The Role of IOC in Coordinating Tsunami Warning Systems PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of IOC in Coordinating Tsunami Warning Systems


1
The Role of IOC in Coordinating Tsunami Warning
Systems
  • Tony Elliott
  • Head of ICG/IOTWS
  • Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
  • IOC Regional Programme Office, Perth

2
Outline
  • Introduction to IOC
  • Global Tsunami Information
  • Establishment of ITSU/PTWS, IOTWS, NEAM and
    CARIBE
  • Elements of an Intergovernmental Regional Warning
    System
  • How Does IOC Facilitate?
  • Take Home Points

3
Founded in 1960 with 136 mainly coastal member
states The General Assembly meets in odd years
and the Executive Council in even years
4
To coordinate these issues among member states
the IOC secretariat is divided into four
units Science and Marine Ecosystems
OOS Capacity Building
Tsunami
5
Tsunami Sources in the world (2180 events from
1628 BC to 2005)
Source, ITDB, 2005
6
Causes of Tsunamis
7
Event Distribution Tsunamigenic Regions
Whole Historical Period
20th Century
8
  • In 1965 IOC established the ICG/ITSU
    International Coordination Group for the Tsunami
    Warning Mitigation System in the Pacific (PTWS)
  • Recommends coordinates tsunami programs,
    including timely ocean wide tsunami warnings
  • Successful operational for more than 40 years
  • System is based on 26 national and 4 regional
    centres

9
26 December 2004
  • c.230,000 Dead Nations of the region react
  • IOC invited to lead TWS establishment

11 countries 230,000 deaths 1 million displaced
10
Establishment of an Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning
System
  • March April 2005 In the aftermath of
    greatest tsunami in recorded history, IOC held
    two International Coordination meetings on the
    development of an IOTWS in Paris and Mauritius
  • July 2005 IOC established the International
    Coordination Group for the Tsunami Warning
    Mitigation System in the Indian Ocean (ICG/IOTWS)

11
Global Network of TWS
12
  • The Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning Mitigation
    System
  • (IOTWS)

13
What is the System?
  • Fully owned by Indian Ocean countries (28 Member
    States)
  • Based on international and multilateral
    cooperation, with governance provided by IOC
  • Based on open and free data exchange
  • Protect all countries in Indian Ocean
  • Transparent and accountable to all countries

14
How Does it Function?
  • Based on joint operation of international
    networks of detection connected with national
    tsunami warning centres
  • High-level commitment by countries with UN
    governance provided under the IOC
  • Each nation is responsible for issuing warnings
    in their territory and for protecting its own
    population.
  • National centres must have strong links with
    emergency preparedness authorities (national,
    provincial and local)

15
End-to-End System
16
IOTWS Working Groups
  • WG1 Seismic measurements, data collection and
    exchange
  • WG2 Sea level data collection and exchange,
    including tsunameters
  • WG3 Risk assessment
  • WG4 Modelling, forecasting and scenario
    development
  • WG5 System of interoperable advisory and
    warning centres
  • WG6 Mitigation, preparedness and response

17
WG1 Seismic Measurements, Data Collection and
ExchangeChair Dr Fauzi, Indonesia
  • Goals-
  • Core network of seismic stations, meeting
    instrument requirements, operational by 2010 and
    being maintained
  • Ensure that all earthquakes gt6 can be reliably
    located and quantified.
  • Reduce time required for earthquake source
    characterisation to meet a local warning response
    of 5 to 10 minutes

18
(No Transcript)
19
WG2 Sea Level Measurements, Data collection and
ExchangeChair Mr Prem Kumar, India
  • Goals-
  • Regional core network of coastal sea level
    stations and deep ocean stations, meeting
    instrument requirements and standards,
    operational by 2010 and being maintained by
    countries in the region

20
(No Transcript)
21
Proposed Deep Ocean Sea Level Measurement Network
  • Malaysia 1(3)
  • India 11
  • Indonesia 12(22)
  • Thailand 3
  • Australia 2 (4)
  • USA 3
  • - IO (Total)

22
(No Transcript)
23
WG3 Risk AssessmentChair Dr Sam
Hettiarachchi, Sri Lanka
  • Goals-
  • Standardised hazard risk assessment methods and
    products developed and employed to reduce
    vulnerability and strengthen coping capacity of
    coastal communities to tsunami hazards
  • Assessment of environmental flashpoints at
    subnational level for use in preparedness and
    spatial planning and disaster risk reduction

