, Sweden 2005)
27Transformation of Text
- Collection of information and data pertinent to
specific focus and responding to how knowledge is
constructed in a particular discipline - Imposing of a personal organizational framework
on informational inputs to create thematic
substructures and to represent deep understanding - Identifying interrelationships of themes
- Critically reflecting on themes to develop
personal viewpoints, positions
28Limbergs Research
- Get the material from the Net, I read it.
Write down some good sentences, make a few
changes and read through it again. Making my own,
sort of! Then I think - Replace here and there.
Pick certain words and make my own text by adding
new words. I recognise the text if I read it
several times. Use those expressions that fit
in. (Kris)
29Limbergs Research
- I borrowed a book on sharks, picked out words
from the book, from the text. I jotted these down
in a little notebook as rough notes, then I
rewrote it and then I painted a front page and
then I put the whole thing into a boklet and the
job was done. (David)
30Why do students transport text rather than
transform text?
- It is rewarded copying and pasting by being
undetected - Erroneous notion that more facts deep knowledge
and deep understanding - Assignment task promotes transport of text
- Not engaged or motivated
- Poor information competencies particularly
those involving analysis, manipulation and
synthesis - Stress and competition
- Poor time management and planning skills
- Lack of confidence to manipulate information
- Unwillingness to ask for help and when they do
ask, told this is an independent project you
have to work it out for yourself - Low level of assignments no critical thinking
required - Assessment of product only
- Absence of clear assessment criteria that
emphasize deep knowledge and deep understanding
31CASE STUDY
Productive Pedagogy and the Leading of Learning
32CASE STUDY
- Do teacher librarian-teacher partnerships
contribute to quality learning outcomes,
evidenced in - Intellectual agency
- Personal Agency
- Social and Cultural Agency
- In other words, is the PoLT framework useful for
understanding the benefits of learning
partnerships of teacher-librarians and classroom
teachers? - How is a supportive learning environment created
through the school library?
33CONTEXT OF RESEARCH
- Grade 9 cohort at Gill St Bernards school, New
Jersey - Research involved 43 students (21 girls, 22 boys)
undertaking a semester long course Research
Project - Collaboration of 7 teachers and teacher-librarian
to develop complex research skills, strategic and
deep information seeking, higher-order
information analysis and synthesis to represent
new understandings as a result of the research - Instructional program built around the stages of
Kuhlthaus Information Search Process and a
series of carefully planned interventions
targeted to the knowledge construction process. -
34Information Search Process
-
-
- Tasks Initiation Selection
Exploration Formulation Collection
Presentation - --------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------?
- Feelings uncertainly optimism confusion
clarity sense of
satisfaction or - (affective) frustration
direction/ disappointment - doubt
confidence - Thoughts vague-----------------------------------
--?focused - (cognitive) ---------------------------
--------------------? - increased interest
- Actions seeking relevant information-----------
-----------------?seeking pertinent information - (physical) exploring
documenting -
35DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
- Free generation written protocol administered at
three stages in the information search process
undertaken by the students (Initiation,
Formulation/Focus and Presentation stage of
research) - students knowledge of chosen topic
- perceptions on levels of knowledge
- information seeking and use experience
- Structured search log kept by students which
recorded all the sources used in constructing
their research papers - Affective Domain / Next Task Log feelings and
task progression
36CHANGES IN INTELLECTUAL QUALITY
- Substance of knowledge knowledge about topic
-
- Amount of knowledge
- Structure of knowledge unstructured to high
levels of organization and coherence - Estimate of topical knowledge coded Nothing,
Not Much, Some, Quite a Bit, A Great Deal - 5. Title of knowledge
37MEASURING CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
- Graesser Clarks typology (1984) of statements
based on the nature of relationships embedded in
them. The statements were - Properties statements describing
characteristics - Manner statements describing processes,
styles, actions - Reason statements of explanations of how
and why - Outcome statements providing end result
- Causality statements of some event causally
leads to another - Set Membership statements about class inclusion
- Implication statements showing predictive
relations - Value judgment statements presenting personal
position or viewpoint
38INITIATION OF RESEARCH TASK
- Initial representations were lists of unrelated
concepts, and generalities, language
associations - Statements were primarily property (is a), manner
(describe how something happens) - Average number of statements was 4 (range from
0-11) - Random representation unstructured, no clear
sequence or organization guess work I think
that, or at best chronological / historical - Some indication of inaccuracy / misrepresentation
- Acknowledge that students knew very little
- Motivated to learn personal experiences,
personal connections, intriguing facts about
topic, curiosity, teacher/librarian recommendation
39MIDPOINT OF RESEARCH TASK FOCUS FORMULATION
- Dramatic increase in number of propositional
statements range from 6-34 statements average
number 17 - Focus on Properties describes characteristics
Manner describe processes, styles, actions
Reason explanations of how and why - Some evidence of organizational structure of
ideas some attempt to develop conceptual
groupings - Cognitive intents From initiation to
