Title: The Promise and Problems of Nuclear Energy II
1The Promise and Problems of Nuclear Energy II
Lecture 13 HNRT 228 Energy and the Environment
2Chapter 6 Summary Again
- History of Nuclear Energy
- Radioactivity
- Nuclear Reactors
- Boiling Water Reactor
- Fuel Cycle
- Uranium Resources
- Environmental and Safety Aspects of Nuclear
Energy - Chernobyl Disaster
- Nuclear Weapons
- Storage of High-Level Radioactive Waste
- Cost of Nuclear Power
- Nuclear Fusion as a Energy Source
- Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions
- A Fusion Reactor
3Review of Fission
- 235U will undergo spontaneous fission if a
neutron happens by, resulting in - two sizable nuclear fragments flying out
- a few extra neutrons
- gamma rays from excited states of daughter nuclei
- energetic electrons from beta-decay of daughters
- The net result lots of banging around
- generates heat locally (kinetic energy of tiny
particles) - for every gram of 235U, get 65 billion Joules, or
about 16 million Calories - compare to gasoline at roughly 10 Calories per
gram - a tank of gas could be replaced by a 1-mm pellet
of 235U!!
4Enrichment
- Natural uranium is 99.27 238U, and only 0.72
235U - 238U is not fissile, and absorbs wandering
neutrons - In order for nuclear reaction to self-sustain,
must enrich fraction of 235U to 35 - interestingly, it was so 3 billion years ago
- now probability of wandering neutron hitting 235U
is sufficiently high to keep reaction crawling
forward - Enrichment is hard to do a huge technical
roadblock to nuclear ambitions
5iClicker Question
- Which is closest to the half-life of a neutron?
- A 5 minutes
- B 10 minutes
- C 15 minutes
- D 20 minutes
- E 30 minutes
6iClicker Question
- Which is closest to the half-life of a neutron?
- A 5 minutes
- B 10 minutes
- C 15 minutes
- D 20 minutes
- E 30 minutes
7iClicker Question
- What is the force that keeps the nucleus
together? - A weak force
- B strong force
- C electromagnetic force
- D gravitational force
8iClicker Question
- What is the force that keeps the nucleus
together? - A weak force
- B strong force
- C electromagnetic force
- D gravitational force
9iClicker Question
- A neutron decays. It has no electric charge. If a
proton (positively charged) is left behind, what
other particle must come out if the net charge is
conserved? - A No other particles are needed.
- B A negatively charged particle must emerge as
well. - C A positively charged particle must emerge as
well. - D Another charge will come out, but it could be
either positively charged or negatively
charged. - E Neutrons cannot exist individually.
10iClicker Question
- A neutron decays. It has no electric charge. If a
proton (positively charged) is left behind, what
other particle must come out if the net charge is
conserved? - A No other particles are needed.
- B A negatively charged particle must emerge as
well. - C A positively charged particle must emerge as
well. - D Another charge will come out, but it could be
either positively charged or negatively
charged. - E Neutrons cannot exist individually.
11iClicker Question
- How many neutrons in U-235?
- A 141
- B 142
- C 143
- D 144
- E 145
12iClicker Question
- How many neutrons in U-235?
- A 141
- B 142
- C 143
- D 144
- E 145
13iClicker Question
- How many neutrons in Pu-239?
- A 141
- B 142
- C 143
- D 144
- E 145
14iClicker Question
- How many neutrons in Pu-239?
