Sussex Central Middle School - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Sussex Central Middle School PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 69ee94-MjBkY



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Sussex Central Middle School

Description:

Title: Sussex Central Middle School Author: astephenson Last modified by: dbrown Created Date: 1/4/2012 2:05:43 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Date added: 23 September 2019
Slides: 20
Provided by: astephenson
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sussex Central Middle School


1
Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary
SchoolGrades K 3 Diane Brown,
Principal January 12, 2012
Home of The CES Tiger Cubs
2
Sussex County
  • 45 miles southeast of Richmond
  • 496 square miles
  • Agricultural economy
  • 25 of land is devoted to agriculture
  • 80 commercial forestry
  • Major employers are Dept. of Corrections,
  • School Board, Pork Processing

3
School Profile
  • Enrollment 203
  • General Education 175
  • SPED 28
  • LEP 3
  • African American 76
  • White 19
  • Asian 1
  • Hispanic 3 each
  • Free/Reduced Lunch 93
  • Accreditation Denied

4
Data
  • 2009 2010  2011
  • Reading 60 63 73 13
  • Math 56 86 86 30
  • History 82 83 63 -19
  • Science 63 81 74 11

5
Chambliss Elementary School Chambliss Elementary School Chambliss Elementary School
AMO English (75) Math (70) Science (50) History (50)
2007- 08 E/77 66 79 72 81
Did Not Make AYP M/75
2009-10 E/ 81 60 56 61 81
Did Not Make AYP M/ 79
Accreditation Denied
2010-11 E/89 63 86 81 83
Made AYP M/83
Accreditation Denied
2011-12 E/86 73 86 74 63
Did Not Make AYP M/85
Accreditation Denied
6
School Safety ReportThree-Year Trend Data
7
Teacher Absence Rate 2010-2011
Teacher Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Total
Kgn                      
A 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 0 14
B 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0.5 1 0 8.5
C 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 1.5 7.5
Total 1 1 3 2 6 4 7 1.5 3 1.5 30
                       
1st                      
D 0 5 0 0 2 2 0.5 1 5 0.5 16
E 4 1.5 0 1.5 2.5 0 1 1 2 0 13.5
F 1 1 5 0 0.5 16 23 1 1.5 0 49
G 1 1 1 0 2.5 1 2 0 4.5 2.5 16
Total 6 8.5 6 1.5 7.5 19 26.5 3 12 3 74
                       
2nd                      
H 0 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 2 1.5 0 9
I 1.5 2 1 1 3.5 2.5 2 1 2 1 17.5
J 0.5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5
                       
Total 2 5 2 1.5 4.5 4 2.5 3 6 1 31.5
                       
3rd                      
K 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 3 1 1 13
L 1 1 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 3.5 0.5 11
M 1 1.5 1 0 2 0 1.5 0 0.5 1 8.5
N 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 8.5
Total 3 5.5 6 5 4.5 2 3 3 5.5 2.5 29
                       
                       
Total Kgn, 1, 2, 3 12 20 17 10 22.5 28 38 11 26.5 8 159.5
8
Teacher Absence Rate 2010-2011 Continued
Teacher Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Total
                       
Resource                      
O 1   0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 4
P   1.5 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4.5
Q   1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
R 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
S 0 2 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 11
T 3 1 3 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 14
U       0 2 0 4 2 0 0 8
V 1 3.5 2 2.5 4.5 1 2 1 0 0 17.5
Total 6 10 5 4.5 10.5 6 16 5 0 0 63
                       
Special Education                      
W 1 1 8 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 16
X 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 5
Total 1 3 9 1 0 2 3 2 0 0 21
                       
Total - Resource/SpEd 7 13 14 5 1/2 10 1/2 8 19 7 0 0 84
9
Teacher Absence Rate 2011-2012
Teacher Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Kgn                    
A 0 0 1 0.5            
B 0 1 0 1            
C 0 0 1 0.5            
Total 0 1 2 2            
                     
1st                    
D 0 1 2 3.5            
E 1 .5 0.5 1 0            
F 1 1 1 1            
                     
Total 2.5 2.5 4 4.5            
                     
2nd                    
G 0.5 3 (1c) 1 1            
H 0 0 1.5 0.5            
I 0 2 0 0            
                     
Total 0.5 5 2.5 1.5            
                     
3rd                    
j 0 1 1 0            
k   2 5 2            
l 1 2 (1c) 2 1            
                     
Total 1 5 8 3            
                     
                     
Total Kgn, 1, 2, 3 4 13.5 16.5 11            
10
Teacher Absence Rate 2011-2012 Continued
Teacher  Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
           
Resource          
M 0 0 0 0  
N 2 1 5 0  
O 1.5 1.5 (1c) 5 0  
           
           
           
           
           
Total 3.5 2.5 10 0  
           
Special Education          
P 4 (3c) 1 1 (1c) 0  
Q 0 0.5 0 0  
Total 4 1.5 1 0  
           
Total - Resource/SpEd 7.5 4 11 0  
11
Strengths of Transformation
  • Culture of continuous improvement
  • Focus on data to drive improvement
  • Significant growth in SOL pre and post released
    test in third grade
  • Shared leadership structure to enhance
    professional capacity
  • Friendly, well ordered environment
  • Partnership with external lead partner

12
Students Engrossed in Reading
13
Areas of Opportunity
  • Improve student learning
  • Differentiation
  • More student engagement in learning
  • Improve Teacher Questioning Higher order skills
    questioning-
  • Collaborative learning

14
Addressing the Areas of Opportunity
  • Professional development on learning styles and
    modalities, assessment for learning,
    collaborative learning and motivation of students
  • Rigorous lesson observations to ensure effective
    teaching strategies are being implemented
  • Professional development for all teachers on
    parental and community involvement

15
SIG Funds
  • Resources for professional development (e.g.,
    purchase of Igniting a Passion for Reading for
    book study)
  • Classroom Libraries K-3
  • Additional teaching materials
  • Contracted services with External Lead Partner
    (e.g., Principal coaching, job-embedded
    professional development)
  • Extended After School Programs that provide
    learning opportunities
  • Teacher Incentive Pay
  • 2 Part-time reading teachers
  • Technology Consultant

16
Progress of Implementation
  • Creation Use of District Team Full
  • Enabling School Autonomy Partial
  • Principal Hiring Teachers Full
  • Stakeholder Engagement Partial
  • Creation Use of School Team Full
  • Leading Change High
  • Evaluating, rewarding, removing staff High
  • Professional Development High
  • Learning Time High
  • Reforming Instruction - Partial

17
Barriers during Implementation
  • Limited Engagement of parents in the educational
    process
  • Creating and maintaining business partnerships

18
Goals for 2012
  • Achieve Accreditation
  • Achieve Adequate Yearly Progress
  • Continue to show academic growth in all content
    areas
  • Include parents and community partners on the
    school improvement team

19
Plan for LTP Phase Out
  • Review status of the 25 indicators in the RFP
  • Identify what worked and the resources
    necessary to sustain continuous improvement
  • Identify the key features that made the
    partnership successful and how they can be
    replicated with school and division staff
  • Continue to implement the train the teacher model
    and monitoring teacher performance
  • Continue to scrutinize, analyze and process
    student data and school data
  • Continued professional development for teachers
    and administrator
  • Continue shared leadership responsibilities
About PowerShow.com