The Muslim World After 9/11 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – The Muslim World After 9/11 PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 682ffe-OTE0Y


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

The Muslim World After 9/11


The Muslim World After 9/11 & the Iraq War February 2005 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: CSD145
Learn more at:


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Muslim World After 9/11

The Muslim World After 9/11 the Iraq War
  • February 2005

Understanding Emerging ThreatsThe Muslim World
After 9/11 the Iraq War
  • This study has several objectives
  • Develop a typology of tendencies in Muslim world
  • Identify key cleavages and fault lines
  • Identify the factors that produce extremism and
  • Analyze the effects of 9/11, the GWOT and Iraq
  • Develop recommendations for a U.S. strategy
  • The goals of the strategy are
  • Help our friends and potential allies
  • Neutralize our adversaries
  • Influence those in the middle

Muslim Tendencies Marker Issues
  • Seven Tendencies Seven marker issues
  • Radical Fundamentalists Ideology
  • Scriptural Fundamentalists Political/legal
  • Traditionalists Views of government
  • Modernists (liberal) Human rights
  • Modernists (Islamist) Social agenda
  • Liberal Secularists Propensity for violence
  • Authoritarian Secularists Links to terrorism

Typology of Muslim Tendencies
Authoritarian Secularists
Liberal Secularists
Scriptural Fundamentalists
Radical or neo- Fundamentalists
Leader cult and socialist and/or pan-Arab
Liberal democratic or social democratic values
Islam viewed as consistent with modern world
Fuse Islamic beliefs with local traditions
Literal interpretation of Islamic scriptures
Emphasis on obligation of jihad
Rely on authoritarian structures
Support secular law and institutions
Politically moderate
Politically moderate
Politically conservative
Revolutionary and anti-status quo
Political legitimacy derives from state ideology
Political legitimacy derives from the will of the
people through free elections.
Political legitimacy derives from the will of the
people through free elections.
Political legitimacy derives from the will of the
Political legitimacy derives from God
Political legitimacy derives from God
Primacy of party and state and collective
Primacy of individual political and human rights
Islam contains the basic concepts of human rights
and individual freedoms
Islam guarantees human rights and liberties
Reject Western concept of human rights and
individual liberties
Human Rights
Progressive in education and womens rights
Generally progressive
Conservative but many value non-religious
subjects in education
Generally reactionary
Social Agenda
Terrorism an instrument of state policy
Usually none
Usually none
Usually none
Generally indirect
Links to Terrorism
Propensity for Violence
Muslim Tendencies Radical Fundamentalists
Hib ut-Tahrir (international) MMI - Majlis
Mujahidin Indonesia
Add Scriptural Fundamentalists
Add Traditionalists and Modernists
Add Secularists
The Muslim World Is Far From Homogenous
T u r k i c
P e r s i an
A r a b
S o u t h A s i a n
B e r b e r A f r i c a n
M a l a y
Briefing Outline
  • The Islamic Landscape
  • Fault lines in the Muslim World
  • Sources of Islamic Radicalism
  • Post-9/11 and Post-Iraq Trends
  • Conclusions

Sources of Islamic Radicalism
  • Processes

Catalytic Events
Sources of Islamic Radicalism
  • Conditions
  • Failed political and economic models
  • Structural anti-Westernism
  • Unresolved issues of state and religious
  • Processes
  • The Islamic resurgence
  • Riyaldiplomatik external funding of religious
    fundamentalism and extremism
  • Convergence of Islamism and tribalism
  • Growth of radical Islamic networks
  • Emergence of the mass media
  • The Palestinian-Israeli and Kashmir conflicts
  • Catalytic Events
  • The Six-Day War (in Arab world)
  • The Iranian Revolution
  • The Afghan War
  • The (First) Gulf War
  • September 11 and the Global War on Terrorism
  • The Iraq War and its aftermath

Briefing Outline
  • The Islamic Landscape
  • Fault lines in the Muslim World
  • Sources of Islamic Radicalism
  • Post-9/11 and post-Iraq Trends
  • Conclusions

The War in Iraq a Catalytic Eventin the Middle
  • On the order of the 1967 Six-Day War or higher
  • Western-led coalition assumed responsibility for
    restructuring political system of Muslim country
  • Effects of the war can be analyzed at three
  • Effects on Iraq
  • Effects on Middle East
  • Effects on broader Muslim World

