Foundations of Biology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Foundations of Biology

Description:

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: TGSta8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foundations of Biology


1
John 112 12 But as many as received him, to
them gave he power to become the sons of God,
even to them that believe on his name

2
Endosymbiosis and the Origin of EukaryotesAre
mitochondria really just bacterial symbionts?
  • Timothy G. Standish, Ph. D.

3
Outline
  • Mitochondria - A very brief overview
  • Endosymbiosis - Theory and evidence
  • Archaezoa - Eukaryotes lacking mitochondria
  • Gene expression - Mitochondrial proteins coded in
    the nucleus
  • Mitochondrial genetic codes
  • Gene transport - Mitochondria to nucleus
  • Conclusions

4
Mitochondria
  • Mitochondria are organelles found in most
    eukaryotic organisms.
  • The site of Krebs cycle and electron transport
    energy producing processes during aerobic
    respiration
  • Are inherited only from the mother during sexual
    reproduction in mammals and probably all other
    vertebrates.
  • Because of their mode of inheritance genetic
    material found in mitochondria appears to be
    useful in determining the maternal lineage of
    organisms.

5
Mitochondria
Matrix
Inter membrane space
6
Extranuclear DNA
  • Mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA
  • This extranuclear DNA exhibits non-Mendalian
    inheritance
  • Recombination is known between some mt and ctDNAs
  • Extranuclear DNA may also be called cytoplasmic
    DNA
  • Generally mtDNA and ctDNA is circular and
    contains genes for multimeric proteins some
    portion of which are also coded for in the
    nucleus
  • Extra-nuclear DNA has a rate of mutation that is
    independent of nuclear DNA
  • Generally, but not always, all the RNAs needed
    for transcription and translation are found in
    mtDNA and ctDNA, but only some of the protein
    genes

7
mtDNA
  • Mitochondrial DNA is generally small in animal
    cells, about 16.5 kb
  • In other organisms sizes can be more than an
    order of magnitude larger
  • Plant mtDNA is highly variable in size and
    content with the large Arabidopsis mtDNA being
    200 kb.
  • The largest known number of mtDNA protein genes
    is 97 in the protozoan Riclinomonas mtDNA of 69
    kb.
  • Most of the genetic information for
    mitochondrial biogenesis and function resides in
    the nuclear geneome, with import into the
    organelle of nuclear DNA-specified proteins and
    in some cases small RNAs. (Gray et al.,1999)

8
Endosymbiosis
9
Origin of Eukaryotes
  • Two popular theories presupposing naturlaism seek
    to explain the origin of membrane bound
    organelles
  • 1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of
    mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by
    Lynn Margulis (Margulis, 1981)
  • 2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the
    endomembrane system

10
Origin of Eukaryotes
  • Two popular theories presupposing naturlaism seek
    to explain the origin of membrane bound
    organelles
  • 1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of
    mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by
    Lynn Margulis (Margulis, 1981)
  • 2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the
    endomembrane system

11
Origin of Eukaryotes
  • Two popular theories presupposing naturlaism seek
    to explain the origin of membrane bound
    organelles
  • 1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of
    mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by
    Lynn Margulis (Margulis, 1981)
  • 2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the
    endomembrane system

12
Origin of Eukaryotes
  • Two popular theories presupposing naturlaism seek
    to explain the origin of membrane bound
    organelles
  • 1 Endosymbiosis to explain the origin of
    mitochondria and chloroplasts (popularized by
    Lynn Margulis (Margulis, 1981)
  • 2 Invagination of the plasma membrane to form the
    endomembrane system

13
How Mitochondria Resemble Bacteria
  • Most general biology texts list ways in which
    mitochondria resemble bacteria. Campbell et al.
    (1999) list the following
  • Mitochondria resemble bacteria in size and
    morphology.
  • They are bounded by a double membrane the outer
    thought to be derived from the engulfing vesicle
    and the inner from bacterial plasma membrane.
  • Some enzymes and inner membrane transport systems
    resemble prokaryotic plasma membrane systems.
  • Mitochondrial division resembles bacterial binary
    fission
  • They contain a small circular loop of genetic
    material (DNA). Bacterial DNA is also a circular
    loop.
  • They produce a small number of proteins using
    their own ribosomes which look like bacterial
    ribosomes.
  • Their ribosomeal RNA resembles eubacterial rRNA.

