Multilevel Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 96
About This Presentation
Title:

Multilevel Modeling

Description:

Multilevel Modeling 1. Overview 2. Application #1: Growth Modeling Break 3. Application # 2: Individuals Nested Within Groups 4. Questions? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 97
Provided by: Colleg51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multilevel Modeling


1
Multilevel Modeling
  • 1. Overview
  • 2. Application 1 Growth Modeling
  • Break
  • 3. Application 2 Individuals Nested
    Within Groups
  • 4. Questions?

2
Overview
  • What is multilevel modeling?
  • Examples of multilevel data structures
  • Brief history
  • Current applications
  • Why multilevel modeling?
  • What types of studies use multilevel modeling?
  • Computer Programs (HLM 6
  • SAS Mixed
  • Resources

3
Multilevel Question
  • What effects do the following variables have on
    3rd grade reading achievement?
  • School Size
  • Classroom Climate
  • Student Gender

4
What is Multilevel or Hierarchical Linear
Modeling?
  • Nested Data Structures

5
Several Types of Nesting
  • 1. Individuals Nested Within Groups

6
Individuals Undivided
Unit of Analysis Individuals
7
Individuals Nested Within Groups
Unit of Analysis Individuals Classes
8
and Further Nested
Unit of Analysis Individuals Classes Schools
9
Examples of Multilevel Data Structures
  • Neighborhoods are nested within communities
  • Families are nested within neighborhoods
  • Children are nested within families

10
Examples of Multilevel Data Structures
  • Schools are nested within districts
  • Classes are nested within schools
  • Students are nested within classes

11
Multilevel Data Structures
  • Level 4 District (l)
  • Level 3 School (k)
  • Level 2 Class (j)
  • Level 1 Student (i)

12
2nd Type of Nesting
  • Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
  • Focus Change or Growth

13
Time Points Nested Within Individuals
14
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
  • Carlos
  • Day Energy Level
  • Monday 0 98
  • Tuesday 1 90
  • Wednes. 2 85
  • Thursday 3 72
  • Friday 4 70

15
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
16
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
17
Changes for 5 Individuals
18
3rd Type of Nesting (similar to the 2nd)
  • Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
  • Focus is not on change
  • Focus in on relationships between variables
    within an individual

19
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
  • Carlos
  • Day Hours of Sleep Energy Level
  • Monday 9 98
  • Tuesday 8 90
  • Wednesday 8 85
  • Thursday 6 72
  • Friday 7 70

20
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals (Not
Change)
21
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals (Not
Change)
22
Repeated Measures Nested Within Individuals
23
Repeated Measures Within Persons
  • Level 2 Student (i)
  • Level 1 Repeated Measures
  • Over Time (t)

24
Nested Data
  • Data nested within a group tend to be more alike
    than data from individuals selected at random.
  • Nature of group dynamics will tend to exert an
    effect on individuals.

25
Nested Data
  • Intraclass correlation (ICC) provides a measure
    of the clustering and dependence of the data
  • 0 (very independent) to 1.0 (very dependent)
  • Details discussed later

26
Brief Historyof Multilevel Modeling
  • Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations
    and the behavior of individuals. Sociological
    Review, 15, 351-357.
  • Burstein, Leigh (1976). The use of data from
    groups for inferences about individuals in
    educational research. Doctoral Dissertation,
    Stanford University.

27
Table 1
Frequency of HLM application evidenced in
Scholarly Journals
Journal 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total by journal
American Educational Research Journal 3 5 4 3 ? 15
Child Development 3 2 6 5 13 29
Cognition and Instruction 1 0 0 0 0 1
Contemporary Educational Psychology 0 0 0 0 0 0
Developmental Psychology 2 1 2 5 7 17
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2 1 5 2 2 12
Educational Technology, Research and Development 0 0 0 0 0 0
Journal of Applied Psychology 1 1 5 7 6 20
Journal of Counseling Psychology 0 2 1 0 0 3
Journal of Educational Computing Research 0 0 0 0 0 0
Journal of Educational Psychology 1 2 3 6 1 13
Journal of Educational Research 2 0 3 3 5 13
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 0 0 0 0 0 0
Journal of Experimental Education 0 0 0 0 1 1
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 4 6 5 13 32
Journal of Reading Behavior/Literacy Research 0 0 0 0 0 0
Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reading Research Quarterly 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sociology of Education 1 2 5 2 1 11
Total by Year 20 20 40 39 49 168
28
Multilevel Articles
29
Some Current Applications of Multilevel Modeling
  • Growth Curve Analysis
  • Value Added Modeling of Teacher and School
    Effects
  • Meta-Analysis

30
Multilevel Modeling Seems New But.
  • Extension of General Linear Modeling
  • Simple Linear Regression
  • Multiple Linear Regression
  • ANOVA
  • ANCOVA
  • Repeated Measures ANOVA

31
Multilevel Modeling
  • Our focus will be on observed variables (not
    Latent Variables as in Structural Equation
    Modeling)

32
Why Multilevel Modelingvs. Traditional
Approaches?
  • Traditional Approaches 1-Level
  • Individual level analysis (ignore group)
  • Group level analysis (aggregate data and ignore
    individuals)

33
Problems withTraditional Approaches
  • Individual level analysis (ignore group)
  • Violation of independence of data assumption
    leading to misestimated standard errors (standard
    errors are smaller than they should be).