- A 141
- B 142
- C 143
- D 144
- E 145
15iClicker Question
- If a substance has a half-life of 30 years, how
much will be left after 90 years? - A one-half
- B one-third
- C one-fourth
- D one-sixth
- E one-eighth
16iClicker Question
- If a substance has a half-life of 30 years, how
much will be left after 90 years? - A one-half
- B one-third
- C one-fourth
- D one-sixth
- E one-eighth
17iClicker Question
- If one of the neutrons in carbon-14 (carbon has 6
protons) decays into a proton, what nucleus is
left? - A carbon-13, with 6 protons, 7 neutrons
- B carbon-14, with 7 protons, 7 neutrons
- C boron-14, with 5 protons, 9 neutrons
- D nitrogen-14, with 7 protons, 7 neutrons
- E nitrogen-15, with 7 protons, 8 neutrons
18iClicker Question
- If one of the neutrons in carbon-14 (carbon has 6
protons) decays into a proton, what nucleus is
left? - A carbon-13, with 6 protons, 7 neutrons
- B carbon-14, with 7 protons, 7 neutrons
- C boron-14, with 5 protons, 9 neutrons
- D nitrogen-14, with 7 protons, 7 neutrons
- E nitrogen-15, with 7 protons, 8 neutrons
19iClicker Question
- Basically, what is the nature of the alpha
particle? - A an electron
- B a proton
- C a helium nucleus
- D a uranium nucleus
- E an iron nucleus
20iClicker Question
- Basically, what is the nature of the alpha
particle? - A an electron
- B a proton
- C a helium nucleus
- D a uranium nucleus
- E an iron nucleus
21iClicker Question
- Basically, what is the nature of the beta
particle? - A an electron
- B a proton
- C a helium nucleus
- D a uranium nucleus
- E an iron nucleus
22iClicker Question
- Basically, what is the nature of the beta
particle? - A an electron
- B a proton
- C a helium nucleus
- D a uranium nucleus
- E an iron nucleus
23Brief History of Nuclear Power
1938 Scientists study Uranium nucleus 1941
Manhattan Project begins 1942 Controlled
nuclear chain reaction 1945 U.S. uses two
atomic bombs on Japan 1949 Soviets develop
atomic bomb 1952 U.S. tests hydrogen bomb 1955
First U.S. nuclear submarine
24Atoms for Peace
Program to justify nuclear technology Proposals
for power, canal-building, exports First
commercial power plant, Illinois 1960
25Emissions Free
- Nuclear energy annually prevents
- 5.1 million tons of sulfur
- 2.4 million tons of nitrogen oxide
- 164 metric tons of carbon
- Nuclear often pitted against fossil fuels
- Some coal contains radioactivity
- Nuclear plants have released low-level radiation
26Early knowledge of risks
- 1964 Atomic Energy Commission report
- on possible reactor accident
- 45,000 dead
- 100,000 injured
- 17 billion in damages
- Area the size of Pennsylvania contaminated
27States with nuclear power plant(s)
28Nuclear power around the globe
- 17 of worlds electricity from nuclear power
- U.S. about 20 (2nd largest source)
- 431 nuclear plants in 31 countries
- 103 of them in the U.S.
- Built none since 1970s
- U.S. firms have exported nukes.
- Push from Bush/Obama for new nukes.
29Countries Generating Most Nuclear Power
Country Total MW
USA 99,784
France 58,493
Japan 38,875
Germany 22,657
Russia 19,843
Canada 15,755
Ukraine 12,679
United Kingdom 11,720
Sweden 10,002
South Korea 8,170
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32Nuclear Fuel Cycle
- Uranium mining and milling
- Conversion and enrichment
- Fuel rod fabrication
- POWER REACTOR
- Reprocessing, or
- Radioactive waste disposal
- Low-level in commercial facilities
- High level at plants or underground repository
33iClicker Question
- About what percentage of U.S. electricity is
derived from nuclear power? - A 10
- B 20
- C 30
- D 40
- E 50
34iClicker Question
- About what percentage of U.S. electricity is
derived from nuclear power? - A 10
- B 20
- C 30
- D 40
- E 50
35iClicker Question
- Which of the following countries has the highest
percentage of electricity generated by nuclear
power? - A United States
- B United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- C Japan
- D France
- E Russia
36iClicker Question
- Which of the following countries has the highest
percentage of electricity generated by nuclear
power? - A United States
- B United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- C Japan
- D France
- E Russia
37Front end Uranium mining and milling
38Uranium tailingsand radon gas
Deaths of Navajominers since 1950s
39Radioactivity Basics
- Radioactivity The spontaneous nuclear
transformation of an unstable atom that often
results in the release of radiation, also
referred to as disintegration or decay. - Units
- Curie (Ci) the activity in one standard gram of
Radium 3.7 x 1010 disintegrations per second - Becquerel (Bq) 1 disintegration per second
International Units (SI)
40Radioactivity Basics
- Radiation Energy in transit in the form of
electromagnetic waves (gamma-? or x-ray), or high
speed particles ( alpha-a, beta-ß, neutron-?,
etc.) - Ionizing Radiation Radiation with sufficient
energy to remove electrons during interaction
with an atom, causing it to become charged or
ionized. - Can be produced by radioactive decay or by
accelerating charged particles across an electric
potential.
