Title: Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced-Stage Non
1Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus
Gemcitabine With Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in
Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced-Stage
NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer
- AuthorsGiorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Purvish
Parikh, Joachim von Pawel, Bonne Biesma, Johan
Vansteenkiste, Christian Manegold, Piotr
Serwatowski, Ulrich Gatzemeier, Raghunadharao
Digumarti, Mauro Zukin, Jin S. Lee, Anders
Mellemgaard, Keunchil Park, Shehkar Patil, Janusz
Rolski, Tuncay Goksel, Filippo de Marinis,
Lorinda Simms, Katherine P. Sugarman, David
Gandara - Date posted
2Treatment A Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Day 1
Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 Day 1 8 B12 folic
acid
R
Treatment B Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Day 1
Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Day 1 B12 folic acid
3RESULTS
Cis/Pem Cis/Gem P-value
Response Rate () 31 28 NS
OS (median, mos) 10.3 10.3 NS
OS Adeno (median, mos) 12.6 10.9 .03
OS Squame (median, mos) 9.4 10.8 .05
Toxicity (Grade3/4) Less heme,Feb neutro, alopecia Less nausea/ vomiting
4STUDY COMMENTARY
- This was designed as a non-inferiority trial.
- Have to ask why 1750 patient trial needed to show
that platinum based doublets are not inferior. - Significant differential effect based on
histology seen in second line trials of
pemetrexed and docetaxel - Never smokers have significantly better survival
regardless of treatment. Needs to be considered
in design of clinical trials. - Cis/Pem has significantly less hematologic
toxicity but significantly more emesis.
5BOTTOM LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
- There should be no further trials comparing
platinum based doublets in unselected populations
of advanced NSCL cancer patients. - Here appears to be a real differential treatment
effect based on histology for some chemotherapy
agents. This will need to be considered when
designing the next generation clinical trials. - Despite the reduced hematological toxicity
associated with cis/pem and the non-inferiority,
the significantly higher cost of this regimen
will likely preclude its routine use as standard
first line chemotherapy.