formulation getting a bigger picture (building
background) getting a changed picture (correcting
misinformation) getting a clearer picture - Key mechanism writing of abstract and its
feedback
40CONCLUSION OF RESEARCH TASK SUBMISSION OF
RESEARCH PAPER
- Clear and precise listing of properties, manner
and increasing use of set membership - Final representations also stronger on reasons,
outcomes, causality, implications, predictive,
reflective (increased complexity) - Average number of statements 31 (range 8 63)
- For 4 students, decrease in number of statements
reflect higher levels of synthesis coalescing
lists into conceptual categories - Higher levels of structural centrality and
conceptual coherence -ie. overall integrated and
interlinked structure, yet subgroups of ideas - Cognitive intents getting a clearer picture,
getting a position in a picture (ie clarifying
aspects in process of sorting and writing,
developing a personal perspective) - Reflective, comparative, positional personal
ownership, and clearer focus on topics as
evidenced by titles
41PRODUCTIVE PEDAGOGY INTELLECTUAL AGENCY
- the collaborative program of instruction
contributed to growth of intellectual AGENCY - development of knowledge representations from
simplistic, superficial and disjointed structures
to structures that embedded explanations, causal,
predictive and reflective statements deep
knowledge - organization of ideas into structured conceptual
groupings knowledge coherence and depth - use of specific terminology associated with the
celebrations with descriptions and explanations
surrounding these terms - choice of sources showed increasing complexity
and depth from general background to specific
topicality - overall fluency and fluidity of the written
representations indicate ability to substantially
communicate in writing about their topical
knowledge - Ability to deal with conflicting facts or
viewpoints - evidence of constructing arguments and
explanations in relation to conflicting aspects
of topics
42SUPPORTIVE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
- Rollercoaster of emotions Very distinctive ebb
and flow of emotions follows the six deadlines
required to guide the students effectively
through the research process - Initial feelings varied from a state confidence
to slight hesitation/uncertainty - Increase in optimism and confidence as they
identify a general topic and begin to investigate
sources for relevant information -
- Highest increase in negative emotions where
complex information processing and knowledge
construction takes place analysis, synthesis,
dealing with conflict, structuring arguments,
sequencing ideas with stress, pressure and
brain strain being reported.
43SUPPORTIVE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
- roller coaster of emotions was recognized by the
teaching team, and interventions implemented to
support students - Individual meetings and feedback sessions
encouraged students to talk about their feelings
and learnings opportunities for dialogue,
feedback, encouragement - instructional interventions explicitly targeted
to the skills requirements, especially knowledge
construction - instructional intervention that modeled the
intellectual scaffolds for successfully
completing the task - stages and milestones approach
- clear expectations of tasks to be submitted,
criteria for assessment, dates, and feedback and
support mechanisms - providing direction and regulation to keep
students on task and engaged, as well as able to
manage all of the complexities of the task
44MAKING CONNECTIONS
- Reasons for choice of topic connections made to
personal real life contexts - personal experiences (participating in a
particular celebration) - personal connections (know someone who
participates), knowledge of intriguing facts or
aspects about topic - curiosity (typically based on having read or
viewed something) - As students learned more about their topic, the
specific new knowledge they acquired generated
curiosity and motivation, encouraging them to dig
deeper into their topic. - links to students background knowledge and
connection to the world beyond the classroom
45DID I LEARN ANYTHING?
- Perceptions of knowledge gained
- Know heaps more
- Know lots more, and surprised at breadth and
depth of knowledge - Know lots more, but still could learn more
- Know lots, but dissatisfaction about not knowing
enough
46PERSONAL AGENCY
- learned to follow a set plan and be organized
- help me through papers in high school, college
and life in general - getting genuine information is hard and tedious
work - learned the basics of writing a more
professional research paper - research approach is more complicated but
creates a much better paper - my project is amazing. I have put a lot of hard
work into it
47SOCIAL AND CULTURAL AGENCY
- Topic celebration of culture was an invitation
to cultural exploration 81 of students chose
celebrations outside of USA - Able to draw out cultural comparisons
- Able to reflect on changes in perception about
different cultural celebrations - More accepting of different / strange cultural
beliefs and systems which context of these more
clearly understood
48School Librarians And TheLeading Of Learning
- Learning to Read
- Guided Inquiry
- Reading to Learn
49Schools Context
- 10 New Jersey public schools chosen by call for
nomination and selected by NJ Expert Panel - Experienced and expert school librarians
- Diverse schools
- 10 teacher-school librarian teams
- 10 school librarians working on curriculum
projects with 17 classroom teachers - 574 students in Grades 6 12
- Data collected over four weeks, Spring 2004
- Inquiry Training Institute Feb 24, 2004
overview and critique of units, use of data
collection instruments, procedures and ethical
guidelines
50Inquiry Learning
- An inquiry approach to learning is one where
students actively engage with diverse and often
conflicting sources of information and ideas to
discover new ones, to build new understandings,
and to develop personal viewpoints and
perspectives.