14
How Mitochondria DontResemble Bacteria
  • Mitochondria are not always the size or
    morphology of bacteria
  • In some Trypanosomes (ie Trypanosoma brucei)
    mitochondria undergo spectacular changes in
    morphology that do not resemble bacteria during
    different life cycle stages (Vickermann, 1971)
  • Variation in morphology is common in protistans,
    Considerable variation in shape and size of the
    organelle can occur. (Lloyd, 1974 p1)
  • Mitochondrial division and distribution of
    mitochondria to daughter cells is tightly
    controlled by even the simplest eukaryotic cells

15
How Mitochondria DontResemble Bacteria
  • Circular mtDNA replication via D loops is
    different from replication of bacterial DNA
    (Lewin, 1997 p441).
  • mtDNA is much smaller than bacterial chromosomes.
  • Mitochondrial DNA may be linear, examples
    include Plasmodium, C. reinhardtii, Ochromonas,
    Tetrahymena, Jakoba (Gray et al., 1999).
  • Mitochondrial genes may have introns which
    eubacterial genes typically lack (these introns
    are different from nuclear introns so they cannot
    have come from that source) (Lewin, 1997 p721,
    888).
  • The genetic code in many mitochondria is slightly
    different from bacteria (Lewin, 1997).

16
Archaezoa
17
Giardia - A Missing Link?
  • The eukaryotic parasite Giardia has been
    suggested as a missing link between eukaryotes
    and prokaryotes because it lacks mitochondria
    (Friend, 1966, Adam, 1991) thus serving as an
    example of membrane invagination but not
    endosymbiosis
  • Giardia also appears to lack smooth endoplasmic
    reticulum, peroxisomes and nucleoli (Adam, 1991)
    so these must have either been lost or never
    evolved

18
A Poor Missing Link
  • As a missing link Giardia is not a strong
    argument due to its parasitic life cycle which
    lacks an independent replicating stage outside of
    its vertebrate host
  • Transmission is via cysts excreted in feces
    followed by ingestion
  • As an obligate parasite, to reproduce, Giardia
    needs other more derived (advanced?) eukaryotes
  • Some other free living Archaezoan may be a better
    candidate

19
Origin of Gardia
  • Gardia and other eukaryotes lacking mitochondira
    and plastids (Metamonada, Microsporidia, and
    Parabasalia ) have been grouped by some as
    Archezoa (Cavalier-Smith, 1983 Campbell et
    al., 1999 pp524-6)
  • This name reflects the belief that these protozoa
    split from the group which gained mitochondria
    prior to that event.
  • The discovery of a mitochondrial heat shock
    protein (HSP60) in Giardia lamblia (Soltys and
    Gupta, 1994) has called this interpretation into
    question.
  • Other proteins thought to be unique to
    mitochondria, HSP70 (Germot et al., 1996),
    chaperonin 60 (HSP60) (Roger et al., 1996 Horner
    et al., 1996) and HSP10 (Bui et al, 1996) have
    shown up in Gardias fellow Archezoans

20
Origin of Archezoa
  • The authors who reported the presence of
    mitochondrial genes in amitochondrial eukaryotes
    all reinterpreted prevailing theory in saying
    that mitochondria must have been present then
    lost after they had transferred some of their
    genetic information to the nucleus.
  • The hydrogenosome, a structure involved in
    carbohydrate metabolism found in some Archezoans
    (Muller, 1992), is now thought to represent a
    mitochondria that has lost its genetic
    information completely and along with that loss,
    the ability to do the Krebs cycle (Palmer, 1997).
  • Alternative explanations include transfer of
    genetic material from other eukaryotes and the
    denovo production of hydrogenosomes by primitive
    eukaryotes.