A Strategy for the Muslim WorldNeeds to Include
  • A geopolitical vision of the Muslim world
  • What kind of a Muslim world do we want to see
    emerge from the current turmoil?
  • And what are the engagement, military posture,
    and access implications of this vision?
  • Practical steps to
  • (1) support friends and potential allies
  • (2) neutralize enemies
  • (3) appeal to mainstream Muslims The War of

The Centerpiece of the Practical Side of the
Strategy is to Empower Moderates
  • Two components of this approach
  • Help to create moderate Muslim networks
  • Support Civil Islamorganizations
  • Currently radicals have the advantage
  • They are a minority, but have developed extensive
    international networks
  • Liberal and moderate Muslims have no similar
  • Creation of an international moderate Muslim
    network would provide a platform to amplify their
    message and protection
  • However, the initial impulse may require an
    external catalyst

And Disrupt Radicals
  • The U.S. and its allies also need to disrupt
    radical networks and deny resources to extremists
  • The key analytical/intelligence problem is how
    can hostile networks be identified?
  • Within Western countries, policymakers need to be
    attentive to radical infiltration of prisons and
    the military
  • Resource denial involves difficult practical
    problems, but could be partially addressed
    through network disruption

Influence the Muslim Mainstream
  • Obvious attempts by non-Muslims to influence
    Muslims would likely backfire.
  • U.S. needs to rely on Muslim scholars to
    delegitimize radical ideology
  • Over the long term, important to promote madrassa
    and mosque reform
  • What the U.S. and its allies can do
  • Assist moderate madrassas to provide broad modern
    education marketable skills
  • Assist governments in developing/strengthening
    capabilities to monitor mosques and madrassas

Seek to Engage Islamists in Normal Politics
  • Goal is to influence radicals into moderation
  • Always a danger that an Islamist party, once in
    power, may move against democratic freedoms
  • However, inclusion of such groups within
    democratic institutions may over time lessen
  • An unequivocal commitment to non-violence and
    democratic processes should be prerequisite
  • Turkeys AKP an ambiguous model

Engage Muslim Diasporas
  • Engagement of Muslim diasporas could help U.S.
    advance its interests in Muslim world
  • One possibility is working with Muslim NGOs in
    responding to humanitarian crises
  • However, efforts to engage diasporas need to be
    undertaken cautiously
  • Need to be able to distinguish between benign
    and malign diasporan manifestations

Expand Economic Opportunities
  • Will not by itself prevent extremists from
    striking at perceived enemies of Islam
  • However, might help to indirectly undercut the
    appeal of radicals
  • Priority on improving the economic/job prospects
    of the young
  • How international assistance is channeled is
  • Funding should not be politically neutral
  • Should emphasize programs run by secular or
    moderate Muslim organizations

Build Appropriate Military Capabilities and
  • Comprehensive review of U.S. military
    capabilities and posture in Muslim world needed
  • New challenges require the U.S. to develop
    different kinds of military capabilities
  • counter-insurgency stabilization capabilities
  • cultural intelligence
  • In Iraq, the U.S. faces a dilemma
  • cannot leave without defeating insurgency or
    leaving power vacuum behind
  • but need to reduce visibility as occupying

Geopolitical Implications of Pro-Democracy
  • A pro-democracy strategy implies
  • Re-examination of the current U.S. military
    relationship with authoritarian but friendly
    Muslim states
  • Hard-headed look at benefits/costs of such
  • What are the alternatives to authoritarian
  • What is the risk/benefit balance?
  • Distancing from authoritarian but friendly
    regimes could have access implications as well
  • Compensate through closer engagement with
    countries undergoing democratic change

Engagement and Access Implications
  • In Arab world, shift focus of U.S. security
    relationships from authoritarian states (Saudi
    Arabia, Egypt) to democratizing states (Bahrain,
  • Main operating bases in Iraq not desirable at
    this time, but should not foreclose option
  • Throughout the Muslim world
  • seek to reduce ungoverned areas that can become
    havens for terrorists
  • Shift from bilateral to regional approaches to
    what are essentially transnational problems

Bottom Line
  • Islamic radicalism is driven by complex and
    interactive factors
  • Some are common to Muslim world others vary
    widely from region to region regionally-based
    analysis is critical
  • Key challenge for the U.S. is to identify and
    find common ground with liberal Muslims and find
    ways to help them counter the extremists
  • Islamic networks play key role in spread of
    extremism there is critical need to build
    moderate Muslim networks
  • Education a key battlefield problem is how to
    move reform of both secular and Islamic schools
  • A democratization strategy will require
    comprehensive re-examination of U.S. defense
    relationships in Muslim world and will have
    engagement and access implications