51Guided Inquiry
- Carefully planned, closely supervised targeted
intervention of an instructional team of teacher
librarians and teachers to guide students through
curriculum based inquiry units that gradually
lead towards development of deep understanding
and independent learning - Based on understanding student information
seeking and use, and principles of
constructivist learning - Develops students competence with learning from
a variety of sources while enhancing their
understanding of the content areas of the
curriculum - Students not abandoned in the research process
52Interventions
- Guided inquiry is not doing information
literacy - Specific interventions are determined by the
stage of the search process, the affective,
cognitive and behavioral needs of the learners,
and the curriculum standards and goals to be
achieved - Instructional interventions enable students to
produce and demonstrate deep understanding, and
facilitate intellectual and personal agency. - The instructional partnership is not about
teacher doing content and teacher-librarian
doing information literacy, but about mutually
solving learning dilemmas with the shared
expertises information learning and
disciplinary learning - Starting point is a learning problem in the
particular discipline, targeted to curriculum
standards and content
53Implementing Guided Inquiry Key Strategies
- Initiated though compelling situations, and
questions which meaningfully engage students in
wanting to know, and which provide challenge and
opportunity. - Instructional activities put emphasis on
meaningful, authentic activities that help the
learner develop skills relevant to problem
solving and to construct understandings focus on
identifying and solving intellectual and/or
real-world problems - learning activities closely resemble the ways
that students will be expected to use their
knowledge and skills in the real world - Students are more motivated to engage in their
inquiry when they are able to exercise some
choice over the specific questions they want to
answer and how to present their new
understandings.
54Implementing Guided Inquiry Key Strategies
- Attempt is made to connect with students
background knowledge. - Instructional activities involve the students in
thinking, acting, and reflecting, discovering and
linking ideas, making connections, developing and
transforming prior knowledge, skills, attitudes
and values - higher order thinking and critical
analysis occurs throughout. - Instructional activities enable students to
develop deep knowledge, deep understanding. - Students see that inquiry learning is
developmental process of advancing,
consolidating, reinforcing, and involving whole
person opportunities for sustained dialogue and
feedback, opportunities for students to provide
their understanding of concepts or ideas
55Implementing Guided Inquiry Key Strategies
- Choice of products to show their new
understandings - Students have opportunity to communicate and
share their new understandings - Inquiry learning environment is one where
academic and personal success and intellectual
inquiry are valued and acknowledged, and one
where students feel connected, cared for and
trusted - Students are given opportunity to practice their
new skills to sustain and support their learning
beyond the formal classroom and school library
experience - inquiry learning is responsive to students
personal, social and cultural worlds, valuing
differences and cultivating an inclusive
community
56A TIME OF BOLD ACTION Edna St Vincent Millay
1892-1950
- Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour
- Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
- Of facts, they lie unquestioned, uncombined.
- Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
- Is daily spun, but there exists no loom
- To weave it into fabric.
-
57Useful Sources
- Ausubel, David P. (1963). The Psychology of
Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York Grune
Stratton. - Brunner , J. (1975). Toward a theory of
instruction. Cambridge Harvard University
Press. - Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA
Heath. - Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New
York Macmillan. - Gardener, H. (1983). Frames of Mind The Theory
of Multiple Intelligences. New York Basic. - Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality
the psychology of personal constructs. New York
Norton.
58Useful Sources
- Gordon, C. Information Literacy in Action.
Great Glenham UK, John Catt Educational, 2000. - Loertscher, D., Koechlin, C., and Zwann, S. Ban
those Bird Units 15 Models for Teaching and
Learning in Information-Rich and Technology Rich
Environments. Salt Lake City. Hi Willow Research
and Publishing, 2005. - Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning A
process approach to library and information
services. 2nd edition. Westport, CT Libraries
Unlimited. - Donham, J. K., Bishop, K., Kuhlthau, C, Oberg,
D. (2001). Inquiry based learning Lessons
from Library Power. Worthington, OH Linworth. - Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society The
development of higher mental processes.
Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.