21
Origin of ArchezoaMitochondrial Aquisition
22
Origin of ArchezoaGene Transfer and Loss
Lost genetic material
23
Origin of ArchezoaOption 1 - Mitochondrial
Eukaryote Production
24
Origin of ArchezoaOption 2 - Mitochondrial DNA
Loss/Hydrogenosome production
25
Origin of ArchezoaOption 2A -
Mitochondria/Hydrogenosome Loss
26
Gene Transport
27
  • All in all then, the host nucleus seems to be a
    tremendous magnet, both for organellar genes and
    for endosymbiotic nuclear genes.
  • Palmer, 1997

28
Steps in Mitochondrial AcquisitionThe Serial
Endosymbiosis Theory
29
Steps in Mitochondrial AcquisitionThe Hydrogen
Hypothesis
30
Phylogeny
Cell fusion
31
Timing of Gene Transfer
  • Because gene transfer occurred in eukaryotes
    lacking mitochondria, and these are the lowest
    branching eukaryotes known
  • Gene transfer must have happened very early in
    the history of eukaryotes.
  • The length of time for at least some gene
    transfer following acquisition of mitochondria is
    greatly shortened.
  • No plausible mechanism for movement of genes from
    the mitochondira to the nucleus exists although
    intraspecies transfer of genes is sometimes
    invoked to explain the origin of other individual
    nuclear genes.

32
Gene Expression
33
Cytoplasmic Production of Mitochondrial Proteins
  • Mitochondria produce only a small subset of the
    proteins used in the Krebs cycle and electron
    transport. The balance come from the nucleus
  • As mitochondrial geneomes vary spectacularly
    between different groups of organisms, some of
    which may be fairly closely related, if all came
    from a common ancestor, different genes coding
    for mitochondrial proteins must have been passed
    between the nucleus and mitochondria multiple
    times

34
The Unlikely Movement of Genes Between
Mitochondria and the Nucleus
  • Movement of genes between the mitochondria and
    nucleus seems unlikely for at least two reasons
  • Mitochondria do not always share the same genetic
    code with the cell they are in
  • Mechanisms for transportation of proteins coded
    in the nucleus into mitochondria seem to preclude
    easy movement of genes from mitochondria to the
    nucleus

35
Protein Production Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
36
Protein Production Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
37
Protein Production Mitochondria
Matrix
Inter membrane space
38
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
39
Protein Production Mitochondria
40
Protein Production Mitochondria
MLSLRQSIRFFKPATRTLCSSRYLL
Inter membrane space
Matrix
41
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
42
Protein Production Mitochondria
43
Protein Production Mitochondria
44
Yeast Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit IV Leader
Neutral Non-polar Polar Basic Acidic
MLSLRQSIRFFKPATRTLCSSRYLL
  • This leader does not resemble other eukaryotic
    leader sequences, or other mtProtein leader
    sequences.
  • Probably forms an a helix
  • This would localize specific classes of amino
    acids in specific parts of the helix
  • There are about 3.6 amino acids per turn of the
    helix with a rise of 0.54 nm per turn

45
Yeast Cytochrome C1 Leader
MFSNLSKRWAQRTLSKTLKGSKSAAGTATSYFE-KLVTAGVAAAGITAST
LLYANSLTAGA--------------
Neutral Non-polar Polar Basic Acidic
  • Cytochrome c functions in electron transport and
    is thus associated with the inner membrane on the
    intermembrane space side
  • Cytochrome c1 holds an iron containing heme
    group and is part of the B-C1 (III) complex
  • C1 accepts electrons from the Reiske protein and
    passes them to cytochrome c

46
Protein Production Mitochondria
Matrix
Inter membrane space
47
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
48
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
49
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
50
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
51
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
52
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
53
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
54
Protein Production Mitochondria
Inter membrane space
Matrix
55
Protein Production Mitochondria
Note that chaperones are not involved in folding
of proteins in the inter membrane space and that
they exist in a low pH environment
Inter membrane space
Matrix
56
Alternative Mechanism
  • There are actually two theories about how the
    leader operates to localize mtproteins in the
    inter membrane space
  • The first, as shown in the previous slides,
    involves the whole protein moving into and then
    out of the matrix
  • The alternative theory suggests that once the
    first leader, which targets to the mitochondria
    is removed, the second leader prevents the
    protein from ever entering the matrix so it is
    transported only into the inter membrane space.