41Radioactivity Basics
- Roentgen R the unit of exposure to Ionizing
Radiation. The amount of ? or x-ray radiation
required to produce 1.0 electrostatic unit of
charge in 1.0 cubic centimeter of dry air. - Rad the unit of absorbed dose. Equal to 100 ergs
per gram of any material from any radiation. - SI unit Gray
- 1 Gray 100 rads
- REM the unit of absorbed dose equivalent. The
energy absorbed by the body based on the damaging
effect for the type of radiation. - REM Rad x Quality Factor
- SI unit Sievert 1 Sv 100 Rem
42iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the Roentgen?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
43iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the Roentgen?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
44iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the RAD?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
45iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the RAD?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
46iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the REM?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
47iClicker Question
- Which of the following describes the REM?
- A the unit of absorbed dose equivalent.
- B the unit of absorbed dose.
- C the unit of exposure to ionizing radiation
- D all of the above
- E none of the above
48ALARA
- A philosophy, necessary to maintain personnel
exposure or the release of radioactivity to the
environment well below applicable limits by means
of a good radiation protection plan, through
education, administrative controls and safe lab
practices. - As Low As Reasonably Achievable
49ALARA Principles
- Distance
- Inverse Square Law radiation intensity is
inversely proportional to the square of the
distance from the source - Use remote handling tools, or work at arms length
- Maximize distance from source of radiation
50ALARA Principles
- Shielding
- Any material between a source of radiation and
personnel will attenuate some of the energy, and
reduce exposure - Select proper shielding material for type of
radiation, use less dense material for ßs, to
minimize Bremsstrahlung (braking) radiation
51Background Radiation
Below are estimates of natural and man-made
background radiation at sea level at middle
latitudes. The total averages 400 500 mREM/yr
- Natural Sources (300 mREM) "Natural" background
radiation consists of radiation from cosmic
radiation, terrestrial radiation, internal
radionuclides, and inhaled radon. - Occupational Sources (0.9 mREM) According to
NCRP Report No. 93, the average dose for workers
that were actually exposed to radiation in 1980
was approximately 230 mREM. - The Nuclear Fuel Cycle (0.05 mREM) Each step in
the nuclear fuel cycle can produce radioactive
effluents in the air or water. - Consumer Products (5-13 mREM) The estimated
annual dose from some commonly-used consumer
products such as cigarettes (1.5 pack/day, 8,000
mREM) and smoke detectors (1 mREM) contribute to
total annual dose. - Miscellaneous Environmental Sources (0.6 mREM) A
few environmental sources of background radiation
are not included in the above categories. - Medical Sources (53 mREM) The two contributors
to the radiation dose from medical sources are
diagnostic x-rays and nuclear medicine. Of the
estimated 53 mREM dose received annually,
approximately 39 mREM comes from diagnostic
x-rays.
52Metric Conversions
- 1 rem 0.01 Sv 10 mSv
- 1 mrem 0.00001 Sv 0.01 mSv 10 µSv
- 1 Sv 100 rem 100,000 mrem (or millirem)
- 1 mSv 100 mrem 0.1 rem
- 1 µSv 0.1 mrem
53Maximum Permissible Dose Equivalents for
Radiation Workers
Avg dose/ week (rem) Max 13 week dose (rem) Max yearly dose (rem) Max lifetime dosea (rem)
Radiation controlled areas
Whole body, gonads, blood-forming organs, and lens of eye 0.1 3 5 5(N - 18)d
Skin of whole body 10 30
Hands and forearms, head neck, feet, and ankles 25 75
Environs
Any part of body .01 0.5
Notes Avg week dose is for design purposes
only 1 REM assumed 1 R Note a N age in
years For minors, dose limits are 10 of adult
limits and radiation work is not
permitted Source National Bureau of Standards
Handbook 59 (1958) with addendums.