24
Indian Ocean Hazard Maps
Preparation of Indian Ocean Tsunami Hazard Maps
(2nd Quarter 2008) The Hazard Maps will
represent, at a regional scale, wave heights and
return periods for tsunamis generated from major
earthquakes and volcano sources.
25
WG4 Modelling, Forecasting and Scenario
DevelopmentChair Dr Charitha Pattiaratchi, Sri
Lanka
  • Goals-
  • Provide benchmarked and validated numerical
    modelling methods and software applicable for the
    Indian Ocean
  • Develop and sustain national and regional
    capacity to apply numerical modelling for tsunami
    source generation, wave propagation, and coastal
    inundation in the Indian Ocean

26
ComMIT
27
WG5 System of Interoperable Advisory and
Warning CentresChair Mr Geoff Crane, Australia
  • Goals-
  • Coordinated regional warning system for the
    entire Indian Ocean region composed of network of
    interoperable Regional Tsunami Watch Providers
    and National Tsunami Warning Centres.
  • National tsunami warning centres established and
    operating as authoritative source for tsunami
    advice and warnings.
  • Tsunami alerts disseminated to the last mile
    through effective communications programmes.

28
RTWP Initiative
  • Interim Advisory Service provided by PTWC and JMA
  • Potential RTWPs are Australia, India, Indonesia,
    Malaysia, Iran and Thailand/ ADPC
  • Implementation Plan to create an interoperable
    system of RTWPs. Plan to be completed by end
    2007
  • Working towards providing full regional coverage
    for Indian Ocean by end 2008

29
TSUNAMI BULLETIN NUMBER 001 PACIFIC TSUNAMI
WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS ISSUED AT 2055Z 01 APR
2007 THIS BULLETIN IS FOR ALL AREAS OF THE
PACIFIC BASIN EXCEPT ALASKA BRITISH COLUMBIA -
WASHINGTON - OREGON - CALIFORNIA. A TSUNAMI
WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR SOLOMON IS. / PAPUA
NEW GUINEA FOR ALL OTHER PACIFIC AREAS, THIS
MESSAGE IS AN ADVISORY ONLY.AN EARTHQUAKE HAS
OCCURRED WITH THESE PRELIMINARY PARAMETERS
ORIGIN TIME - 2040Z 01 APR 2007 COORDINATES -
8.6 SOUTH 157.2 EAST LOCATION - SOLOMON
ISLANDS MAGNITUDE - 7.8 EVALUATION IT IS
NOT KNOWN THAT A TSUNAMI WAS GENERATED. THIS
WARNING IS BASED ONLY ON THE EARTHQUAKE
EVALUATION. AN EARTHQUAKE OF THIS SIZE HAS
THE POTENTIAL TO GENERATE A DESTRUCTIVE TSUNAMI
THAT CAN STRIKE COASTLINES IN THE REGION NEAR
THE EPICENTER WITHIN MINUTES TO HOURS.
AUTHORITIES IN THE REGION SHOULD TAKE APPROPRIATE
ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THIS POSSIBILITY.
THIS CENTER WILL MONITOR SEA LEVEL GAUGES
NEAREST THE REGION AND REPORT IF ANY TSUNAMI
WAVE ACTIVITY IS OBSERVED.

30
A perfect warning will be useless if people do
not know what to do in case of an
emergency Awareness and preparedness at the
country level is essential
31
WG6 Mitigation, Preparedness and
ResponseChair Mr Michel Vielle, Seychelles
  • Goals-
  • Promote, share, and develop tsunami good practice
    examples, tools, and best practice information
    for capacity and resilience building and
    emergency management.
  • Mainstream tsunami warning and mitigation systems
    into development planning and practice.
  • Prepare national and local emergency response
    plans for coastal regions and undertake regular
    preparedness exercises and drills.
  • Undertake education and outreach campaigns on
    tsunami risks, warning systems, and response in
    coastal region

32
Outstanding Issues
  • Maintenance
  • Communications
  • Data Sharing
  • Bathymetric/topographic data
  • Training, capacity building, technology transfer,
    training and training
  • Preparedness, Mitigation Response
  • Research

33
Take Home Points
  • IOTWS is a complex, multi-national, multi agency,
    multi-donor system
  • Many players, coordination is the IOCs role but
    is a major challenge
  • Pace of implementation
  • Regional national local
  • Regional cooperation very important
  • Multi hazard integration

34
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com