57
Building a Minimally Functional Nuclear
Mitochondrial Gene
Given that a fragment of DNA travels from the
mitochondria to the nucleus and is inserted into
the nuclear DNA
  • Additional hurdles may include
  • Resolution of problems resulting from differences
    between mitochondrial and nuclear introns
  • Resolution of problems resulting from differences
    between mitochondiral and nuclear genetic codes

58
Additional Requirements
  • In addition to addition of appropriate control
    and leader sequences to mitochondrial genes, the
    following would be needed
  • Recognition and transport mechanisms in the
    cytoplasm
  • Leader sequence binding receptors
  • Peptidases that recognize leader sequences and
    remove them

59
No Plausible Mechanism Exists
  • If genes were to move from the mitochondria to
    the nucleus they would have to somehow pick up
    the leader sequences necessary to signal for
    transport before they could be functional
  • While leader sequences seem to have meaningful
    portions on them, according to Lewin (1997, p251)
    sequence homology between different sequences is
    not evident, thus there could be no standard
    sequence that was tacked on as genes were moved
    from mitochondria to nucleus
  • Alternatively, if genes for mitochondrial
    proteins existed in the nucleus prior to loss of
    genes in the mitochondria, the problem remains,
    where did the signal sequences come from? And
    where did the mechanism to move proteins with
    signal sequences on them come from?

60
Mitochondrial Genetic Codes
61
Variation In Codon Meaning
  • Lack of variation in codon meanings across almost
    all phyla is taken as an indicator that initial
    assignment must have occurred early during
    evolution and all organisms must have descended
    from just one individual with the current codon
    assignments
  • Exceptions to the universal code are known in a
    few single celled eukaryotes, mitochondria and at
    least one prokaryote
  • Most exceptions are modifications of the stop
    codons UAA, UAG and UGA

62
Variation in Mitochondrial Codon Assignment
  • NOTE - This would mean AUA changed from Ile to
    Met, then changed back to Ile in the Echinoderms
  • AAA must have changed from Lys to Asn twice
  • UGA must have changed to Trp then back to stop
  • Differences in mtDNA lower the number of tRNAs
    needed

63
Problems Resulting From Differences in Genetic
Codes
  • Changing the genetic code, even of the most
    simple genome is very difficult.
  • Because differences exist in the mitochondrial
    genomes of groups following changes in the
    mitochondrial genetic code, mitochondrial genes
    coding differently must have been transported to
    the nucleus.
  • These mitochondrial genes must have been edited
    to remove any problems caused by differences in
    the respective genetic codes.

64
Behe Goes Beyond Moustraps
  • In an essay entitled Intelligent Design theory
    as a Tool for Analyzing Biochemical Systems,
    Michael Behe encourages researchers to go beyond
    simple biochemical systems and to apply
    Intelligent design theory to more complex
    sub-cellular systems. He specifically poses the
    question
  • Given that some biochemical systems were
    designed by an intelligent agent, and given the
    tools by which we came to that conclusion, how do
    we analyze other biochemical systems that may be
    more complicated and less discrete than the ones
    we have so far discussed? (Behe, 1998 p184)

65
No Modern Examples
  • Unfortunately for Margulis and S.E.T. the serial
    endosymbiotic theory, no modern examples of
    prokaryotic endocytosis or endosymbioses exist .
    . . She discusses any number of prokaryotes
    endosymbiotic in eukaryotes and uses Bdellovibrio
    as a model for prokaryotic endocytosis.
    Bdellovibrios are predatory (or parasitoid)
    bacteria that feed on E. coli by penetrating the
    cell wall of the latter and then removing
    nutrient molecules from E. coli while attached to
    the outer surface of its plasma membrane.
    Although it is perfectly obvious that this is not
    an example of one prokaryote being engulfed by
    another Margulis continually implies that it is.
  • P.J. Whitfield, review of Symbiosis in Cell
    Evolution, Biological Journal of the Linnean
    Society 18 198277-78 p. 78)