54Occupational Exposure
- In terms of absolute energy content, 1 RAD is not
a lot (i.e., 0.01 joule absorbed/kg). - The main risks associated exposure to analytical
X-rays are - High Intensity Exposures Skin burns and lesions
and possible damage to eye tissue - Long-term chronic Exposures Possible chromosomal
damage and long term risk of skin cancer - Goal of all Radiation Safety practice is ALARA
As Low as Reasonably Achievable
55Long-term Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Long-term effects are usually related to
increased risk of cancer, summarized in the table
below
Disease Additional Cases per 100,000 (with one-time 10 REM dose)
Adult leukemia 95
Cancer of digestive system 230
Cancer of respiratory system 170
Source Biological Effects of Ionizing
Radiation V (BEIR V) Committee
- Radiation-induced life shortening (supported by
animal experiments) suggests accelerated aging
may result in the loss of a few days of life as a
result of each REM of exposure
- Genetic Effects of radiation fall into two
general categories - Effect on individuals Can change DNA and create
mutation but long term effects not well
understood. Biological repair mechanisms may
reduce importance. - Effect of offspring Exposure to a fetus in utero
can have profound effects on developing organs
resulting in severe birth defects. For this
reason pregnant women should avoid any
non-background exposures
56Bioeffects on Surface tissues
- Because of the low energy (8 keV for Cu) of
analytical x-rays, most energy will be absorbed
by skin or other exposed tissue - The threshold of skin damage is usually around
300 R resulting in reddening of the skin
(erythema) - Longer exposures can produce more intense
erythema (i.e., sunburn) and temporary hair
loss - Eye tissue is particularly sensitive if working
where diffracted beams could be present, eye
protection should be worn
57Uranium Enrichment
- U-235
- Fissionable at 3
- Weapons grade at 90
- U-238
- More stable
- Plutonium-239
- Created from U-238 highly radioactive
58Radioactivity of Plutonium
- Life span at least
- 240,000 years
- Compare to
- Last Ice Age glaciation
- 10,000 years ago
- Neanderthal Man died out
- 30,000 years ago
59Risks of Enrichment andFuel Fabrication
- Largest industrial users of water, electricity
- Paducah, KY, Oak Ridge, TN, Portsmouth, OH
- Cancers and leukemia among workers
- Fires and mass exposure.
- Karen Silkwood at Oklahoma fabrication plant.
- Risk of theft of bomb material.
60Nuclear Fission Reactors
- Nuclear fission is used simply as a heat source
to run a heat engine - By controlling the chain reaction, can maintain
hot source for periods greater than a year - Heat is used to boil water
- Steam turns a turbine, which turns a generator
- Efficiency limited by familiar Carnot efficiency
- ? (Th - Tc)/Th (about 3040, typically)
61Nuclear Plant Layout
62The Core of the Reactor
not shown are the control rods that
absorb neutrons and thereby keep the process
from running away
63Fuel Packaging
- Want to be able to surround uranium with fluid to
carry away heat - lots of surface area is good
- Also need to slow down neutrons
- water is good for this
- So uranium is packaged in long rods, bundled into
assemblies - Rods contain uranium enriched to 3 235U
- Need roughly 100 tons per year for a 1 GW plant
- Uranium stays in three years, 1/3 cycled yearly
64Control Rod Action
- Basic Concept
- need exactly one excess neutron per fission event
to find another 235U - Inserting a neutron absorber into the core
removes neutrons from the pool - Pulling out rod makes more neutrons available
- Emergency procedure is to drop all control rods
at once
65California Nuclear Plant at San Onofre
- 10 miles south of San Clemente
- Easily visible from I-5
- 2 reactors brought online in 1983, 1984
- older decommissioned reactor retired in 1992
after 25 years of service - 1.1 GW each
- PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) type
- No cooling towers
- the ocean is used
66The relative cost of nuclear power
safety regulations tend to drive cost
67Sidebar Regarding Nuclear Bombs
- Since neutrons initiate fission, and each fission
creates more neutrons, there is potential for a
chain reaction - Have to have enough fissile material around to
intercept liberated neutrons - Critical mass for 235U is about 15 kg
- for 239Pu its about 5 kg
- need highly enriched (about 90 235U for uranium
bomb) - Bomb is relatively simple
- separate two sub-critical masses and just put
them next to each other when you want them to
explode! - difficulty is in enriching natural uranium to
mostly 235U
68Sources of Radiation Exposure
From National Institutes of Health
69Useful Radiation Effects INuclear
Power Nuclear fission for electricity Thermoelec
tric for spacecraftMedical Diagnostic scans,
tracers Cancer radiation treatment Plutonium
powered pacemaker Medical, dental sterilization
70Useful Radiation Effects IIPolymer
cross-linking Shrink tubing (e.g., turkey
wrapping) Ultra-strong materials (e.g.,
Kevlar) Tires (replaces vulcanization) Flooring
Food irradiation Sterilization of
meat De-infestation of grain and
spices Increase shelf life (e.g., fruits,
veggies)
71The radura symbol on foodstuffs
72- Useful Radiation Effects III
- Sterilization of food for
- hospitals and space travel
- Radioactive dating
- Insect control
- Semiconductor doping
- Testing of space-hardened computer technology
- Environmental studies in
- air purity, global warming, ozone
73The finite uranium resource
- Uranium cost is about 23/kg
- about 1 of cost of nuclear power
- more expensive to get as we deplete the easy
spots - Estimated 3 million tons available at cost less
than 230/kg - Need 200 tons per GW-yr
- Now have 100 GW of nuclear power generation
- about 100 plants _at_ 1 GW each
- 3 million tons will last 150 years at present
rate - only 30 years if nuclear replaced all electricity
production
74Breeder Reactors
- The finite resource problem goes away under a
breeder reactor program - Neutrons can attach to the non-fissile 238U to
become 239U - beta-decays into 239Np with half-life of 24
minutes - 239Np beta-decays into 239Pu with half-life of
2.4 days - now have another fission-able nuclide
- about 1/3 of energy in normal reactors ends up
coming from 239Pu - Reactors can be designed to breed 239Pu in a
better-than-break-even way
75(No Transcript)
76Breeders, continued
- Could use breeders to convert all available 238U
into 239Pu - all the while getting electrical power out
- Now 30 year resource is 140 times as much (not
restricted to 0.7 of natural uranium), or 4200
yr - Technological hurdle need liquid sodium or other
molten metal to be the coolant - but four are running in the world
- Enough 239Pu falling into the wrong hands spells
- BOOM!!