34
Problems withTraditional Approaches
  • Group level analysis
  • (aggregate data and ignore individuals)
  • Aggregation bias the meaning of a variable at
    Level-1 (e.g., individual level SES) may not be
    the same as the meaning at Level-2 (e.g., school
    level SES)

35
Multilevel Approach
  • 2 or more levels can be considered simultaneously
  • Can analyze within- and between-group variability

36
What Types of Studies Use Multilevel Modeling?
  • Quantitative
  • Experimental
  • Nonexperimental
  • (Survey, Observational)

37
How Many Levels Are Usually Examined?
  • 2 or 3 levels very common
  • 15 students x 10 classes x 10 schools
  • 1,500

38
Types of Outcomes
  • Continuous Scale (Achievement, Attitudes)
  • Binary (pass/fail)
  • Categorical with 3 categories

39
Software to do Multilevel Modeling
  • SPSS Users
  • 2 SAV Files Level 1
  • Level 2
  • HLM 6 (Menu Driven)
  • (Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, Congdon, 2004)

40
HLM 6
41
Software to do Multilevel Modeling
  • SAS Users
  • Proc Mixed

42
Resources (Samplesee handouts for more complete
list)
  • Books
  • Hierarchical Linear Models Applications and
    Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. Raudenbush
    Bryk, 2002.
  • Introducing Multilevel Modeling.
  • Kreft DeLeeum, 1998.
  • Journals
  • Educational and Psychological Measurement
  • Journal of Educational and Behavioral Sciences
  • Multilevel Modeling Newsletter

43
Resources (cont)(Samplesee handouts for more
complete list)
  • Software
  • HLM6
  • SAS (NLMIXED and PROC MIXED)
  • MLwiN
  • Journal Articles
  • See Handouts for various methodological and
    applied articles
  • Data Sets
  • NAEP Data
  • NELS88 High School and Beyond

44
Self-Check 1
  • A teacher with 1 classroom of 24 students used
    weekly curriculum-based measurements to monitor
    reading over a 14 week period. The teacher was
    interested in individual students rates of
    change and differences in change by male and
    female students.

45
Self-Check 1
  • How would you classify this situation?
  • (a) not multilevel
  • (b) 2-level
  • (c) 3-level

46
Self-Check 2
  • A researcher randomly selected 50 elementary
    schools and randomly selected 30 teachers within
    each school. The researcher was interested in
    the relationships between 2 predictors (school
    size and teachers years experience at their
    current school) and teachers job satisfaction.

47
Self-Check 2
  • How would you classify this situation?
  • (a) not multilevel
  • (b) 2-level
  • (c) 3-level

48
Self-Check 3
  • 60 undergraduates from the research participant
    pool volunteered for a study that used written
    vignettes to manipulate the interactional style
    (warm, not warm) of a professor interacting with
    a student.  30 randomly assigned students read
    the vignette depicting warmth and 30 randomly
    assigned students read the vignette depicting a
    lack of warmth.  After reading the vignette
    students used a questionnaire to rate the
    likeability of the professor.

49
Self-Check 3
  • How would you classify this situation?
  • (a) not multilevel
  • (b) 2-level
  • (c) 3-level

(Select ONLY one)
50
Growth Curve Modeling
  • Studying the growth in reading achievement over a
    two year period
  • Studying changes in student attitudes over the
    middle school years

51
Research Questions
  • What is the form of change for an individual
    during the study?

52
Research Questions
  • What is an individuals initial status on the
    outcome of interest?

53
Research Questions
  • How much does an individual change during the
    course of the study?

Rise
Run
54
Research Questions
  • What is the average initial status of the
    participants?

55
Research Questions
  • What is the average change of the participants?

56
Research Questions
  • To what extent do participants vary in their
    initial status?

57
Research Questions
  • To what extent do participants vary in their
    growth?

58
Research Questions
  • To what extent does initial status relate to
    growth?

59
Research Questions
  • To what extent is initial status related to
    predictors of interest?

60
Research Questions
  • To what extent is growth related to predictors of
    interest?

61
Design Issues
  • How many waves a data collection are needed?
  • gt2
  • Depends on complexity of growth curve

62
Design Issues
  • Can there be different numbers of observations
    for different participants?
  • Examples
  • Missing data
  • Planned missingness

63
Design Issues
  • Can the time between observations vary from
    participant to participant?
  • Example Students observed
  • 1, 3, 5, 7 months
  • 1, 2, 4, 8 months
  • 2, 4, 6, 8 months

64
Design Issues
  • How many participants are needed?
  • More is better
  • Power analyses
  • gt 30 rule of thumb

65
Design Issues
  • How should participants be sampled?
  • What you have learned about sampling still
    applies

66
Design Issues
  • What is the value of random assignment?
  • What you have leaned about random assignment
    still applies

67
Design Issues
  • How should the outcome be measured?
  • What you have learned about measurement still
    applies

68
Example
  • Context description
  • A researcher was interested in changes in verbal
    fluency of 4th grade students, and differences in
    the changes between boys and girls.