66
Conclusions
  • Presence of mitochondrial genes in nuclear DNA
    reduces the window of time available for
    mitochondrial acquisition in eukaryotes.
  • Understanding the structure of mitochondrial
    genes in the nucleus and how they are expressed
    makes the transfer of genes from
    protomitochondria to the nucleus appear complex.
  • Differences between mitochondrial genetic codes
    and nuclear genetic codes adds to the complexity
    of gene transfer between mitochondria and
    nucleus.
  • As molecular data accumulates, the endosymbiotic
    origin of mitochondria appears less probable.

67
Laboratory
68
PCR of Human mtDNA
Single nucleotide polymorphisms are common in the
mtDNA control region. These can be used to
identify remains and determine maternal linage
due to the maternal inheritance of mitochondria
69
Human mtDNA
70
The Amplified Segment
  • gaaaaagtct ttaactccac cattagcacc caaagctaag
  • Attctaattt aaactattct ctgttctttc atggggaagc
  • agatttgggt accacccaag tattgactca cccatcaaca
  • accgctatgt atttcgtaca ttactgccag ccaccatgaa
  • tattgtacgg taccataaat acttgaccac ctgtagtaca
  • taaaaaccca atccacatca aaaccccctc cccatgctta
  • caagcaagta cagcaatcaa ccctcaacta tcacacatca
  • actgcaactc caaagccacc cctcacccac taggatacc
  • Acaaacctac ccacccttaa cagtacatag Tacataaagc
  • catttaccgt acatagcaca ttacagtcaa atcccttctc
  • Gtccccatgg atgacccccc tcagataggg gtcccttgac
  • caccatcctc cgtga

71
The Amplified Segment
  • 5ctttaactccaccattagcacccaaagctaag
  • 5ttaactccaccattagca3
  • 3tcagataggggtcccttgaccaccatcctccgt
  • 3ggaactggtggtaggagg5
  • Following are what I suspect the primers to be
  • Right Primer 5ggaggatggtggtcaagg3 TM 58.80
  • Left Primer 5ttaactccaccattagca3 TM 49.71

72
The Amplified Segment
5ttaactccaccattagca3
3ggaactggtggtaggagg5
  • Following are what I suspect the primers to be
  • Right Primer 5ggaggatggtggtcaagg3 TM 58.80
  • Left Primer 5ttaactccaccattagca3 TM 49.71

73
Human mtDNA Genes
  • Genes in human (for which numbers are given) and
    other mammalian mitochondria can be divided into
    three groups
  • tRNA genes - 22
  • rRNA genes - 2
  • Protein coding genes - 13
  • Total genes 37
  • All protein coding genes are involved in
    respiration
  • Aside from the coding portion of genes there is
    very little additional DNA except in the
    approximately 1,200 bp control region

74
  • Location Strand Length Gene Product
  • 3307..4263 318 ND1 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 1
  • 4470..5513 347 ND2 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 2
  • 5904..7445 513 COX1 cytochrome c oxidase
    subunit I
  • 7586..8269 227 COX2 cytochrome c oxidase
    subunit II
  • 8366..8572 68 ATP8 ATP synthase F0 subunit
    8
  • 8527..9207 226 ATP6 ATP synthase F0 subunit
    6
  • 9207..9989 260 COX3 cytochrome c oxidase
    subunit III
  • 10059..10406 115 ND3 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 3
  • 10470..10766 98 ND4L NADH dehydrogenase
    subun 4L
  • 10760..12139 459 ND4 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 4
  • 12337..14148 603 ND5 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 5
  • 14149..14673 - 174 ND6 NADH dehydrogenase
    subunit 6
  • 14747..15883 378 CYTB cytochrome b

75
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com