77Reactor Risks
- Once a vigorous program in the U.S.
- in France
- 80 of electricity is nuclear
- No new orders for reactors in U.S. since late
70s - aftershock of Three-Mile Island
- Reactor failure modes
- criticality accident runaway chain reaction
- ?meltdown
- loss of cooling not runaway, but overheats
?meltdown - steam or chemical explosions are not ruled out
?meltdown - N.B. reactors are incapable of nuclear explosion
78Risk Assessment
- Extensive studies by agencies like the NRC
- 1975 report concluded that
- loss-of-cooling probability was 1/2000 per
reactor year - significant release of radioactivity 1/1,000,000
per RY - chance of killing 100 people in an accident about
the same as killing 100 people by a falling
meteor - 1990 NRC report accounts for external disasters
(fire, earthquake, etc.) - large release probability 1/250,000 per RY
- 109 reactors, each 30 year lifetime ? 1 chance
79Close to home Three Mile Island
80The Three-Mile Island Accident, 1979
- The worst nuclear reactor accident in U.S.
history - Loss-of-cooling accident in six-month-old plant
- Combination of human and mechanical errors
- Severe damage to core
- but containment vessel held
- No major release of radioactive material to
environment - Less than 1 mrem to nearby population
- less than 100 mrem to on-site personnel
- compare to 300 mrem yearly dose
- Instilled fear in American public, fueled by
movies like The China Syndrome
81(No Transcript)
82Health around TMI
- In 1979, hundreds of people reported nausea,
vomiting, hair loss, and skin rashes. Many pets
were reported dead or showed signs of radiation - Lung cancer, and leukemia rates increased 2 to
10 times in areas within 10 miles downwind - Farmers received severe monetary losses due to
deformities in livestock and crops after the
disaster that are still occurring today.
83Plants near TMI
- -lack of chlorophyll
- -deformed leaf patterns
- -thick, flat, hollow stems
- -missing reproductive parts
- -abnormally large
TMI dandelion leaf at right
84Animals Nearby TMI
- Many insects disappeared for years.
- Bumble bees, carpenter bees, certain type
caterpillars, or daddy-long-leg spiders - Pheasants and hop toads have disappeared.
85The Chernobyl Disaster
- Disregard of safety standards plus unstable
design led to disaster - Chernobyl was a boiling-water, graphite-moderated
design - unlike any in the USA
- used for 239Pu weapons production
- frequent exchange of rods to harvest Pu meant
lack of containment vessel like the ones in USA - positive-feedback effect
- It gets too hot, it runs hotter
- runaway possible
- once runaway, control rods ineffective
86Chernobyl, continued
- On April 25, 1986, operators decided to do an
experiment as the reactor was powering down for
routine maintenance - disabled emergency cooling system!!!
- withdrew control rods completely!!!
- powered off cooling pumps!!!
- reactor went out of control, caused steam
explosion that ripped open the reactor - many fires, exposed core, major radioactive
release
87Chernobyl after-effects
- Total of 100 million people exposed (135,000
lived within 30 km) to radioactivity much above
natural levels - Expect from 25,000 to 50,000 cancer deaths as a
result - compared to 20 million total worldwide from other
causes - 20,000,000 becomes 20,050,000 (hard to notice
- unless youre one of those 50,000
- 31 died from acute radiation exposure at site
- 200 got acute radiation sickness
88Fallout from Chernobyl
89400 million people exposed in 20 countries
90Radiation and Health
- Health effects as a result of radiation exposure
- -increased likelihood of cancer
- -birth defects including long limbs, brain
- damage, conjoined stillborn twins
- -reduced immunity
- -genetic damage
91It Cant Happen Here
- Soviet reaction to Three-Mile Island, 1979
- Blamed on Capitalism and pressurized-water
reactor design - U.S. reaction to Chernobyl, 1986
- Blamed on Communism and graphite reactor design
- No technology 100 safe
- Three-Mile Island bubble almost burst
92iClicker Question Consider all of the people
throughout history who have been exposed to
man-made nuclear radiation, such as Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, nuclear
bomb tests, accidental spills, etc.