69
  • ID    Gender         Time______
  •            
  •                   t0    t4    t7
  • 1    0  20    30    30
  • 2     0          40    44    49
  • 3 0          45    40    60
  • 4     0         50    55    59
  • 5     0          42    48    53
  • 6 1          45    52    61
  • 7 1          39    55    63
  • 8 1          46    58    68
  • 9 1          44    49    59

70
Example
  • Level-1 model specification

71
Example
  • Level-2 model specification

72
Example
  • Combined Model

73
Example
  • SAS program
  • proc mixed covtest
  • class gender
  • model score time gender timegender/s
  • random intercept / substudent s

74
Example
  • SAS output variance estimates

Covariance Parameter
Estimates  
Standard Z Cov Parm Subject Estimate
Error Value Pr Z   Intercept Student
62.5125 35.9682 1.74 0.0411 Residual
14.1173 4.9912 2.83 0.0023
75
Example
  • SAS output fixed effects


Solution for Fixed Effects  
Standard Effect Gender Estimate
Error DF t Value Pr gt t   Intercept
39.8103 3.7975 7 10.48 lt.0001 time
1.5077 0.3295 16 4.58
0.0003 Gender F 5.7090 5.6962 16
1.00 0.3311 Gender M 0
. . . . timeGender F 1.0692
0.4943 16 2.16 0.0460 timeGender M
0 . . . .
76
Example
  • Graph fixed effects



77
Example
  • Conclusions
  • Fourth grade girls verbal fluency is increasing
    at a faster rate than boys.

78
Persons Nested in Contexts
  • Studying attitudes of teachers who are nested in
    schools
  • Studying achievement for students who are nested
    in classrooms that are nested in schools

79
Research Questions
  • How much variation occurs within and among
    groups?
  • To what extent do teacher attitudes vary within
    schools?
  • To what extent does the average teacher attitude
    vary among schools?

80
Research Questions
  • What is the relationship among selected within
    group factors and an outcome?
  • To what extent do teacher attitudes vary within
    schools as function of years experience?
  • To what extent does student achievement vary
    within schools as a function of SES?

81
Research Questions
  • What is the relationship among selected between
    group factors and an outcome?
  • To what extent do teacher attitudes vary across
    schools as function of principal leadership
    style?
  • To what extent does student math achievement vary
    across schools as a function of the school
    adopted curriculum?

82
Research Questions
  • To what extent is the relationship among selected
    within group factors and an outcome moderated by
    a between group factor?
  • To what extent does the within schools
    relationship between student achievement and SES
    depend on the school adopted curriculum?

83
Design Issues
  • Consider a design where students are nested in
    schools
  • How should schools should be sampled?
  • How should students be sampled within schools?

84
Design Issues
  • Consider a design where students are nested in
    schools
  • How many schools should be sampled?
  • How many students should be sampled per school?

85
Design Issues
  • What kind of outcomes can be considered?
  • Continuous
  • Binary
  • Count
  • Ordinal

86
Design Issues
  • How will level-1 variables be conceptualized and
    measured?
  • SES
  • How will level-2 variables be conceptualized and
    measured?
  • SES

87
Terminology
  • Individual growth trajectory individual growth
    curve model
  • A model describing the change process for an
    individual
  • Intercept
  • Predicted value of an individuals status at some
    fixed point
  • The intercept cold represent the status at the
    beginning of a study
  • Slope
  • The average amount of change in the outcome for
    every 1 unit change in time

88
intercept
89
(No Transcript)
90
HLM
  • Hierarchical Linear Model
  • The hierarchical or nested structure of the data
  • For growth curve models, the repeated measures
    are nested within each individual

91
Levels in Multilevel Models
  • Level 1 time-series data nested within an
    individual

92
Levels in Multilevel Models
  • Level 2 model that attempts to explain the
    variation in the level 1 parameters

93
More terminology
  • Fixed coefficient
  • A regression coefficient that does not vary
    across individuals
  • Random coefficient
  • A regression coefficient that does vary across
    individuals

94
More terminology
  • Balanced design
  • Equal number of observations per unit
  • Unbalanced design
  • Unequal number of observation per unit
  • Unconditional model
  • Simplest level 2 model no predictors of the
    level 1 parameters (e.g., intercept and slope)
  • Conditional model
  • Level 2 model contains predictors of level 1
    parameters

95
Estimation Methods
  • Empirical Bayes (EB) estimate
  • optimal composite of an estimate based on the
    data from that individual and an estimate based
    on data from other similar individuals (Bryk,
    Raudenbush, Condon, 1994, p.4)

96
Estimation Methods
  • Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm
  • An iterative numerical algorithm for producing
    maximum likelihood estimates of variance
    covariance components for unbalanced data.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com