Alphabet Soup (R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Alphabet Soup (R

Description:

Title: Indicators and Alphabet Soup Author: PKeefer Last modified by: Douglas Spencer Created Date: 10/31/2009 7:51:18 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: PKeefer
Category:
Tags: alphabet | soup

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alphabet Soup (R


1
Alphabet Soup (RDAPSAUNDPWBUSAIDDFIDNSF)
2
Group Mandate
  • What should APSA do?
  • What do we want donors to do?
  • Will they do it?

3
APSA-1
  • Problem Peer review is insufficient to weed out
    inappropriate uses of data by scholars (not to
    mention policy makers).
  • Solutions
  • Task Force to establish standards for how
    research addresses validity, methodology, data
    availability.
  • Seek NSF funding for studying the Laitin
    question under what conditions are politicians
    swayed by scholarly findings?

4
APSA-2
  • Problem Data is badly cited!!
  • Solutions
  • Exhortation to journals regarding citation
    standards.
  • New (electronic) journal on new data
  • Valuable in its own right (compare to. . .PS?)
  • Easier for users to cite.
  • More likely to show up in citation indices (which
    is what we REALLY care about).

5
APSA-3
  • Clearinghouse for expertise
  • To facilitate scholars in at the ground floor of
    impact evaluation, program design.
  • For policy (expert) advice
  • Organize capacity building on indicators/concepts
    related to democracy/governance. For
    practitioners AND donor officials.
  • Research project under what conditions do
    scholars influence policy?

6
What can donors do for us? - 1
  • Moneymoneymoneymoneymoney
  • From foundations, multilaterals, bilaterals,
    other govt agencies, NSF. ALL are possible.
  • For pure data collection and research projects
    that might require new data.
  • Direct research opportunities directly coincide
    with donor needs (randomized evaluation of
    democracy interventions at the local level).
  • Indirect research opportunities Contact with
    new problems/puzzles.

7
What can donors do for us? - 2
  • Here are a few of our favorite things. Mary
    Poppins approach to fundraising
  • Data on
  • Media (ownership, content, circulation, etc.).
  • DecentraIization, ethnicity and ethnic
    composition of parliaments.
  • Modes and outcomes of informal adjudication
  • Political party funding
  • De jure vs. de facto (implementation of laws and
    regs)
  • Modes of political activism

8
What can donors do for us? - 3
  • Projects on
  • Patronage and clientelism
  • Political consequences (e.g., instability) of
    globalization or climate change.
  • Collective mobilization to influence politics
    (e.g., parties, civil society, etc.).
  • Why projects? Large conceptual obstacles to
    better indicators (e.g., democracy).

9
What are donors most likely to help with?
  • Most donors
  • Data with immediate normative appeal
  • Media easy
  • Informal adjudication harder
  • De jure vs. de facto harder
  • Data that is immediately usable for programming
  • More scientific donors (at least to some
    extent) can be persuaded by appeal of less
    programmatic data.
  • WB (15 million internal research fund)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com