Which number most nearly approximates how many
children conceived and born later to these people
suffered genetic damage due to a parents
exposure, excluding exposure during
pregnancy? A. millions B.
thousands C. hundreds D. zero
93iClicker Question Consider all of the people
throughout history who have been exposed to
man-made nuclear radiation, such as Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, nuclear
bomb tests, accidental spills, etc.
Which number most nearly approximates how many
children conceived and born later to these people
suffered genetic damage due to a parents
exposure, excluding exposure during
pregnancy? A. millions B.
thousands C. hundreds D. zero
94Nuclear Proliferation
- The presence of nuclear reactors means there will
be plutonium in the world - and enriched uranium
- If the world goes to large-scale nuclear power
production (especially breeder programs), it will
be easy to divert Pu into nefarious purposes - But other techniques for enriching uranium may
become easy/economical - and therefore the terrorists top choice
- Should the U.S. abandon nuclear energy for this
reason? - perhaps a bigger concern is all the weapons-grade
Pu already stockpiled in the U.S. and former
U.S.S.R.
95(No Transcript)
96Nuclear Waste
- Each reactor has storage pool, meant as temporary
holding place - originally thought to be 150 days
- 40 years and counting
- Variety of radioactive products, with a wide
range of half-lives - 1GW plant waste is 70 MCi after one year 14 MCi
after 10 years 1.4 MCi after 100 years 0.002
MCi after 100,000 years - 1 Ci (Curie) is 37 billion radioactive decays per
second
97Storage Solutions
- No failsafe storage solution yet developed
- EPA demands less than 1000 premature cancer
deaths over 10,000 years!! - hard to design and account for all contingencies
- USA proposed site at Yucca Mountain, NV
- Good and bad choice
- geologically cracks and questionable stability
98Burial Issues
- Radioactive emissions themselves are not
radioactive - just light, electrons/positrons and helium nuclei
- but they are ionizing they rip apart
atoms/molecules they encounter - Absorb emissions in concrete/earth and no effect
on biology - so burial is good solution
- Problem is the patience of time
- half lives can be long
- geography, water table changes
- nature always outlasts human structures
- imagine building something to last 10,000 years!!
99Yucca Mountain
100Transportation risks
- Uranium oxide spills
- Fuel rod spills (WI 1981)
- Radioactive waste risks
101Transport to Yucca Mountain
102Kyshtym waste disaster, 1957
Orphans
- Explosion at Soviet weapons factory forces
evacuation of over 10,000 people in Ural Mts. - Area size of Rhode Island still uninhabited
thousands of cancers reported
103(No Transcript)
104Risk of terrorism(new challenge to industry)
9/11 jet passed near Indian Point
105iClicker Question Suppose that all of the
electrical energy for the world for the next 500
years were obtained from nuclear reactors.
Further suppose that all of the nuclear waste
from these reactors were dissolved and spread
uniformly throughout the oceans of the world.
Which statement is true A. The oceans would be a
vast wasteland, unable to support life. B. Much
death and damage to ocean life would be
caused. C. Any effect would be so small that it
would be virtually impossible to see.
106iClicker Question Suppose that all of the
electrical energy for the world for the next 500
years were obtained from nuclear reactors.
Further suppose that all of the nuclear waste
from these reactors were dissolved and spread
uniformly throughout the oceans of the world.
Which statement is true A. The oceans would be a
vast wasteland, unable to support life. B. Much
death and damage to ocean life would be
caused. C. Any effect would be so small that it
would be virtually impossible to see.
107Fusion The big nuclear hope
- Rather than rip nuclei apart, how about putting
them together?
alpha (4He)
- Iron is most tightly bound nucleus
- Can take loosely bound light nucleiand build
them into more tightly boundnuclei, releasing
energy - Huge gain in energy going from protons(1H) to
helium (4He). - Its how our sun gets its energy
- Much higher energy content than fission
tritium
dueterium
proton
108Thermonuclear Fusion in the Sun
- Sun is 16 million degrees Celsius in center
- Enough energy to ram protons together (despite
mutual repulsion) and make deuterium, then helium - Reaction per mole 20 million times more
energetic than chemical reactions, in general
4 protons mass 4.029
neutrinos, photons (gamma rays)
4He nucleus mass 4.0015
109Emc2 balance sheets
- Helium nucleus is lighter than the four protons!
- Mass difference is 4.029 4.0015 0.0276 a.m.u.
- 0.7 of mass disappears, transforming to energy
- 1 a.m.u. (atomic mass unit) is 1.6605?10-27 kg
- difference of 4.58?10-29 kg
- multiply by c2 to get 4.12?10-12 J
- 1 mole (6.022?1023 particles) of protons ?
2.5?1012 J - typical chemical reactions are 100200 kJ/mole
- nuclear fusion is 20 million times more potent
stuff! - works out to 150 million Calories per gram
- compare to 16 million Cal/g uranium, 10 Cal/g
gasoline
110Artificial Fusion
- 15 million degrees in Suns center is just enough
to keep the process going - but Sun is huge, so it seems prodigious
- In laboratory, need higher temperatures still to
get worthwhile rate of fusion events - like 100 million degrees
- Bottleneck in process is the reaction
- 1H 1H ? 2H e ? (or proton-proton ?
deuteron) - Better to start with deuterium plus tritium
- 2H and 3H, sometimes called 2D and 3T
- but give up some energy starting higher on
binding energy graph - Then
- 2H 3H ? 4He n 17.6 MeV (leads to 81 MCal/g)
111(No Transcript)
112Deuterium everywhere
- Natural hydrogen is 0.0115 deuterium
- Lots of hydrogen in sea water (H2O)
- Total U.S. energy budget (100 QBtu 1020 J per
year) covered by sea water contained in cubic
volume 170 meters on a side - corresponds to 0.15 cubic meters per second
- about 1,000 showers at two gallons per minute
- about one-millionth of rainfall amount on U.S.
- 4 gallons per person per year
113Tritium Nowhere
- Tritium is unstable, with half-life of 12.32
years - thus none naturally available
- Can make it by bombarding 6Li with neutrons
- extra n in D-T reaction can be used for this, if
reaction core is surrounded by lithium blanket - Lithium on land in U.S. would limit D-T to a
hundred years or so - maybe a few thousand if we get lithium from ocean
- D-D reaction requires higher temperature, but
could be sustained for many millennia
114By-products?
- Not like radioactive fission products
- Building stable nuclei (like 4He)
- Tritium is only radioactive substance
- energy is low, half-life short not much worry
here - Extra neutrons can tag onto local metal nuclei
(in surrounding structure) and become radioactive - but this is a small effect, especially compared
to fission
115Why dont we embrace fusion?
- A huge technological challenge
- Always 20 years from fruition
- must confine plasma at 50 million degrees
- 100 million degrees for D-D reaction
- all the while providing fuel flow, heat
extraction, tritium supply, etc. - hurdles in plasma dynamics turbulence, etc.
- Still pursued, but with decreased enthusiasm,
increased skepticism - but payoff is huge clean, unlimited energy
116Fusion Successes?
- Fusion has been accomplished in labs, in big
plasma machines called Tokamaks - got 6 MW out of Princeton Tokamak in 1993
- but put 12 MW into it to sustain reaction
- Hydrogen bomb also employs fusion
- fission bomb (e.g., 239Pu) used to generate
extreme temperatures and pressures necessary for
fusion - LiD (lithium-deuteride) placed in bomb
- fission neutrons convert lithium to tritium
- tritium fuses with deuterium
117Other Forms of Nuclear Power?
- Three main nuclear power reaction types
- Radioactive Decay
- Atomic Batteries
- Passive beta decay collectors
- Radioisotope thermoelectric generators
- Passive application of Peltier and Seebeck
effects - Nuclear Fusion
- Already discussed
- Nuclear Fission
- Already discussed
118Passive Radioactive Decay
- Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator
- Obtains power from passive radioactive decays
- Utilized in satellites and space probes
- Seebeck/Peltier effect
- Junction of two dissimilar metals at different
temperatures create a current - Fuel
- Long half life, low shielding (beta decay)
- Plutonium 238 most common
119The Peltier/Seebeck Effect
By Jacob McKenzie, Ty Nowotny, Colin Neunuebel
- Discovered by Thomas Johann Seebeck in 1821.
- He accidentally found that a voltage existed
between two ends of a metal bar when a
temperature gradient existed within the bar.
120The Seebeck Effect
- A temperature difference causes diffusion of
electrons from the hot side to the cold side of a
conductor. - The motion of electrons creates an electrical
current. - The voltage is proportional to the temperature
difference as governed by
Va(Th-Tc)
where a is the Seebeck coefficient of the couple
121History of Peltier devices
- The Peltier effect is named after Jean Charles
Peltier (1785-1845) who first observed it in
1834. - The Peltier effect had no practical use for over
100 years until dissimilar metal devices were
replaced with semiconductor Peltiers which could
produce much larger thermal gradients. - Peltier Cooler - produce a temperature gradient
that is proportional to an applied current
122Peltier Effect With Dissimilar Metals
- At the junction of two dissimilar metals the
energy level of conducting electrons is forced to
increase or decrease. - A decrease in the energy level emits thermal
energy, while an increase will absorb thermal
energy from its surroundings. - The temperature gradient for dissimilar metals is
very small.
The figure of merit is a measure
of thermoelectric efficiency.
123Sidebar Semiconductor Peltier
- Bismuth-Telluride n and p blocks
- An electric current forces electrons in n type
and holes in p type away from each other on the
cold side and towards each other on the hot side. - The holes and electrons pull thermal energy from
where they are heading away from each other and
deliver it to where they meet.
124Sample PeltierTemperature Gradient
Carnot Efficiency
Nc _at_ 12v 1-Tc/Th 1-283.6/342.3 17.1
125Applications
- Deep space probes
- Microprocessor cooling
- Laser diode temperature stabilization
- Temperature regulated flight suits
- Air conditioning in submarines
- Portable DC refrigerators
- Automotive seat cooling/heating
Radioisotopic Thermoelectric Generator (RTG)
126RTG Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Solid state (no moving parts)
- No maintenance
- Long service lifetime
- Relatively constant power production
- Solar Panels not needed
- Cons
- Good for low electrical power requirements
- Inefficient compared to phase change cooling
- Decays over time
- Requires shielding
- Radioactive waste
127Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
128Wikipedia Reports on Disaster at Fukushima An
earthquake categorized as 9.0 on the moment
magnitude scale occurred on 11 March 2011, at
1446 Japan Standard Time (JST) off the northeast
coast of Japan. On that day, reactor units 1, 2,
and 3 were operating, but units 4, 5, and 6 had
already been shut down for periodic inspection.
When the earthquake was detected, units 1, 2 and
3 underwent an automatic shutdown (called
scram). After the reactors shut down,
electricity generation stopped. Normally the
plant could use the external electrical supply to
power cooling and control systems, but the
earthquake had caused major damage to the power
grid. Emergency diesel generators started
correctly but stopped abruptly at 1541, ending
all AC power supply to the reactors. The plant
was protected by a sea wall, but tsunami water
which followed after the earthquake topped this
sea wall, flooding the low lying generator
building After the failure of the diesels,
emergency power for control systems was supplied
by batteries that would last about eight hours.
Batteries from other nuclear plants were sent to
the site and mobile generators arrived within 13
hours, but work to connect portable generating
equipment to power water pumps was still
continuing as of 1504 on 12 March. Generators
would normally be connected through switching
equipment in a basement area of the buildings,
but this basement area had been flooded by the
tsunami.
129Investigation Committee on the Accident at the
Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo
Electric Power Company The 10 member,
government-appointed panel included scholars,
journalists, lawyers and engineers, was supported
by public prosecutors and government experts and
released its final, 448-pages investigation
report on 23 July 2012. The panel interviewed 772
people, including plant workers, government
officials and evacuees, for a total of nearly
1,479 hearing hours. Its report was the fourth
investigation into the crisis after the earlier
release of a Diet study, a private report by
journalists and academics as well as an
investigation by TEPCO. The panel said the
government and TEPCO failed to prevent the
disaster not because a large tsunami was
unanticipated, but because they were reluctant to
invest time, effort and money in protecting
against a natural disaster considered unlikely.
"The utility and regulatory bodies were overly
confident that events beyond the scope of their
assumptions would not occur and were not aware
that measures to avoid the worst situation were
actually full of holes," the government panel
said in its final report. The panel's report
faulted an inadequate legal system for nuclear
crisis management, a crisis-command disarray
caused by the government and Tepco, and possible
excess meddling on the part of the prime
minister's office in the early stage of the
crisis. The panel concluded that a culture of
complacency about nuclear safety and poor crisis
management led to the nuclear disaster.